VISION SCREENING OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 966-967
Author(s):  
Robert B. Kugel ◽  
John B. Bartram ◽  
Roger B. Bost ◽  
James J. A. Cavanaugh ◽  
Virgil Hanson ◽  
...  

Ideally, an eye examination should be performed immediately after birth and periodically during the preschool years. These years are important because it is at this time that much of a child's relationship to his environment is being established through visual channels and treatment for visual disorders is most successful. At present, this is an impossible goal due to the large reservoir of preschool children, limited trained personnel and financial support, and lack of understanding by the publie of the importance of early eye care. As an interim measure, the most practical approach seems to be one of vision screening as part of the total health supervision of the preschool child. This would encompass children from 3 to 5 years of age and could be performed by trained paramedical personnel or volunteers with a minimum of equipment. For a successful program there must be community cooperation, approval, organization, education, and financing. A real effort must be made to contact that large group of children who are unknown to any service (physician) or agency. The screening itself has little value unless it is accompanied by adequate follow-up and resources to accept the referral and supervise the provision of proper care. CONDITIONS DETECTED BY SCREENING 1. Refractive errors. 2. Muscle imbalance. 3. Amblyopia. 4. Some eye diseases. SCREENING PROCEDURES A. Observation or history-applicable from birth. 1. Unusually large eyes, sensitivity to light, excessive tearing, cloudiness, inflammation, hemorrhage, abnormal eye movements, i.e., nystagmus. 2. Difficulty with focusing or persistent deviation of one eye after 6 months of age.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Wasserman ◽  
Candace A. Croft ◽  
Sarah E. Brotherton

In this cross-sectional study, the vision-screening process is described for 8417 children aged 3 to 5 seen for health supervision in a group of 102 pediatric practices in 23 states and Puerto Rico. Three hundred forty children who failed screening (63% of those who failed) were followed up 2 months after initial screening. The sample was 52% male, 86% white, 9% black, 3% Hispanic, and 1% Asian. Vision screening was attempted on 66% of children overall. Pediatricians' reasons for not screening were "not routine" (44%), "too young" (40%), and "screening done previously" (17%). Younger children were less likely to be screened than older children (39% of those aged 3), and Hispanics were less likely to be screened than other ethnic groups (P < .001). Thirty-three percent of children received no screening for latent strabismus. Two months later, 50% of parents whose child had failed a vision test were unaware of this fact on questionnaire follow-up. Eighty-five percent of children referred to an eye specialist had made or kept an appointment. It is concluded that pediatricians need to increase vision screening among younger preschool children and communicate more effectively to parents the results of screening failure.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Eksteen ◽  
Robert H. Eikelboom ◽  
Hannah Kuper ◽  
Stefan Launer ◽  
De Wet Swanepoel

Abstract Background The majority of children with sensory impairments live in low- and middle-income countries. More studies of hearing and vision impairment prevalence are needed, in order to generate more accurate estimates of trends in sensory impairments. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and describe the characteristics of hearing and vision loss among preschool children (4–7 years) in an underserved South African community following community-based mobile health (mHealth) supported hearing and vision services. Methods A screening program of sensory impairments was undertaken of children attending preschools in the communities of Khayelitsha and Mitchell’s Plain, Cape Town, from September 2017 until June 2019. Hearing and vision screening were done by trained community health workers using mHealth technology. Children who failed hearing and vision screening were seen for follow-up assessments at their preschools. Follow-up assessments were conducted using smartphones that host point-of-care validated and calibrated hearing and vision testing applications (hearTest app, hearX Group, South Africa and PeekAcuity app, Peek Vision, United Kingdom). Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis were conducted after extracting data from a secure cloud-based server (mHealth Studio, hearX Group) to Microsoft Excel (2016). Results A total of 10,390 children were screened at 298 preschools over 22 months. Of the children screened, 5.6 and 4.4% of children failed hearing and vision screening respectively. Community-based follow-up hearing tests were done at the preschools on 88.5% (514) of children of whom 240 children (54.2% female) presented with hearing loss. A preschool-based follow-up vision test was done on 400 children (88.1%). A total of 232 children (46.1% female) had a vision impairment, and a further 32 children passed the test but had obvious signs of ocular morbidity. Logistic regression analysis found that age was a significant predictor of vision loss (p < 0.05), but not for hearing loss (p = 0.06). Gender was not a significant predictor of hearing (p = 0.22) or vision loss (p = 0.20). Conclusions Hearing loss is prevalent in at least 22 per 1000 and vision loss in at least 23 per 1000 preschool children in an underserved South African community. Timely identification of sensory losses can be facilitated through community-based hearing and vision services supported by mHealth technology.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex R. Kemper ◽  
Anya Helfrich ◽  
Jennifer Talbot ◽  
Nita Patel

