scholarly journals Participatory budgeting for research funding decisions

Author(s):  
Cobi Calyx

This paper argues that funding decisions about scientific research should be made using participatory budgeting public engagement methods, to support publicly-funded research translation into evidence-based policymaking, given evident public support. This would reflect international shifts toward public participation in governance and respond to the need for changes in research funding policies, evidenced in studies showing how research funding allocations are inefficient or inequitable. Involving consumers in decision making is an established practice in health research, while experiments involving the public in prioritising between research proposals have promising results. Furthering such methods and moving towards participatory budgeting for research funding would further the shift towards participatory governance and public engagement with science. However, for participatory budgeting to support evidence-based policy by evidencing public support, who is participating is an important consideration. Upstream research does not yet have clear consumers for applying stakeholder participation methods established in health research. Moreover, civic engagement differs from consumer engagement in promoting democratic ideals. Legitimacy for public funding and policy decisions depends on a diversity of public participants in decision-making processes, reflecting broader society rather than a consumer group.<br /><br />Key messages<br /><ul><li>participatory budgeting public engagement methods could be used for science funding decisions</li><br /><li>participatory budgeting could address the need for changes in research funding policies</li><br /><li>participatory budgeting for public research funding would further the shift towards participatory governance and public engagement with science</li></ul>

Author(s):  
Mhairi Aitken ◽  
Gareth McAteer ◽  
Sara Davidson ◽  
Clive Frostick ◽  
Sarah Cunningham-Burley

The potential for data collected in the public and private sector to be linked and used in research has led to increasing interest in public acceptability of data sharing and data linkage. The literature has identified a range of factors that are important for shaping public responses and in particular has noted that public support for research conducted through data linkage or data sharing is contingent on a number of conditions being met. In order to examine the relative importance of these conditions a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted via an online questionnaire among members of Ipsos MORI’s online panel in Scotland. The survey was completed by 1,004 respondents. Overall the two most influential factors shaping respondents’ preferences are: the type of data being linked; and, how profits are managed and shared. The type of data being linked is roughly twice as important as who the researchers are. There were slight differences across age groups and between genders and slight differences when comparing respondents with and without long term health conditions. The most notable differences between respondents were found when comparing respondents according to employment and working sector. This study provides much needed evidence regarding the relative importance of various conditions which may be essential for securing and sustaining public support for data-linkage in health research. This may be useful for indicating which factors to focus on in future public engagement and has important implications for the design and delivery of research and public engagement activities. The continuously evolving nature of the field means it will be necessary to revisit the key conditions for public support on an ongoing basis and to examine the contexts and circumstances in which these might change. .


PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12407
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Wilson ◽  
Elizabeth K. Perkin

The inauguration of President Trump in the United States led to the active restriction of science communication from federal agencies, resulting in the creation of many unofficial “alt” Twitter accounts to maintain communication. Alt accounts had many followers (e.g., 15 accounts had > 100,000) and received a large amount of media attention, making them ideal for better understanding how differences in messaging can affect public engagement with science on microblogging platforms. We analyzed tweets produced by alt and corresponding official agency accounts to compare the two groups and determine if specific features of a tweet made them more likely to be retweeted or liked to help the average scientist potentially reach a broader audience on Twitter. We found adding links, images, hashtags, and mentions, as well as expressing angry and annoying sentiments all increased retweets and likes. Evidence-based terms such as “peer-review” had high retweet rates but linking directly to peer-reviewed publications decreased attention compared to popular science websites. Word choice and attention did not reflect official or alt account types, indicating topic is more important than source. The number of tweets generated and attention received by alt accounts has decreased since their creation, demonstrating the importance of timeliness in science communication on social media. Together our results show potential pathways for scientists to increase efficacy in Twitter communications.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Tariqa A Ackbarali ◽  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Wendy Turell ◽  
Maria Arnone ◽  
Anthony Mato ◽  
...  

