Evaluation of the Microtensile Bond Strength between Resin Composite and Hydrofluoric Acid Etched Ceramic in Different Storage Media

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2671-2685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Ho ◽  
Jukka P. Matinlinna
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Media

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic Repaired with Composite Resin

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Claudia Ramos Colares ◽  
Jiovanne Rabelo Neri ◽  
Andre Mattos Brito de Souza ◽  
Karina Matthes de Freitas Pontes ◽  
Juliano Sartori Mendonca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Airborne Particle ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Pretreatment ◽  
Oxide Particles

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for µTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). µTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher µTBS than G3 (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p>0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.

scholarly journals Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos José Soares ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira ◽  
Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo ◽  
Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonded Interface ◽  
Luting Composite ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on composite resin on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. Two laboratory composites for indirect restorations, Solidex and Targis, and a conventional composite, Filtek Z250, were tested. Forty-eight composite resin blocks (5.0 x 5.0 x 5.0mm) were incrementally manufactured, which were randomly divided into six groups, according to the surface treatments: 1- control, 600-grit SiC paper (C); 2- silane priming (SI); 3- sandblasting with 50 mm Al2O3 for 10s (SA); 4- etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s (HF); 5- HF + SI; 6 - SA + SI. Composite blocks submitted to similar surface treatments were bonded together with the resin adhesive Single Bond and Rely X luting composite. A 500-g load was applied for 5 minutes and the samples were light-cured for 40s. The bonded blocks were serially sectioned into 3 slabs with 0.9mm of thickness perpendicularly to the bonded interface (n = 12). Slabs were trimmed to a dumbbell shape and tested in tension at 0.5mm/min. For all composites tested, the application of a silane primer after sandblasting provided the highest bond strength means.

scholarly journals Influence of Water Aging on Microtensile Bond Strength of a Flowable and a Packable Bulk-fill Resin Composites to Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Ayah Atif Selim ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Abo Elezz ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Aging Effect ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Influence Of Water

AIM: Investigation of the aging effect on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite (RC) versus a conventionally incrementally applied one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 45 sound human impacted third molars extracted molars have been selected to prepare specimens for the μTBS test. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C) according to type of RC material which used for restoring the teeth. Where nanohybrid RC (Grandio®SO) was used as the control Group (C1), packable bulk-fill RC (X-tra fil®) was used for restoring teeth in C2 group and flowable bulk-fill RC (X-tra base®) was used for restoring teeth in C3 group. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 5) according to the water storage time, where in subgroup 1; teeth were stored for 24 h, subgroup 2; teeth were stored for 3 months while for subgroup 3; and teeth were stored for 6 months. After water storage, teeth were sectioned for preparation of μTBS testing beams. Maximum tensile stresses were recorded in megapascal (MPa). RESULTS: After 24 h of water storage, the X-tra base® showed a higher statistically significant μTBS to dentin (33.82 ± 9.84 MPa) than did the other two types of RCs. After 3 months, the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean value of μTBS (10.90 ± 5.66 MPa), meanwhile, after 6 months of water storage Grandio®SO showed the highest mean value of μTBS (15.85 ± 6.76 MPa). Regardless of the time the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean of μTBS (15.07 ± 11.73 MPa), while there is no significant difference between the X-tra base® and Grandio®SO. Furthermore, the water aging adversely affects μTBS values which deceased gradually by time. CONCLUSION: The packable bulk-fill RC characterized by lower μTBS to dentin in comparison to the flowable bulk fill and the incrementally applied nanohybrid RCs. Furthermore, the μTBS of the three tested materials decreased gradually by aging.

scholarly journals Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (21) ◽  
pp. 2405-2418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Derya Merve Halacoglu ◽  
Zümrüt Ceren Ozduman ◽  
Duygu Tuncer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Multi Mode

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength of repaired indirect resin composite

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Porntida Visuttiwattanakorn ◽  
Kallaya Suputtamongkol ◽  
Duangjai Angkoonsit ◽  
Sunattha Kaewthong ◽  
Piyanan Charoonanan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength

Microtensile Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Luting Cements to Dentin by the Type of Dentin Adhesives

2007 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 889-892
Author(s):  
S.Y. Kim ◽  
D.W. Kim ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
K.K. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Dentin Adhesives ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

This study was performed to investigate the bond strength between 4 dentin adhesives and resin luting cements by means of μTBS test. The materials used in this study were four resin cements (Choice, Panavia F, RelyX ARC, Bistite II DC), one 3-step adhesive (All-Bond2), one 2- step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE-Bond) and two 1-step self-etching adhesives(Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F). Combination of 4 different dentin adhesives with 4 resin cements made up 16 experimental groups. Extracted human mandibular third molars without caries and restoratives were stored in saline and used within 1 month of extraction. All adhesive systems and resin cements were manipulated and applied to the dentin surfaces according to the manufactures’ instructions. The resin composite “overlays” prepared with 6 mm thickness (Tescera, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) were luted with each resin cement. Each sample was measured μTBS. 1-step self-etching adhesives coupled with all resin luting cements used in this study resulted in lower bond strength except of OU-PA group. When Choice, RelyX ARC and Bistite II were used, Clearfil SE-Bond showed significantly higher μTBS values than 1-step self-etching adhesives (p<0.05). Clearfil SE-Bond did not show significant μTBS values than All-Bond 2 that is conventional 3-step dentin adhesive (p>0.05).

