scholarly journals Determinants of In-Hospital Death and Rupture in Patients With a Stanford B Aortic Dissection

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 1521-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Sakakura ◽  
Norifumi Kubo ◽  
Junya Ako ◽  
Nahoko Ikeda ◽  
Hiroshi Funayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Stanford B

ASSA13-08-8 Features and Treatments of Hypertension in Elderly Patients with Stanford B Aortic Dissection

Heart ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A38.2-A38
Author(s):  
Sun Mingyu ◽  
Wang Xiaozeng ◽  
Jing Quanmin ◽  
Wang Zulu ◽  
Han Yaling
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Stanford B

Surgical outcomes of total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique in type A aortic dissection: insights from single-center experience

2022 ◽  
pp. 021849232110701
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Yueyun Zhou ◽  
Wei Qin ◽  
Cunhua Su ◽  
Fuhua Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Total Arch Replacement ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Elephant Trunk Technique ◽  
Visceral Malperfusion ◽  
Cerebral Malperfusion

Background Total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique plays an important role in treating acute type A aortic dissection in China. We aim to summarize the therapeutic effects of this procedure in our center over a 17-year period. Methods Consecutive patients treated at our hospital due to type A aortic dissection from January 2004 to January 2021 were studied. Relevant data of these patients undergoing total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 589 patients were included with a mean age of 53.1 ± 12.2 years. The mean of cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamping, and selected cerebral perfusion time were 199.6 ± 41.9, 119.0 ± 27.2, and 25.1 ± 5.0 min, respectively. In-hospital death occurred in 46 patients. Multivariate analysis identified four significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality: preexisting renal hypoperfusion (OR 5.43; 95% CI 1.31 – 22.44; P = 0.020), cerebral malperfusion (OR 11.87; 95% CI 4.13 – 34.12; P < 0.001), visceral malperfusion (OR 4.27; 95% CI 1.01 – 18.14; P = 0.049), and cross-clamp time ≥ 130 min (OR 3.26; 95% CI 1.72 – 6.19; P < 0.001). The 5, 10, and 15 years survival rates were 86.4%, 82.6%, and 70.2%, respectively. Conclusions Total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique is an effective treatment for acute type A aortic dissection with satisfactory perioperative results. Patients with preexisting renal hypoperfusion, cerebral malperfusion, visceral malperfusion, and long cross-clamp time are at a higher risk of in-hospital death.

scholarly journals Preoperative hematological parameters are inadequate for predicting mortality in Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-06
Author(s):  
Selim Durmaz ◽  
◽  
Ömer Faruk Rahman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Circulatory Arrest ◽  
Hematological Parameters ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Type A ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection

Background: Mortality in acute Type A aortic dissection is still high and unpredictable. We aimed to investigate the validity of preoperative hematological markers and possible risk factors in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients operated with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest method. Methods: 78 consecutive patients who were admitted to the emergency service and operated on were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for in-hospital death were investigated to develop a predictive model. Results: There was no difference between patients in terms of the were demographic data of the patients. In the mortality group, only preoperative creatinine levels were found to be higher (p < 0.05). Factors affecting mortality were found as total circulatory arrest (TCA) and cross-clamp (X-clamp) times when intraoperative data were examined (p < 0.05). ROC analysis was performed to determine the power to predict mortality and to determine the cut-off point. In ROC analysis to predict mortality, X-Clamp time > 71 minutes, 68.2% sensitivity and 66.1% specificity, TCA > 44.5 minutes, 72.7% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity were found. In the mortality group, these values were found to be significantly higher than those who were discharged. Conclusion: In the surgical treatment of Type A aortic dissection under deep hypothermia, hematologic biomarkers may be insufficient in estimating the risk for mortality. Keywords: Acute; aortic dissection; biomarker; mortality

Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome with concurrent aortic dissection: a case report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengqi Qiu ◽  
Congcong Li ◽  
Jianya Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Hemorrhagic Fever ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
High Fever ◽  
Hantaan Virus ◽  
Hantavirus Infection ◽  
Microvascular Damage ◽  
Stanford B

