scholarly journals Measuring femoral neck loads in healthy young and older adults during stair ascent and descent

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245658
Author(s):  
Chen Deng ◽  
Jason C. Gillette ◽  
Timothy R. Derrick
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Young Group ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Elliptical Cross ◽  
Stair Ascent ◽  
Axial Forces ◽  
Significant Difference

Understanding the hip loading environment for daily activities is useful for hip fracture prevention, rehabilitation, and the design of osteogenic exercises. Seventeen older adults (50–70 yrs) and twenty young adults (18–30 yrs) were recruited. A rigid body model combined with a musculoskeletal model was used to estimate lower extremity loading. An elliptical cross-section model of the femoral neck was used to estimate femoral neck stress during stair ascent and descent. Two peaks were identified in the stress curves, corresponding to the peaks in the vertical ground reaction force. During stair ascent, significantly higher tension on the superior femoral neck was found for the young group at peak 1 (young: 13.5±6.1 MPa, older: 4.2±6.5 MPa, p<0.001). Also during stair ascent, significantly higher compression on the posterior femoral neck was found for the older group at peak 2 (young: -11.4±4.9 MPa, old: -18.1±8.6 MPa, p = 0.006). No significant difference was found for stair descent. Components of stress (muscle vs. reaction forces; axial forces vs. bending moments) were also examined for each trial of stair ascent and descent. The stresses and their components provided loading magnitude and locations of higher stress on the femoral neck during stair ascent and descent. Understanding femoral neck stresses may be used to help prevent hip fractures, reduce pain, improve rehabilitation, and design osteogenic exercises.

Effect of Hopping Frequency on Bilateral Differences in Leg Stiffness

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Hobara ◽  
Koh Inoue ◽  
Kazuyuki Kanosue
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Human Movement ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Mass Model ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bilateral Differences

Understanding the degree of leg stiffness during human movement would provide important information that may be used for injury prevention. In the current study, we investigated bilateral differences in leg stiffness during one-legged hopping. Ten male participants performed one-legged hopping in place, matching metronome beats at 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0 Hz. Based on a spring-mass model, we calculated leg stiffness, which is defined as the ratio of maximal ground reaction force to maximum center of mass displacement at the middle of the stance phase, measured from vertical ground reaction force. In all hopping frequency settings, there was no significant difference in leg stiffness between legs. Although not statistically significant, asymmetry was the greatest at 1.5 Hz, followed by 2.2 and 3.0 Hz for all dependent variables. Furthermore, the number of subjects with an asymmetry greater than the 10% criterion was larger at 1.5 Hz than those at 2.2 and 3.0 Hz. These results will assist in the formulation of treatment-specific training regimes and rehabilitation programs for lower extremity injuries.

Enhanced Performance With Elastic Resistance During the Eccentric Phase of a Countermovement Jump

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saied Jalal Aboodarda ◽  
Ashril Yusof ◽  
N.A. Abu Osman ◽  
Martin W. Thompson ◽  
A. Halim Mokhtar
Keyword(s):  
Power Output ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Tensile Force ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Jump Height ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Infrared Cameras

Purpose:To identify the effect of additional elastic force on the kinetic and kinematic characteristics, as well as the magnitude of leg stiffness, during the performance of accentuated countermovement jumps (CMJs).Methods:Fifteen trained male subjects performed 3 types of CMJ including free CMJ (FCMJ; ie, body weight), ACMJ-20, and ACMJ-30 (ie, accentuated eccentric CMJ with downward tensile force equivalent to 20% and 30% body mass, respectively). A force platform synchronized with 6 high-speed infrared cameras was used to measure vertical ground-reaction force (VGRF) and displacement.Results:Using downward tensile force during the lowering phase of a CMJ and releasing the bands at the start of the concentric phase increased maximal concentric VGRF (6.34%), power output (23.21%), net impulse (16.65%), and jump height (9.52%) in ACMJ-30 compared with FCMJ (all P < .05). However, no significant difference was observed in the magnitude of leg stiffness between the 3 modes of jump. The results indicate that using downward recoil force of the elastic material during the eccentric phase of a CMJ could be an effective method to enhance jump performance by applying a greater eccentric loading on the parallel and series elastic components coupled with the release of stored elastic energy.Conclusions:The importance of this finding is related to the proposition that power output, net impulse, takeoff velocity, and jump height are the key parameters for successful athletic performance, and any training method that improves impulse and power production may improve sports performance, particularly in jumping aspects of sport.

scholarly journals Vertical ground reaction force analysis during gait with unstable shoes