School nurses can play a key role in the detection of significant refractive error. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a statewide school nurse vision screening program by evaluating the outcomes of screening among first, third, and fifth graders in 10 schools in North Carolina during the 2009–2010 school year. Of the 2,726 children who were screened, 7.7% ( n = 209) were abnormal, of which 89% ( n = 186) were placed into a comprehensive database for follow-up. No documentation of any follow-up was available for 35% ( n = 65) of these children. Of the 106 with complete eye examination data available, 54.7% ( n = 58) had myopia, 22.6% ( n = 24) had hyperopia, 11.3% ( n = 12) had astigmatism, 1.9% ( n = 2) had anisometropia, and 9.4% ( n = 10) were normal. Even with incomplete follow-up, this screening activity led to identification of 3 cases for every 100 children screened, underscoring the importance of high-quality school-based vision screening programs.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Hark ◽  
Camille S. Tan ◽  
Yocheved S. Kresch ◽  
C. Gustavo De Moraes ◽  
Jason D. Horowitz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. e240029
Author(s):  
Anirban Dutta ◽  
Sujata Das ◽  
Himanshu Sekhara Behera ◽  
Ruchi Mittal

A 61-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of reduced vision, redness and pain in the right eye. Examination revealed a bandage contact lens (BCL) in situ with diffuse, pigmented deposits. On removal, the underlying cornea was found to be clear. He had been prescribed the BCL 6 months ago following a deep-seated corneal foreign body removal and was unable to follow-up subsequently.The BCL was sent for microbiological and histopathological evaluation. The culture revealed growth of Cladosporium spp, a dematiaceous fungi. Periodic acid–Schiff staining revealed infiltration of pigmented fungal filaments into the substance of the BCL.While contact lens deposits are a frequent finding, fungal deposits are seldom noted. Irregular follow-up and improper lens maintenance are significant risk factors for the same. Early identification and subsequent removal of the lens is vital to prevent infection of the underlying ocular structures.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 918-919 ◽  
Author(s):  

Vision screening and eye examination are important for the detection of conditions that distort or suppress the normal visual image and, ultimately, may lead to blindness in children. Examination of the eyes can and should be performed at any age, beginning in the newborn period. Vision screening should be performed at as early an age as is practicable. Conditions that interfere with vision are of grave import because visual stimuli are critical to the development of normal vision. Decreased visual acuity often contributes to inadequate school performance. In addition, retinal abnormalities, cataract, glaucoma, retinoblastoma, eye muscle imbalance, and systemic disease with ocular manifestations may all be identified by careful examination. Vision screening should be carried out as part of a regular plan of continuing care, beginning in the preschool years. Screening examinations may be effectively performed by paramedical personnel under appropriate medical supervision. As with other specialty areas, it is important for the pediatrician to establish contact with an area ophthalmologist in the same geographical area who is familiar with children's eye problems. A close working relationship with such a specialist will clarify questions about procedures for eye screening as well as indications for referral. TIMING OF EXAMINATION AND SCREENING Children should have age-appropriate assessment for eye problems in the newborn period and at subsequent health supervision visits. Vision screening can begin as early as 3 years of age. Infants at risk for eye problems, such as retrolental fibroplasia, or those with a family history of congenital cataracts, retinoblastoma, and metabolic and genetic diseases should have an ophthalmologic examination in the nursery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ving F. Chan ◽  
Hasan Minto ◽  
Eden Mashayo ◽  
Kovin S. Naidoo

Purpose: Vision Champions (VC) are children trained to perform simple eye health screening and share eye health messages among their community. Our objectives were to assess the ability of VC in identifying and referring children and the community with refractive error and obvious ocular disease and to assess the change in knowledge and practice of eye healthseeking behaviour of the community 3 months after the introduction of the Vision Champion Programme.Methods: We purposively sampled 600 households and interviewed 1051 participants in two phases with a close-ended questionnaire. The numbers of children screened, referred by the VC and those who attended the Vision Centre were recorded. The percentage of people who answered the questions correctly were compared between Phase 1 (P1) and Phase 2 (P2).Results: The VC shared their eye health messages with 6311 people, screened 7575 people’s vision and referred 2433 people for further care. The community were more aware that using eye ointment not prescribed by doctors (P1 = 58.96% vs. P2 = 72.75%) can lead to blindness. Participants were more aware that they should not administer eye drops in stock (P1 = 44.18% vs. P2 = 61.37%) or received from a friend or relative (P1 = 53.23% vs. P2 = 72.35%) if their eyes are red and painful.Conclusion: Children have the potential to effectively share eye health messages and conduct simple vision screening for their families and peers. Efforts are needed to sensitise the community to improve the referral or follow-up rate.


2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeri K. Gustafson ◽  
Marilyn J. Kinne ◽  
Donita G. Little ◽  
MaryAnn T. Strawhacker

This study assessed the vision-screening practices of all preschools and elementary schools during the spring of 2000 in the Heartland Area Education Agency (AEA) in central Iowa. Surveys were returned by 7% of the preschools and 56% of the elementary schools. Survey questions were drafted based on recommendations from the Iowa Vision Screening Program Guidelines, which were distributed to all Iowa school districts in 1997. Areas surveyed included vision-screening personnel, attainment of students’ visual history, rescreening practices, referral and follow-up, and screening procedures. Survey results indicated that there is a need for improvement to standardize vision-screening procedures within Heartland AEA. Time and effort are invested in activities that are not recommended, and not enough effort is being put into recommended activities such as obtaining vision histories, rescreening to avoid overreferrals, and follow-up to make sure students receive required treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 793-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rannveig Linda Thorisdottir ◽  
Tove Faxén ◽  
Jonas Blohmé ◽  
Rafi Sheikh ◽  
Malin Malmsjö

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document