scholarly journals Hormone Receptor and ERBB2 Status in Gene Expression Profiles of Human Breast Tumor Samples

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e26023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Dvorkin-Gheva ◽  
John A. Hassell
Endocrinology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 700-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djuana M. E. Harvell ◽  
Jennifer K. Richer ◽  
D. Craig Allred ◽  
Carol A. Sartorius ◽  
Kathryn B. Horwitz

In breast cancers, estrogen receptor (ER) levels are highly correlated with response to endocrine therapies. We sought to define mechanisms of estrogen (E) signaling in a solid breast tumor model using gene expression profiling. ER+ T47D-Y human breast cancer cells were grown as xenografts in ovariectomized nude mice under four conditions: 1) 17β-estradiol for 8 wk (E); 2) without E for 8 wk (control); 3) E for 7 wk followed by 1 wk of E withdrawal (Ewd); or 4) E for 8 wk plus tamoxifen for the last week. E-regulated genes were defined as those that differed significantly between control and E and/or between E and Ewd or control and Ewd. These protocols generated 188 in vivo E-regulated genes that showed two major patterns of regulation. Approximately 46% returned to basal states after Ewd (class I genes); 53% did not (class II genes). In addition, more than 70% of class II-regulated genes also failed to reverse in response to tamoxifen. These genes may be interesting for the study of hormone-resistance issues. A subset of in vivo E-regulated genes appears on lists of clinical ER discriminator genes. These may be useful therapeutic targets or markers of E activity. Comparison of in vivo E-regulated genes with those regulated in identical cells in vitro after 6 and 24 h of E treatment demonstrate only 11% overlap. This indicates the extent to which gene expression profiles are uniquely dependent on hormone-treatment times and the cellular microenvironment.


2003 ◽  
Vol 278 (34) ◽  
pp. 31667-31675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Ruiz-Ruiz ◽  
Gema Robledo ◽  
Eva Cano ◽  
Juan Miguel Redondo ◽  
Abelardo Lopez-Rivas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seokhyun Yoon ◽  
Hye Sung Won ◽  
Keunsoo Kang ◽  
Kexin Qiu ◽  
Woong June Park ◽  
...  

AbstractThe cost of next-generation sequencing technologies is rapidly declining, making RNA-seq-based gene expression profiling (GEP) an affordable technique for predicting receptor expression status and intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer (BRCA) patients. Based on the expression levels of co-expressed genes, GEP-based receptor-status prediction can classify clinical subtypes more accurately than can immunohistochemistry (IHC). Using data from the cancer genome atlas TCGA BRCA and METABRIC datasets, we identified common predictor genes found in both datasets and performed receptor-status prediction based on these genes. By assessing the survival outcomes of patients classified using GEP- or IHC-based receptor status, we compared the prognostic value of the two methods. We found that GEP-based HR prediction provided higher concordance with the intrinsic subtypes and a stronger association with treatment outcomes than did IHC-based hormone receptor (HR) status. GEP-based prediction improved the identification of patients who could benefit from hormone therapy, even in patients with non-luminal BRCA. We also confirmed that non-matching subgroup classification affected the survival of BRCA patients and that this could be largely overcome by GEP-based receptor-status prediction. In conclusion, GEP-based prediction provides more reliable classification of HR status, improving therapeutic decision making for breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document