scholarly journals Introduction to the Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence for Smart Cities and Industries

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Sharma ◽  
Pradeep Kumar Singh ◽  
Wei-Chiang Hong ◽  
Gaurav Dhiman ◽  
Adam Slowik
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Biological System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Smart Cities ◽  
Industrial Condition ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Geospatial Information ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Data Arrangement

Smart Cities and Artificial Intelligence offers an intensive evaluation of how the smart city establishments are made at different scales through automated thinking headways, for instance, geospatial information, data examination, data portrayal, clever related things, and quick natural frameworks handiness. Progressing propels in electronic thinking attract us closer to making a persistent reproduced model of human-made and trademark structures, from urban regions to transportation establishments to utility frameworks. This continuous living model empowers us to all the bound to manage and improve these working structures, making them dynamically watchful. Keen Cities and Artificial Intelligence gives a multidisciplinary, joined procedure, using speculative and applied bits of information, for the evaluation of savvy city situations. This special issue shows how the mechanized and physical universes are associated inside this organic framework, and how nonstop data arrangement is changing the possibility of our urban as well as industrial condition. It gives a fresh sweeping perspective on the natural framework designing, advances, and parts that include the masterminding and execution of sharp city and industry establishments. This special issue also shows how the computerized and physical universes are connected inside this biological system, and how continuous information assortment is changing the idea of our urban and industry condition. It gives a crisp all-encompassing viewpoint on the biological system engineering, advances, and parts that involve the arranging and execution of keen city and industry foundations. After following double blind peer review for all the submitted manuscripts across the globe, and after the rigorous review process, revision and based on final recommendations of the reviewers and editorial team, finally 17 manuscripts have been accepted for publication.  

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2126 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
High Similarity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Review Form ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Content Review

All conference organizers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: The ICoPIs 2021 manuscripts were reviewed using double-blind peer review. One reviewer reviewed one manuscript. The number of papers submitted was 62 articles. The number of ICoPIs 2021 reviewers were 9 people. The reviewing processes were conducted via email or OCS. The manuscripts in ICoPIs 2021 have been through two stages of review. The first review stage involved three steps. First, manuscripts were distributed to the 10 reviewers. Second, the ICoPIs team checked the similarity of the manuscript. Third, the reviewed manuscripts consisting of the reviewer’s detailed comments were returned to the authors, along with the review summary form and the similarity check results. The authors were requested to return the revision of their papers within a certain period of time. In the second review stage, the editorial team scrutinized the revised manuscripts with the summary review form and the similarity percentage. If the revision has followed the comments and suggestions from reviewers and the limitation of similarity, the manuscript would be forwarded for language and template check. • Conference submission management system: OCS (https://fisika.fkip.untad.ac.id/icopis/) • The number of submissions received: There were 62 articles submitted to the ICoPIs 2021 • The number of submissions sent for review: There were 56 articles reviewed by the reviewers of the ICoPIs 2021 • The number of submissions accepted: There were 37 articles accepted for recommendation/publication to JPCS IOP Publishing. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59.68% • The average number of reviews per paper: One article was reviewed 4 times; twice for content review and a similarity check, once for language and once more for the template. • The total number of reviewers involved: There were 24 reviewers involved, consisting of 9 content reviewers, 10 editors (review content and templates), and 5 language reviewers. • Any additional info on the review process: While the ICoPIs team waited for the manuscripts from the reviewers, we checked the similarity of the papers. We sent three documents to the authors for the first review stage, including the reviewed manuscript, the summary of the review form, and the result of a similarity check. The authors sent the revised article along with the similarity check (maximum 20%). The manuscripts entered the second review stage. When a manuscript has followed the comments and suggestions from reviewers and was considered suitable for publication, the manuscript then proceeded to the editors for the template and language check. We did a similarity check once more during this phase but only for the manuscript with a high similarity percentage in the first review stage. So, one manuscript has been through a similarity check 2 to 3 times. • Contact person for queries: +628975586104 (Misbah) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 918 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Full Paper ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Galley Proof

