Update on the Pharmacotherapy of Obesity

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1505-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cerulli ◽  
Ben M Lomaestro ◽  
Margaret Malone
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Regulate Food Intake

Objective: To review recent developments in the pharmacotherapy of obesity, including the agents currently approved for use in the management of obesity and those under development. Data Sources: A MEDLINE search from January 1990 to July 1997 was conducted to identify English literature available on the pharmacotherapy of obesity. The search was supplemented by a review of the bibliographies of identified literature. Study Selection: All controlled and uncontrolled trials were reviewed. When available, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were used preferentially. Data Extraction: Agents were reviewed with regard to mechanism of action, clinical trial data regarding efficacy, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and contraindications where information was available. Study design, selected population, results, and adverse effect information were included. Data Synthesis: The anorexiants currently available or under development for the management of obesity regulate food intake and satiety via the adrenergic and/or serotonergic pathways. Clinical trials have shown a 10–15% weight loss can typically be anticipated; however, little long-term safety and efficacy data are available. Adverse events tend to be mild and self-limiting, but serious adverse events can occur. Treatment options under development include thermogenic agents, digestive inhibitors, and analogs and antagonists of hormones that regulate food intake and satiety. Conclusions: Several mechanisms to control weight are currently under investigation for the management of obesity. Since obesity is a chronic condition, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents and the role of combination therapy using different modalities.

Update on the Pharmacotherapy of Obesity

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cerulli ◽  
Ben M Lomaestro ◽  
Margaret Malone
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Maladie Chronique ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Regulate Food Intake

