Distinct elements of the xsna promoter are required for mesodermal and ectodermal expression

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mayor ◽  
L.J. Essex ◽  
M.F. Bennett ◽  
M.G. Sargent
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Gc Content ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Upstream Sequence ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Translational Start ◽  
Mesoderm Inducing Factors

Xsna, the Xenopus homologue of Drosophila snail, is expressed in both mesoderm and ectoderm. Expression occurs in all mesoderm initially but is down regulated in a tissue-specific fashion at the end of gastrulation in a way that reveals the subdivision of the mesoderm before its derivatives are overtly differentiated. Xsna is also expressed in the ectoderm of the prospective neural fold from stage 11, in a distinct band of cells surrounding the prospective neural plate, which we designate the neural plate border. The deep and superficial ectoderm compartments labelled by Xsna represent the prospective neural crest and the prospective roof of the neural tube, respectively. Xsna expression persists in neural crest cells during their subsequent migration. The role of the Xsna promoter in creating this pattern of expression has been investigated by injecting fertilised eggs with constructs containing the 5′ upstream sequence of the gene fused to a reporter. An element of 115 base pairs (−160 to −45 relative to the transcriptional start) is sufficient to drive appropriate reporter gene expression. The promoter does not contain a TATA or CAAT box and does not have a high GC content, but RNA synthesis starts precisely at 33 bases upstream to the translational start. The start sequence can be deleted so that transcription is initiated elsewhere without affecting the expression pattern. The distribution of Xsna promoter activity within the embryo, examined using beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) fusions, is similar to that of the endogenous mRNA seen by in situ hybridisation. The contribution of elements within the 5′ sequence have been assessed by comparing the expression patterns of constructs that have deletions in this region. Sequences from −112 to −97 are required for mesodermal expression and sequences from −96 to −44 are required for ectodermal expression. The behaviour of the injected promoter constructs differ in one important respect from the endogenous gene in that expression in an animal cap assay is not inducible by mesoderm-inducing factors but is inducible by cells of the vegetal pole.

Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates. Lessons from the amphibians

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Slack ◽  
D. Tannahill
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathway ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Almost All

Interest in the problem of anteroposterior specification has quickened because of our near understanding of the mechanism in Drosophila and because of the homology of Antennapedia-like homeobox gene expression patterns in Drosophila and vertebrates. But vertebrates differ from Drosophila because of morphogenetic movements and interactions between tissue layers, both intimately associated with anteroposterior specification. The purpose of this article is to review classical findings and to enquire how far these have been confirmed, refuted or extended by modern work. The “pre-molecular” work suggests that there are several steps to the process: (i) Formation of anteroposterior pattern in mesoderm during gastrulation with posterior dominance. (ii) Regional specific induction of ectoderm to form neural plate. (iii) Reciprocal interactions from neural plate to mesoderm. (iv) Interactions within neural plate with posterior dominance. Unfortunately, almost all the observable markers are in the CNS rather than in the mesoderm where the initial specification is thought to occur. This has meant that the specification of the mesoderm has been assayed indirectly by transplantation methods such as the Einsteckung. New molecular markers now supplement morphological ones but they are still mainly in the CNS and not the mesoderm. A particular interest attaches to the genes of the Antp-like HOX clusters since these may not only be markers but actual coding factors for anteroposterior levels. We have a new understanding of mesoderm induction based on the discovery of activins and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) as candidate inducing factors. These factors have later consequences for anteroposterior pattern with activin tending to induce anterior, and FGF posterior structures. Recent work on neural induction has implicated cAMP and protein kinase C (PKC) as elements of the signal transduction pathway and has provided new evidence for the importance of tangential neural induction. The regional specificity of neural induction has been reinvestigated using molecular markers and provides conclusions rather similar to the classical work. Defects in the axial pattern may be produced by retinoic acid but it remains unclear whether its effects are truly coordinate ones or are concentrated in certain regions of high sensitivity. In general the molecular studies have supported and reinforced the “pre-molecular ones”. Important questions still remain: (i) How much pattern is there in the mesoderm (how many states?) (ii) How is this pattern generated by the invaginating organizer? (iii) Is there one-to-one transmission of codings to the neural plate? (iv) What is the nature of the interactions within the neural plate? (v) Are the HOX cluster genes really the anteroposterior codings?

