Influence of Adhesive Layer Thickness of Dentin Adhesives on Microtensile Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Tae-Yub Kwon ◽  
Young-Jin Kim
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Dentin Adhesives

Microtensile Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Luting Cements to Dentin by the Type of Dentin Adhesives

2007 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 889-892
Author(s):  
S.Y. Kim ◽  
D.W. Kim ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
K.K. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Dentin Adhesives ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

This study was performed to investigate the bond strength between 4 dentin adhesives and resin luting cements by means of μTBS test. The materials used in this study were four resin cements (Choice, Panavia F, RelyX ARC, Bistite II DC), one 3-step adhesive (All-Bond2), one 2- step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE-Bond) and two 1-step self-etching adhesives(Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F). Combination of 4 different dentin adhesives with 4 resin cements made up 16 experimental groups. Extracted human mandibular third molars without caries and restoratives were stored in saline and used within 1 month of extraction. All adhesive systems and resin cements were manipulated and applied to the dentin surfaces according to the manufactures’ instructions. The resin composite “overlays” prepared with 6 mm thickness (Tescera, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) were luted with each resin cement. Each sample was measured μTBS. 1-step self-etching adhesives coupled with all resin luting cements used in this study resulted in lower bond strength except of OU-PA group. When Choice, RelyX ARC and Bistite II were used, Clearfil SE-Bond showed significantly higher μTBS values than 1-step self-etching adhesives (p<0.05). Clearfil SE-Bond did not show significant μTBS values than All-Bond 2 that is conventional 3-step dentin adhesive (p>0.05).

scholarly journals Interaction morphology and bond strength of nanofilled simplified-step adhesives to acid etched dentin

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 349-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Di Hipólito ◽  
André Figueiredo Reis ◽  
Sumita B Mitra ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Colloidal Silica ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Tem Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adhesive Layers

ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the effect of nanofillers incorporated into adhesives on the microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS) and interfacial micromorphology to dentin.Methods: The occlusal enamel of 5 human molars was removed and each tooth sectioned into four quarters. The exposed dentin was treated with one of the following adhesives: Adper Single Bond (SB-unfilled), OptiBond Solo Plus (OS-barium aluminoborosilicate, 400nm Ø), Prime & Bond NT (NT-colloidal silica, 7-40 nm Ø) and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2-colloidal silica, 5nm Ø). Cylinders of resin-based composite were constructed on the adhesive layers. After 24-hour storage, the restored tooth-quadrants were sectioned to obtain stick-shaped specimens (0.8 mm2, cross-sectional area) and submitted to μ-TBS at a cross-speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = .05). Twenty-eight additional teeth were used for interfacial micromorphologic analysis by SEM (16-teeth) and TEM (12-teeth). The dentin surfaces of 32 discs were treated with the adhesives (8 discs for adhesive) and laminated to form disc-pairs using a flowable resin composite for SEM/EDS analysis. For TEM, 90nm-thick nondemineralized unstained sections were processed.Results: SB2 showed significant higher bond strength than SB, OS and NT. The SEM/EDS and TEM analysis revealed nanofillers infiltrated within the interfibrillar spaces of the SB2-hybrid layer. Fillers were concentrated around patent tubular orifices and in the adhesive layer for OS and NT.Conclusion: The presence of nanofillers within the interfibrillar spaces of the SB2-hybrid layer suggests its importance in the improvement of the μ-TBS. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:349-360)

scholarly journals Influence of Water Aging on Microtensile Bond Strength of a Flowable and a Packable Bulk-fill Resin Composites to Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Ayah Atif Selim ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Abo Elezz ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Aging Effect ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Influence Of Water

