Fronto-orbital Advancement Using an En Bloc Frontal Bone Craniectomy

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons68-ons74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Guzman ◽  
Joseph F Looby ◽  
Stephen A Schendel ◽  
Michael S B Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Frontal Bone ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
A Minor

Abstract BACKGROUND: Fronto-orbital advancement is a procedure commonly performed in craniofacial centers for coronal and metopic suture synostosis. Several variations of the technique have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe our modifications to the anterior cranioplasty procedure and the results of our surgical series. METHODS: Using our craniofacial database, we retrospectively analyzed the records of all patients undergoing fronto-orbital advancement for craniosynostosis. The same team of neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons performed all procedures. Demographic data, operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and clinical outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 248 patients treated for craniosynostosis, a total of 70 patients underwent fronto-orbital advancement. Nineteen presented with metopic, 26 with unilateral coronal, 17 with bilateral coronal, and 8 with multiple synostosis. Median age at surgery was 6.5 months. Mean operative time was 210 minutes; mean blood loss was 167 mL; and length of stay was 4.5 days. A positive correlation was found between operative time and blood loss (r = 0.1, P < .01) and age at surgery and blood loss (r = 0.3, P < .0001). There was a minor morbidity rate of 2.9%. A good reconstruction was obtained in all patients using our en bloc fronto-orbital advancement without any midline osteotomies at a mean follow-up of 15 months. CONCLUSION: A team approach and the application of a standardized surgical technique should make it safer to operate in young children, shorten the surgical time, and lead to a reduction in blood loss. Reconstructing the frontal bone as an entire unit yielded excellent correction for coronal and metopic synostosis.

Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish N. Shah ◽  
Alex A. Kane ◽  
J. Dayne Petersen ◽  
Albert S. Woo ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Endoscopic Procedure ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

Object This study investigated the differences in effectiveness and morbidity between endoscopically assisted wide-vertex strip craniectomy with barrel-stave osteotomies and postoperative helmet therapy versus open calvarial vault reconstruction without helmet therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis. Methods Between 2003 and 2010, the authors prospectively observed 89 children less than 12 months old who were surgically treated for a diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis. The endoscopic procedure was offered starting in 2006. The data associated with length of stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, operating times, and cephalic indices were reviewed. Results There were 47 endoscopically treated patients with a mean age at surgery of 3.6 months and 42 patients with open-vault reconstruction whose mean age at surgery was 6.8 months. The mean follow-up time was 13 months for endoscopic versus 25 months for open procedures. The mean operating time for the endoscopic procedure was 88 minutes, versus 179 minutes for the open surgery. The mean blood loss was 29 ml for endoscopic versus 218 ml for open procedures. Three endoscopically treated cases (6.4%) underwent transfusion, whereas all patients with open procedures underwent transfusion, with a mean of 1.6 transfusions per patient. The mean length of stay was 1.2 days for endoscopic and 3.9 days for open procedures. Of endoscopically treated patients completing helmet therapy, the mean duration for helmet therapy was 8.7 months. The mean pre- and postoperative cephalic indices for endoscopic procedures were 68% and 76% at 13 months postoperatively, versus 68% and 77% at 25 months postoperatively for open surgery. Conclusions Endoscopically assisted strip craniectomy offers a safe and effective treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis that is comparable in outcome to calvarial vault reconstruction, with no increase in morbidity and a shorter length of stay.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic splenectomy: how minimal can we make it?

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adetokunbo Fadipe ◽  
David Wilkinson ◽  
Robert Peters ◽  
Catherine Doherty ◽  
Nick Lansdale
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Splenectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Hereditary Spherocytosis ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Splenic Size