Sequence and developmental expression of AmphiDll, an amphioxus Distal-less gene transcribed in the ectoderm, epidermis and nervous system: insights into evolution of craniate forebrain and neural crest

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2911-2920 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.D. Holland ◽  
G. Panganiban ◽  
E.L. Henyey ◽  
L.Z. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Epidermal Cells ◽  
Developmental Expression ◽  
Neural Cells ◽  
Dorsoventral Axis ◽  
Dynamic Expression ◽  
Cerebral Vesicle

The dynamic expression patterns of the single amphioxus Distal-less homolog (AmphiDll) during development are consistent with successive roles of this gene in global regionalization of the ectoderm, establishment of the dorsoventral axis, specification of migratory epidermal cells early in neurulation and the specification of forebrain. Such a multiplicity of Distal-less functions probably represents an ancestral chordate condition and, during craniate evolution, when this gene diversified into a family of six or so members, the original functions evidently tended to be parcelled out among the descendant genes. In the amphioxus gastrula, AmphiDll is expressed throughout the animal hemisphere (presumptive ectoderm), but is soon downregulated dorsally (in the presumptive neural plate). During early neurulation, AmphiDll-expressing epidermal cells flanking the neural plate extend lamellipodia, appear to migrate over it and meet mid-dorsally. Midway in neurulation, cells near the anterior end of the neural plate begin expressing AmphiDll and, as neurulation terminates, these cells are incorporated into the dorsal part of the neural tube, which forms by a curling of the neural plate. This group of AmphiDll-expressing neural cells and a second group expressing the gene a little later and even more anteriorly in the neural tube demarcate a region that comprises the anterior three/fourths of the cerebral vesicle; this region of the amphioxus neural tube, as judged by neural expression domains of craniate Distal-less-related genes, is evidently homologous to the craniate forebrain. Our results suggest that craniates evolved from an amphioxus-like creature that had the beginnings of a forebrain and possibly a precursor of neural crest - namely, the cell population leading the epidermal overgrowth of the neural plate during early neurulation.

scholarly journals Expression patterns of signalling molecules and transcription factors in the early rabbit embryo and their significance for modelling amniote axis formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Plöger ◽  
Christoph Viebahn
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Body Plan ◽  
The Body ◽  
Anchor Point ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Point Model ◽  
Signalling Molecules ◽  
Rabbit Embryo

AbstractThe anterior-posterior axis is a central element of the body plan and, during amniote gastrulation, forms through several transient domains with specific morphogenetic activities. In the chick, experimentally proven activity of signalling molecules and transcription factors lead to the concept of a ‘global positioning system’ for initial axis formation whereas in the (mammotypical) rabbit embryo, a series of morphological or molecular domains are part of a putative ‘three-anchor-point model’. Because circular expression patterns of genes involved in axis formation exist in both amniote groups prior to, and during, gastrulation and may thus be suited to reconcile these models, the expression patterns of selected genes known in the chick, namely the ones coding for the transcription factors eomes and tbx6, the signalling molecule wnt3 and the wnt inhibitor pkdcc, were analysed in the rabbit embryonic disc using in situ hybridisation and placing emphasis on their germ layer location. Peripheral wnt3 and eomes expression in all layers is found initially to be complementary to central pkdcc expression in the hypoblast during early axis formation. Pkdcc then appears — together with a posterior-anterior gradient in wnt3 and eomes domains — in the epiblast posteriorly before the emerging primitive streak is marked by pkdcc and tbx6 at its anterior and posterior extremities, respectively. Conserved circular expression patterns deduced from some of this data may point to shared mechanisms in amniote axis formation while the reshaping of localised gene expression patterns is discussed as part of the ‘three-anchor-point model’ for establishing the mammalian body plan.

scholarly journals Quantitative comparison of mesoderm inducing factors in xenopus

1989 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
J.B.A. Green ◽  
G. Howes ◽  
M. Yaqoob ◽  
J. Cooke ◽  
J.C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Comparison ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Mesoderm Inducing Factors

Xerl is a secreted protein required for establishing the neural plate/neural crest boundary inXenopus embryo

2003 ◽  
Vol 296A (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sei Kuriyama ◽  
Akihiro Ueda ◽  
Tsutomu Kinoshita
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Secreted Protein

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Manzanares ◽  
S. Cordes ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
V. Sadl ◽  
K. Maruthainar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Transgenic Embryos ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Segmental Expression

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

Is there a ventral neural ridge in chick embryos? Implications for the origin of adenohypophyseal and other APUD cells

Development ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
N. B. Levy ◽  
Ann Andrew ◽  
B. B. Rawdon ◽  
Beverley Kramer
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Endocrine Cells ◽  
Ventral Surface ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Serial Sections ◽  
Apud Cells ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Neural Ectoderm ◽  
Thickened Surface

