Fresnel diffraction from curved fiber snippets with application to fiber diameter measurement

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monty Glass
1993 ◽  
Vol 280 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R. Koenig ◽  
R.D. Hamilton ◽  
T.E. Laskowski ◽  
J.R. Olson ◽  
J.F. Gordon ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2395 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Smithgall ◽  
L. S. Watkins ◽  
R. E. Frazee

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (13) ◽  
pp. 2598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan J. Butler ◽  
G. W. Forbes

1988 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Thompson ◽  
D. C. Teasdale

Author(s):  
Laima Grāve ◽  
Anna Putniņa ◽  
Silvija Kukle ◽  
Veneranda Stramkale

Microfibers and nanofibers from natural products have high mechanical properties. For this reason researchers pay particular attention to the natural fibers and to the method how they are obtained. In the research samples with different treatments (alkaline pretreatment, steam explosion and water extraction) were investigated to evaluate treatment influence on fiber diameters. Fractionation does not provide actual results of fibers diameter as thinner fibers agglomerate to each other and around thicker fibers and cannot be sieved. Fiber diameter measurement with an optical microscope shows that pretreatment and treatment reduced the thickest fiber percentage and increase the number of fine particles. Dew-retted hemp gives 16% of thicker fibers and only 39% fibers with a diameters less than 63µm. 50% of alkaline pretreated and steam explosion treated fibers diameters are less than 63 µm and only 8% of diameters fall in range 160 - 630 µm.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ertan Öznergiz ◽  
Yasar Emre Kiyak ◽  
Mustafa E. Kamasak ◽  
Isa Yildirim

Due to the high surface area, porosity, and rigidity, applications of nanofibers and nanosurfaces have developed in recent years. Nanofibers and nanosurfaces are typically produced by electrospinning method. In the production process, determination of average fiber diameter is crucial for quality assessment. Average fiber diameter is determined by manually measuring the diameters of randomly selected fibers on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. However, as the number of the images increases, manual fiber diameter determination becomes a tedious and time consuming task as well as being sensitive to human errors. Therefore, an automated fiber diameter measurement system is desired. In the literature, this task is achieved by using image analysis algorithms. Typically, these methods first isolate each fiber in the image and measure the diameter of each isolated fiber. Fiber isolation is an error-prone process. In this study, automated calculation of nanofiber diameter is achieved without fiber isolation using image processing and analysis algorithms. Performance of the proposed method was tested on real data. The effectiveness of the proposed method is shown by comparing automatically and manually measured nanofiber diameter values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document