Abstract Aims Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is routinely performed in children, however, a large spleen in a small child can pose significant operative challenges. We instigated a highly standardised surgical and anaesthetic approach to LS to minimise surgical trauma and enhance recovery. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of this programme. Methods Prospective study of all LS’s performed 2018–2021. Surgical approach was via one 10 mm and three 5 mm ports. Early hilar control was accomplished with Hem-o-loks. Splenic retrieval via the 10 mm incision used finger morcellation within an Espiner EcoSac. Anaesthesia utilised a standardised regime of agents and bupivacaine was infiltrated to the splenic bed and wound sites. Post-operative opiates were minimised. Data are presented as median [IQR]. Results Twenty consecutive children were included. Indications for LS were hereditary spherocytosis (n = 12), sickle cell disease (n = 6), beta-thalassaemia (n = 1) and splenic haemangiomatosis (n = 1). Age at surgery was 101 months [75–117] and weight 30 kg [21–37]. Splenic size was 13.4 cm [12–14.4]. Operative time was 178 min [156–185]. There were no open conversions and no significant intra or post-operative bleeding. One patient developed pancreatitis. Median post-operative pain score was 1 [1–3]. Median length of stay was 2 days [2–3]. Conclusion LS is feasible, safe and efficient in smaller children with large spleens. This standardised programme of anaesthesia and surgery based around a core team reliably results in few complications, good analgesia and short length of stay.

A team approach to anterior lumbar spine surgery in the military

Vascular ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahita Dua ◽  
Jennifer Fox ◽  
Bhavin Patel ◽  
Eric Martin ◽  
Michael Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Military ◽  
Median Operative Time

We report a five year military experience with anterior retroperitoneal spine exposure combining vascular and neurosurgical spine teams. From August 2005 through April 2010 (56 months), hospital records from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Complications, estimated blood loss, transfusions, operative time and length of stay were documented. Eighty-four patients with lumbar spondylosis underwent primary (63, 75%) or secondary exposure (21, 25%) of a single- (66, 79%) or multilevel disc space (18, 21%). Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 127 minutes (range, 30–331 minutes) and 350 mL (range, 0–2940 mL). The overall complication rate was 23.8%. Postoperative complications included six blood transfusions (7%), three patients with retrograde ejaculation (3.57%) or surgical site infection; two with a prolonged ileus (2.38%) or ventral hernia and one each with a bowel obstruction (1, 1.19%), deep venous thrombosis or lymphocele. All-cause mortality was 1%. In conclusion, a team approach can minimize complications while offering the technical benefits and durability of an anterior approach to the lumbar spine.

scholarly journals Transverse Versus Longitudinal Uterine Incision in Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled trial

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Elguindy ◽  
H Hemeda ◽  
M Esmat ◽  
M Nawara ◽  
A M F Metwally
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Fever ◽  
Abdominal Myomectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective The Aim of the study is to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incision in abdominal myomectomy regarding intraoperative blood loss Design: A randomized Controlled interventional study. Setting Ain Shams Maternity teaching hospital. Patients and methods 52 patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy for single myoma were involved The patients were randomized into two groups that showed no significant difference in demographic data, characters of myoma or indication of surgery Results Our results proved that there was no significant difference between both incisions regarding intra-operative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, post-operative Hgb drop, operative time or incidence of postoperative fever. Conclusion Transverse uterine incision for myomectomy does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision. There is no difference between both incisions in operative time or postoperative complications Trial identifier: NCT03009812, MY-789

scholarly journals Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickalus R. Khan ◽  
Aaron J. Clark ◽  
Siang Liao Lee ◽  
Garrett T. Venable ◽  
Nicholas B. Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)—or MI-TLIF—has been increasing in prevalence compared with open TLIF (O-TLIF) procedures. The use of MI-TLIF is an evolving technique with conflicting reports in the literature about outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of MI-TLIF in comparison with O-TLIF for early and late outcomes by using the Visual Analog Scale for back pain (VAS-back) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary end points include blood loss, operative time, radiation exposure, length of stay, fusion rates, and complications between the 2 procedures. METHODS: During August 2014, a systematic literature search was performed identifying 987 articles. Of these, 30 met inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed by using both pooled and subset analyses based on study type. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that MI-TLIF reduced blood loss (P < .001), length of stay (P < .001), and complications (P = .001) but increased radiation exposure (P < .001). No differences were found in fusion rate (P = .61) and operative time (P = .34). A decrease in late VAS-back scores was demonstrated for MI TLIF (P < .001), but no differences were found in early VAS-back, early ODI, and late ODI. CONCLUSION: MI-TLIF is associated with reduced blood loss, decreased length of stay, decreased complication rates, and increased radiation exposure. The rates of fusion and operative time are similar between MI-TLIF and O-TLIF. Differences in long-term outcomes in MI-TLIF vs O-TLIF are inconclusive and require more research, particularly in the form of large, multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled trials.