OBJECTIVE To review recent developments in the pharmacotherapy of obesity, including the agents currently approved for use in the management of obesity and those under development. DATA SOURCES A MEDLINE search from January 1990 to July 1997 was conducted to identify English literature available on the pharmacotherapy of obesity. The search was supplemented by a review of the bibliographies of identified literature. STUDY SELECTION All controlled and uncontrolled trials were reviewed. When available, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were used preferentially. DATA EXTRACTION Agents were reviewed with regard to mechanism of action, clinical trial data regarding efficacy, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and contraindications where information was available. Study design, selected population, results, and adverse effect information were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: The anorexiants currently available or under development for the management of obesity regulate food intake and satiety via the adrenergic and/or serotonergic pathways. Clinical trials have shown a 10–15% weight loss can typically be anticipated; however, little long-term safety and efficacy data are available. Adverse events tend to be mild and self-limiting, but serious adverse events can occur. Treatment options under development include thermogenic agents, digestive inhibitors, and analogs and antagonists of hormones that regulate food intake and satiety. CONCLUSIONS Several mechanisms to control weight are currently under investigation for the management of obesity. Since obesity is a chronic condition, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents and the role of combination therapy using different modalities. OBJETIVO Revisar los recientes avances farmacológicos en el tratamiento de la obesidad, incluyendo aquellos medicamentos actualmente aprobados para este uso y otros que todavía se encuentran en desarrollo. FUENTES DE INFORMACION Se realizó una búsqueda computarizada de MEDLINE para determinar artículos publicados en la literatura inglesa entre enero de 1990 a julio de 1997. Además, se utilizarón las referencias citadas en los artículos identificados en la búsqueda. SELECCION DE ESTUDIOS Estudios clínicos de tipo controlados y no-controlados fueron incluidos en el análisis. Se le dió preferencia a aquellos estudios clínicos que eran de diseño doble ciego, controlados, y que usaron un grupo control de placebo. EXTRACCIÓN DE DATOS Los medicamentos fueron evaluados de acuerdo al mecanismo de acción farmacológica, la información ciéntifica relacionada con su eficacia, efectos secundarios, farmacocinética, interacciones de medicamentos, y contraindicaciones de uso. El disefio ciéntifico utilizado en los estudios clínicos, el grupo de pacientes incluido en los estudios, los resultados obtenidos, y los efectos adversos fueron además incluidos en el análisis. SINTESIS Los medicamentos anoréxicos actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de la obesidad regulan la cantidad de alimentos ingeridos y la sensación de saciedad através de los mecanismos adrenérgicos y de serotonina. Los estudios clínicos disponibles han demostrado que usualmente se puede esperar de un 10–15% de perdida de peso con el uso de estos medicamentos. Sin embargo, no existe mucha información relacionada al uso seguro y la eficacia de estos medicamentos a largo plazo. Los efectos adversos observados con estos medicamentos tienden a ser leves y de corta duración, pero efectos adversos severos pueden ocurrir. Otras opciones de tratamiento incluyen medicamentos termogénicos, inhibidores digestivos, y análogos y antagonistas de diferentes hormonas que regulan la ingestión de alimentos y la sensación de saciedad. CONCLUSIONES Actualmente, algunos de los mecanismos relacionados con el control de peso están siendo investigados para poder determinar futuros tratamientos de la obesidad. Debido a que la obesidad es un problema crónico, se tienen que realizar estudios clínicos adicionales disefiados para evaluar la eficacia y el uso seguro de estos medicamentos a largo plazo. Además, el uso de estos medicamentos en combinación tiene que ser evaluado. OBJECTIF Réviser les développements dans la pharmacothérapie de l'obésité ainsi que les médicaments actuellement utilisés et ceux qui sont en développement. REVUE DE LITTÉRATURE Une recherche sur MEDLINE a été entreprise pour identifier les publications en langue anglaise concernant le traitement de l'obésité et publiées entre janvier 1990 à juillet 1997. Les bibliographies des références pertinentes ont aussi été scrutées. SÉLECTION DES ÉTUDES Toutes les études, contrôlées ou non, ont été révisées. Cependant, les études à double insu ou contrôlées par placebo ont été préférées. EXTRACTION DE L'INFORMATION: Chaque médicament a été révisé pour le mécanisme d'action, les données d'efficacité clinique, les réactions indésirables, la pharmacocinétique, les interactions médicamenteuses, et les contre-indications. Le devis des études, la population à l'étude, les résultats, et les réactions indésirables sont présentes. RÉSUMÉ Les anorexigènes disponibles sur le marché contrôlent l'apport alimentaire et la satiété par une action sur les voies adrénergiques et sérotoninergiques. Les études cliniques ont démontré qu'une perte de poids de 10–15% est un objectif réaliste. Cependant, peu d'études d'efficacité et de sécurité à long terme sont disponibles. Les réactions indésirables sont généralement mineures et se résolvent spontanément. Cependant, des réactions sévères peuvent aussi survenir. De nouvelles avenues thérapeutiques sont en développement. Elles comportent des agents thermogéniques, des inhibiteurs de la digestion, des analogues et antagonistes hormonaux qui régissent l'apport alimentaire et la satiété. CONCLUSIONS Plusieurs stratégies de contrôle de l'obésité sont actuellement en investigation. Puisque l'obésité est une maladie chronique, des études devraient être réalisées pour évaluer l'efficacité et la sécurité des médicaments ainsi que le rôle des thérapies combinées.

Treatment Options for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Celecoxib, Leflunomide, Etanercept, and Infliximab

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte T Luong ◽  
Barbara S Chong ◽  
Dionne M Lowder
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs ◽  
Antiinflammatory Drugs ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Pertinent Data

OBJECTIVE: To review new pharmacologic agents approved for use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966–January 2000) was conducted to identify English-language literature available on the pharmacotherapy of RA, focusing on celecoxib, leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab. These articles, relevant abstracts, and data provided by the manufacturers were used to collect pertinent data. STUDY SELECTION: All controlled and uncontrolled trials were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Agents were reviewed with regard to mechanism of action, efficacy, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, dosing, precautions/contraindications, adverse effects, and cost. DATA SYNTHESIS: Traditional pharmacologic treatments for RA have been limited by toxicity, loss of efficacy, or both. Increasing discoveries into the mechanisms of inflammation in RA have led to the development of new agents in hopes of addressing these limitations. With the development of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, the potential exists to minimize the gastrotoxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Leflunomide has been shown to be equal to or less efficacious than methotrexate, and may be beneficial as a second-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The biologic response modifiers, etanercept and infliximab, are alternatives that have shown benefit alone or in combination with methotrexate. However, they should be reserved for patients who fail to respond to DMARD therapy. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents as well as their role in combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib, leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab are the newest agents approved for RA. Clinical trials have shown that these agents are beneficial in the treatment of RA; however, long-term safety and efficacy data are lacking.