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind The 2nd International Symposium on Arboriculture in the Tropics: Trees and Human Health (The 2nd ISATrop2021) Editorial team used a double-blind review, where both the reviewer (scientific committee) and author identities were concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. Only the editor knows the name of this reviewer and author. The list of Scientific committees has been determined before the symposium takes place and was ratified in the form of a Letter of Assignment. • Conference submission management system: The registration mechanism for the 2nd ISATrop2021 for participants, both non-presenters and oral presenters was carried out via online submission with the form provided on the arboriculture website ( https://arborikultur.ipb.ac.id/registration/ ). Abstracts for presenters are also uploaded when filling out the registration form. Speakers and participants can monitor and communicate with symposium organizers via email [email protected] and WhatsApp with contact person Ulfa Adzkia, S.Hut, M.Si as the symposium secretary (+62 822 6245 4154). Participants who have presented their papers at the 2nd ISATrop2021 on 21-22 June 2021, can then submit full papers via email [email protected] to the 2nd ISATrop2021 Editorial Team. • Number of submissions received: 62 • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 • Number of submissions accepted: 53 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 85.48% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 papers • Total number of reviewers involved: 27 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - Full papers that have been received by the 2nd ISATrop2021 Editorial Team via email [email protected] from the participants have been going through a peer review mechanism as follows: 1. The Editor Team allocates 1-3 papers to the 2nd ISATrop2021 Scientific Committees (reviewers). 2. Each full paper along with the review form was sent to each reviewer via email [email protected]. 3. The review and revision process were continued until the full paper is declared “Accepted by No Revision” by the reviewer. 4. Full Paper that has been Accepted by Revision, then processed for plagiarism checking by TURNITIN, proofread checking by the proofreader team, and layout checking by the layout team. 5. While waiting for the proof read and layout check results, the author was asked to submit a “Statement of Originality form” via email. The form template was provided by the editor team. 6. The results of the proofread and layout in the form of “Galley Proof Draft” were then sent back to the author via email. 7. Galley Proof Draft that has been checked and corrected by the author, then sent back to the editor team via email. 8. The final layout team then rechecks the full paper to ensure that the format is in accordance with the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science format. • Contact person for queries: Name : Fifi Gus Dwiyanti Affiliation: Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Supervision, Advisement and Dialogic Pedagogy: present day issues and provocations for the future

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. SA112-116
Author(s):  
Mikhail Gradovski
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Dialogic Pedagogy ◽  
The Future

This article is a reflection on the Dialogic Pedagogy Journal (DPJ) Special Issue on Supervision and Advisement. Altogether five articles made it through a rigorous double-blind peer review process and crossed the finishing line to become a part of this special issue. Supervision and advisement are areas of education where Dialogic Pedagogy approach is a welcome guest as learning and teaching constructs that are used in these areas require various forms of dialogue.  This special issue is a humble but a promising beginning for the special issues on supervision and advisement in this journal. All the studies included in this special issue are good examples of well-done scientific endeavors that can be used as illustrations of how a good piece of research should be executed and reported. However, the question remains if the means of analyses used in these studies are satisfactory enough so that we could understand to the fullest the complexities of the co-lived lives of the participants in supervisory and advisement relationships and co-learned knowledge that all the participants have gained.

scholarly journals Southern Africa Special Edition: Editorial

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Pather ◽  
Dr. Letibe Jacob (Jackie) Phahlamohlaka
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Southern Africa ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Special Edition ◽  
Community Informatics ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Great Pleasure ◽  
Double Blind

It is with great pleasure that we present the first Southern African special issue of The Journal of Community Informatics. This is the culmination of a long journey, which started with an initial discussion with the Editor-in-Chief, Dr Michael Gurstein, almost three years ago. After the initial call, in latter 2012, all submissions were subjected to an initial filtering in terms of alignment to the scope of the call. Thereafter all papers have been subjected to a double-blind peer review process, with some papers going through three iterations of review. As the editors of this special issue, we would like to thank all of the authors who responded to the call, and to the reviewers who have diligently cooperated with the editors throughout the process of review. Our heartfelt gratitude is extended also to the JoCI Editor in Chief for the unstinting support in ensuring the special edition has come together.

