A history of fundraising in the UK

Author(s):  
Beth Breeze

Chapter 1 reviews the historical roots and development of fundraising in the UK, highlighting important milestones and key issues that have emerged over time and that remain contentious today. Noting that asking is as old as giving, the standard origin myth of fundraising - which states that fundraising began in the US in the late 19th/early 20th century - is rejected as a-historical, overly-reliant on a ‘Great men’ explanation, and relevant only for explaining how for-profit consultancy came into being in specific countries. An alternative approach to charting the history of fundraising, focused on purpose and impact rather than people and processes, is illustrated with ten examples of the outcomes of fundraising over the centuries.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby V. Reddy

Big Tech has flourished on the US public markets in recent years with numerous blue-chip IPOs, from Google and Facebook, to new kids on the block such as Snap, Zoom, and Airbnb. A key trend is the burgeoning use of dual-class stock. Dual-class stock enables founders to divest of equity and generate finance for growth through an IPO, without losing the control they desire to pursue their long-term, market-disrupting visions. Bobby Reddy scrutinises the global history of dual-class stock, evaluates the conceptual and empirical evidence on dual-class stock, and assesses the approach of the London Stock Exchange and ongoing UK regulatory reforms to dual-class stock. A policy roadmap is presented that optimally supports the adoption of dual-class stock while still protecting against its potential abuses, which will more effectively attract high-growth, innovative companies to the UK equity markets, boost the economy, and unleash the true potential of 'founders without limits'.


2021 ◽  
pp. 273-307
Author(s):  
Neena Samota

This chapter explores the broader context and history of race-related issues in the UK, considering why racial disparities persist in diverse societies like the US, Australia, Canada, and the UK, before narrowing the focus to race and ethnicity in the sphere of crime and criminal justice. The concepts of ‘race’ and ‘ethnicity’ have long played major roles in both classroom and broader societal discussions about crime, punishment, and justice, but they have arguably never been more present and visible than today. The chapter looks at the problems with the statistics available on race, ethnicity, and crime, noting the ways in which they may not tell the whole story, before considering the statistics themselves as the chapter discusses the relationships between ethnicity and victimisation and offending. It then moves on to how ethnic minorities experience the various elements of the criminal justice system and the disadvantages they often face, before outlining the attempts that have been made to address these disparities at a state level. Finally, the chapter discusses critical race theory, a key theory in modern criminological examinations of race and its relationship to crime and justice, which grew out of the US but has much broader value and relevance as a framework of analysis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Tait ◽  
Belinda Carpenter

AbstractThe long history of suicide as a criminal offence still has a significant contemporary effect on how it is perceived, conceptualised and adjudged. This is particularly the case within countries where suicide is largely determined within a coronial system, such as Australia, the UK and the US. This paper details the outcomes of a study involving semi-structured interviews with coroners both in England and Australia, as well as observations at inquests. It focuses around the widely held contention that the suicide rates produced within these coronial systems are underestimations of anywhere between 15 to 50 per cent. The results of these interviews suggest that there are three main reasons for this systemic underestimation. The first reflects the legacy of suicide as a criminal offence, resulting in the highest standard of proof for findings of suicide in the UK, and a continuing stigma attached to families of the deceased. The second is the considerable pressure brought to bear upon coroners by the family of the deceased, who, because of that stigma, commonly agitate for any finding other than that of suicide. The third involves the rise of ‘therapeutic jurisprudence’, wherein coroners take on the responsibility of the emotional well-being of the grieving families, which in turn affects the likelihood of reaching a finding of suicide. The conclusions drawn by the paper are also twofold: first – with respect to the stigma of suicide – it will take a lot more than simple decriminalisation to change deeply held social perceptions within the community. Second, given that suicide prevention programmes and policies are based on such deeply questionable statistics, targeted changes to coronial legislation and practice would appear to be required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-695
Author(s):  
JONATHAN SIMON

