scholarly journals Nietzsche e as ciências naturais: entrevista com Pietro Gori

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Gori ◽  
Wigson Rafael Silva Da Costa ◽  
Vinicius Carvallho Da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
William James ◽  
Ernst Mach

Para tratar das relações entre Nietzsche e o empreendimento científico, convidamos para essa entrevista um dos mais conceituados estudiosos do pensamento nietzschiano na atualidade. Pietro Gori, Ph.D. em Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea, trabalha como pesquisador no Instituto de Filosofia da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, onde também atua como professor adjunto das cadeiras de Filosofia da Ciência e Filosofia do Conhecimento. É ainda diretor do "Lisbon Nietzsche Group" do Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA; membro da associação "HyperNietzsche", da "Red Iberoamericana de Estudios Nietzscheanos"; do "Seminário Permanente Nietzscheano" e colaborador do "Internationale Nietzscheforschungsgruppe Stuttgart". Suas principais áreas de especialização acadêmica são Filosofia Ocidental Moderna e Contemporânea; História e Filosofia da Ciência; Epistemologia e Antropologia Filosófica. Dentro destas áreas, Pietro Gori dedicou seus trabalhos principalmente aos representantes de uma virada antifundacionalista na filosofia, onde destacam-se Ernst Mach, Friedrich Nietzsche e William James. Sobre esses temas, entre as numerosas publicações de Pietro Gori, em 2019 foi publicado o livro Nietzsche’s Pragmatism. A Study on Perspectival Thought (De Gruyter). 

scholarly journals Todellinen elämä: Bergson ja koettu luonto

2021 ◽  
pp. 147-161
Author(s):  
Jan-Ivar Lindén
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
William James ◽  
Georg Simmel ◽  
Max Scheler ◽  
Wilhelm Dilthey

Bergsonin elämänfilosofia liittyy laajaan suuntaukseen, joka syntyi biologian mullistuksien myötä 1800-luvun loppupuolella (Friedrich Nietzsche, Wilhelm Dilthey, Menyhert Palágyi, Ludwig Klages, Max Scheler, Georg Simmel, William James...). Sikäli kuin naturalismi tulkitaan tämän päivän keskustelussa usein yksipuolisesti materialismiksi, elämänfilosofia voi antaa toisen kiinnostavan näkökulman ihmisen asemaan luonnossa. Suuntaus on tässä suhteessa vahvasti vaikuttanut fenomenologisiin teorioihin subjektin ruumiillisuudesta ja yleensäkin embodiment-käsitteeseen. Artikkelin tarkoitus on valaista filosofisen psykologian ja luonnonfilosofian suhdetta Bergsonin tuotannossa, temaattisesti syventää tätä suhdetta sekä historiallisesti ja ontologisesti taustoittaa Bergsonin filosofiaa, muun muassa suhteessa hänen edeltäjänsä Félix Ravaissonin aristotelismiin.

Rorty's Nietzschean Pragmatism: A Jamesian Response

2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Boffetti
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
William James ◽  
Richard Rorty ◽  
Liberal Society ◽  
Radical Empiricism ◽  
Pragmatic Theory ◽  
What Works ◽  
Complete Interpretation

Richard Rorty makes the case that Friedrich Nietzsche shared a common pragmatism with William James in order to incorporate certain Nietzschean themes into neo-pragmatism and to give his philosophy stronger pragmatic credentials. In making this connection, he establishes a version of pragmatism that rejects both epistemology and metaphysics, reduces the pragmatic theory of truth to “truth is what works,” places the Darwinian account of man at the center of the human narrative, and makes Nietzschean “self-creation” the chief end of a postmodern, post-religious liberal society. But if one reads James more faithfully (a task that Rorty rejects), it is clear that James does not succumb to the nihilism, perspectivalism, and atheism characteristic of Rorty's Nietzschean pragmatism. A more comprehensive reading of James's philosophy brings together James's pragmatism, his pluralism, and his radical empiricism. And this more complete interpretation of James's pragmatism offers a pluralistic and hopeful approach to politics that does not suffer from Nietzsche's and Rorty's nihilistic, relativistic, and antipolitical tendencies.

scholarly journals Pragmatism and Existential Philosophy

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-118
Author(s):  
Hans Lipps ◽  
Jason Hills
Keyword(s):  
Lived Experience ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
John Dewey ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
William James ◽  
Existential Philosophy

Hans Lipps compares pragmatism (William James and John Dewey) existentialism (Friedrich Nietzsche, Soren Kierkegaard, and Martin Heidegger) in this 1936 article translated from French.  He claims that they aim at the same goals, e.g., a return to lived experience and a rejection of the Cartesian legacy in philosophy.  While summarizing the commonalities of each, he engages in a polemic against philosophy then that remains relevant now into the next century.

scholarly journals Was James Psychologistic?

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Klein
Keyword(s):  
William James ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
American Pragmatism ◽  
Ernst Mach ◽  
Herbert Spencer ◽  
Scientific Philosophy

As Thomas Uebel has recently argued, some early logical positivists saw American pragmatism as a kindred form of scientific philosophy. They associated pragmatism with William James, whom they rightly saw as allied with Ernst Mach. But what apparently blocked sympathetic positivists from pursuing commonalities with American pragmatism was the concern that James advocated some form of psychologism, a view they thought could not do justice to the <em>a priori</em>. This paper argues that positivists were wrong to read James as offering a psychologistic account of the <em>a priori</em>. They had encountered James by reading <em>Pragmatism</em> as translated by the unabashedly psychologistic Wilhelm Jerusalem. But in more technical works, James had actually developed a form of conventionalism that anticipated the so-called “relativized” <em>a priori</em> positivists themselves would independently develop. While positivists arrived at conventionalism largely through reflection on the exact sciences, though, James’s account of the <em>a priori</em> grew from his reflections on the biological evolution of cognition, particularly in the context of his Darwin-inspired critique of Herbert Spencer.

scholarly journals The varieties of sick experience: Nietzsche, James, and the art of health

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Wirth
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
William James

O artigo propõe um diálogo entre William James e Friedrich Nietzsche acerca da natureza da doença e sua superação ou convalescença. À primeira vista, seria uma tolice reconciliar o renascimento religioso com a convalescença que levou Nietzsche à “grande saúde.” A fim de tentar ir além desta insensatez, consideraremos cuidadosamente o locus onde a saúde emerge para ambos pensadores. A discussão é motivada, ademais, por um interesse no destino da religião após a morte de Deus.

A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Gantman ◽  
Robin Gomila ◽  
Joel E. Martinez ◽  
J. Nathan Matias ◽  
Elizabeth Levy Paluck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
William James ◽  
Mental Processes ◽  
Psychological Science ◽  
Behavioral Measurement ◽  
The World ◽  
Pragmatist Philosophy

AbstractA pragmatist philosophy of psychological science offers to the direct replication debate concrete recommendations and novel benefits that are not discussed in Zwaan et al. This philosophy guides our work as field experimentalists interested in behavioral measurement. Furthermore, all psychologists can relate to its ultimate aim set out by William James: to study mental processes that provide explanations for why people behave as they do in the world.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document