Redesigning Indonesia Copyright Act to Accommodate Autonomous Intelligent System: Status Quo and Room for Improvement

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurensia Andrini
Keyword(s):  
Intelligent System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Duration Of Protection

Abstract It is an undeniable fact that artificial intelligence has been developed up until the point that it requires a very minimum human involvement. In other words, the current development has brought an Autonomous Intelligent System (AIS) into reality. On one hand, an AIS plays a significant role in creating easier life for human being. On the other hand, however, AIS’ existence creates too much challenge for the current legal framework. In the realm of Copyright law, the very fundamental question is based on the fact that AIS can create copyrightable works on its own. It can create songs, music, paintings, or even a cook-book. In such kind of circumstances, scholars have a thought-provoking debate on whether or not AIS shall be given Copyright. It is the purpose of my research to take a look into Indonesia’s current Copyright Act to analyse (i) to what extent Indonesia’s Copyright Act can be utilised to accommodate AIS and (ii) the aspects of Copyright Act need to be improved in order to accommodate AIS in the Indonesia’s Copyright Act. In order to address the research objectives, I use normative approach by way of literature study. The temporary data gathered from my literature study is then analysed qualitatively in order to reach desirable conclusion. This study finds that (i) there is a very minimum provision with regard to AIS in the Indonesia’s Copyright Act. There have been stipulations to determine who shall be entitled to hold copyright upon a creation. However, there has not been any stipulations allowing the possibility for AIS to be regarded as copyright holder; and therefore (ii) the re-design of Indonesia’s Copyright Act need to accommodate the issues of (a) copyrightability of AIS’ work, (b) the moral rights and economic rights given to AIS, as well as (c) the duration of protection if AIS is to be regarded as a copyright holder.

scholarly journals PENGATURAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA PERMAINAN VIDEO

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Nusan Indah Permata Sari ◽  
Anak Agung Gede Agung Dharma Kusuma
Keyword(s):  
Video Games ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Know How ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
Copyright Laws

Tujuan penulisan jurnal ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaturan permainan video dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap pelanggaran permainan video. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekaburan norma pada Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yaitu pada ketentuan pasal 40 ayat (1) huruf r “permainan video”. Kekaburan norma ini terlihat jelas karena tidak adanya penjelasan lebih lanjut terkait dengan pengertian permainan video serta pengklasifikasiannya. Selain itu terlihat jelas pula bahwa terdapat kekosongan norma terkait dengan sanksi bagi pelanggar hak moral pencipta yang tidak dilakukan tidak untuk kegiatan komersiil. Selanjutnya kesimpulan kedua bahwa permainan video merupakan salah satu objek dari suatu ciptaan yang dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yang perlindungannya berlaku selama 50 tahun sejak permainan video tersebut dipublikasikan.  Berdasarkan ketentuan pasal 95 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta atau ahli waris dari pencipta permainan video dapat mengajukan tuntutan ganti rugi ke Pengadilan Niaga kepada pelaku pelanggaran hak ekonomi pencipta permainan video.   The purpose of this scientific journal is to know the rules of the video games in the Copyright law and to know how the copyright legal protection against video games violations. In this paper, the research method used is normative legal research which uses a statutory approach. The result of this journal are indicate there is a blurry norm in Article 40 paragraph letter r of Copyright law. The ambiguity of norm is cleary seen because there is no further explanation related to the understanding of video games and their classification and it is also cleary that there are void norm related to sanction for violators of the creator’s moral rights wich are not carried out not for commercial activities. Then, the second conclusions is that video games are one of the object of a creation that get protection from Copyright laws, the protection os valid for 50 years since the video games was published. Based on the Article 95 of Copyright law, the creator or copyright holder or the heirs of creator of video games can submit compensations claims to the Commersial Court to the perpretators of violations of the economic rights of the video games creator’s.

scholarly journals Hak Cipta Karya Seni Lukis Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Emy Kencana Wati ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Form ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Law System ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
The Right

The use of copyright for painting artworks in the Intellectual Property Law system in Indonesia provides many benefits for painters as copyright owners or copyright holders. A creator or copyright holder has Economic Rights on his work which includes the right to duplicate, display, and lease his work to third parties. Copyright Law No. 28/2014 states that copyright can be used as an object of Fiduciary security. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the copyright of painting works that can be used as fiduciary guarantees to get credit in banking and to analyze the execution of copyright guarantees of painting works if the debtor defaults The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and the sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with literature collection techniques which are analyzed in descriptive analytical form. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the characteristics of copyright in painting are providing protection for works of art and providing economic rights for the creators or copyright holders and moral rights for the creators. The execution of copyright guarantees can be done by executorial method in accordance with article 29 of the Fiduciary Law.