AIM: Investigation of the aging effect on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite (RC) versus a conventionally incrementally applied one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 45 sound human impacted third molars extracted molars have been selected to prepare specimens for the μTBS test. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C) according to type of RC material which used for restoring the teeth. Where nanohybrid RC (Grandio®SO) was used as the control Group (C1), packable bulk-fill RC (X-tra fil®) was used for restoring teeth in C2 group and flowable bulk-fill RC (X-tra base®) was used for restoring teeth in C3 group. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 5) according to the water storage time, where in subgroup 1; teeth were stored for 24 h, subgroup 2; teeth were stored for 3 months while for subgroup 3; and teeth were stored for 6 months. After water storage, teeth were sectioned for preparation of μTBS testing beams. Maximum tensile stresses were recorded in megapascal (MPa). RESULTS: After 24 h of water storage, the X-tra base® showed a higher statistically significant μTBS to dentin (33.82 ± 9.84 MPa) than did the other two types of RCs. After 3 months, the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean value of μTBS (10.90 ± 5.66 MPa), meanwhile, after 6 months of water storage Grandio®SO showed the highest mean value of μTBS (15.85 ± 6.76 MPa). Regardless of the time the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean of μTBS (15.07 ± 11.73 MPa), while there is no significant difference between the X-tra base® and Grandio®SO. Furthermore, the water aging adversely affects μTBS values which deceased gradually by time. CONCLUSION: The packable bulk-fill RC characterized by lower μTBS to dentin in comparison to the flowable bulk fill and the incrementally applied nanohybrid RCs. Furthermore, the μTBS of the three tested materials decreased gradually by aging.

scholarly journals Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (21) ◽  
pp. 2405-2418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Derya Merve Halacoglu ◽  
Zümrüt Ceren Ozduman ◽  
Duygu Tuncer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Multi Mode

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength of repaired indirect resin composite

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Porntida Visuttiwattanakorn ◽  
Kallaya Suputtamongkol ◽  
Duangjai Angkoonsit ◽  
Sunattha Kaewthong ◽  
Piyanan Charoonanan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength

The Effect of Endodontic Irrigants on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Dentin Adhesives

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1259-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haktan Yurdagüven ◽  
Jale Tanalp ◽  
Burcu Toydemir ◽  
Kambiz Mohseni ◽  
Mübin Soyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Dentin Adhesives

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic Repaired with Composite Resin

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Claudia Ramos Colares ◽  
Jiovanne Rabelo Neri ◽  
Andre Mattos Brito de Souza ◽  
Karina Matthes de Freitas Pontes ◽  
Juliano Sartori Mendonca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Airborne Particle ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Pretreatment ◽  
Oxide Particles

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for µTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). µTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher µTBS than G3 (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p>0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.

scholarly journals Effect of Non-Thermal Argon Plasma on Bond Strength of a Self-Etch Adhesive System to NaOCl-Treated Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Luiz Bittencourt de Abreu ◽  
Maíra Prado ◽  
Renata Antoun Simão ◽  
Eduardo Moreira da Silva ◽  
Katia Regina Hostilio Cervantes Dias
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Plasma Treatment ◽  
Ftir Spectroscopy ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Argon Plasma ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Chemical Modifications ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Studies have been showing a decrease of bond strength in dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of non-thermal argon plasma on the bond strength of a self-etch adhesive system to dentin exposed to NaOCl. Thirty-two flat dentin surfaces of bovine incisors were immersed in 2.5% NaOCl for 30 min to simulate the irrigation step during endodontic treatment. The specimens were divided into four groups (n=8), according to the surface treatment: Control (without plasma treatment), AR15 (argon plasma for 15 s), AR30 (argon plasma for 30 s) and AR45 (argon plasma for 45 s). For microtensile bond strength test, 5 specimens were used per group. In each group, the specimens were hybridized with a self-etch adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond) and resin composite buildups were constructed. After 48 h of water storage, specimens were sectioned into sticks (5 per tooth, 25 per group) and subjected to microtensile bond strength test (μTBS) until failure, evaluating failure mode. Three specimens per group were analyzed under FTIR spectroscopy to verify the chemical modifications produced in dentin. μTBS data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tamhane tests (p<0.05). AR30 showed the highest μTBS (20.86±9.0). AR15 (13.81±6.4) and AR45 (11.51±6.8) were statistically similar to control (13.67±8.1). FTIR spectroscopy showed that argon plasma treatment produced chemical modifications in dentin. In conclusion, non-thermal argon plasma treatment for 30 s produced chemical changes in dentin and improved the μTBs of Clearfil SE Bond to NaOCl-treated dentin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document