scholarly journals Postpartum family planning in Rwanda: a cost effectiveness analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 887
Author(s):  
Pamela Williams ◽  
Katie Morales ◽  
Vikram Sridharan ◽  
Alekya Tummala ◽  
Elliot Marseille

Background: Globally, there is a large unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period: 90% of women in this group want family planning for birth spacing or to avoid unintended pregnancies and stop child bearing once desired family size has been reached. Women spend on average about 30 years, or three-quarters of their reproductive lives, attempting to avoid pregnancy. In total 76% of Rwandan women want family planning postpartum, yet a 26% unmet need remains. Methods: This cost effectiveness analysis compared the two most frequently-used family planning methods in Rwanda, longer-acting reversible contraception (LARC), injections and subdermal implants, and shorter-acting reversible contraceptives (non-LARC), pills and condoms. Women who do not use contraception postpartum were also represented. A time horizon of 24 months was used to reflect the World Health Organization suggested two-year spacing from birth until the next pregnancy, and the analysis was conducted from a health systems perspective. Results: For women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Rwanda, including LARC postpartum family planning methods in the options, saves $18.73 per pregnancy averted, compared to family planning options that offer non-LARC methods exclusively. Conclusion: There is an opportunity to avert unplanned pregnancies associated with the increased utilization of LARC methods. Despite the availability of LARC methods in many of Rwanda’s health facilities, the full benefits are not yet realized. LARC is cost-saving compared with non-LARC methods. Effective public health messaging campaigns and other promotion targeting current resistance to LARC use for the postpartum population could both enhance health and save public health funds.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 887
Author(s):  
Pamela Williams ◽  
Katie Morales ◽  
Vikram Sridharan ◽  
Alekya Tummala ◽  
Elliot Marseille

Background: Globally, there is a large unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period: 90% of women in this group want family planning for birth spacing or to avoid unintended pregnancies and stop child bearing once desired family size has been reached. Women spend on average about 30 years, or three-quarters of their reproductive lives, attempting to avoid pregnancy. In total 76% of Rwandan women want family planning postpartum, yet a 26% unmet need remains. Methods: This cost effectiveness analysis compared the two most frequently-used family planning methods in Rwanda, longer-acting reversible contraception (LARC), injections and subdermal implants, and shorter-acting reversible contraceptives (non-LARC), pills and condoms. Women who do not use contraception postpartum were also represented. A time horizon of 24 months was used to reflect the World Health Organization suggested two-year spacing from birth until the next pregnancy, and the analysis was conducted from a health systems perspective. Results: For women of reproductive age (12-49 years) in Rwanda, including LARC postpartum family planning methods in the options, saves $18.73 per pregnancy averted, compared to family planning options that offer non-LARC methods exclusively. Conclusion: $2.8 million US$ per year can be saved if LARC is included as a contraceptive choice across all health centers in Rwanda; this cost savings provides the opportunity for these funds to be allocated to other high value interventions. Potential inclusion of these methods at Rwanda’s faith-based health facilities warrants further attention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 887
Author(s):  
Pamela Williams ◽  
Katie Morales ◽  
Vikram Sridharan ◽  
Alekya Tummala ◽  
Elliot Marseille

Background: Globally, there is a large unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period: 90% of women in this group want family planning for birth spacing or to avoid unintended pregnancies and stop child bearing once desired family size has been reached. In total 76% of Rwandan women want family planning postpartum, yet a 26% unmet need remains. Currently, the four most commonly used postpartum family planning methods in Rwanda are injections, subdermal implants, pills, and condoms. The economic and health benefit impact of the current method selection has not yet been evaluated. Methods: To evaluate the impact of current usage rates and method types, this cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) compared the most frequently used family planning methods in Rwanda broken into two categories, longer-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (injections and subdermal implants) and shorter-acting reversible contraceptives (non-LARC) (pills and condoms). A time horizon of 24 months was used to reflect the World Health Organization suggested two-year spacing from birth until the next pregnancy, and was conducted from a health systems perspective. This CEA compared two service package options to provide a comparator for the two method types, thus enabling insights to differences between the two. Results: For women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Rwanda, including LARC postpartum family planning methods in the options, saves $18.73 per pregnancy averted, compared to family planning options that offer non-LARC methods exclusively. Conclusion: There is an opportunity to avert unplanned pregnancies associated with increased utilization of LARC methods. The full benefits of LARC are not yet realized in Rwanda. Under the conditions presented in this study, a service package that includes LARC has the potential to be cost-saving compared with one non-LARC methods. Effective health messaging of LARC use for the postpartum population could both enhance health and reduce costs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1159-1166
Author(s):  
Sarra E. Saied ◽  
◽  
Nada G.O. Ahmed ◽  
Elmuez E.A ◽  
Egbal A.B.A. Karaig ◽  
...  

Introduction:The unmet need for family planning reflects the gap between womens reproductive intentions and their contraceptive behavior. Its a useful indicator for tracking progress towards the target of achieving universal access to reproductive health. Aim:This study aimsat measuringthe level of unmet need for family planning in Ombada locality to identify the determinants that affectutilization of FP methodsand to assessthe readiness of the public health facilities to the provision of FP services. Methods:The study was a descriptive cross-sectional health facility and community-based studyusinga multistage sampling technique.The study collected data from married women of reproductive age (15-49 years)and from the public health facilities providingfamily planning services in the study area using structured questionnaire and checklist respectively. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version20. Results:Currently users for family planning methods were (21.55%). The total unmet need for family planning was high and measured as (39.26%), while the total demand for family planning was (60.8%). Factors such as age, age at marriage, living children, knowledge about family planning methods and discussion with husband were found to be significantly related to the high total unmet need. Major reasons for the non-use of family planning methods were husband/family objection, fear of side effects and a lack of knowledge about family planning methods. Assessment of health facilities revealed poor infrastructure readiness. Conclusion: Women in the surveyed locality are still not empowered regarding their reproductive health choices, as they are still under the control of husbands and families concerning the use of contraceptive methods. In addition, the lack of counsellingcomponent, which was the weakest link in the provision of family planning services, lead to voluntary or un-voluntary avoid of using FP methods, or adopting unprofessional sources or methods as alternatives. Thus, policymakers and directorates managers have to carefully consider such findings when planning for FP interventions.


Author(s):  
Ruchita Dixit ◽  
Aaradhana Bandhani

Background: Family planning is defined by World Health Organization (WHO) as, “a way of thinking and living that is adopted voluntarily, upon the basis of knowledge, attitudes and responsible decisions by individuals and couples, in order to promote the health and welfare of family groups and thus contribute effectively to the social development of a country”. The extensive acceptance of family planning, in a society, is an integral component of modern development and is essential for the incorporation of women into social and economic life. Therefore the present study as well focused on the women knowledge and participation in family planning. Objectives: This study projected to evaluate the knowledge of the women about various family planning methods and its sources of information.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 200 married women between 15-60 years of age group selected by multistage random sampling. The women were asked to complete the 20 questions including demographic data. Self structured questionnaire was used to evaluate their knowledge about Family planning methods. Subsequently, the data analyzed by using SPSS version 1.2.Results: In this present study knowledge of family planning methods were higher. Female sterilization and use of condom is the most widely known and practiced method of all contraceptive methods followed by oral Pills and IUDs. Health functionaries were found to the more informative as compared to media and others sources of information regarding family planning methods.Conclusions: From the results found in this study it can be accomplish that women’s awareness regarding family planning was higher and found satisfactory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document