Educational Need Advancements in evidence-based treatment strategies with approved BTK inhibitors ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are improving survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These advances create knowledge and practice gaps as new BTK inhibitors are introduced to the treatment landscape for clinicians and patients. Education is needed to ensure that clinicians can apply current evidence and stratify patients appropriately. As new data emerges regarding long-term adverse events and the relevance of high-risk prognostic features in treatment selection; patient and provider education is warranted for effective integration of BTK inhibitors, evidence-based management strategies, patient understanding of the factors affecting treatment, improving patient-provider communication, and active participation in care decisions. Educational Initiative To meet educational needs, an educational initiative was conducted in August 2020 for HCP and patient/caregiver audiences. Both HCP and patient/caregiver programs feature live-virtual programming with interactive faculty panels, live audience polling, pre-education question submission and live Q&A. All education will remain on-demand for 12 months. HCP Elements The live-virtual CME program targets hematologic oncologists, hematologists, oncology advanced practice providers, oncology nurses, and other clinicians who manage patients with CLL. Faculty include two hematologists/oncologists with expertise in the management of patients with CLL. As a companion resource to the live CME program, expert clinical perspective was provided in the form of a patient decision library featuring four 15-minute cases from real patients, presented with interview vignettes and a focus on alignment with treatment recommendations. Patient/Caregiver Elements The live-virtual patient and caregiver directed program features a three-person panel, including one hematologist/oncologist, one hematology/oncology nurse practitioner, and one CLL patient. The initiative was conducted in partnership with the CLL Society. The full program will be featured online and will be additionally distributed in smaller chapters on social media, including Facebook and YouTube. Patients will also be invited to engage in the patient decision library to hear the stories of the four patients and the expert commentary on treatment decision-making. Methods and Anticipated Results Educational impact evaluation data will be collected through a series of surveys administered to learners prior to and following the educational programs. For the HCP program, questions will be designed to evaluate the effects of learner participation on change in knowledge, competence, and clinical practice behavior parameters. For the patient/caregiver program, questions will be designed to evaluate the effects of participation on change in knowledge, empowerment, and health-related behaviors. Impact, engagement, and attendance data to date will be reported. Some engagement statistics include total learners, target audience learners, average time in session, total in-session polling responses, question count, and total slide downloads. Impact data will be specifically gathered through an activity pretest, posttest (immediately following activity), and a 2-month follow-up posttest. The 2-month follow-up posttest has a strong focus on behavioral impact of the education and will be composed of open- and closed-ended questions. Open-ended qualitative responses will be grouped by theme. McNemar testing will be conducted on responses to knowledge and competence questions that are repeated at 3 timepoints (pre/post/follow-up) to assess statistical significance; effect size (Cohen's D) will also be reported for these questions. Disclosures Davids: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Surface Oncology: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Zentalis: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy. Mato:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Koffman:Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; Miragen Therapeutics Inc: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Astra Zeneca: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Iovance Biotherapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Synairgen Plc: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Oncternal Therapeutics Inc: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BeiGene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; TG Therapeutics: Speakers Bureau; Humanigen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol-Myers Squib: Speakers Bureau; MEI Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Verastem Oncology: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Brian Haynes

Expert and informed decision making is an essential process in all of health care. Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) purports to support and enhance this process by the timely infusion of high-quality, pertinent evidence from health research, tailored as closely as possible to the individual and their health problem. Doing so is not an easy task for many reasons, beginning with imperfections and incompleteness in the evidence and ending with the complexities of the dual decision making required by individuals and their care providers. EBM needs a lot of help supporting decision-making processes and welcomes further interdisciplinary collaboration. The “conformist principle,” “best practice regimens,” and “transductive models” should not be considered as barriers to such collaboration: These are not part of EBM. Rather, EBM has always seen evidence from health research as but one of many inputs to decision making by providers and patients. An overarching problem for collaboration to address is understanding the decision-making process well enough to develop effective means to bolster it, so that people are consistently offered the current best options for their problems in a way that fits their circumstances and that they can understand and judge.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2587-2587
Author(s):  
Fernanda Gutierrez-Rodrigues ◽  
Carrie Diamond ◽  
Ruba Shalhoub ◽  
André Pinto ◽  
Flávia S Donaires ◽  
...  

