Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid prototyping

Discussion regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and admission to an intensive care unit is frequently fraught in the context of older age. It is complicated by the fact that the presence of multiple comorbidities and frailty adversely impact on prognosis. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation are not appropriate for all. Who decides and how? This paper discusses the issues, biases, and potential harms involved in decision-making. The basis of decision making requires fairness in the distribution of resources/healthcare (distributive justice), yet much of the printed guidance has taken a utilitarian approach (getting the most from the resource provided). The challenge is to provide a balance between justice for the individual and population justice.

Download Full-text

Comparative study between noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure

QJM ◽

10.1093/qjmed/hcab086.039 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽

Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽

Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽

Hesham M Abotiba

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Respiratory Failure ◽

Acute Respiratory Failure ◽

Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽

Positive Pressure ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.

Download Full-text

Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema in an Intensive Care Unit

Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) ◽

10.1016/j.arbr.2018.07.010 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 55 (1) ◽

pp. 63-64

Author(s):

Alberto Belenguer Muncharaz

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽

Pulmonary Edema ◽

Airway Pressure ◽

Positive Airway Pressure ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema ◽

Non Invasive

Download Full-text

Risk Factors Associated with Mechanical Ventilation in Critical Bronchiolitis

Children ◽

10.3390/children8111035 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (11) ◽

pp. 1035

Author(s):

Rachel K. Marlow ◽

Sydney Brouillette ◽

Vannessa Williams ◽

Ariann Lenihan ◽

Nichole Nemec ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Medical Center ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Severity Of Illness ◽

Pediatric Intensive Care ◽

Respiratory Support ◽

Non Invasive ◽

Lengths Of Stay

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends supportive care for the management of bronchiolitis. However, patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe (critical) bronchiolitis define a unique group with varying needs for both non-invasive and invasive respiratory support. Currently, no guidance exists to help clinicians discern who will progress to invasive mechanical support. Here, we sought to identify key clinical features that distinguish pediatric patients with critical bronchiolitis requiring invasive mechanical ventilation from those that did not. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary pediatric medical center. Children ≤2 years old admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from January 2015 to December 2019 with acute bronchiolitis were studied. Patients were divided into non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) groups; the IMV group was further subdivided depending on timing of intubation relative to PICU admission. Of the 573 qualifying patients, 133 (23%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Median age and weight were lower in the IMV group, while incidence of prematurity and pre-existing neurologic or genetic conditions were higher compared to the NRS group. Multi-microbial pneumonias were diagnosed more commonly in the IMV group, in turn associated with higher severity of illness scores, longer PICU lengths of stay, and more antibiotic usage. Within the IMV group, those intubated earlier had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and PICU length of stay, associated with lower pathogen load and, in turn, shorter antibiotic duration. Taken together, our data reveal that critically ill patients with bronchiolitis who require mechanical ventilation possess high risk features, including younger age, history of prematurity, neurologic or genetic co-morbidities, and a propensity for multi-microbial infections.

Download Full-text

Prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation for intensive care unit patients: A cohort study

Colombia Medica ◽

10.25100/cm.v44i3.1285 ◽

2013 ◽

pp. 184-188 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Alvaro Sanabria ◽

Ximena Gomez ◽

Valentin Vega ◽

Luis Carlos Dominguez ◽

Camilo Osorio

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Medical Condition ◽

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Saps Ii Score

Introduction: There are no established guidelines for selecting patients for early tracheostomy. The aim was to determine the factors that could predict the possibility of intubation longer than 7 days in critically ill adult patients. Methods: This is cohort study made at a general intensive care unit. Patients who required at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation were included. Data on the clinical and physiologic features were collected for every intubated patient on the third day. Uni- and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to determine the variables associated with extubation. Results: 163 (62%) were male, and the median age was 59±17 years. Almost one-third (36%) of patients required mechanical ventilation longer than 7 days. The variables strongly associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation were: age (HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99); diagnosis of surgical emergency in a patient with a medical condition (HR 3.68 (95% CI 1.62-8.35), diagnosis of surgical condition-non emergency (HR 8.17 (95% CI 2.12-31.3); diagnosis of non-surgical-medical condition (HR 5.26 (95% CI 1.85-14.9); APACHE II (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.97) and SAPS II score (HR 1.04 (95% CI 1.00-1.09) The area under ROC curve used for prediction was 0.52. 16% of patients were extubated after day 8 of intubation. Conclusions: It was not possible to predict early extubation in critically ill adult patients with invasive mechanical ventilation with common clinical scales used at the ICU. However, the probability of successfully weaning patients from mechanical ventilation without a tracheostomy is low after the eighth day of intubation.