scholarly journals Longterm Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Monotherapy: Results from the 2-year Open-label Extension of the MUSASHI Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 799-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ogata ◽  
Koichi Amano ◽  
Hiroaki Dobashi ◽  
Masayuki Inoo ◽  
Tomonori Ishii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Open Label Extension

Objective.To evaluate the longterm safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Of 346 patients who received 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with either TCZ-SC monotherapy, 162 mg every 2 weeks (q2w); or intravenous TCZ (TCZ-IV) monotherapy, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks; 319 patients continued to receive TCZ-SC q2w in the 84-week open-label extension (OLE) of the MUSASHI study (JAPICCTI-101117). Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were evaluated for all patients treated with TCZ during 108 weeks.Results.The proportions of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses, low disease activity [28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) ≤ 3.2], or remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at Week 24 were maintained until Week 108. The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were 498.3 and 16.9 per 100 patient-years (PY), respectively. The overall safety of TCZ-SC monotherapy was similar to that of TCZ-IV monotherapy. Rates of injection site reactions (ISR) through 108 weeks remained similar to rates through 24 weeks. ISR were mild and did not cause any patient withdrawals. No serious hypersensitivity events (including anaphylactic reactions) occurred. Anti-TCZ antibodies were present in 2.1% of patients treated with TCZ-SC monotherapy.Conclusion.TCZ-SC monotherapy maintained a favorable safety profile and consistent efficacy throughout the 108-week study. Like TCZ-IV, TCZ-SC could provide an additional treatment option for patients with RA.

Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
M C Genovese ◽  
M Schiff ◽  
M Luggen ◽  
J-C Becker ◽  
R Aranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Sleep Problems ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Sf 36

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept during 2 years of the ATTAIN (Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-TNF INadequate responders) trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Methods:Patients completing the 6-month, double-blind period were eligible to enter the long-term extension; patients received abatacept ∼10 mg/kg, plus disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Safety and efficacy (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses, DAS28 (C-reactive protein), HAQ-DI, SF-36, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index, fatigue VAS) were assessed through 2 years.Results:317 patients (218 from the abatacept and 99 from the placebo group) entered and 222 (70%) completed 18 months of long-term extension treatment. The incidence and type of adverse events were consistent between the double-blind and cumulative (double-blind plus long-term extension) periods. Rates of serious adverse events were 25.6 and 23.4 per 100 patient-years in the double-blind versus cumulative period. At 6 months and 2 years, using non-responder analyses, ACR responses in abatacept-treated patients were: ACR 20, 59.4% and 56.2%; ACR 50, 23.5% and 33.2%; ACR 70, 11.5% and 16.1%; HAQ-DI responses were 54.4% and 47.9%. At 6 months and 2 years, using post-hoc as-observed analyses, the percentage of patients (95% confidence interval) achieving DAS28 (C-reactive protein) low disease activity score (⩽3.2) and DAS28 (C-reactive protein)-defined remission (<2.6) increased from 18.3% (13.0, 23.5) to 32.0% (24.6, 39.4) and 11.1% (6.8, 15.3) to 20.3% (13.9, 26.6). Clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36, pain, fatigue and sleep problems were also maintained throughout the 2 years of abatacept treatment.Conclusion:No unique safety observations were reported during open-label exposure. Improvements in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, physical function and health-related quality of life observed after 6 months, were maintained throughout the 2 years in this population with difficult-to-treat disease.Trial registration number:NCT00124982.

scholarly journals Pomaglumetad Methionil (LY2140023 Monohydrate) and Aripiprazole in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind Comparison

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Adams ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Brian A. Millen ◽  
Bruce J. Kinon ◽  
Juan-Carlos Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Blind Comparison

We tested the hypothesis that long-term treatment with pomaglumetad methionil would demonstrate significantly less weight gain than aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia. In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study, 678 schizophrenia patients were randomized to either pomaglumetad methionil (n=516) or aripiprazole (n=162). Treatment groups were also compared on efficacy and various safety measures, including serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The pomaglumetad methionil group showed significantly greater weight loss at Week 24 (Visit 12) compared with the aripiprazole group (−2.8 ± 0.4 versus 0.4 ± 0.6;P<0.001). However, change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores for aripiprazole was significantly greater than for pomaglumetad methionil (−15.58 ± 1.58 versus −12.03 ± 0.99;P=0.045). The incidences of SAEs (8.2% versus 3.1%;P=0.032) and discontinuation due to AEs (16.2% versus 8.7%;P=0.020) were significantly higher for pomaglumetad methionil compared with aripiprazole. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of TEAEs, EPS, or suicidal ideation or behavior were noted between treatment groups. In conclusion, long-term treatment with pomaglumetad methionil resulted in significantly less weight gain than aripiprazole. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT01328093.

