scholarly journals Overexpression of Mdm36 reveals Num1 foci that mediate dynein-dependent microtubule sliding in budding yeast

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (20) ◽  
pp. jcs246363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safia Omer ◽  
Katia Brock ◽  
John Beckford ◽  
Wei-Lih Lee
Keyword(s):  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Direct Imaging ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Sliding Mechanism ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Assembly Factor ◽  
Pulling Force

ABSTRACTThe current model for spindle positioning requires attachment of the microtubule (MT) motor cytoplasmic dynein to the cell cortex, where it generates pulling force on astral MTs to effect spindle displacement. How dynein is anchored by cortical attachment machinery to generate large spindle-pulling forces remains unclear. Here, we show that cortical clustering of Num1, the yeast dynein attachment molecule, is limited by its assembly factor Mdm36. Overexpression of Mdm36 results in an overall enhancement of Num1 clustering but reveals a population of dim Num1 clusters that mediate dynein anchoring at the cell cortex. Direct imaging shows that bud-localized, dim Num1 clusters containing around only six Num1 molecules mediate dynein-dependent spindle pulling via a lateral MT sliding mechanism. Mutations affecting Num1 clustering interfere with mitochondrial tethering but do not interfere with the dynein-based spindle-pulling function of Num1. We propose that formation of small ensembles of attachment molecules is sufficient for dynein anchorage and cortical generation of large spindle-pulling forces.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

scholarly journals Overexpression of Mdm36 reveals Num1 foci that mediate dynein-dependent microtubule sliding in budding yeast

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safia Omer ◽  
Katia Brock ◽  
John Beckford ◽  
Wei-Lih Lee
Keyword(s):  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Direct Imaging ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Sliding Mechanism ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Pulling Force

ABSTRACTCurrent model for spindle positioning requires attachment of the microtubule (MT) motor cytoplasmic dynein to the cell cortex, where it generates pulling force on astral MTs to effect spindle displacement. How dynein is anchored by cortical attachment machinery to generate large spindle-pulling forces remains unclear. Here, we show that cortical clustering of Num1, the yeast dynein attachment molecule, is limited by Mdm36. Overexpression of Mdm36 results in an overall enhancement of Num1 clustering but reveals a population of dim Num1 clusters that mediate dynein-anchoring at the cell cortex. Direct imaging shows that bud-localized, dim Num1 clusters containing only ∼6 copies of Num1 molecules mediate dynein-dependent spindle pulling via lateral MT sliding mechanism. Mutations affecting Num1 clustering interfere with mitochondrial tethering but not dynein-based spindle-pulling function of Num1. We propose that formation of small ensembles of attachment molecules is sufficient for dynein anchorage and cortical generation of large spindle-pulling force.

scholarly journals Two populations of cytoplasmic dynein contribute to spindle positioning in C. elegans embryos

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (9) ◽  
pp. 2777-2793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Schmidt ◽  
Lars-Eric Fielmich ◽  
Ilya Grigoriev ◽  
Eugene A. Katrukha ◽  
Anna Akhmanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Force Generation ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Knockout Mutants ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Endogenous Proteins ◽  
Pulling Force

The position of the mitotic spindle is tightly controlled in animal cells as it determines the plane and orientation of cell division. Contacts between cytoplasmic dynein and astral microtubules (MTs) at the cell cortex generate pulling forces that position the spindle. An evolutionarily conserved Gα-GPR-1/2Pins/LGN–LIN-5Mud/NuMA cortical complex interacts with dynein and is required for pulling force generation, but the dynamics of this process remain unclear. In this study, by fluorescently labeling endogenous proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, we show that dynein exists in two distinct cortical populations. One population directly depends on LIN-5, whereas the other is concentrated at MT plus ends and depends on end-binding (EB) proteins. Knockout mutants lacking all EBs are viable and fertile and display normal pulling forces and spindle positioning. However, EB protein–dependent dynein plus end tracking was found to contribute to force generation in embryos with a partially perturbed dynein function, indicating the existence of two mechanisms that together create a highly robust force-generating system.

scholarly journals Visualization of dynein-dependent microtubule gliding at the cell cortex: implications for spindle positioning

2011 ◽  
Vol 194 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva M. Gusnowski ◽  
Martin Srayko
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Level Of Activity ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Cell Embryo ◽  
Pulling Force ◽  
The One

