What Is the Best First-Line Treatment Strategy for Patients with Indolent Lymphomas?

2012 ◽  
pp. 488-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Salles ◽  
Hervé Ghesquières ◽  
Emmanuel Bachy
Keyword(s):  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Short Treatment ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Overview: Although advanced follicular lymphoma is considered incurable, patient outcomes have improved over the last decade with the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Multiple treatment options are available and their use depends on clinical presentation (i.e., Ann Arbor stage, tumor burden, symptoms) and patient condition and age. Radiation therapy for patients with limited stage disease remains useful, although its use in the era of anti-CD20 antibodies should be re-evaluated. Single-agent rituximab has been tested in multiple studies with patients with low tumor burden. Short treatment duration provides a response lasting 2 to 3 years, although the benefit of maintenance therapy with rituximab after induction therapy with rituximab remains unproven. When watchful waiting is not an option, a combination of rituximab with chemotherapy is the standard of care: alkylating agents with anthracycline or bendamustine appear to be the most widely used regimens, but alkylating agents alone may still be used in selected patients subgroups. The toxicity of regimens containing fludarabine appears to limit their indication as first-line treatment. In patients responding to one of these combinations, consolidation therapy with rituximab maintenance has been shown to prolong progression-free survival with acceptable toxicity. The benefit of radioimmunotherapy in first-line treatment is still uncertain. With patients surviving for many years, the therapeutic strategy of first-line management should weigh the quality and duration of response against the risk of long-term toxicities.

scholarly journals Rituximab as Single Agent in Primary MALT Lymphoma of the Ocular Adnexa

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ombretta Annibali ◽  
Francesca Chiodi ◽  
Chiara Sarlo ◽  
Magdalena Cortes ◽  
Francesco M. Quaranta-Leoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Indolent Disease ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Ocular Adnexal Lymphomas are the first cause of primary ocular malignancies, and among them the most common are MALT Ocular Adnexal Lymphomas. Recently systemic immunotherapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody has been investigated as first-line treatment; however, the optimal management for MALT Ocular Adnexal Lymphomas is still unknown. The present study evaluated retrospectively the outcome of seven consecutive patients with primary MALT Ocular Adnexal Lymphomas, of whom six were treated with single agent Rituximab. All patients received 6 cycles of Rituximab 375 mg/mq every 3 weeks intravenously. The overall response rate was 100%; four patients (67%) achieved a Complete Remission, and two (33%) achieved a partial response. In four patients an additional Rituximab maintenance every 2-3 months was given for two years. After a median follow-up of 29 months (range 8–34), no recurrences were observed, without of therapy- or disease-related severe adverse events. None of the patients needed additional radiotherapy or other treatments. Rituximab as a single agent is highly effective and tolerable in first-line treatment of primary MALT Ocular adnexal Lymphomas. Furthermore, durable responses are achievable with the same-agent maintenance. Rituximab can be considered the agent of choice in the management of an indolent disease in whom the “quality of life” matter is of primary importance.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of ibrutinib plus rituximab in patients with previously untreated marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7576-TPS7576
Author(s):  
Ariela Noy ◽  
Stephanie Hughes ◽  
Erin Biggar ◽  
Matthew Bogdan
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
The United States ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
First Line Treatment

TPS7576 Background: First-line treatment options for patients with MZL include single-agent immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoimmunotherapy. While chemoimmunotherapy has a higher toxicity profile than immunotherapy alone, it may lead to longer progression-free survival (PFS). Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, is FDA approved for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma but not specifically for advanced MZL. Ibrutinib is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the United States for patients with MZL who require systemic therapy and have received ≥1 prior anti-CD20-based therapy. The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab has proven effective and is well tolerated in other B-cell lymphomas; it may serve as an effective chemotherapy-free option for the treatment of previously untreated MZL. Methods: NCT04212013 is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy of ibrutinib + rituximab vs placebo + rituximab in patients with previously untreated MZL. Adults (≥18 y) with histologically documented MZL (splenic, nodal, and extranodal subtypes), no prior systemic treatment for MZL (prior splenectomy or other local surgical or radiation treatment allowed), measurable disease on CT scan, documented evidence of need for treatment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 are eligible. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ibrutinib 560 mg once daily or placebo; all patients will also receive rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1. Subcutaneous dosing after dose 1 is allowed. Treatment with ibrutinib or placebo will continue for 30 mo or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or investigator decision to withdraw, noncompliance, death, or study termination. Clinical assessments will occur every 4 weeks until week 13, at week 25, and then every 6 mo thereafter. Imaging assessments will be conducted at week 13, at week 25, and then every 6 mo thereafter. Response will be investigator assessed per the revised International Working Group for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (RECIL) criteria. At month 30, patients who have a complete response (CR) will discontinue treatment; patients who have a partial response (PR) or stable disease may continue treatment at investigator discretion. Safety will be assessed throughout the study and for 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. The primary endpoint is CR rate at month 30. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (CR + PR), duration of response, PFS, overall survival, and safety. Enrollment has started and will continue until approximately 138 patients are enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04212013.