scholarly journals Special Issue: Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Smart Cities

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Burak Kantarci ◽  
Sema Oktug
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Wireless Communications ◽  
Mobile Networks ◽  
Smart Cities ◽  
Wireless Sensor ◽  
Special Issue

Our lives are being transformed by the interplay between mobile networks, wireless communications, and artificial intelligence. [...]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 942 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Review Form ◽  
Check System ◽  
Set Up ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Topic of the paper must be consistent with the presentation/poster presented during the Conference as well as the thematic panels of the Conference. After submission of a paper editorial team checked the paper’s composition and its arrangement. Then invitations with enclosed abstract of the paper was sent to appropriate Reviewers. As two formal acceptances of an invitation were received, Reviewers were sent the full paper and the review form prepared by the editorial team. The time for the review was set up to 30 days. The review then was submitted to the editorial team with a recommendation to accept the paper in the present form or to make minor/major corrections or to reject it. The editorial team sent a decision email to the author including reviewers’ opinions and suggestions. While revision was needed, the author was given 14 days for corrections and resubmitting the article. In case of minor corrections, the editorial verified the paper and made the final decision. But in case of major corrections, the corrected paper was sent to the Reviewers once again for the further evaluation after which the editorial team made the final decision. • Conference submission management system: Submission, review process as well as all communication with authors and reviewers were made via Conferences’ e-mail box • Number of submissions received: 44 • Number of submissions sent for review: 44 • Number of submissions accepted: 39 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 88,64 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 59 (30 foreign and 29 from Poland) • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): No • Contact person for queries: Damian Kasza; Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wyb. Wyspianskiego St., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected]

EDITORIAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adile Askim Kurt
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Related Field

Dear Readers, It is the great honor for us to publish Volume 4, Issue 1 of Journal of Education and Special Education Technology’s (JESET). From 2015 till this days, we, as editorial team of JESET, aimed and made an effort to gain researches on technology in special education, have high quality and unique findings. We believed that just this kind of researches could useful for literature and our audiences such as readers, researchers, trainers, instructors in special education and educational technologies area. A total number of seven (7) manuscripts were submitted for this issue and each paper has been subjected to double-blind peer review process by the reviewers specialized in the related field. At the end of the review process, a total number of two (2 high quality research papers were selected and accepted for publication. Aim of this issue is to give the researchers an opportunity to share the results of their academic studies. There are different research topics discussed in the articles. The topics of the next issue will be different. You can make sure that we will be trying to serve you with our journal with a rich knowledge in which different kinds of topics are discussed in 2018 Volume. I would like to present many thanks to all the contributors who helped to publish this issue. Best regards, Yours sincerely, Associate Professor Doctor Adile Askim KURT

Editorial: Team work and team talk as distributed and coordinated action in healthcare delivery

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Srikant Sarangi
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Team Work ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Coordinated Action

This special issue of Communication & Medicine is dedicated to the theme of teamwork and team talk in healthcare delivery.

Reflections on Successful Research in Artificial Intelligence: An Introduction

AI Magazine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Ching-Hua Chen ◽  
James Hendler ◽  
Sabbir Rashid ◽  
Oshani Seneviratne ◽  
Daby Sow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
General Public ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Editorial Team ◽  
Special Topic

This editorial introduces the special topic articles on reflections on successful research in artificial intelligence. Consisting of a combination of interviews and full-length articles, the special topic articles examine the meaning of success and metrics of success from a variety of perspectives. Our editorial team is especially excited about this topic, because we are in an era when several of the aspirations of early artificial intelligence researchers and futurists seem to be within reach of the general public. This has spurred us to reflect on, and re-examine, our social and scientific motivations for promoting the use of artificial intelligence in governments, enterprises, and in our lives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document