Abstract Inherited and acquired bone marrow failure syndromes (BMF) may be difficult to distinguish due to heterogeneity and overlap of clinical phenotypes. Genomic screening has been increasingly used to identify mutations in BMF-related genes that are known to be etiologic in inherited BMF. However, genomic testing is expensive, results may not return for several seeks, and findings can be difficult to interpret as some reported variants are of unclear clinical significance. To guide the decision-making for genetic testing and results interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical and molecular parameters associated with a higher probability of patients having an inherited disease. We screened 323 BMF patients from two independent cohorts for germline mutations in BMF-related genes using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, and correlated the results with patients' prior diagnosis, family history, telomere length (TL), karyotype, and the presence of a paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clones. Patients were followed at the Hematology Branch of NHLBI (NHLBI, n=179) and the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP, n=144). Diagnoses included were severe (SAA) and moderate aplastic anemia (MAA), isolated cytopenias, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), hypocellular MDS (HypoMDS), dyskeratosis congenita (DC), and Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA). Patients were classified as suspected to have inherited BMF (phenotype suggestive for constitutional disease, short or very short telomeres, family history of hematologic, pulmonary, or liver disease, and idiopathic cytopenias), or acquired BMF (normal TL and no signs of constitutional disease) (Figure 1A). Pathogenicity of novel and rare variants was assessed using the ACMG criteria. We identified a pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) germline variant in 21 (18%) and 44 (47%) inherited BMF patients from NHLBI and USP cohorts, respectively (Figure 1B). Altogether, mutated genes were associated with telomeropathies (mostly DC and MAA), congenital cytopenias, DBA, cryptic Fanconi anemia, and myeloid malignancies (Figure 1C). In both cohorts, inherited BMF patients with DC, DBA, MAA, and isolated cytopenias were more likely to have a pathogenic variant. BMF patients suspected to have an acquired disease were rarely found with a pathogenic variant; one patient from each cohort (NHLBI, 1.5% and USP, 2%), carried the R166A RUNX1 and A202T TERT variants, respectively. Overall, patients with SAA were highly unlikely to have a pathogenic variant, regardless of the clinical suspicion for constitutional disease (Figure 1B). The presence of PNH clone and chromosomal abnormalities were poorly associated with variants' pathogenicity; only one patient from the USP cohort had a PNH clone of 6% and the pathogenic TERT D718E variant, and three patients had an abnormal karyotype (indicated by asterisks in Figure 3C). In both cohorts, we additionally screened 101 acquired BMF and 140 inherited BMF patients for somatic clones in myeloid-driver genes. These results recapitulated the clonal landscape previously observed in AA by our group; the frequency of variants in ASXL1, DNMT3A, TET2, and JAK2, but not in BCOR and BCORL1, increased with aging. In the current study, TP53, RUNX1, and Ras genes were more frequently mutated in the patients suspected to have inherited BMF (Fisher's exact test, 14% vs. 4.4%; p<0.005) whereas BCOR and BCORL1 were more commonly abnormal in patients suspected to have acquired BMF (18% vs. 3.1%; p<0.005). Somatic mutations were particularly present in 5/21 DC patients (23%, median age, 11 years) but not in DBA (1 out of 11; median age, 3) and isolated cytopenias (median age, 6). In summary, inherited BMF patients were more likely to have a pathogenic variant compared to acquired BMF (18% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001). Inherited BMF patients with MAA and isolated cytopenias without PNH clones and a normal karyotype had increased risk of having constitutional disease. Systematic analysis of clinical and genomic data may be helpful to assist physicians in identifying patients who should be first screened for inherited BMF based on the probability of finding a pathogenic germline variant. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Dunbar: National Institute of Health: Research Funding. Young:CRADA with Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; National Institute of Health: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten A Hecht ◽  
Katherine Stofer ◽  
Martha Monroe ◽  
Geraldine Klarenberg ◽  
Max A Nickerson

Public Engagement with Science (PES) is a popular topic in the science community due to general concerns about public support for science, attitudes toward science, and changes in scientific funding requirements. PES may be especially relevant in conservation disciplines as the public plays an important role in conservation practice. Herpetofauna specifically stand to benefit, as PES activities can help improve attitudes and conservation behavior of participants toward uncharismatic species. We assessed the current scope of herpetologists' PES activities and investigated factors associated with their participation in PES. We used a closed-ended question survey distributed via the listservs of four American herpetological organizations. Herpetologists' intentions to engage at least 10 hours in the next 12 months significantly differed between herpetologists with high and low conservation research focuses, but hours of engagement in the past 12 months was not significantly different among these groups. Despite most responding herpetologists having limited formal training, time, resources, and institutional support, many participated in a variety of PES activities, often utilizing partnerships and their own resources. Sampled herpetologists rarely evaluated their PES activities or considered publishing about their engagement activities. Some respondents expressed unease with the idea of message framing. Respondents were interested in evaluation training and providing accessible opportunities, and grant funds were the most likely interventions to increase herpetologists' participation in PES. These results provide reference data and insight into the public engagement practices and needs of practicing herpetologists and conservation scientists.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-102
Author(s):  
Christopher R Burton ◽  
Lynne Williams ◽  
Tracey Bucknall ◽  
Denise Fisher ◽  
Beth Hall ◽  
...  

