Adjuvant Therapy for Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Treatment Selection in a Complex Population

Author(s):  
Cynthia Owusu ◽  
Arti Hurria ◽  
Hyman Muss

Overview: Breast cancer is a disease of aging. However, older women with breast cancer are less likely to participate in clinical trials or to receive recommended treatment. This undertreatment has contributed to a lag in breast cancer survival outcomes for older women compared with that for their younger counterparts. The principles that govern recommendations for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer are the same for younger and older women. Systemic adjuvant treatment recommendations should be offered on the basis of tumor characteristics that divide patients into three distinct subgroups. These include (1) older women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer who should be offered endocrine therapy; (2) older women with HR-negative and HER2-negative breast cancer who should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy; and (3) older women with HER2-positive disease who should be offered chemotherapy with trastuzumab. Exceptions to these guidelines may be made for older women with small node-negative tumors or frail older women with limited life expectancy, where close surveillance may be a reasonable alternative. Addressing the current age-related disparities in breast cancer survival will require that older women are offered the same state-of-the-art-treatment as their younger counterparts, with a careful weighing of the risks and benefits of each treatment in the context of the individual's preferences. In addition, older women should be encouraged to participate in breast cancer clinical trials to generate additional chemotherapy efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life data.

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis M. Collins ◽  
Neil T. Conlon ◽  
Srinivasaraghavan Kannan ◽  
Chandra S. Verma ◽  
Lisa D. Eli ◽  
...  

An estimated 15–20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ERBB2/neu). Two small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), lapatinib and neratinib, have been approved for the treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Lapatinib, a reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ERBB1/HER1) and HER2 TKI, is used for the treatment of advanced HER2+ breast cancer in combination with capecitabine, in combination with trastuzumab in patients with hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer, and in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for the first-line treatment of HER2+ breast cancer. Neratinib, a next-generation, irreversible pan-HER TKI, is used in the US for extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer following 1 year of trastuzumab. In Europe, neratinib is used in the extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive HER2+ breast cancer who are less than 1 year from the completion of prior adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Preclinical studies have shown that these agents have distinct properties that may impact their clinical activity. This review describes the preclinical characterization of lapatinib and neratinib, with a focus on the differences between these two agents that may have implications for patient management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13615-e13615
Author(s):  
Kirsten M. M. Beyer ◽  
Yuhong M. Zhou ◽  
Purushottam W. Laud ◽  
Emily McGinley ◽  
Tina W.F. Yen ◽  
...  

e13615 Background: Although racism and racial residential segregation are widely considered to contribute to health disparities, including in breast cancer, studies examining the impact of mortgage discrimination, a factor contributing to residential racial segregation, and breast cancer survival are limited. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between redlining (mortgage discrimination based on property location) and survival among older women with breast cancer. Methods: Using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) database, we estimated redlining for all census tracts in the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) within 15 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas. This measure was linked by tract with a SEER-Medicare cohort of 27,516 women aged 66-90 years with an incident stage I-IV breast cancer in 2007-2009 and claims information through 2014. We used cox proportional hazards regression models with survival time as the outcome variable and a 4-level categorical logged redlining variable as the key predictor. We also modeled the hazard ratio using redlining as a continuous variable. Models were stratified by stage, ER/PR status, and age group and adjusted for comorbidity and MSA-level standard error. Results: At a median follow-up of 72 months, one-third of the cohort was deceased. The majority of the cohort had no comorbidities and had hormone receptor-positive, early stage (I/II) cancers. Redlining was associated with poorer survival. When redlining is discretized into four groups with approximate equal-sized intervals, the first and second highest redlining groups are significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 1.226 [1.108, 1.355] for the highest group; HR = 1.159 [1.095, 1.228] for the second highest group). When redlining and its quadratic terms are included in the model, the original and square terms are significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 1.177 [1.111, 1.248] for redlining; HR = 0.982 [0.973, 0.991] for squared redlining). Conclusions: The study suggests that redlining could negatively contribute to breast cancer survival. Persistent place-based mortgage discrimination, as a manifestation of institutional racism, could have long-term effects on people’s health, possibly by impacting health care access or exposing residents to harmful neighborhood conditions. Housing policies that seek to reduce or eliminate place-based mortgage discrimination could contribute to reducing breast cancer survival disparities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazmin San Miguel ◽  
Scarlett L Gomez ◽  
James D Murphy ◽  
Richard B Schwab ◽  
Corinne McDaniels-Davidson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (S1) ◽  
pp. S124-S128 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Rutherford ◽  
G A Abel ◽  
D C Greenberg ◽  
P C Lambert ◽  
G Lyratzopoulos

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey Martindale ◽  
Awinder Singh ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
Ashley Steinberg ◽  
Amer Homsi ◽  
...  

Breast cancer survival has significantly improved over the past two decades. However, the diagnosis of breast cancer is lower and the mortality rate remains higher, in African American women (AA) compared to Caucasian-American women. The purpose of this investigation is to analyze postoperative events that may affect breast cancer survival. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from The Brooklyn Hospital Center cancer registry from 1997 to 2010. Of the 1538 patients in the registry, 1226 are AA and 269 are Caucasian. The study was divided into two time periods, 1997–2004 (period A) and 2005–2010 (period B), in order to assess the effect of treatment outcomes on survival. During period A, 5-year survival probabilities of 75.37%, 74.53%, and 78.70% were seen among all patients, AA women and Caucasian women, respectively. These probabilities increased to 87.62%, 87.15% and 89.99% in period B. Improved survival in AA women may be attributed to the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and hormonal therapy. Improved survival in Caucasian patients was attributed to the use of radiation therapy, as well as earlier detection resulting in more favorable tumor grades and pathological stages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document