Download Full-text

Síndrome de Dificuldade Respiratória Aguda: Casuística de Dois Anos numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos

Acta Médica Portuguesa ◽

10.20344/amp.4266 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 211 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lúcia Taborda ◽

Filipa Barros ◽

Vitor Fonseca ◽

Manuel Irimia ◽

Ramiro Carvalho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽

Respiratory Distress ◽

Distress Syndrome ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Interquartile Range ◽

The Mean

Introduction: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome has a significant incidence and mortality at Intensive Care Units. Therefore, more studies are necessary in order to develop new effective therapeutic strategies. The authors have proposed themselves to characterize Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit for 2 years. Material and Methods: This was an observational retrospective study of the patients filling the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome criteria from the American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, being excluded those non invasively ventilated. Demographic data, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome etiology, comorbidities, Gravity Indices, PaO2/FiO2, ventilator modalities and programmation, pulmonary compliance, days of invasive mechanical ventilation, corticosteroids use, rescue therapies, complications, days at Intensive Care Unit and obits were searched for and were submitted to statistic description and analysis. Results: A 40 patients sample was obtained, with a median age of 72.5 years (interquartile range = 22) and a female:male ratio of ≈1:1.86. Fifty five percent of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome cases had pulmonary etiology. The mean minimal PaO2/FiO2 was 88mmHg (CI 95%: 78.5–97.6). The mean maximal applied PEEP was 12.4 cmH2O (Standard Deviation 4.12) and the mean maximal used tidal volume was 8.2 mL/ Kg ideal body weight (CI 95%: 7.7–8.6). The median invasive mechanical ventilation days was 10. Forty seven and one half percent of the patients had been administered corticosteroids and 52.5% had been submitted to recruitment maneuvers. The most frequent complication was Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (20%). The median Intensive Care Unit stay was 10.7 days (interquartile range 10.85). The fatality rate was 60%. The probability of the favorable outcome ‘non-death in Intensive Care Unit’ was 4.4x superior for patients who were administered corticosteroids and 11x superior for patients < 65 years old. Discussion and Conclusions: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is associated with long hospitalization and significant mortality. New prospective studies will be necessary to endorse the potential benefit of steroid therapy and to identify the subgroups of patients that warrant its use.

Download Full-text

Compliance with Low Tidal Volume Ventilation After Initiation of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Outside of an Intensive Care Unit

10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a5292 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

D. Fein ◽

L. Andrea ◽

J.-T. Chen

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Tidal Volume ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Low Tidal Volume ◽

Low Tidal Volume Ventilation ◽

Volume Ventilation

Download Full-text

Physiotherapeutic intervention in the intensive care unit for SARS-VOC-2 patients: challenges and innovations of invasive mechanical ventilation

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND KNOWLEDGE SPREADING ◽

10.20952/jrks1111648 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 11648

Author(s):

Noemi Moreira Reis ◽

Fábio Luiz Oliveira De Carvalho

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Download Full-text

Use of a Nutrition Support Protocol to Increase Enteral Nutrition Delivery in Critically Ill Patients

American Journal of Critical Care ◽

10.4037/ajcc2014140 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 23 (5) ◽

pp. 396-403 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Friederike Compton ◽

Christian Bojarski ◽

Britta Siegmund ◽

Markus van der Giet

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Enteral Nutrition ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Nutrition Support ◽

Early Enteral Nutrition ◽

Feeding Tubes ◽

Enteral Nutrition Support ◽

The Impact

BackgroundEarly enteral nutrition is recommended for patients in intensive care units, but nutrition provision is often hindered by a variety of unit-specific problems.ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of a nutrition support protocol on nutrition prescription and delivery in the intensive care unit.MethodsNutrition-related data from 73 patients receiving mechanical ventilation who were treated in an adult medical intensive care unit before introduction of an enteral nutrition support protocol were retrospectively compared with data for 87 patients admitted after implementation of the protocol.ResultsAfter implementation of the protocol, enteral nutrition was started significantly earlier (P = .007) and enteral feeding goals were reached significantly faster (6 vs 10 days, P < .001) than before. Prescription of enteral nutrition on the first day of invasive mechanical ventilation increased from 38% before to 54% after (P = .03) implementation of the protocol. Prescribed and delivered nutrition doses on the first 2 days of mechanical ventilation also increased significantly (P < .001) after the protocol was implemented. Nasojejunal feeding tubes were used in 52% of patients before and 56% of patients after protocol implementation P = .63). Jejunal tubes were placed earlier after the protocol was implemented than before (median 5 vs 6.5 days), and when a jejunal tube was in place, feeding goals were reached faster (median 2 vs 3 days, P = .002).ConclusionImplementing an enteral nutrition support protocol shortened the time to reach feeding goals. Jejunal feeding tubes were necessary in more than half of the patients, and with a jejunal feeding tube in place, feeding goals were reached rapidly.

Download Full-text