Promoting the Poor: Catholic Leaders and the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-321
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. McAndrews
Keyword(s):  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act

Patrons of the Poor

1970 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Spicer
Keyword(s):  
Social Structure ◽  
Social System ◽  
The United States ◽  
Political Organization ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
Clear Trend ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Civil Disorder ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act ◽  
Problem Condition

In industrialized societies no less than in feudal landlord societies there are extreme differences in wealth. There has been no clear trend toward leveling the extremes in those Western industrialized societies in which the private sector of the economy has maintained an important controlling role. Extreme poverty is clearly a persistent accompaniment of industrialization in such societies. The current great concern in the United States with this phenomenon, in the sense of its being conceived as a problem condition to be changed, may or may not be indicative that change is incipient. Fundamental change would of course involve new ideological orientations and new social structure - in short, a different kind of social system. Symptoms of such change are perhaps to be seen in the new orientations embodied in the Economic Opportunity Act and in what has been labeled civil disorder. The legislation proposes new forms of social structure for linking people in poverty areas directly with the national political organization. Civil disorder, too, may be symptomatic of new forms of internal social organization stimulated both by the new legislation and by other conditions.

War on Dependency: Liberal Individualism and the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth Davies
Keyword(s):  
National Income ◽  
War On Poverty ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Lyndon Johnson ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act ◽  
Rehabilitative Services ◽  
Liberal Individualism ◽  
Economic Adviser

In 1964 President Lyndon Johnson, professing himself alarmed by the seemingly “endless growth of relief rolls,” declared “war” on poverty. Walter Heller, his chief economic adviser, had recently remarked that it would be quite possible to eliminate the symptoms of poverty by simply redistributing two percent of the national income. Johnson, however, preferred to attack thesourcesof deprivation, claiming that the range of rehabilitative services provided by his Economic Opportunity Act would allow the poor to engineer their own paths to affluence.

scholarly journals How Johnson Fought the War on Poverty: The Economics and Politics of Funding at the Office of Economic Opportunity

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha J. Bailey ◽  
Nicolas J. Duquette
Keyword(s):  
New Deal ◽  
War On Poverty ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
Johnson Administration ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Office Of Economic Opportunity ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act ◽  
Political Variables ◽  
Economics And Politics

This article presents a quantitative analysis of the geographic distribution of spending through the 1964 Economic Opportunity Act (EOA). Using newly assembled state- and county-level data, the results show that the Johnson administration directed funding in ways consistent with the War on Poverty's rhetoric of fighting poverty and racial discrimination: poorer areas and those with a greater share of nonwhite residents received systematically more funding. In contrast to New Deal spending, political variables explain very little of the variation in EOA funding. The smaller role of politics may help explain the strong backlash against the War on Poverty's programs.

Revitalizing the Mahoning Valley

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
T F Buss ◽  
R J Vaughan
Keyword(s):  
Development Strategy ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Business Leaders ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
Steel Mills ◽  
The Poor ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Capital Subsidies

For nearly a decade, since the closing of its steel mills, the Mahoning Valley in northeast Ohio has pursued a traditional development strategy, based upon large capital subsidies, to attract new or support existing businesses. These policies have failed. As a result, local business leaders have questioned the foundations of traditional policy and have developed an alternative strategy that involves a far broader set of state and local programs in the development process. The new strategy aims at five objectives: (1) rebuilding the entrepreneurial environment; (2) strengthening existing businesses; (3) creating economic opportunity for the poor; (4) improving the quality of public services, especially education and infrastructure; and (5) improving the quality of life, especially housing.

scholarly journals A High-Wire Crusade: Republicans and the War on Poverty, 1966

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-405
Author(s):  
Mark McLay
Keyword(s):  
New Deal ◽  
Republican Party ◽  
War On Poverty ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
Great Society ◽  
Elementary And Secondary Education ◽  
Education Act ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act ◽  
Antipoverty Programs ◽  
The New Deal

Abstract:During 1966, the Republican Party launched a largely successful challenge to Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” Republican candidates pursued an anti–War on Poverty midterm strategy, which made antipoverty programs the symbol of Great Society liberalism, rather than its more popular programs, such as Medicare or the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Moreover, in Congress and on the campaign trail, Republicans offered well-crafted alternatives—such as their “Opportunity Crusade”—to offset charges of negativism and elitism that had dogged the Grand Old Party (GOP) since the creation of the New Deal in the 1930s. Significantly, while the War on Poverty survived the year, the Republican minority was unexpectedly successful in making important changes to the Economic Opportunity Act during the antipoverty legislation’s renewal. Overall, the Republican challenge to the War on Poverty in 1966, boded ill for the program’s longevity when the GOP finally secured the levers of power.

409 George Street

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Federal Government ◽  
Basic Education ◽  
Funding Agency ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
George Street ◽  
The North ◽  
Lyndon Johnson ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act ◽  
Eastern North Carolina

This chapter discusses the founding of Craven Operation Progress (COP) and the broad and enthusiastic support it received from the North Carolina Fund, its first funding agency. When President Lyndon Johnson signed the Economic Opportunity Act in August 1964 critical antipoverty plans and programs for Craven County and nearby counties had been under way for more than half a year. These included a strawberry marketing program, a rural environmental sanitation program, adult basic education classes, and manpower training. From the very beginning, plans and incentives to combat the causes of poverty in Eastern North Carolina did not await direction or guidance from the federal government but grew instead out of local needs and circumstances.

THE HAWAII SUPERFERRY BUSINESS VENTURE NAVIGATES TO FAILURE

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Tramontano ◽  
Amarjit Singh
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Interest Groups ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
Private Business ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Short Lifetime ◽  
Public Interest Groups ◽  
Perfect Storm

At first glance, the private business venture of the Hawaii Superferry appeared to be an economic opportunity for Superferry executives, the State of Hawaii, as well as tourists and residents looking for a cheaper alternative for inter-island travel. However, upon its introduction to the Hawaii Islands, it faced stiff opposition from several public interest groups. Plagued with legal troubles and roadblocks throughout the Superferry's short lifetime, the inter-island ferry business was no longer able to stay afloat financially. The poor implementation of conflict resolution and negotiation of the parties involved appeared to be the perfect storm for what was supposed to be smooth sailing. The eagerness with which the State waived environmental permits appeared to be done with the sole aim of benefiting the Superferry corporation, upon which the Court did not look with favor. This article explores the arguments made by the defense and opposition, and presents the findings of the court.

Head Start for the Handicapped: Congressional Mandate Audit

1977 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail L. Ensher ◽  
Burton Blatt ◽  
James F. Winschel
Keyword(s):  
Head Start ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Economic Opportunity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Handicapped Children ◽  
Economic Opportunity Act

The 1972 Amendments to the Economic Opportunity Act mandated that not less than 10% of the Head Start enrollment nationwide be made available to handicapped children. This article reports research evaluating the effect of the mandate during the first year of its implementation. The findings indicate reasonable progress in meeting the needs of the handicapped; however, labeling appears to have increased and serious problems remain in accommodating youngsters with severe disabilities. Recommendations for the enhancement of Head Start efforts on behalf of the handicapped are including a suggestion for reducing society's inclination to segregate or exclude children with major differences in development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document