scholarly journals Effect of Non-Thermal Argon Plasma on Bond Strength of a Self-Etch Adhesive System to NaOCl-Treated Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Luiz Bittencourt de Abreu ◽  
Maíra Prado ◽  
Renata Antoun Simão ◽  
Eduardo Moreira da Silva ◽  
Katia Regina Hostilio Cervantes Dias
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Plasma Treatment ◽  
Ftir Spectroscopy ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Argon Plasma ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Chemical Modifications ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Studies have been showing a decrease of bond strength in dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of non-thermal argon plasma on the bond strength of a self-etch adhesive system to dentin exposed to NaOCl. Thirty-two flat dentin surfaces of bovine incisors were immersed in 2.5% NaOCl for 30 min to simulate the irrigation step during endodontic treatment. The specimens were divided into four groups (n=8), according to the surface treatment: Control (without plasma treatment), AR15 (argon plasma for 15 s), AR30 (argon plasma for 30 s) and AR45 (argon plasma for 45 s). For microtensile bond strength test, 5 specimens were used per group. In each group, the specimens were hybridized with a self-etch adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond) and resin composite buildups were constructed. After 48 h of water storage, specimens were sectioned into sticks (5 per tooth, 25 per group) and subjected to microtensile bond strength test (μTBS) until failure, evaluating failure mode. Three specimens per group were analyzed under FTIR spectroscopy to verify the chemical modifications produced in dentin. μTBS data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tamhane tests (p<0.05). AR30 showed the highest μTBS (20.86±9.0). AR15 (13.81±6.4) and AR45 (11.51±6.8) were statistically similar to control (13.67±8.1). FTIR spectroscopy showed that argon plasma treatment produced chemical modifications in dentin. In conclusion, non-thermal argon plasma treatment for 30 s produced chemical changes in dentin and improved the μTBs of Clearfil SE Bond to NaOCl-treated dentin.

scholarly journals Chitosan in different concentrations added to a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system: influence on bond strength to dentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Rafael Avellar de Carvalho Nunes ◽  
Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral ◽  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França ◽  
Cecilia Pedroso Turssi ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Strength Tests

<p class="Corpo"><strong>Objective</strong>: the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of adding different concentrations of chitosan to an experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system on the bond strength and failure mode to dentin. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>: thirty-two flat dentin surfaces were obtained from extracted human third molars and divided into four groups  (n=8) for application of the adhesive systems: AD - conventional two-step adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2); EXP – experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system; Chi0.2% - EXP with addition of 0.2% Chitosan; Chi0.5% - EXP with addition of 0.5% Chitosan. Resin composite build-ups were made and the composite/dentin specimens were sectioned to obtain rectangular beams with a bond area of approximately 1mm<sup>2</sup>. After 24 hours, the sticks were submitted to microtensile bond strength tests in a universal test machine. The fracture pattern was evaluated under a stereoscopic loupe at 40X magnification. <strong>Results</strong>: one-way analysis of variance showed that the type of adhesive system had no significant effect on the bond strength values (p = 0.142), showing the mean bond strength values (standard deviation), in MPa, for the groups as follows: AD=20.1 (5.4); EXP=16.6 (2.3); Chi0.2%=16.1 (2.8); Chi0.5%=16.9 (2.3). In all the groups there was predominance of cohesive fractures in dentin, representing 68 to 82% of the failure modes. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: the addition of 0.2 or 0.5% of chitosan had no influence on the bond strength and failure mode of an experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system to dentin.</p><p class="Corpo"><strong>Keywords</strong></p><p class="Corpo">Chitosan; Dental Adhesives; Failure Mode; Microtensile Bond Strength.</p>

scholarly journals Interaction morphology and bond strength of nanofilled simplified-step adhesives to acid etched dentin

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 349-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Di Hipólito ◽  
André Figueiredo Reis ◽  
Sumita B Mitra ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Colloidal Silica ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Tem Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adhesive Layers

ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the effect of nanofillers incorporated into adhesives on the microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS) and interfacial micromorphology to dentin.Methods: The occlusal enamel of 5 human molars was removed and each tooth sectioned into four quarters. The exposed dentin was treated with one of the following adhesives: Adper Single Bond (SB-unfilled), OptiBond Solo Plus (OS-barium aluminoborosilicate, 400nm Ø), Prime & Bond NT (NT-colloidal silica, 7-40 nm Ø) and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2-colloidal silica, 5nm Ø). Cylinders of resin-based composite were constructed on the adhesive layers. After 24-hour storage, the restored tooth-quadrants were sectioned to obtain stick-shaped specimens (0.8 mm2, cross-sectional area) and submitted to μ-TBS at a cross-speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = .05). Twenty-eight additional teeth were used for interfacial micromorphologic analysis by SEM (16-teeth) and TEM (12-teeth). The dentin surfaces of 32 discs were treated with the adhesives (8 discs for adhesive) and laminated to form disc-pairs using a flowable resin composite for SEM/EDS analysis. For TEM, 90nm-thick nondemineralized unstained sections were processed.Results: SB2 showed significant higher bond strength than SB, OS and NT. The SEM/EDS and TEM analysis revealed nanofillers infiltrated within the interfibrillar spaces of the SB2-hybrid layer. Fillers were concentrated around patent tubular orifices and in the adhesive layer for OS and NT.Conclusion: The presence of nanofillers within the interfibrillar spaces of the SB2-hybrid layer suggests its importance in the improvement of the μ-TBS. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:349-360)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document