Genitofemoral Nerve Protection During the Lateral Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Approach

2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. ons192-ons197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel C. Tender ◽  
Daniel Serban
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Genitofemoral Nerve ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar fusions is a novel technique with good results, but also with significant sensory and motor complications. OBJECTIVE: To present the early results of a modified surgical technique, in which the psoas muscle is dissected under direct visualization. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients with L4-5 or L3-4 pathology were prospectively followed after being treated using a minimally invasive lateral approach with direct exposure of the psoas muscle before dissection. There were 7 woman and 6 men with a mean age of 52.3 years. Perioperative parameters like operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay, were noted. Pain, paresthesia, and motor weakness, as well as any other complications, were evaluated at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 163 minutes, 126 mL, and 3 days, respectively. One patient exhibited anterior thigh pain and paresthesia at 2 weeks, both of which resolved by 3 months. Two patients experienced superficial wound infections that healed with antibiotics. The genitofemoral nerve was identified and protected in 7 patients; in 4 patients, it had a more posterior anatomic location than expected. The femoral nerve was not exposed or detected in the operative field by neuromonitoring, nor were there any symptoms related to a femoral nerve injury in any patient. CONCLUSION: Dissection of the psoas muscle under direct visualization during the minimally invasive lateral approach may provide increased safety to the genitofemoral and femoral nerves.

scholarly journals From Small Acorns – Developing a Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Service

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
JK Smith ◽  
AG Acheson ◽  
JAD Simpson ◽  
J Stewart ◽  
IJ Beckingham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Lymph Node Retrieval ◽  
Clear Resection Margin ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Randomised Controlled

INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials have shown that laparoscopic colorectal surgery is equal in terms of safety to open surgery. Benefits have been seen for length of stay, blood loss, immune suppression and analgesia requirements. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of introducing laparoscopic colorectal surgery to our unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively collected cases of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery between July 2003 and July 2007 were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 143 patients (75 males and 68 females) with amean age of 65.8 years (range, 21–95 years) underwent surgery. Laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy was performed in 93 patients (65%). The conversion rate for all cases was 14.7%. Mean operative time was 203 min (range, 100–400 min), with amean blood loss of 180 ml. The mean number of lymph nodes in malignant cases was 13.8 with clear resection margin in all but one case. The mean postoperative stay was 5.6 days (median, 4 days; range, 2–35 days). UKCCR standard for lymph node retrieval was achieved in 62.6% of cases. There were four postoperative deaths. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 21.7%. The service is consultant-led with 9.8% of cases performed by senior trainees and 37% of procedures performed by two consultants. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically feasible and safe in our hands. Although operative time is longer, this is counterbalanced by shorter hospital stay. The results from this series support the findings of others and continuing development of this service.

scholarly journals Better Outcomes With Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy Than Conventional Thyroidectomy

Acta Medica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Nilda Sütay Süslü ◽  
Cagri Kulekci ◽  
Selcuk Dagdelen ◽  
Nafiye Yildiz ◽  
Tomris Erbas
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy ◽  
Invasive Group ◽  
Permanent Hypocalcemia ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Introduction Aim of this study was to evaluate our results from conventional and minimally invasive thyroidectomy and compare their outcomes. Materials and Methods 137 patients undergone conventional and minimally invasive thyroidectomy (video-assisted and open technique with mini-cervicotomy) were reviewed. Demographic data, blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcome and complications were examined and compared. Results Minimally invasive group consists of 53 cases(39%) and conventional group is composed of 84 cases(61%). No conversion from minimally invasive to conventional techniques was observed. In minimally invasive group, 25 patients(47%) had differantiated thyroid carcinoma and 28 patients(53%) had benign pathologies. Postoperative complications include transient hypocalcemia in 5 patients(3.6%) (4 in conventional, 1 in minimally invasive group), permanent hypocalcemia in 4 patients(3%) (3 in conventional, 1 in minimally invasive group), unilateral vocal cord paralysis in 2 patients(2%) (1 in conventional, 1 in minimally invasive group). Operative time was similar in both groups; however blood loss during surgery, postoperative pain was significantly lower in minimally invasive group. Conclusion Minimally invasive techniques could be implemented on selected carcinoma patients and results in equal safety and less surgical morbidity. Keywords: minimally invasive thyroidectomy, thyroid cancer, MIVAT