Two- to ten-somite chick embryos were studied in order to ascertain whether, as has been proposed, there exists a ‘ventral neural ridge’ which gives rise to the hypophyseal (Rathke's) pouch. Serial sections and stereo-microscopy were used. The neural ridges arch around the rostral end of the embryo onto the ventral surface of the head, but no evidence was found for their extension to form a ‘ventral neural ridge’ reaching the stomodaeum: in fact a considerable expanse of non-thickened surface ectoderm was seen to separate the ventral portions of the neural ridges from the stomodaeum. The thickening of neural ectoderm which does appear on the ventral surface of the head results from apposition and fusion of the opposite neural ridges flanking the neural plate and thus the tip of the anterior neuropore - the classically accepted mode of closure of the neuropore. These findings are in accord with the generally accepted concept of the origin of thehypophyseal pouch rather than with its derivation from a ‘ventral neural ridge’. No sign of neural crest formation was encountered ventrally; this observation excludes the possibility that endocrine cells of the APUD series could originate from neural crest in this region.

Overexpression of Snail family members highlights their ability to promote chick neural crest formation

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (7) ◽  
pp. 1583-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta G. del Barrio ◽  
M. Angela Nieto
Keyword(s):  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
The Family ◽  
Snail Family ◽  
Migratory Cells ◽  
Snail Gene

The Snail gene family of transcription factors plays crucial roles in different morphogenetic processes during the development of vertebrate and invertebrate embryos. In previous studies of function interference for one of the family members, Slug, we showed its involvement and neural crest formation in the chick embryo. Now we have carried out a series of gain-of-function experiments in which we show that Slug overexpression in the neural tube of the chick embryo induces an increase in neural crest production. The analysis of electroporated embryos shows that Slug can induce the expression of rhoB and an increase in the number of HNK-1-positive migratory cells, indicating that it lies upstream of them in the genetic cascade of neural crest development. The increase in neural crest production after Slug overexpression was confined to the cranial region, indicating that the mechanisms of crest induction somehow differ between head and trunk. The expression of the two vertebrate family members, Slug and Snail, is peculiar with respect to the neural crest. Slug is not expressed in the premigratory crest in the mouse, whereas it is expressed in this cell population in the chick and the opposite is true for Snail(Sefton, M., Sánchez, S. and Nieto M. A. (1998) Development125, 3111-3121). This raises the question of whether they can be functionally equivalent. To test this hypothesis both intra- and interspecies, we have performed a series of ectopic expression experiments by electroporating chick and mouse Snail in the chick embryo hindbrain. We observe that both genes elicit the same responses in the neural tube. Our results indicate that they can be functionally equivalent, although the embryos show a higher response to the endogenous gene, chick Slug.

scholarly journals Mining of Brassica-Specific Genes (BSGs) and Their Induction in Different Developmental Stages and under Plasmodiophora brassicae Stress in Brassica rapa

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 2064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingliang Jiang ◽  
Xiangshu Dong ◽  
Hong Lang ◽  
Wenxing Pang ◽  
Zongxiang Zhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Brassica Rapa ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Plasmodiophora Brassicae ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gc Content ◽  
Biological Information ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Orphan Genes ◽  
Conserved Genes

Orphan genes, also called lineage-specific genes (LSGs), are important for responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, and are associated with lineage-specific structures and biological functions. To date, there have been no studies investigating gene number, gene features, or gene expression patterns of orphan genes in Brassica rapa. In this study, 1540 Brassica-specific genes (BSGs) and 1824 Cruciferae-specific genes (CSGs) were identified based on the genome of Brassica rapa. The genic features analysis indicated that BSGs and CSGs possessed a lower percentage of multi-exon genes, higher GC content, and shorter gene length than evolutionary-conserved genes (ECGs). In addition, five types of BSGs were obtained and 145 out of 529 real A subgenome-specific BSGs were verified by PCR in 51 species. In silico and semi-qPCR, gene expression analysis of BSGs suggested that BSGs are expressed in various tissue and can be induced by Plasmodiophora brassicae. Moreover, an A/C subgenome-specific BSG, BSGs1, was specifically expressed during the heading stage, indicating that the gene might be associated with leafy head formation. Our results provide valuable biological information for studying the molecular function of BSGs for Brassica-specific phenotypes and biotic stress in B. rapa.

scholarly journals Xenopus Nkx6.3 Is a Neural Plate Border Specifier Required for Neural Crest Development

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e115165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuming Zhang ◽  
Yu Shi ◽  
Shuhua Zhao ◽  
Jiejing Li ◽  
Chaocui Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Neural Crest Development ◽  
Neural Plate Border
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document