scholarly journals A study of a structure identification method using sensitivity analysis. 2nd report. Identification of design variables with frequency response.

1988 ◽  
Vol 54 (505) ◽  
pp. 2101-2106
Author(s):  
Ichiro HAGIWARA ◽  
Akira ARAI ◽  
Kazuo NAGABUCHI
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Frequency Response ◽  
Structure Identification ◽  
Identification Method ◽  
Design Variables

Sizing Design Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Frequency Response of Vibrating Structures

1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Jae Hwan Lee
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Frequency Response ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Design Sensitivity ◽  
Design Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis Method ◽  
Dynamic Frequency

A continuum design sensitivity analysis method of dynamic frequency response of structural systems is developed using the adjoint variable and direct differentiation methods. A variational approach with a non-selfadjoint operator for complex variable is used to retain the continuum elasticity formulation throughout derivation of design sensitivity results. Sizing design variables such as thickness and cross-sectional area of structural components are considered for the design sensitivity analysis. A numerical implementation method of continuum design sensitivity analysis results is developed using postprocessing analysis data of COSMIC/NASTRAN finite element code to get the design sensitivity information of displacement and stress performance measures of the structures. The numerical method is tested using basic structural component such as a plate supported by shock absorbers and a vehicle chassis frame structure for sizing design variables. Accurate design sensitivity results are obtained even in the vicinity of resonance.

Design Sensitivity Analysis of Frequency Response in Machine Structures

1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yoshimura
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Frequency Response ◽  
Dynamic Characteristics ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Design Sensitivity ◽  
Design Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Sensitivity Coefficients ◽  
Design Variables

Design sensitivity analysis of frequency response is required to improve and optimize dynamic characteristics of machine-tool and other machine structures. This paper presents design sensitivity coefficients of receptance-frequency-response evaluative functions. Design sensitivity analyses of the evaluative functions are conducted with respect to design variables of fundamental structural elements in machines. A numerical example of the design sensitivity coefficients is given using a simplified structural model of a lathe, and the relationships between design variable changes and improvements in evaluative functions are described.

Efficient Sensitivity Analysis for Multibody Dynamics Systems Using an Iterative Steps Method With Application in Topology Optimization

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Dong ◽  
Zheng-Dong Ma ◽  
Gregory Hulbert ◽  
Noboru Kikuchi ◽  
Sudhakar Arepally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Topology Optimization ◽  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Finite Difference Methods ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Topology Optimization Problem ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis Method ◽  
Rotational Motions

Efficient and reliable sensitivity analyses are critical for topology optimization, especially for multibody dynamics systems, because of the large number of design variables and the complexities and expense in solving the state equations. This research addresses a general and efficient sensitivity analysis method for topology optimization with design objectives associated with time dependent dynamics responses of multibody dynamics systems that include nonlinear geometric effects associated with large translational and rotational motions. An iterative sensitivity analysis relation is proposed, based on typical finite difference methods for the differential algebraic equations (DAEs). These iterative equations can be simplified for specific cases to obtain more efficient sensitivity analysis methods. Since finite difference methods are general and widely used, the iterative sensitivity analysis is also applicable to various numerical solution approaches. The proposed sensitivity analysis method is demonstrated using a truss structure topology optimization problem with consideration of the dynamic response including large translational and rotational motions. The topology optimization problem of the general truss structure is formulated using the SIMP (Simply Isotropic Material with Penalization) assumption for the design variables associated with each truss member. It is shown that the proposed iterative steps sensitivity analysis method is both reliable and efficient.

Design Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Multidisciplinary Multibody Systems in the MIXEDMODELS Platform

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa A. Vaze ◽  
Prakash Krishnaswami ◽  
James DeVault
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Multibody Systems ◽  
Design Sensitivity ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
The State ◽  
Design Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
State Variables ◽  
Sensitivity Coefficients ◽  
Design Variables

Most state-of-the-art multibody systems are multidisciplinary and encompass a wide range of components from various domains such as electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, etc. The design considerations and design parameters of the system can come from any of these domains or from a combination of these domains. In order to perform analytical design sensitivity analysis on a multidisciplinary system (MDS), we first need a uniform modeling approach for this class of systems to obtain a unified mathematical model of the system. Based on this model, we can derive a unified formulation for design sensitivity analysis. In this paper, we present a modeling and design sensitivity formulation for MDS that has been successfully implemented in the MIXEDMODELS (Multidisciplinary Integrated eXtensible Engine for Driving Metamodeling, Optimization and DEsign of Large-scale Systems) platform. MIXEDMODELS is a unified analysis and design tool for MDS that is based on a procedural, symbolic-numeric architecture. This architecture allows any engineer to add components in his/her domain of expertise to the platform in a modular fashion. The symbolic engine in the MIXEDMODELS platform synthesizes the system governing equations as a unified set of non-linear differential-algebraic equations (DAE’s). These equations can then be differentiated with respect to design to obtain an additional set of DAE’s in the sensitivity coefficients of the system state variables with respect to the system’s design variables. This combined set of DAE’s can be solved numerically to obtain the solution for the state variables and state sensitivity coefficients of the system. Finally, knowing the system performance functions, we can calculate the design sensitivity coefficients of these performance functions by using the values of the state variables and state sensitivity coefficients obtained from the DAE’s. In this work we use the direct differentiation approach for sensitivity analysis, as opposed to the adjoint variable approach, for ease in error control and software implementation. The capabilities and performance of the proposed design sensitivity analysis formulation are demonstrated through a numerical example consisting of an AC rectified DC power supply driving a slider crank mechanism. In this case, the performance functions and design variables come from both electrical and mechanical domains. The results obtained were verified by perturbation analysis, and the method was shown to be very accurate and computationally viable.