One-Year Open-Label Safety and Efficacy Study of Paliperidone Extended-Release Tablets in Patients With Schizophrenia

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 506-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Kramer ◽  
George Simpson ◽  
Valentinas Maciulis ◽  
Stuart Kushner ◽  
Yanning Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Stabilization Phase ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Paliperidone Extended Release

ABSTRACTIntroduction: This 52-week open-label extension (OLE) to a double-blind placebo-controlled recurrence prevention study examined the long-term safety and efficacy of flexibly-dosed paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with schizophrenia.Methods: Patients entering the OLE either entered from the double-blind phase (placebo or paliperidone ER treatment) or entered directly from the run-in or stabilization phase (paliperidone ER) of the earlier study. During the OLE, patients were treated with flexibly-dosed paliperidone ER (3–15 mg/day; 9 mg starting dose). Safety and tolerability assessments included incidence of adverse events and extrapyramidal symptoms. Efficacy was also assessed.Results: The study population (n=235) was predominantly men (66%), 18–58 years of age. Twelve patients (5%) experienced an adverse event requiring treatment discontinuation. One or more serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 13 patients (6%). There was one death. The mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score decreased from open-label baseline to endpoint for all groups, regardless of previous double-blind treatment (placebo or paliperidone ER).Conclusion: This year-long OLE provides information on the long-term safety and tolerability of paliperidone ER in patients with schizophrenia. The resulting safety and tolerability profile was similar to that seen in earlier short-term studies.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for active peripheral psoriatic arthritis: an exploratory randomised placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-219511
Author(s):  
Maja Skov Kragsnaes ◽  
Jens Kjeldsen ◽  
Hans Christian Horn ◽  
Heidi Lausten Munk ◽  
Jens Kristian Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Faecal Microbiota ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation

ObjectivesAlthough causality remains to be established, targeting dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota by faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a novel treatment for inflammatory diseases. In this exploratory, proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMT in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsIn this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, superiority trial, we randomly allocated (1:1) adults with active peripheral PsA (≥3 swollen joints) despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate to one gastroscopic-guided FMT or sham transplantation into the duodenum. Safety was monitored throughout the trial. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing treatment failure (ie, needing treatment intensification) through 26 weeks. Key secondary endpoints were change in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response at week 26.ResultsOf 97 screened, 31 (32%) underwent randomisation (15 allocated to FMT) and 30 (97%) completed the 26-week clinical evaluation. No serious adverse events were observed. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in the FMT group than in the sham group (9 (60%) vs 3 (19%); risk ratio, 3.20; 95% CI 1.06 to 9.62; p=0.018). Improvement in HAQ-DI differed between groups (0.07 vs 0.30) by 0.23 points (95% CI 0.02 to 0.44; p=0.031) in favour of sham. There was no difference in the proportion of ACR20 responders between groups (7 of 15 (47%) vs 8 of 16 (50%)).ConclusionsIn this first preliminary, interventional randomised controlled trial of FMT in immune-mediated arthritis, we did not observe any serious adverse events. Overall, FMT appeared to be inferior to sham in treating active peripheral PsA.Trial registration numberNCT03058900.

scholarly journals Long-term safety and efficacy of opicapone in Japanese Parkinson’s patients with motor fluctuations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Takeda ◽  
Ryosuke Takahashi ◽  
Yoshio Tsuboi ◽  
Masahiro Nomoto ◽  
Tetsuya Maeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Motor Fluctuations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Off Time