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-466
Author(s):  
Giulia Pereira ◽  
Aluísio Otavio Vargas Avila ◽  
Rudnei Palhano
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Unstable Shoes ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIntroduction Footwear is no longer just an accessory but also a protection for the musculoskeletal system, and its most important characteristic is comfort.Objectives This study aims to identify and to analyze the vertical ground reaction force in barefoot women and women with unstable shoes.Methodology Five women aged 25 ± 4 years old and mass of 50 ± 7 kg participated in this study. An AMTI force plate was used for data acquisition. The 10 trials for each situation were considered valid where the subject approached the platform with the right foot and at the speed of 4 km/h ± 5%. The instable shoe of this study is used in the practice of physical activity.Results The results showed that the first peak force was higher for the footwear situation, about 5% and significant differences between the barefoot and footwear situation. This significant difference was in the first and second peaks force and in the time of the second peak.Conclusion The values showed that the footwear absorbs approximately 45% of the impact during gait.

A Subject Specific Kinematic and Kinetic Relationship During a Single-Leg Drop Landing

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Yin Tse ◽  
Hamid Nayeb-Hashemi ◽  
Ashkan Vaziri ◽  
Paul K. Canavan
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Valgus Angle ◽  
Drop Landing ◽  
Average Maximum ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Subject Specific ◽  
Vertical Ground

A single-leg landing is a common type of high-risk maneuver performed by athletes. The majority of anterior cruciate ligament injury is accounted for by non-contact mechanisms, such as single-leg landings. The purpose of this study was to develop a subject specific single-leg drop landing to analyze the kinematics and kinetics of two different types of landings. Kinematic data was analyzed at five points during the landing phase: initial contact (IC), peak vertical ground reaction force (pVGRF), peak joint reaction force (pJRF), maximum knee flexion (MKF), and maximum valgus angle (MFP). A linear relationship was noted in comparing the average maximum peak vertical ground reaction force, average maximum knee flexion, and average maximum valgus angle to the platform heights in both landing styles. An increase in platform height was directly related to increased knee valgus angle in both landing styles. Significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted in the peak vertical ground reaction force between the 60% and 80% platform heights, as well as between 60% and 100% with arms above. Landing with arms across the body yielded more significant difference (p < 0.05) between platform heights in both frontal and sagittal planes. However, comparing both landing styles to each other only yielded significant difference (p < 0.05) at the 100% platform height. A valgus-varus-valgus movement was observed in all landings, and is a probable contributor to single-leg landing ACL ruptures.

scholarly journals Effects of age and walking speeds on vertical ground reaction force in younger and older adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-299
Author(s):  
Maryam Rastegar ◽  
Seyyed Hosein Hoseini ◽  
Mohamad Hosein Naser Melli ◽  
Morteza Taffah
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Walking Speeds

scholarly journals Does Vertical Ground Reaction Force of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle Joints Change in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis after Spinal Fusion?

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-355
Author(s):  
Mohd Imran Yusof ◽  
Shazlin Shaharudin ◽  
Prema Sivalingarajah
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ankle Joints ◽  
Vertical Ground

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>Comparative cross-sectional study.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>We measured the vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) of the hip, knee, and ankle joints during normal gait in normal patients, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with a Cobb angle &lt;40° and in AIS patients with spinal fusion. We aimed to investigate whether vGRF in the aforementioned joints is altered in these three groups of patients.</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>vGRF of the lower limb joints may be altered in these groups of patients. Although it is known that excessive force in the joints may induce early arthritis, there is limited relevant information in the literatures.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>We measured vGRF of the hip, knee, and ankle joints during heel strike, early stance, mid stance, and toe-off phases in normal subjects (group 1, n=14), AIS patients with Cobb angle &lt;40° (group 2, n=14), and AIS patients with spinal fusion (group 3, n=13) using a gait analysis platform. Fifteen auto-reflective tracking markers were attached to standard anatomical landmarks in both the lower limbs. The captured motion images were used to define the orientations of the body segments and force exerted on the force plate using computer software. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test and analysis of variance to examine differences between the right and left sides as well as those among the different subject groups.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The measurements during the four gait phases in all the groups did not show any significant difference (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05). In addition, no significant difference was found in the vGRF measurements of all the joints among the three groups (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>A Cobb angle &lt;40° and spinal fusion did not significantly create imbalance or alter vGRF of the lower limb joints in AIS patients.</p></sec>