Background Health-care systems across the globe are facing increased pressures to balance the efficient use of resources and at the same time provide high-quality care. There is greater requirement for services to be evidence based, but practices that are of limited clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness still occur. Objectives Our objectives included completing a concept analysis of de-implementation, surfacing decision-making processes associated with de-implementing through stakeholder engagement, and generating an evidence-based realist programme theory of ‘what works’ in de-implementation. Design A realist synthesis was conducted using an iterative stakeholder-driven four-stage approach. Phase 1 involved scoping the literature and conducting stakeholder interviews to develop the concept analysis and an initial programme theory. In Phase 2, systematic searches of the evidence were conducted to test and develop this theory, expressed in the form of contingent relationships. These are expressed as context–mechanism–outcomes to show how particular contexts or conditions trigger mechanisms to generate outcomes. Phase 3 consisted of validation and refinement of programme theories through stakeholder interviews. The final phase (i.e. Phase 4) formulated actionable recommendations for service leaders. Participants In total, 31 stakeholders (i.e. user/patient representatives, clinical managers, commissioners) took part in focus groups and telephone interviews. Data sources Using keywords identified during the scoping work and concept analysis, searches of bibliographic databases were conducted in May 2018. The databases searched were the Cochrane Library, Campbell Collaboration, MEDLINE (via EBSCOhost), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via EBSCOhost), the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library and the following databases via the ProQuest platform: Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Social Sciences Database and Sociological Abstracts. Alerts were set up for the MEDLINE database from May 2018 to December 2018. Online sources were searched for grey literature and snowballing techniques were used to identify clusters of evidence. Results The concept analysis showed that de-implementation is associated with five main components in context and over time: (1) what is being de-implemented, (2) the issues driving de-implementation, (3) the action characterising de-implementation, (4) the extent that de-implementation is planned or opportunistic and (5) the consequences of de-implementation. Forty-two papers were synthesised to identify six context–mechanism–outcome configurations, which focused on issues ranging from individual behaviours to organisational procedures. Current systems can perpetuate habitual decision-making practices that include low-value treatments. Electronic health records can be designed to hide or remove low-value treatments from choice options, foregrounding best evidence. Professionals can be made aware of their decision-making strategies through increasing their attention to low-value practice behaviours. Uncertainty about diagnosis or patients’ expectations for certain treatments provide opportunities for ‘watchful waiting’ as an active strategy to reduce inappropriate investigations and prescribing. The emotional component of clinician–patient relationships can limit opportunities for de-implementation, requiring professional support through multimodal educational interventions. Sufficient alignment between policy, public and professional perspectives is required for de-implementation success. Limitations Some specific clinical issues (e.g. de-prescribing) dominate the de-implementation evidence base, which may limit the transferability of the synthesis findings. Any realist inquiry generates findings that are essentially cumulative and should be developed through further investigation that extends the range of sources into, for example, clinical research and further empirical studies. Conclusions This review contributes to our understanding of how de-implementation of low-value procedures and services can be improved within health-care services, through interventions that make professional decision-making more accountable and the prominence of a whole-system approach to de-implementation. Given the whole-system context of de-implementation, a range of different dissemination strategies will be required to engage with different stakeholders, in different ways, to change practice and policy in a timely manner. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017081030. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Author(s):  
Muhammad A.N. Saqib ◽  
Ibrar Rafique

Background: Health research is very important for formulating evidence-based policies. Aims: To assess the health research funding and its output in the last 5 fiscal years (2013–14 to 2018) in Pakistan. Methods: Information about health research funding was retrieved from 3 major local agencies, the Higher Education Commission, the Pakistan Science Foundation and the Pakistan Health Research Council. Details of funding from international donors were retrieved and the number of publications was estimated from Pubmed and Pakmedinet. Results: A total of 1261.6 million Pakistan rupees (Rs) (US$ 8.4 million) was spent on health research in the last 5 fiscal years, the majority from local donors (P < 0.02). Overall funding increased from Rs 104.7 million in 2013–14 to Rs 349.8 million 2017–18. In publications data, 24 796 original articles were published, including 16 137 Medline and 8659 non-Medline indexed. Overall there was a gradual increase in the number of publications per year, statistically significant for Medline indexed journals. Research funding had a strong correlation (Cronbach α 0.88) with publications. Conclusion: Health research funding directly affects health research output. The funding on health research should be considered an investment rather than expenditure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document