Barriers to Attending an Eye Examination after Vision Screening Referral within a Vulnerable Population

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 1042-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily W. Gower ◽  
Emily Silverman ◽  
Sandra D. Cassard ◽  
Sherill K. Williams ◽  
Kira Baldonado ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 918-919 ◽  
Author(s):  

Vision screening and eye examination are important for the detection of conditions that distort or suppress the normal visual image and, ultimately, may lead to blindness in children. Examination of the eyes can and should be performed at any age, beginning in the newborn period. Vision screening should be performed at as early an age as is practicable. Conditions that interfere with vision are of grave import because visual stimuli are critical to the development of normal vision. Decreased visual acuity often contributes to inadequate school performance. In addition, retinal abnormalities, cataract, glaucoma, retinoblastoma, eye muscle imbalance, and systemic disease with ocular manifestations may all be identified by careful examination. Vision screening should be carried out as part of a regular plan of continuing care, beginning in the preschool years. Screening examinations may be effectively performed by paramedical personnel under appropriate medical supervision. As with other specialty areas, it is important for the pediatrician to establish contact with an area ophthalmologist in the same geographical area who is familiar with children's eye problems. A close working relationship with such a specialist will clarify questions about procedures for eye screening as well as indications for referral. TIMING OF EXAMINATION AND SCREENING Children should have age-appropriate assessment for eye problems in the newborn period and at subsequent health supervision visits. Vision screening can begin as early as 3 years of age. Infants at risk for eye problems, such as retrolental fibroplasia, or those with a family history of congenital cataracts, retinoblastoma, and metabolic and genetic diseases should have an ophthalmologic examination in the nursery.


1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Jackson ◽  
E. S. Barnett ◽  
A. B. Stevens ◽  
M. McClure ◽  
C. Patterson ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 966-967
Author(s):  
Robert B. Kugel ◽  
John B. Bartram ◽  
Roger B. Bost ◽  
James J. A. Cavanaugh ◽  
Virgil Hanson ◽  
...  

Ideally, an eye examination should be performed immediately after birth and periodically during the preschool years. These years are important because it is at this time that much of a child's relationship to his environment is being established through visual channels and treatment for visual disorders is most successful. At present, this is an impossible goal due to the large reservoir of preschool children, limited trained personnel and financial support, and lack of understanding by the publie of the importance of early eye care. As an interim measure, the most practical approach seems to be one of vision screening as part of the total health supervision of the preschool child. This would encompass children from 3 to 5 years of age and could be performed by trained paramedical personnel or volunteers with a minimum of equipment. For a successful program there must be community cooperation, approval, organization, education, and financing. A real effort must be made to contact that large group of children who are unknown to any service (physician) or agency. The screening itself has little value unless it is accompanied by adequate follow-up and resources to accept the referral and supervise the provision of proper care. CONDITIONS DETECTED BY SCREENING 1. Refractive errors. 2. Muscle imbalance. 3. Amblyopia. 4. Some eye diseases. SCREENING PROCEDURES A. Observation or history-applicable from birth. 1. Unusually large eyes, sensitivity to light, excessive tearing, cloudiness, inflammation, hemorrhage, abnormal eye movements, i.e., nystagmus. 2. Difficulty with focusing or persistent deviation of one eye after 6 months of age.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  

Vision screening and eye examination are vital for the detection of conditions that distort or suppress the normal visual image, which may lead to inadequate school performance or, at worst, blindness in children. Retinal abnormalities, cataracts, glaucoma, retinoblastoma, eye muscle imbalances, and systemic disease with ocular manifestations may all be identified by careful examination. Examination of the eyes can be performed at any age, beginning in the newborn period, and should be done at all well infant and well child visits. Vision screening should be performed for a child at the earliest age that is practical, because a small child rarely complains that one eye is not seeing properly. Conditions that interfere with vision are of extreme importance, because visual stimuli are critical to the development of normal vision. Normal visual development requires the brain to receive equally clear, focused images from both eyes simultaneously for visual pathways to develop properly. Vision screening should be carried out as part of the regular plan for continuing care beginning at 3 years of age. Vision screening guidelines have been endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS), and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). To achieve the most accurate testing possible, the most sophisticated test that the child is capable of performing should be used (see "Appendix 1").1 As with other specialty areas, it is important for the pediatrician to establish contact with an ophthalmologist who is experienced in treating children's eye problems and who practices in the same geographic area.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254831
Author(s):  
Christiane Al-Haddad ◽  
Zeinab El Moussawi ◽  
Stephanie Hoyeck ◽  
Carl-Joe Mehanna ◽  
Nasrine Anais El Salloukh ◽  
...  

Purpose The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of amblyopia risk factors in children visiting the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) using automated vision screening. Methods This was a hospital-based screening of 1102 children aged between 2 and 6 years. Vision screening was performed using PlusoptiX S12 over 2 years (2018–2020). The need for referral to a pediatric ophthalmologist was based on the amblyopia risk factors set forth by the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Referred patients underwent a comprehensive eye examination. Results A total of 1102 children were screened, 63 were referred for amblyopia risk factors (5.7%); 37/63 (59%) underwent comprehensive eye examination and 73% were prescribed glasses. Of the non-referred group of children, 6.35% had astigmatism, 6.25% were hyperopic and 3.27% were myopic. The refractive errors observed among the examined patients were distributed as follows: 41% astigmatism, 51% hyperopia, and 8% myopia; amblyopia was not detected. Refractive amblyopia risk factors were associated with the presence of systemic disorders. Bland-Altman plots showed most of the differences to be within limits of agreement. Conclusion Using an automated vision screener in a hospital-based cohort of children aged 2 to 6 years, the rate of refractive amblyopia risk factors was 5.7%. Hyperopia was the most commonly encountered refractive error and children with systemic disorders were at higher risk.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex R. Kemper ◽  
Anya Helfrich ◽  
Jennifer Talbot ◽  
Nita Patel

School nurses can play a key role in the detection of significant refractive error. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a statewide school nurse vision screening program by evaluating the outcomes of screening among first, third, and fifth graders in 10 schools in North Carolina during the 2009–2010 school year. Of the 2,726 children who were screened, 7.7% ( n = 209) were abnormal, of which 89% ( n = 186) were placed into a comprehensive database for follow-up. No documentation of any follow-up was available for 35% ( n = 65) of these children. Of the 106 with complete eye examination data available, 54.7% ( n = 58) had myopia, 22.6% ( n = 24) had hyperopia, 11.3% ( n = 12) had astigmatism, 1.9% ( n = 2) had anisometropia, and 9.4% ( n = 10) were normal. Even with incomplete follow-up, this screening activity led to identification of 3 cases for every 100 children screened, underscoring the importance of high-quality school-based vision screening programs.


1981 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 239-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur J. Rathgeber

It would be preferable if every child had a professional eye examination prior to entering school and every two years thereafter. This ideal is rarely realized. As a second choice, a vision screening program to identify high-risk children should be a part of a school district's comprehensive screening program. The purpose of this article is to describe Manitoba's program, detailing organizational strategies, instrumentation, and results of a study designed to measure the effectiveness of the screening process. The results of the study indicated that two-thirds of the children identified by the vision-screening process as high-risk children required professional care, or that some incipient condition was present.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e0212733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Donaldson ◽  
Marek Karas ◽  
Donna O’Brien ◽  
J. Margaret Woodhouse

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document