POLYPHARMACY BUT NOT POTENTIAL INAPPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION WAS ASSOCIATED WITH FRAILTY IN OLDER ADULTS FROM A MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRY OUTPATIENT CLINIC

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
I. APRAHAMIAN ◽  
M.M. BIELLA ◽  
G. VANO ARICÓ DE ALMEIDA ◽  
F. PEGORARO ◽  
A.V. ALVES PEDRINI ◽  
...  

Objectives: the aims of the present study were: (1) investigate the prevalence and association of polypharmacy and pre-frailty or frailty in a middle-income country sample of older adults; and (2) evaluate the prevalence of potential inappropriate prescription (PIP) and its association with pre-frailty or frailty. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Outpatient center at a university-based hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Participants: 629 older adults from both sexes evaluated between June 2014 and July 2016. Measurements: Frailty was identified through the FRAIL scale. All medications received were analyzed by research staff. Presence of PIP was evaluated according to the 2015 updated Beers list. Binary logistic regression tested the association between 4 definitions of polypharmacy (≥ 3, 4, 5, and 6 drugs), and presence of PIP, and the dependent variable pre-frailty and frailty. Results: 15.7% of participants were frail. Polypharmacy was present in 219 (34.8%), and PIP was observed in 184 (29.3%) older adults. All definitions of polypharmacy were significantly associated with frailty (OR between 2.05 to 2.34, p < 0.001). Polypharmacy with 4 or 5 or more drugs were associated with pre-frailty (OR 1.53 and 1.47, respectively). PIP was not associated with frailty (OR 1.47, p = 0.149). Conclusions: Several definitions of polypharmacy were associated with frailty, but only two were associated with pre-frailty. The presence of PIP was not associated with pre-frailty or frailty.

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 106047
Author(s):  
Lilian Marie Boll ◽  
Ramezanali Khamirchi ◽  
Lucia Alonso ◽  
Elisa Llurba ◽  
Óscar J Pozo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Sortênia Alves Guimarães ◽  
Carolina Araújo dos Santos ◽  
Joice da Silva Castro ◽  
Leidjaira Lopes Juvanhol ◽  
Fabiane Aparecida Canaan Rezende ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daariimaa Khurelbat ◽  
Gereltuya Dorj ◽  
Bruce Sunderland ◽  
Tsetsegmaa Sanjjav ◽  
Enkhtuul Bayarsaikhan ◽  
...  

IBRO Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Juliana Dias de Lima ◽  
Ivan Abdalla Teixeira ◽  
Felipe de Oliveira Silva ◽  
Andrea Camaz Deslandes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Umphrey ◽  
George Paasi ◽  
William Windsor ◽  
Grace Abongo ◽  
Jessica Evert ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUNDVirtual global health partnership initiatives (VGHPIs) evolved rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure partnership continuity, however the current landscape for VGHPI use and preference is unknown. This study aimed to increase understanding of GH partners’ perspectives on VGHPIs.METHODSFrom 15 October to 30 November 2020, authors conducted an online, international survey using snowball sampling to document pandemic-related changes in partnership activities; preferences for VGHPIs; and perceived acceptability and barriers. Analysis stratified responses by country income classification and partnership type. RESULTSA total of 128 respondents described 219 partnerships. 152/219 (69%) partnerships were transnational, 157/219 (72%) were of >5 years duration, and 127/219 (60%) included bidirectional site visits. High-income country (HIC) partners sent significantly more learners to low- to middle-income country (LMIC) partner sites (P<0.01). Participants commented on pandemic-related disruptions affecting 217/219 (99%) partnerships; 195/217 (90%) were disruption to activities; 122/217 (56%) to communication; 73/217 (34%) to access to professional support; and 72/217 (33%) to funding. Respondents indicated that VGHPIs would be important to 206/219 (94%) of their partnerships moving forward. There were overall differences in resource availability, technological capacity, and VGHPI preferences between LMIC and HIC respondents, with a statistically significant difference in VGHPI acceptability (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding VGHPIs’ perceived barriers. CONCLUSIONSThe pandemic disrupted essential partnership elements, compounding differences between LMIC and HIC partners in their resources and preferences for partnership activities. VGHPIs have the potential to bridge new and existing gaps and maximize gains, bi-directionality, and equity in partnerships during and after COVID-19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document