scholarly journals A modified regimen of biweekly gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is both tolerable and effective: a retrospective analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Ahn ◽  
Kavya Krishna ◽  
Marlo Blazer ◽  
Joshua Reardon ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background: Treatment with nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine demonstrates a survival advantage when compared with single-agent gemcitabine. However, the combination is associated with significant toxicities, leading to a high rate of drug discontinuation. We implemented a modified regimen of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (mGNabP) in an attempt to minimize toxicities while maintaining efficacy. Methods: A total of 79 evaluable patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC) treated with a modified regimen of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 15 of every 28-day cycle were identified from our prospective database. A total of 57 patients received this regimen as first-line treatment and were evaluated for toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Overall, 22 patients with advanced or metastatic PC treated with the modified regimen outside the first-line setting were only evaluated for toxicities. Results: The median OS and PFS were 10 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9–13 months] and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.1–7.4 months) for patients that received the modified regimen as first-line therapy. Neurotoxicity occurred in 27% with only 1.6% of patients experiencing grade ⩾3 toxicity. The incidence of grade ⩾3 neutropenia was 19%, resulting in growth factor support in 12% of patients. This rate was similar in patients who received the modified regimen for first-line treatment of mPC versus the overall group. Conclusions: A modified regimen of biweekly nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine is associated with a lower cost, acceptable toxicity profile and appears to be relatively effective in pancreatic cancer. Prospective randomized studies confirming its potential benefits compared with standard weekly mGNabP are warranted.

scholarly journals Patient profiles as an aim to optimize selection in the second line setting: the role of aflibercept

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. González Astorga ◽  
F. Salvà Ballabrera ◽  
E. Aranda Aguilar ◽  
E. Élez Fernández ◽  
P. García-Alfonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Effective Therapeutic Option ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
First Line Treatment

AbstractColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, it is recommended, as first-line treatment, chemotherapy (CT) based on doublet cytotoxic combinations of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). In addition to CT, biological (targeted agents) are indicated in the first-line treatment, unless contraindicated. In this context, most of mCRC patients are likely to progress and to change from first line to second line treatment when they develop resistance to first-line treatment options. It is in this second line setting where Aflibercept offers an alternative and effective therapeutic option, thought its specific mechanism of action for different patient’s profile: RAS mutant, RAS wild-type (wt), BRAF mutant, potentially resectable and elderly patients. In this paper, a panel of experienced oncologists specialized in the management of mCRC experts have reviewed and selected scientific evidence focused on Aflibercept as an alternative treatment.

Lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced thyroid cancer: long progression-free survival

Endocrine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone De Leo ◽  
Marta Di Stefano ◽  
Luca Persani ◽  
Laura Fugazzola ◽  
Carla Colombo
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Thyroid Cancer ◽  
First Line Treatment

scholarly journals Vasculogenic mimicry, a negative indicator for progression free survival of lung adenocarcinoma irrespective of first line treatment and epithelial growth factor receptor mutation status

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejun He ◽  
Jijun You ◽  
Haibing Ding ◽  
Zhisheng Zhang ◽  
Lin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Vasculogenic Mimicry ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background Vascular mimicry (VM) was associated with the prognosis of cancers. The aim of the study was to explore the association between VM and anticancer therapy response in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with lung adenocarcinoma between March 1st, 2013, to April 1st, 2019, at the Second People’s Hospital of Taizhou City. All included patients were divided into the VM and no-VM groups according to whether VM was observed or not in the specimen. Vessels with positive PAS and negative CD34 staining were confirmed as VM. The main outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Sixty-six (50.4%) patients were male. Eighty-one patients received chemotherapy as the first-line treatment, and 50 patients received TKIs. Forty-five (34.4%) patients were confirmed with VM. There was no difference regarding the first-line treatment between the VM and no-VM groups (P = 0.285). The 86 patients without VM had a median PFS of 279 (range, 90–1095) days, and 45 patients with VM had a median PFS of 167 (range, 90–369) days (P < 0.001). T stage (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.71), N stage (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.09–1.86), M stage (HR = 2.85, 95%CI: 1.76–4.61), differentiation (HR = 1.85, 95%CI: 1.29–2.65), therapy (HR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.21–0.49), VM (HR = 2.12, 95%CI: 1.33–3.37), and ECOG (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.84) were independently associated with PFS. Conclusion The benefits of first-line TKIs for NSCLC with EGFR mutation are possibly better than those of platinum-based regimens in patients without VM, but there is no difference in the benefit of chemotherapy or target therapy for VM-positive NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Anlotinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ALTER L012.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21040-e21040
Author(s):  
Qiming Wang ◽  
Xiuli Yang ◽  
Tianjiang Ma ◽  
Qiumin Yang ◽  
Chenghui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

e21040 Background: The anti-angiogenic drug bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy has achieved positive results in previous studies. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for EGFR-negative patients was increased to 8.3 months in the BEYOND study. Unlike bevacizumab, anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor and can be conveniently orally administered. In the phase III trial ALTER 0303, anlotinib significantly improved overall survival (OS) and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients. This exploratory study aims to establish the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: This is a multi-center, single-arm clinical trial. Adults with treatment-naive, histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV non-squamous NSCLC, ECOG 0-1, and without known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations are included. Patients received anlotinib (12 mg p.o., QD, d1 to 14, 21 days per cycle) combined with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, iv, d15-21, Q3W) + carboplatin (AUC = 5, iv, d15-21, Q3W) for 4 cycles followed by anlotinib and pemetrexed maintenance until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Between Mar 2019 and Dec 2020, 40 patients were enrolled in six centers and 31 of them have received at least one tumor assessment. Median age was 62 (33, 75); 66.7% male, 11.1% brain metastasis. At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2020), patients were followed up for a median of 8.26 months. Median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: NE, NE); ORR was 67.7% (0 CR, 21 PR), DCR was 96.8% (0 CR, 21 PR, 9 SD) and median OS was NE. The most common Grade ≥ 3 AEs were hypertension 22.2%, neutropenia 19.44%, myelosuppression 11.1%, thrombocytopenia 8.33%, leukopenia 5.56%, hand-foot syndrome 5.56% and there were no Grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions: This study finds that anlotinib plus pemetrexed and carboplatin can significantly improve PFS and ORR compared to standard chemotherapy for treatment-naive non-squamous NSCLC patients. The combination was well tolerated, and the AEs were manageable. The follow-up time is not sufficient, and the OS outcomes need further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT03790228.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document