Measurements of Vertical Ground Reaction Force in Jumping Dogs

1992 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Hulse ◽  
H. A. Hogan ◽  
Margaret Slater ◽  
M. T. Longnecker ◽  
Susan Yanoff
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Working Dogs ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Military Working Dogs

SummaryThe purpose of this study was: to quantitate the peak vertical ground reaction force acting on the forelimbs of dogs as they landed after jumping an obstacle; to compare that force at three heights; and to evaluate factors that may affect vertical ground reaction force. Thirteen military working dogs were studied. A strain gauge force plate was used to measure force. Three measurements were recorded for each dog at each height. The means of the medians of the three forces for each dog at each height were compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Mean force at 63 cm was 986.9 ± 221.5 N, mean force at 79 cm was 1175.0 ±227.4 N, and mean force at 94 cm was 1366.1± 268.5 N. There was a significant difference in mean force at the three jump heights (p = 0.0002). The significance was unchanged when force was normalized for body weight. Statistical models were used to evaluate the effect of other independent variables. Factors that were found to effect force were body weight, breed, and sex of the dog. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.Vertical ground reaction force was measured in thirteen dogs landing on a force plate after jumping an obstacle. Three readings were taken for each dog at each of three heights, and the mean vertical ground reaction force was compared. Force readings were significantly different at each height, increasing as height increased. Factors that were found to effect vertical ground reaction force were body weight, breed, and sex.

The Effect of Varus Deformity on Co-Activation of Abdominal and Lower Limb Muscles during Landing Task in Female Subjects

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azizi M ◽  
◽  
Azizi M ◽  
Khademi K ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Control Strategy ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Control Parameters ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Co Activation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Gastrocnemius Muscles

Objective: Genuvarum deformity experience knee instability. This deformity can lead the patient to sever osteoarthritis. The recovery of postural stability is very important to prevention of these patients. Strategies aimed at stabilizing the muscle can have a long-term effect on the joint. This study was performed to determine the relationship between muscle stabilization strategies and knee instability, in order to determine how people with knee Genuvarum, respond to rapid absorption and muscle co- contraction during landing task. Methods: Twenty female participants, (10 normal and 10 Genuvarum) in the present study. The subjects were land by preferred lower limb from a table (30 cm high) on a force plate. Vertical ground reaction force, time to peak of vertical reaction force, velocity of vertical ground reaction force to reach the maximum, time to stability in X and Y directions and resultant vector were calculated as postural control parameters. Also surface electromyography of transverse abdominal/int. oblique, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, lateral gastrocnemius, and medial gastrocnemius muscles were recorded during landing. Motor control strategy were measured by similarity index and voluntary response index. Results: There are significant difference between Genuvarum and Healthy subjects in motor control strategy (P<0.05).A significant difference are detected in postural control parameters between two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Genuvarum deformity may be linked to altered quadriceps, abdominal and gastrocnemius muscles reciprocal co-activation patterns during landing task. In addition, may be affected voluntary motor control strategy in synergy concepts. Postural control is affected in these deformity and shock absorption may be reduced in parallel to increase of response vector and reduce of instability in landing task.

Peak forelimb ground reaction forces experienced by dogs jumping from a simulated car boot

2018 ◽  
Vol 182 (25) ◽  
pp. 716-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pardey ◽  
Gillian Tabor ◽  
James Andrew Oxley ◽  
Alison P Wills
Keyword(s):  
Injury Risk ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Repeated Analysis ◽  
Single Force ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
The Relationship

Many dog owners allow their pets to jump out of a car boot; however, to date, there has been no study that has investigated whether this places dogs at risk of injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between height and peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) in static start jumps. Fifteen healthy adult dogs performed three jumps from a platform that represented common vehicle boot sill heights (0.55, 0.65, 0.75 m), landing on a single force platform. Kinetic data (mediolateral (Fx), craniocaudal (Fy) and vertical (Fz)) were normalised for body weight and analysed via a one-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise post hoc tests with a Bonferroni correction applied. There was a significant difference in peak forelimb vGRF between both the 0.55 m (27.35±4.14 N/kg) and the 0.65 m (30.84±3.66 N/kg) platform (P=0.001) and between the 0.65 and 0.75 m (34.12±3.63 N/kg) platform (P=0.001). There was no significant difference in mediolateral or craniocaudal forces between the heights examined. These results suggest that allowing dogs to jump from bigger cars with a higher boot sill may result in augmented levels of loading on anatomical structures. Further research is required to investigate the kinematic effects of height on static jump-down and how peak forelimb vGRF relates to anatomical loading and subsequent injury risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document