Recombinant human interferon- for condylomata acuminata: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intralesional therapy

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Bornstein ◽  
Bruno Pascal ◽  
Doron Zarfati ◽  
Nimrod Goldschmid ◽  
Haim Abramovici

To assess the efficacy of a novel glycosylated mammalian cell derived recombinant human interferon- (r-hIFN--1a) in the intralesional treatment of genital condylomata acuminata. The study was randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled. Patients ( n =60) with up to 8 distinct condylomata acuminata were randomized to receive either one million international units (IU) of r-hIFN--1a or placebo intralesionally into each lesion, 3 times a week, for a total of 9 occasions. Biopsies were taken from each patient before enrolment to allow human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and patients were tested for the development of anti-IFN- antibodies. Efficacy was assessed by measuring the complete response rate 3 months after treatment. The complete response rate was not significantly better with r-hIFN--1a than with placebo. However, after 3 months, 73.3% of patients treated with r-hIFN--1a had experienced at least a partial response to treatment, compared with 33.3% of placebo-treated patients. At 19 days and 6 weeks, r-hIFN--1a produced a significantly larger reduction in the area of condylomata. Lesions with detectable HPV 6 or 11 showed a trend towards a better response rate to treatment with rhIFN--1a than lesions where no HPV DNA was detected. The treatment was well tolerated. In the 5 patients who developed non-neutralizing anti-IFN- antibodies, therapeutic efficacy was not compromised. Intralesional r-hIFN--1a was effective in the reduction of the size of genital condylomata acuminata.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 2439-2446 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Hulstaert ◽  
S Van Belle ◽  
H Bleiberg ◽  
J L Canon ◽  
M Dewitte ◽  
...  

PURPOSE This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.


1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Olmos ◽  
J Vilata ◽  
A Rodríguez Pichardo ◽  
A Lloret ◽  
A Ojeda ◽  
...  

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess interferon-beta efficacy and safety in the treatment of anogenital condylomatous lesions. One hundred patients received a daily intramuscular injection of either interferon-beta (IFN-β) (2 MIU/day) or placebo for 10 days. Of 94 evaluable patients, the complete response rate observed 8 weeks after treatment was significantly higher in the group receiving IFN-β, as compared to the placebo-treated group (51% vs 28.9%, P<0.05). After one year, 24 patients (100%) out of 24 complete responders to IFN-β who attended for follow-up remained free of lesions. Twelve of 13 patients with complete response to placebo (92.3%) remained free of lesions after one year. Side effects were mild and no significant analytical changes were observed. In conclusion, interferon-beta is an effective and safe treatment for long-term eradication of anogenital condylomatous lesions.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e029942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Rea Hardy ◽  
Helen Skerman ◽  
Jennifer Philip ◽  
Phillip Good ◽  
David C Currow ◽  
...  

ObjectivesMethotrimeprazine is commonly used for the management of nausea but never tested formally against other drugs used in this setting. The aim was to demonstrate superior antiemetic efficacy.DesignDouble-blind, randomised, controlled trial of methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol.Setting11 palliative care sites in Australia.ParticipantsParticipants were >18 years, had cancer, an average nausea score of ≥3/10 and able to tolerate oral medications. Ineligible patients had acute nausea related to treatment, nausea for which a specific antiemetic was indicated, were about to undergo a procedure or had received either of the study drugs or a change in glucocorticoid dose within the previous 48 hours.InterventionsBased on previous studies, haloperidol was used as the control. Participants were randomised to encapsulated methotrimeprazine 6·25 mg or haloperidol 1·5 mg one time or two times per day and assessed every 24 hours for 72 hours.Main outcome measuresA ≥two-point reduction in nausea score at 72 hours from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: complete response at 72 hours (end nausea score less than 3), response at 24 and 48 hours, vomiting episodes, use of rescue antiemetics, harms and global impression of change.ResultsResponse to treatment at 72 hours was 75% (44/59) in the haloperidol (H) arm and 63% (36/57) in the methotrimeprazine (M) arm with no difference between groups (intention-to-treat analysis). Complete response rates were 56% (H) and 51% (M). In theper protocolanalysis, there was no difference in response rates: (85% (44/52) (H) and 74% (36/49) (M). Completeper protocolresponse rates were 64% (H) and 59% (M). Toxicity worse than baseline was minimal with a trend towards greater sedation in the methotrimeprazine arm.ConclusionThis study did not demonstrate any difference in response rate between methotrimeprazine and haloperidol in the control of nausea.Trial registration numberACTRN 12615000177550.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.


Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (41) ◽  
pp. 26406-26416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Santonja ◽  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
Ana Lluch ◽  
Maria Rosario Chica-Parrado ◽  
Joan Albanell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Lu-Zhen Li ◽  
Jia-Ming Wu ◽  
Ting Chen ◽  
Liang-Chen Zhao ◽  
Juan-Na Zhuang ◽  
...  

Objective. Systematically evaluate the efficacy of physical ablation combined with TKI in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. We performed a comprehensive search of databases including OVID, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and three Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chongqing Weipu Database). The aim was to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating physical ablation as the treatment for advanced NSCLC. We also evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and summarized the data extracted for meta-analysis with Review Manager 5.3. Results. A total of 9 studies, including 752 patients, were evaluable. The meta-analysis results show that the complete response rate (CRR) (RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1. 46 to 3.40, P 0.01), partial response rate (PRR) (RR: −2.25, 95% CI: 1.41 to 3.59, P 0.01), and disease control rate (DCR) (RR: −2.80, 95% CI: 1.64 to 4.80, P < 0.01) of patients with advanced NSCLC who received physical ablation combined with TKI therapy were higher than those who did not receive physical ablation therapy. The control groups from seven of the studies had a total of 606 patients with targeted therapies and chemotherapy. The complete response rate was (CRR) (RR: 2.48, 2.4895% CI: 1.55 to 2.47, P 0.01), partial response rate (PRR) (RR: −1.66, 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.31, P < 0.01), and disease control rate (DCR) (RR: −2.68, 95% CI: 1.41 to 5.06, P < 0.01) for patients with advanced NSCLC who had received physical ablation combined with targeted therapies and chemotherapy, compared to patients who had not received physical ablation therapy. This difference was statistically significant. Above all, these results showed that the clinical efficacy of physical ablation combined EGFR-TKIs therapy (regardless of whether it was combined with chemotherapy) was better than that of EGFR-TKIs therapy alone. Conclusion. Physical ablation combined with TKI treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC can improve efficacy.


Author(s):  
J.R. Oleson ◽  
T.V. Samulski ◽  
K.A. Leopold ◽  
S. Clegg ◽  
L.R. Prosnitz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Inaba ◽  
Tomohiro Kadota ◽  
Keiichiro Nishihara ◽  
Daiki Sato ◽  
Keiichiro Nakajo ◽  
...  

Abstract   Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for cT1a esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), however its indication for the entire circumferential lesions is still controversial because of the risk of severe stricture after ESD. Therefore, several treatment options are performed based on physicians’ choice, however, each clinical course is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the long-term outcome after ESD for patients with entire circumferential cT1aN0M0 ESCC, comparing with esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. Methods Patients with entire circumferential cT1aN0M0 SESCC treated with ESD, chemoradiotherapy, or esophagectomy as the initial treatment between January 2010 and December 2016 in our institution were included. Patients who had a history of any malignancy at cStage II-IV within 5 years were excluded. The 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), stricture rate, refractory stricture rate (defined as requiring &gt;6 dilations), curative resection (defined as pT1a without lymphovascular invasion and negative for vertical margin in the pathological evaluation) rate of ESD, and complete response rate of chemoradiotherapy were evaluated for each treatment. Results Of the 48 eligible patients, 25/13/10 patients were performed ESD/chemoradiotherapy/esophagectomy as an initial treatment. Curative resections rate of ESD was 72%, and additional esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy were performed in three and one patients with non-curative resection. Complete response rate of chemoradiotherapy was 100%, however, 4 patients had recurrence thereafter. No recurrences occurred after esophagectomy in all patients treated with esophagectomy. During median follow-up of 83 months, stricture and refractory stricture rate was 80/44% after ESD, 0/0% after chemoradiotherapy, and 20/10% after esophagectomy. The 5-year OS/DFS was 91/87% after ESD, 92/59% after chemoradiotherapy, and 90/90% after esophagectomy. Conclusion While some patients required additional treatments due to non-curative resection, the long-term survival after ESD for circumferential cT1aN0M0 ESCC was similar as those after chemoradiotherapy or esophagectomy. In contrast, the stricture and refractory stricture rate after ESD was higher than others. Further investigation in a large cohort is necessary to clarify the indication criteria of ESD for patients with the lesion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document