Although maybe not the most fashionable area of study today, French science has a secure place in the classical canon of the history of science. Like the Scientific Revolution and Italian science at the beginning of the seventeenth century, French science, particularly eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century French science, remains a safe, albeit conservative, bet in terms of history-of-science teaching and research. The classic trope of the passage of the flame of European science from Italy to Britain and France in the seventeenth and then eighteenth centuries is well established in overviews of the field. Specializing in research in this area is not, therefore, unreasonable as a career choice if you are aiming for a history-of-science position in Europe or even in the US. The Académie (royale) des sciences, with its state-sponsored model of collective research, provides a striking counterpoint to the amateur, more individualistic functioning of London's Royal Society – a foretaste of modernity in the institutionalization of science. Clearly naive, such a representation of French science serves as a good initial framework on which to hang half a century of critical historical research. If proof of the continued interest for eighteenth-century French science is needed, we can cite the Web-based project around Diderot and d'Alembert's Encyclopédie currently in progress under the auspices of the French Academy of Sciences. The large number of publications in the history of French science (in English as well as French) make it unreasonable to pick out one or two for special attention here. But what about history of science in France and the academic community that practises this discipline today? Here, I offer a very personal view and analysis of this community, trying to underline contrasts with the history of science in the UK and the US.


2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Blundell ◽  
Antoine Bozio ◽  
Guy Laroque

In this paper we propose a systematic way of examining the importance of the extensive and the intensive margins of labor supply in order to explain the overall movements in total hours of work over time. We show how informative bounds can be developed on each of these margins. We apply this analysis to the evolution of hours of work in the US, the UK, and France and show that both the extensive and intensive margins matter in explaining changes in total hours.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-117
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kella

Abstract Family and kinship carry special significance to Holocaust survivors and their descendants. In autobiographies and family memoirs, writers of what Marianne Hirsch terms the postmemory generation employ different narrative strategies for coming to terms with the ways in which the Holocaust has marked their identities and family ties. This article focuses on women’s writing of the postmemory generation, examining three works in English by daughters of survivors in the UK, the US, and Canada, written during the 1990s. It investigates the narrative strategies used by Anne Karpf, Helen Fremont, and Lisa Appignanesi to represent maternal sexual agency and vulnerability in a survival context. It suggests that these representations are strongly influenced by matrophobia and matrophilia, defined as the conflicting dread of becoming and desire to be one’s mother, which are themselves strongly conditioned by Holocaust history, particularly the gendered history of vulnerability among women in open hiding during the war1.


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Graham Taylor

In UK scholarly publishing, we have a world-class industry led by famous flagship journals generating over £1bn in turnover, 80% from exports. We comprise a few significant commercial players, a few university presses and a large group of not-for-profit society publishers, often working under contract with the commercials. The UK is a world hub for this activity, alongside the US, The Netherlands and Germany, part of a global industry publishing over 1.5 million peer-reviewed articles per year in over 20 000 journals. But many challenges lie on the road ahead.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5831-5831
Author(s):  
Keri Keri Yang ◽  
Eleanor Lucas ◽  
Beth Lesher ◽  
Tony Caver ◽  
Boxiong Tang