Dynein motors move along the microtubule (MT) lattice in a processive “walking” manner. In the one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryo, dynein is required for spindle-pulling forces during mitosis. Posteriorly directed spindle-pulling forces are higher than anteriorly directed forces, and this imbalance results in posterior spindle displacement during anaphase and an asymmetric division. To address how dynein could be asymmetrically activated to achieve posterior spindle displacement, we developed an assay to measure dynein’s activity on individual MTs at the embryo cortex. Our study reveals that cortical dynein motors maintain a basal level of activity that propels MTs along the cortex, even under experimental conditions that drastically reduce anaphase spindle forces. This suggests that dynein-based MT gliding is not sufficient for anaphase spindle-pulling force. Instead, we find that this form of dynein activity is most prominent during spindle centering in early prophase. We propose a model whereby different dynein–MT interactions are used for specific spindle-positioning tasks in the one-cell embryo.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of spindle positioning

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis J. McNally
Keyword(s):  
Oocyte Maturation ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Animal Development ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pulling Force

Accurate positioning of spindles is essential for asymmetric mitotic and meiotic cell divisions that are crucial for animal development and oocyte maturation, respectively. The predominant model for spindle positioning, termed “cortical pulling,” involves attachment of the microtubule-based motor cytoplasmic dynein to the cortex, where it exerts a pulling force on microtubules that extend from the spindle poles to the cell cortex, thereby displacing the spindle. Recent studies have addressed important details of the cortical pulling mechanism and have revealed alternative mechanisms that may be used when microtubules do not extend from the spindle to the cortex.

scholarly journals Evidence for dynein and astral microtubule–mediated cortical release and transport of Gαi/LGN/NuMA complex in mitotic cells

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 901-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zheng ◽  
Qingwen Wan ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Huabin Zhu ◽  
Xiaogang Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Mitotic Apparatus ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Astral Microtubule ◽  
Mammalian Homologue ◽  
Cortical Localization

Spindle positioning is believed to be governed by the interaction between astral microtubules and the cell cortex and involve cortically anchored motor protein dynein. How dynein is recruited to and regulated at the cell cortex to generate forces on astral microtubules is not clear. Here we show that mammalian homologue of Drosophila Pins (Partner of Inscuteable) (LGN), a Gαi-binding protein that is critical for spindle positioning in different systems, associates with cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain (DYNC1H1) in a Gαi-regulated manner. LGN is required for the mitotic cortical localization of DYNC1H1, which, in turn, also modulates the cortical accumulation of LGN. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis, we show that cortical LGN is dynamic and the turnover of LGN relies, at least partially, on astral microtubules and DYNC1H1. We provide evidence for dynein- and astral microtubule–mediated transport of Gαi/LGN/nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) complex from cell cortex to spindle poles and show that actin filaments counteract such transport by maintaining Gαi/LGN/NuMA and dynein at the cell cortex. Our results indicate that astral microtubules are required for establishing bipolar, symmetrical cortical LGN distribution during metaphase. We propose that regulated cortical release and transport of LGN complex along astral microtubules may contribute to spindle positioning in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Fission yeast myosin I facilitates PI(4,5)P2-mediated anchoring of cytoplasmic dynein to the cortex

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (13) ◽  
pp. E2672-E2681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerrin Mathew Thankachan ◽  
Stephen Sukumar Nuthalapati ◽  
Nireekshit Addanki Tirumala ◽  
Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Total Internal Reflection ◽  
Nuclear Material ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Binding Partner ◽  
Myosin I ◽  
Phosphatidylinositol 4

Several key processes in the cell, such as vesicle transport and spindle positioning, are mediated by the motor protein cytoplasmic dynein, which produces force on the microtubule. For the functions that require movement of the centrosome and the associated nuclear material, dynein needs to have a stable attachment at the cell cortex. In fission yeast, Mcp5 is the anchor protein of dynein and is required for the oscillations of the horsetail nucleus during meiotic prophase. Although the role of Mcp5 in anchoring dynein to the cortex has been identified, it is unknown how Mcp5 associates with the membrane as well as the importance of the underlying attachment to the nuclear oscillations. Here, we set out to quantify Mcp5 organization and identify the binding partner of Mcp5 at the membrane. We used confocal and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to count the number of Mcp5 foci and the number of Mcp5 molecules in an individual focus. Further, we quantified the localization pattern of Mcp5 in fission yeast zygotes and show by perturbation of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase that Mcp5 binds to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2]. Remarkably, we discovered that the myosin I protein in fission yeast, Myo1, which is required for organization of sterol-rich domains in the cell membrane, facilitates the localization of Mcp5 and that of cytoplasmic dynein on the membrane. Finally, we demonstrate that Myo1-facilitated association of Mcp5 and dynein to the membrane determines the dynamics of nuclear oscillations and, in essence, dynein activity.

scholarly journals Cortical dynein pulling mechanism is regulated by differentially targeted attachment molecule Num1

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safia Omer ◽  
Samuel R Greenberg ◽  
Wei-Lih Lee
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Dynein Motor ◽  
Independent Population ◽  
Bud Neck ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Pulling Force

