scholarly journals Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement: A Synthesis on Nutrient Reduction from Agricultural Effluents

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-639
Author(s):  
Tiffany L. Messer ◽  
Trisha L, Moore ◽  
Natalie Nelson ◽  
Laurent Ahiablame ◽  
Eban Z. Bean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Constructed Wetlands ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Treatment Wetland ◽  
Agricultural Applications ◽  
Nutrient Removal Efficiency ◽  
Relative Cover ◽  
Geographic Regions ◽  
Subsurface Treatment

Abstract. Excess nutrients from agricultural settings contribute to surface water and groundwater impairment. Constructed wetlands have been widely used for water quality protection in various agricultural systems. We used a synthesis approach to document the performance of constructed wetlands for nutrient removal from a range of landscapes and geographic regions with the following objectives: (1) review the current use of constructed wetlands in agricultural applications, (2) summarize the nutrient removal efficiency of constructed wetlands, and (3) identify the geographic usage and costs associated with constructed wetlands. We reviewed over 130 publications and reports to characterize nutrient removal performance for the following types of agricultural effluents: cropland surface and subsurface drainage, and wastewater from livestock production, greenhouse, aquaculture, and hydroponic systems. Data from the reviewed studies indicate that constructed wetlands are efficient in protecting water quality in agricultural production settings. However, differences in constructed wetland characteristics reported by the studies suggest that standards are needed to ensure nutrient removal goals are met based on wetland design. Researchers should consider including basic performance parameters for constructed wetlands in published reports, including influent and effluent concentrations, hydraulic retention time, hydraulic loading rate, watershed to treatment wetland ratios, and plant species and relative cover. Future studies are needed to explore cost-benefit analyses to assess the feasibility and potential promotion of wetland incentive programs in various geographic regions and watershed nonpoint-source pollution goals for using these systems in agricultural settings. Keywords: Agricultural wastewater, Agricultural water quality, Aquaculture, Cropland runoff, Greenhouse, Hydroponic, Livestock, Review, Subsurface, Treatment wetland.

Nutrient removal efficiency and resource economics of vertical flow and horizontal flow constructed wetlands

2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Luederitz ◽  
Elke Eckert ◽  
Martina Lange-Weber ◽  
Andreas Lange ◽  
Richard M Gersberg
Keyword(s):  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Constructed Wetlands ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Resource Economics ◽  
Horizontal Flow ◽  
Vertical Flow ◽  
Nutrient Removal Efficiency

scholarly journals Seasonal Variability of Water Quality and Nutrient Removal Efficiency of a Restored Wetland

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-61
Author(s):  
Kunan Vesselly ◽  
Alfonse Opio ◽  
Majaliwa Mwanjalolo ◽  
Frank Kansiime
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Seasonal Variability ◽  
Restored Wetland ◽  
Nutrient Removal Efficiency

scholarly journals Effect of Temperature on Nutrient Removal Efficiency of Water Hyacinth for Phytoremediation Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.35) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Harizah Haris ◽  
Chow Ming Fai ◽  
Ainun Shakirah binti Bahruddin ◽  
Akhilash Aravind A/L Dinesh
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Water Temperature ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Water Hyacinth ◽  
Total Dissolve Solid ◽  
Effect Of Temperature ◽  
Water Tank ◽  
Nutrient Removal Efficiency ◽  
Control Tank

Wetlands have been introduced as natural based devices for treating the stormwater runoff.  Temperature plays an important role in the nutrient removal process of wetland plants. Thus, the effect of temperature on nutrient removal efficiency of the water hyacinth plant was evaluated in this study. Water quality of both tanks that containing water hyacinth plants and control tank were monitored continuously for 2 weeks. The collected water samples were examined for total phosphorous (TP), turbidity, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, conductivity (Cond.), total dissolve solid (TDS) and water temperature. The results showed that there are changes in the water quality concentration although there is no water hyacinth in the control tank. The release of phosphorus from the organic matter and particle in the control tank is suggested that occurred during the high temperature period. The optimum removal of nutrient occurred during the water temperature at 30℃. This clearly showed the effect of temperature on the flux of phosphorus in the water tank.

What's it Worth? Improving Surface Water Quality

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Newsome ◽  
C. D. Stephen
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Surface Water Quality ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
The Cost

Many countries are investing in measures to improve surface water quality, but the investment programmes for so doing are increasingly becoming subject to cost-benefit analysis. Whilst the cost of control measures can usually be determined for individual improvement schemes, there are currently no established procedures for valuing the benefits attributable to improved surface water quality. The paper describes a methodology that has been derived that now makes this possible.

Nutrient Removal Using BauxsolTM for Treated Wastewater Reuse

2011 ◽  
Vol 695 ◽  
pp. 626-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Soo Mun ◽  
Sang Ho Lee ◽  
Jung Hun Lee ◽  
Jeong Yul Suh ◽  
Ree Ho Kim
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Heavy Metal ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Red Mud ◽  
Water Reuse ◽  
Metal Removal ◽  
Heavy Metal Removal ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plant ◽  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
Treated Wastewater Reuse

Urban areas consume huge amounts of water and produce much wastewater, which deteriorate the aquatic environment and exhaust the country’s freshwater resources. Water reuse from sewage and wastewater is recognized as a good option for securing water. There are several kinds of processes for improving the water quality. Nutrient removal is very important for water reuse, especially in water supply for outdoor use, to prevent water quality deterioration via eutrophication. Moreover, low cost and easy maintenance should be considered for nutrient removal. In this study, red mud and BauxsolTM, a mixed mineral powder made of physicochemically modified red mud residue generated by the Bayer process for alumina refineries, was used for the removal of nitrate and heavy metals in artificial solution, and of phosphate in final effluent, from a sewage treatment plant in Dae-gu, Republic of Korea. Nitrate removal by red mud showed little efficiency while heavy metal removal showed high efficiency. The concentrations of the total phosphate in the effluent and treated water were 1.51 and 0.14 mg/L, respectively, which represent about 90.7% removal. Before and after the treatment, the pH was maintained at a neutral range of 6.5-7.2. BauxsolTM also showed a high heavy metal removal capacity. Therefore, BauxsolTM in powder and pellet form can be applied individually or mixed with soil to improve water quality for water reuse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document