Introduction: MCL is a rare, aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with a poor prognosis. A comprehensive understanding of the global epidemiology and economic and humanistic burden of MCL is needed to quantify the burden of disease in patients with MCL. Objective/Methods: To examine the burden of MCL, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify publications between the years 2010 to 2019 reporting on the epidemiology (incidence, prevalence, mortality, survival), economic (direct [e.g., drug costs] and indirect [e.g., lost productivity, missed days of work] costs and healthcare resource utilization [HRU; e.g., hospitalization, length of stay, emergency room use, outpatient visits]) and humanistic (e.g., quality of life [QOL], patient-reported outcome measures) burden of patients with MCL. Embase and Medline were searched via ProQuest and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Library. Results: A total of 2206 publications were identified, 177 full-text references screened, and 12 studies reporting epidemiology outcomes in MCL identified. Epidemiology data (1995-2016) were identified for the US (n = 5), UK (n = 2), Belgium (n = 1), France (n = 1), Netherlands (n = 1), Sweden/Denmark (n = 1), and Taiwan (n = 1). Incidence (n = 9) was lower in Taiwan (0.12 persons per 100,000) than in the US (0.8-1.15) and Europe (0.7-1.27). Six studies reported incidence over multiple time periods with 4 studies showing an increase in total incidence or incidence in men over time and 2 studies showing no change or a decrease in incidence in women over time. MCL prevalence was 3.0 per 100,000 persons in the UK (year 2011) and 3.6 per 100,000 persons in Belgium (year 2013). Mortality, reported in 1 US study, showed a consistent decrease from 1995-2013. Three-year all-cause mortality was 38% and MCL-related mortality 30%; 5-year all-cause mortality was 51% and MCL-related mortality 38%. Median overall survival (OS, n = 5) ranged from 28.8 (years 2004-2017; Europe) to 52.0 (years 1999-2013; US) months. Three-year OS (n = 2) was reported as 43.9% in the UK (2004-2017) and 61.0% in Sweden/Denmark (2006-2011). Increasing trends in survival over time were reported in 3 studies (US, Danish/Swedish, Netherlands; n = 1 each); increases in survival in the Netherlands were greatest in younger (age < 65 years) vs older patients (age ≥ 65 years). Twelve studies reported on the economic burden of MCL (Table). An increase in all costs and HRU, including outpatient encounters, emergency room visits, and days spent in the hospital, were found following vs pre MCL diagnosis. Length of hospital stays ranged from 3.0 to 8.3 days. All cause mean monthly costs for MCL patients were $5131 to $16,117 per patient month (PPM). Treatment cost varied with costs generally higher with chemoimmunotherapy and lower with targeted therapies. Adverse events (AEs) were associated with increased economic burden. Mean all-cause costs in patients with no AEs were $5131 PPM compared with $13,560 PPM in patients with ≥6 AEs. Patients experiencing 3-4 AEs during first-line therapy were almost 7-times more likely to require an inpatient admission than those experiencing only 1-2 AEs (OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 4.0-11.93). Patients with ≥6 AEs had inpatient stays lasting 2.2 days longer than those with no AEs. Common AE costs ranged from $5751 (atrial fibrillation) to $19,645 (hepatotoxicity). No studies reporting on indirect costs or the QOL impact of MCL or MCL treatment were identified. Conclusions: The increasing incidence and survival of patients with MCL along with the high costs of disease and treatment suggest an increasing economic burden. Though limited data are available on costs and HRU in populations with MCL and outcomes reported differed across studies, available data shows variability of costs among treatments influenced by AE costs. Some evidence suggests lower costs of therapy with targeted compared with chemoimmunotherapy regimens. The economic burden of MCL and MCL treatment on costs, beyond direct medical costs, needs to be quantified. Furthermore, the humanistic burden of MCL and impact on patient QOL warrants investigation. Additional epidemiology data are needed globally for MCL as well as the need for economic analyses that reflect the real-world treatment of patients with MCL. Disclosures Yang: BeiGene, Ltd.: Employment. Lucas:Pharmerit: Employment. Lesher:Pharmerit: Employment. Caver:BeiGene, Ltd.: Employment. Tang:BeiGene, Ltd.: Employment.


Author(s):  
Eiji Hotori ◽  
Mikael Wendschlag ◽  
Thibaud Giddey

AbstractThis chapter introduces the concept and a definition of the “formalization” of banking supervision that is examined in this book and outlines the aim and scope of the book. In addition to providing the reader with an overview of the history of banking supervision in eight developed countries (the US, Japan, Sweden, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, France, and the UK), the book presents information regarding the formalization process itself. That process is assessed based on three criteria—bank regulation, supervisory authority, and supervisory activity. This approach is intended to provide more detail than a simple assessment based on banking acts that is common in financial regulation research. The aim of the analysis undertaken in this book is to identify why the history of banking supervision in various countries shares many similarities and yet also displays many differences. In Sect. 1.5, we provide an overview of the historiography of the formalization of banking supervision with a special emphasis on comparative and internationally oriented literature, while the growing body of literature on each of the national cases is discussed in subsequent chapters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document