scholarly journals Adjoint-based parametric sensitivity analysis for swirling M-flames

2018 ◽  
Vol 859 ◽  
pp. 516-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calum S. Skene ◽  
Peter J. Schmid
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Frequency Response ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Base Flow ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Perturbation Expansions ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Adjoint Solutions

A linear numerical study is conducted to quantify the effect of swirl on the response behaviour of premixed lean flames to general harmonic excitation in the inlet, upstream of combustion. This study considers axisymmetric M-flames and is based on the linearised compressible Navier–Stokes equations augmented by a simple one-step irreversible chemical reaction. Optimal frequency response gains for both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric perturbations are computed via a direct–adjoint methodology and singular value decompositions. The high-dimensional parameter space, containing perturbation and base-flow parameters, is explored by taking advantage of generic sensitivity information gained from the adjoint solutions. This information is then tailored to specific parametric sensitivities by first-order perturbation expansions of the singular triplets about the respective parameters. Valuable flow information, at a negligible computational cost, is gained by simple weighted scalar products between direct and adjoint solutions. We find that for non-swirling flows, a mode with azimuthal wavenumber $m=2$ is the most efficiently driven structure. The structural mechanism underlying the optimal gains is shown to be the Orr mechanism for $m=0$ and a blend of Orr and other mechanisms, such as lift-up, for other azimuthal wavenumbers. Further to this, velocity and pressure perturbations are shown to make up the optimal input and output showing that the thermoacoustic mechanism is crucial in large energy amplifications. For $m=0$ these velocity perturbations are mainly longitudinal, but for higher wavenumbers azimuthal velocity fluctuations become prominent, especially in the non-swirling case. Sensitivity analyses are carried out with respect to the Mach number, Reynolds number and swirl number, and the accuracy of parametric gradients of the frequency response curve is assessed. The sensitivity analysis reveals that increases in Reynolds and Mach numbers yield higher gains, through a decrease in temperature diffusion. A rise in mean-flow swirl is shown to diminish the gain, with increased damping for higher azimuthal wavenumbers. This leads to a reordering of the most effectively amplified mode, with the axisymmetric ($m=0$) mode becoming the dominant structure at moderate swirl numbers.

scholarly journals Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis and the role of data based mechanistic modeling in hydrology

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1249-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ratto ◽  
P. C. Young ◽  
R. Romanowicz ◽  
F. Pappenberger ◽  
A. Saltelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Uncertainty Estimation ◽  
Mechanistic Modeling ◽  
Structure Identification ◽  
Catchment Management ◽  
Effective Rainfall ◽  
Combined Approach ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Modelling Methodology

Abstract. In this paper, we discuss a joint approach to calibration and uncertainty estimation for hydrologic systems that combines a top-down, data-based mechanistic (DBM) modelling methodology; and a bottom-up, reductionist modelling methodology. The combined approach is applied to the modelling of the River Hodder catchment in North-West England. The top-down DBM model provides a well identified, statistically sound yet physically meaningful description of the rainfall-flow data, revealing important characteristics of the catchment-scale response, such as the nature of the effective rainfall nonlinearity and the partitioning of the effective rainfall into different flow pathways. These characteristics are defined inductively from the data without prior assumptions about the model structure, other than it is within the generic class of nonlinear differential-delay equations. The bottom-up modelling is developed using the TOPMODEL, whose structure is assumed a priori and is evaluated by global sensitivity analysis (GSA) in order to specify the most sensitive and important parameters. The subsequent exercises in calibration and validation, performed with Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), are carried out in the light of the GSA and DBM analyses. This allows for the pre-calibration of the the priors used for GLUE, in order to eliminate dynamical features of the TOPMODEL that have little effect on the model output and would be rejected at the structure identification phase of the DBM modelling analysis. In this way, the elements of meaningful subjectivity in the GLUE approach, which allow the modeler to interact in the modelling process by constraining the model to have a specific form prior to calibration, are combined with other more objective, data-based benchmarks for the final uncertainty estimation. GSA plays a major role in building a bridge between the hypothetico-deductive (bottom-up) and inductive (top-down) approaches and helps to improve the calibration of mechanistic hydrological models, making their properties more transparent. It also helps to highlight possible mis-specification problems, if these are identified. The results of the exercise show that the two modelling methodologies have good synergy; combining well to produce a complete joint modelling approach that has the kinds of checks-and-balances required in practical data-based modelling of rainfall-flow systems. Such a combined approach also produces models that are suitable for different kinds of application. As such, the DBM model considered in the paper is developed specifically as a vehicle for flow and flood forecasting (although the generality of DBM modelling means that a simulation version of the model could be developed if required); while TOPMODEL, suitably calibrated (and perhaps modified) in the light of the DBM and GSA results, immediately provides a simulation model with a variety of potential applications, in areas such as catchment management and planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document