Cortical dynein generates pulling forces via microtubule (MT) end capture-shrinkage and lateral MT sliding mechanisms. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the dynein attachment molecule Num1 interacts with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria to facilitate spindle positioning across the mother-bud neck, but direct evidence for how these cortical contacts regulate dynein-dependent pulling forces is lacking. We show that loss of Scs2/Scs22, ER tethering proteins, resulted in defective Num1 distribution and loss of dynein-dependent MT sliding, the hallmark of dynein function. Cells lacking Scs2/Scs22 performed spindle positioning via MT end capture-shrinkage mechanism, requiring dynein anchorage to an ER- and mitochondria-independent population of Num1, dynein motor activity, and CAP-Gly domain of dynactin Nip100/p150Glued subunit. Additionally, a CAAX-targeted Num1 rescued loss of lateral patches and MT sliding in the absence of Scs2/Scs22. These results reveal distinct populations of Num1 and underline the importance of their spatial distribution as a critical factor for regulating dynein pulling force.

scholarly journals Dynein light chain 1 and a spindle-associated adaptor promote dynein asymmetry and spindle orientation

2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja K. Dunsch ◽  
Dean Hammond ◽  
Jennifer Lloyd ◽  
Lothar Schermelleh ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Light Chain ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Growth Surface ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Dynein Light Chain ◽  
Dynein Motor ◽  
Pulling Forces

The cytoplasmic dynein motor generates pulling forces to center and orient the mitotic spindle within the cell. During this positioning process, dynein oscillates from one pole of the cell cortex to the other but only accumulates at the pole farthest from the spindle. Here, we show that dynein light chain 1 (DYNLL1) is required for this asymmetric cortical localization of dynein and has a specific function defining spindle orientation. DYNLL1 interacted with a spindle-microtubule–associated adaptor formed by CHICA and HMMR via TQT motifs in CHICA. In cells depleted of CHICA or HMMR, the mitotic spindle failed to orient correctly in relation to the growth surface. Furthermore, CHICA TQT motif mutants localized to the mitotic spindle but failed to recruit DYNLL1 to spindle microtubules and did not correct the spindle orientation or dynein localization defects. These findings support a model where DYNLL1 and CHICA-HMMR form part of the regulatory system feeding back spindle position to dynein at the cell cortex.

scholarly journals Tumor suppressor APC is an attenuator of spindle-pulling forces during C. elegans asymmetric cell division

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. E954-E963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sugioka ◽  
Lars-Eric Fielmich ◽  
Kota Mizumoto ◽  
Bruce Bowerman ◽  
Sander van den Heuvel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Pulling Force

The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor suppressor has dual functions in Wnt/β-catenin signaling and accurate chromosome segregation and is frequently mutated in colorectal cancers. Although APC contributes to proper cell division, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we show that Caenorhabditis elegans APR-1/APC is an attenuator of the pulling forces acting on the mitotic spindle. During asymmetric cell division of the C. elegans zygote, a LIN-5/NuMA protein complex localizes dynein to the cell cortex to generate pulling forces on astral microtubules that position the mitotic spindle. We found that APR-1 localizes to the anterior cell cortex in a Par–aPKC polarity-dependent manner and suppresses anterior centrosome movements. Our combined cell biological and mathematical analyses support the conclusion that cortical APR-1 reduces force generation by stabilizing microtubule plus-ends at the cell cortex. Furthermore, APR-1 functions in coordination with LIN-5 phosphorylation to attenuate spindle-pulling forces. Our results document a physical basis for the attenuation of spindle-pulling force, which may be generally used in asymmetric cell division and, when disrupted, potentially contributes to division defects in cancer.

scholarly journals The Nuclear Mitotic Apparatus (NuMA) Protein: A Key Player for Nuclear Formation, Spindle Assembly, and Spindle Positioning

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomomi Kiyomitsu ◽  
Susan Boerner
Keyword(s):  
Protein A ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Mitotic Apparatus ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Nuclear Mitotic Apparatus

The nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) protein is well conserved in vertebrates, and dynamically changes its subcellular localization from the interphase nucleus to the mitotic/meiotic spindle poles and the mitotic cell cortex. At these locations, NuMA acts as a key structural hub in nuclear formation, spindle assembly, and mitotic spindle positioning, respectively. To achieve its variable functions, NuMA interacts with multiple factors, including DNA, microtubules, the plasma membrane, importins, and cytoplasmic dynein. The binding of NuMA to dynein via its N-terminal domain drives spindle pole focusing and spindle positioning, while multiple interactions through its C-terminal region define its subcellular localizations and functions. In addition, NuMA can self-assemble into high-ordered structures which likely contribute to spindle positioning and nuclear formation. In this review, we summarize recent advances in NuMA’s domains, functions and regulations, with a focus on human NuMA, to understand how and why vertebrate NuMA participates in these functions in comparison with invertebrate NuMA-related proteins.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document