AbstractThe double-blind part of the COMFORT-PD (COMt-inhibitor Findings from Opicapone Repeated Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease) study in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations found that both opicapone 25 and 50 mg were significantly more effective than placebo. This 52-week open-label extension study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of opicapone 50 mg tablets in patients who completed the double-blind part of the COMFORT-PD study. Safety was monitored via adverse events, laboratory testing, and physical, cardiovascular and neurological examinations. Efficacy was primarily assessed by change in OFF-time. Secondary efficacy measures included: ON-time, percentage of OFF/ON-time responders, other outcomes from the double-blind part. 391/437 patients were transferred to the open-label extension period and included in the safety analysis set (full analysis set, n = 387; open-label completers, n = 316). Adverse events were frequently reported (n = 338, 86.4%), but < 50% were considered drug-related (39.9%) and few were considered serious (2.6%) or led to discontinuation (2.8%). Decreased OFF-time was consistently observed over the open-label period regardless of initial randomization. Change [LSM (SE)] in OFF-time from the open-label baseline to the last visit showed a persistent effect in patients initially randomized to opicapone 25 mg [− 0.37 (0.20) h, P = 0.0689] and opicapone 50 mg [− 0.07 (0.21) h, P = 0.6913] whereas opicapone 50 mg led to a statistically significant reduction in the previous placebo group [− 1.26 (0.19) h, P < 0.05]. Once-daily opicapone 50 mg was generally well tolerated and consistently reduced OFF-time over 52 weeks in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations.Trial registration JapicCTI-153112; date of registration: December 25, 2015.

Tonabersat, a Gap-Junction Modulator: Efficacy and Safety in Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Studies of Acute Migraineceph

Cephalalgia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
SD Silberstein ◽  
J Schoenen ◽  
H Göbel ◽  
HC Diener ◽  
AH Elkind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
North American ◽  
Cortical Spreading Depression ◽  
Spreading Depression ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
International Study ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dose Ranging

Tonabersat is a novel benzopyran derivative that blocks the cortical spreading depression proposed to be associated with migraine attacks. The ability of single oral doses of 15, 25, 40 and 80 mg of tonabersat to relieve the symptoms of moderate to severe migraine was evaluated in 859 migraineurs enrolled in two dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials, one international and the other North American. In the international study, significantly more patients given tonabersat than given placebo experienced relief of headache pain at 2 h (15 mg, 36.8%; 40 mg, 40.7%), the principal efficacy variable, and at 4 h (40 mg, 63.0%) and complete abolition of headache at 4 h (40 mg, 34.3%). None of the primary or secondary efficacy variables indicated significant differences between tonabersat and placebo in the North American study. Tonabersat was generally well tolerated, with dizziness and nausea the most common side-effects. Serious adverse events were uncommon, and no patient withdrew from either study because of adverse events. These results suggest a possible interplay between tonabersat pharmacokinetics (the relatively long time required to reach maximum plasma concentrations) and patient characteristics (previous triptan exposure) in the management of acute migraine attacks. Based on the pharmacokinetics and actions on cortical spreading depression, tonabersat may have potential value in migraine prophylaxis.

Adverse events and blinding in two randomized trials of hyperbaric oxygen for persistent post-concussive symptoms

2019 ◽  
pp. 331-340
Author(s):  
Susan Churchill ◽  
◽  
Kayla Deru ◽  
Lindell K. Weaver ◽  
Steffanie H. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hyperbaric Oxygen ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Sham Control ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
To Receive

Safety monitoring and successful blinding are important features of randomized, blinded clinical trials. We report chamber- and protocol-related adverse events (AEs) for participants enrolled in two randomized, double-blind clinical trials of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) for persistent post-concussive symptoms clinicaltrials.gov identifiers NCT01306968, HOPPS, and NCT01611194, BIMA), as well as the success of maintaining the blind with a low-pressure sham control arm. In both studies, participants were randomized to receive HBO2 (1.5 atmospheres absolute, >99% oxygen) or sham chamber sessions (1.2 atmospheres absolute, room air). In 143 participants undergoing 4,245 chamber sessions, chamber-related adverse events were rare (1.1% in the HOPPS study, 2.2% in the BIMA study). Minor, non-limiting barotrauma was the most frequently reported. Rarely, some participants experienced headache with chamber sessions. No serious adverse events were associated with chamber sessions. An allocation questionnaire completed after intervention revealed that the sham control arm adequately protected the blind in both trials. Participants based allocation assumptions on symptom improvement or lack of symptom improvement and could not discern intervention arm by pressure, smell, taste, or gas flow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document