scholarly journals Artery first versus traditional approach in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ali Zedan Tohamy ◽  
Hanan A. Eltyb ◽  
Marwa T. Hussien ◽  
Haisam Atta
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Artery First ◽  
Node Yield

Background: Artery first approach pancreatoduodenectomy (AFAPD) technique is one of the many modifications of the standard whipple procedure (sPD) thus enabling a complete dissection of the right side of this artery and of the portal vein, as well as a complete excision of the retroportal pancreatic lamina. Objective was to evaluate the clinical, perioperative and oncological outcomes of “artery first” approach compared with those of the traditional approach.Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, The present study includes two groups of patients. A first group of 28 patients with PD by “artery first” and a second group including 28 matched patients with PD by TAPD. Demographic characteristics (sex, age), intraoperative data (approach type, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, need for vascular resections), histological diagnosis and pathology data (tumor location, TNM staging, tumor grading, tumor vascular invasion) and patient outcomes (postoperative length of stay, in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity, survival time) were collected.Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding: total operative time (422 vs. 460.min, p=0.19), estimated blood loss (p=0.67), median length of stay (14 days in both groups) (p=0. 0.39), complication rates (32.1% and 35.7%) (p=0. 1.00), lymph node yield (22 and 21) and R0 resection rate (75% and 67.9%).  Conclusions: We concluded that artery first” offers similar operative time, intraoperative blood loss, R0 resection rates, lymph node yield and long-term survival as TAPD.

Perioperative results following lumbar discectomy: comparison of minimally invasive discectomy and standard microdiscectomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. E20 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. German ◽  
Mathew A. Adamo ◽  
Regis G. Hoppenot ◽  
Jessin H. Blossom ◽  
Henry A. Nagle
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Fluid Leak ◽  
First Time

Object Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy is a refinement of the standard open microsurgical discectomy technique. Proponents of the minimally invasive technique suggest that it improves patient outcome, shortens hospital stay, and decreases hospital costs. Despite these claims there is little support in the literature to justify the adoption of minimally invasive discectomy over standard open microsurgical discectomy. In the present study, the authors address some of these issues by comparing the short-term outcomes in patients who underwent first time, single-level lumbar discectomy at L3–4, L4–5, or L5–S1 using either a minimally invasive percutaneous, muscle splitting approach or a standard, open, muscle-stripping microsurgical approach. Methods A retrospective chart review of 172 patients who had undergone a first-time, single-level lumbar discectomy at either L3–4, L4–5, or L5–S1 was performed. Perioperative results were assessed by comparing the following parameters between patients who had undergone minimally invasive discectomy and those who received standard open microsurgical discectomy: length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, rate of cerebrospinal fluid leak, post-anesthesia care unit narcotic use, need for a physical therapy consultation, and need for admission to the hospital. Results Forty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive discectomy, and 123 patients underwent open microsurgical discectomy. At baseline the groups did differ significantly with respect to age, but did not differ with respect to height, weight, sex, body mass index, level of radiculopathy, side of radiculopathy, insurance status, or type of preoperative analgesic use. No statistically significant differences were identified in operative time, rate of cerebrospinal fluid leak, or need for a physical therapy consultation. Statistically significant differences were identified in length of stay, estimated blood loss, postanesthesia care unit narcotic use, and need for admission to the hospital. Conclusions In this retrospective study, patients who underwent minimally invasive discectomy were found to have similiar perioperative results as those who underwent open microsurgical discectomy. The differences, although statistically significant, are of modest clinical significance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document