Abstract Background Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) is caused by hantaviruses presenting with high fever, hemorrhage, acute kidney injury. Microvascular injury and hemorrhage in mucus was often observed in patients with hantavirus infection. Infection with bacterial and virus related aortic aneurysm or dissection occurs sporadically. We present a previously unreported case of hemorrhagic fever with concurrent Stanford B aortic dissection. Case presentation: A 56-year-old man complained of high fever, generalized body ache, with decreased platelet counts of 10 × 10^9/L and acute kidney injury. The ELISA test for Hantaan virus of IgM and IgG antibodies were both positive. During the convalescent period, he complained sudden onset acute chest pain radiating to the back and the CTA revealed an aortic dissection of the descending aorta extending to iliac artery. He was diagnosed with Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and Stanford B aortic dissection. The patient recovered completely after surgery with other support treatments. Conclusion We present a case of HFRS complicated with aortic dissection,and no study has reported the association of HFRS with aortic disease. However, we suppose that hantavirus infection not only cause microvascular damage but may be risk factor for acute macrovascular detriment. A causal relationship has yet to be confirmed.

scholarly journals N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and outcomes in type B aortic dissection in China: a retrospective multicentre study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e029885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changjun Luo ◽  
Jianwei Zhou ◽  
Si Xiong ◽  
Zhongqiang Kang ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Type B ◽  
Type B Aortic Dissection ◽  
Clinical Events

ObjectivesN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) is an unfavourable factor responsible for poor outcomes in the cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, the prognostic role of NT-pro-BNP in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains unclear. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between NT-pro-BNP levels and in-hospital and long-term adverse prognosis in patients with TBAD.DesignA retrospective multicentre study.SettingLiutie Central Hospital, Nanfang Hospital and Huiyang Hospital in China.ParticipantsA total of 657 consecutive patients with TBAD were enrolled in the study. NT-pro-BNP was measured at admission and included patients were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of NT-pro-BNP (pg/mL): <95 (n=220), 95–312 (n=218) and >312 (n=219).Primary and secondary outcome measuresLong-term mortality and in-hospital major adverse clinical events.ResultsOverall, in-hospital death occurred in 27 patients (4.1%), which was significantly higher in upper tertiles of NT-pro-BNP (0.5% vs 4.1% vs 7.8%, p<0.001). The incident of in-hospital major adverse clinical events increased along with higher NT-pro-BNP (1.4% vs 11.5% vs 15.5%, p<0.001). NT-pro-BNP >210 pg/mL had 81.5% sensitivity and 58.6% specificity for predicting in-hospital death (area under the curve= 0.774, 95% CI 0.692 to 0.855; p<0.001). After a median of 3.1 years of follow-up, 97 (14.8%) patients died. The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the long-term cumulative mortality was higher in patients with NT-pro-BNP >210 pg/mL compared with patients with NT-pro-BNP ≤210 pg/mL (log-rank=26.92, p<0.001). In multivariable Cox survival modelling, NT-pro-BNP >210 pg/mL was independently associated with long-term death (adjusted HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.45 to 4.22, p=0.001).ConclusionsNT-pro-BNP resulted as an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with TBAD, thus could be used as a potential risk-stratification tool.

P2787Gender differences in acute type B aortic dissection

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chatani ◽  
R Murai ◽  
Y Kawase ◽  
T Tada ◽  
K Kadota
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type B ◽  
Type B Aortic Dissection ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Abstract Background The incidence of aortic dissection has been reported to be lower in women; however, women have a poor prognosis. Also, the incidence of false lumen thrombosis has been reported to be different between Europe, the United States, and Japan. We aimed to determine gender differences in long-term prognosis of acute type B aortic dissection. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 220 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute type B aortic dissection between January 2012 to December 2017. After exclusion criteria of unknown onset time, >14 days after the onset, in-hospital death, and aortic events requiring additional treatment during hospitalization were applied, 186 patients were analyzed by gender: 133 men and 53 women. The patient background, treatment method, prognosis, and outcome were compared and examined. Results Both the proportions of smoking history and patients receiving oxygen therapy during hospitalization were significantly higher in men (59% vs. 22%, p<0.01; 91% vs. 72%, p<0.01, respectively), whereas that of classical aortic dissection was similar between men and women (41% vs. 32%, p=0.36). The avoidance rate of a composite of all deaths and aortic events 2 years after discharge was similar (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.59; p=0.966).(Picture1) Picture 1 Conclusion The long-term prognosis of acute type B aortic dissection treated by medical therapy during hospitalization was equivalent in men and women despite gender differences in several background factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document