scholarly journals Kajian Hukum Hak Cipta Penggunaan Audio Populer Dalam Pembuatan Vidio Menggunakan Aplikasi Dubsmash

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Dimas Hamdanniam ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Video Creation

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji dan menganalisa: (1) penggunaan audio populer dalam pembuatan video menggunakan aplikasi dubsmash melanggar hak cipta ditinjau dari UUHC. (2) peran dari Notaris dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta dalam hal adany penggunaan audio populer yang membuat video menggunakan aplikasi dubsmash tanpa izin (3) kendala dan solusi dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta.Hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) Pelanggaran atas penggunaan audio populer dalam pembuatan video menggunakan aplikasi dubsmash ditinjau dari UUHC dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan yang termasuk pelanggaran hak ekonomi dimana Pencipta atau pemegang hak ekonominya terenggut. (2) Peran dari Notaris dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta dalam hal adanya penggunaan audio populer yang pembuatan video menggunakan aplikasi Dubsmash tanpa izin ditinjau dari UUHC adalah sebagai konsultan yang terdaftar pada Direktorat Jendral. Perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap pencipta lagu yang diunduh melalui internet dapat dilakukan dengan cara yaitu secara hukum administrasi negara, hukum pidana dan hukum perdata. (3) Kendalanya adalah terikatannya pencipta aplikasi Dubsmash ketika mengupload dengan ketentuan dari Mobile Motion dan dalam hal penyidikan dilakukan oleh PPNS berdasarkan surat perintah penyidikan yang dikeluarkan oleh pejabat yang memiliki kompetensi terhadap hak cipta. Solusinya adalah dengan upaya preventif dan represif. Upaya preventif dilakukan dengan melakukan pencatatan hak cipta pencipta aplikasi Dubsmash atas karya ciptanya dan peran pihak pemerintah melalui Kementerian Informasi dan Teknologi untuk berperan lebih aktif dan upaya represif dilakukan dengan cara penegakan hukum berdasarkan Pasal 113 Ayat (3) UUHC.Saran dari penelitian ini adalah bagi para editor aplikasi dubsmash hendaknya harus lebih memperhatikan ketentuan hukum dalam bidang Hak Cipta di indonesia sebagaimana diatur dalam UUHC, bagi para masyarakat hendaknya mengindahkan UUHC sehingga hak pencipta dapat dilindungi.Kata kunci : Hak Cipta, Audio Populer, Dubsmash ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to examine and analyze: (1) the use of popular audio in video creation using copyright infringing dubsmash apps reviewed from UUHC. (2) the role of a Notary in the legal protection of the creator in terms of the use of popular audio which makes the video use unauthorized dubsmash applications (3) constraints and solutions in the legal protection of the creator.The results of this study are: (1) Violation of the use of popular audio in the making of video using dubsmash application viewed from UUHC can be categorized as an act which includes violation of economic rights where the Creator or his economic rights holder is taken away. (2) The role of the Notary in the legal protection of the creator in the case of the use of the popular audio-making video using the unlicensed Dubsmash app reviewed from UUHC is as a consultant registered with the Directorate General. Such provisions have privileges, as they comply with the principles of the establishment of good legislation. The protection of copyright law against songwriters downloaded through the internet may be done in a manner that is legally state administration, criminal law and civil law. (3) Constraints and solutions in the legal protection of the creator in the form of weakness of the application of compensation sanction to the offender in accordance with the value of the loss of exclusive rights in the form of moral rights and economic rights of the creator and the copyright holder. And the solution is through copyright registration through Notary to obtain legal certainty over the copyrights.Suggestion from this research is for editor of dubsmash application should have to pay more attention to legal provisions in the field of Copyright in Indonesia as regulated in UUHC, for the society should heed UUHC so that the rights of creator can be protected for the sake of nation development.Keywords: Copyright, Popular Audio, Dubsmash

Parody and Moral Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 167-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Jacques
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Personal Interests ◽  
Scope Of Protection

This chapter examines the relationship between parody and an author’s moral rights. It first traces the evolution of the concept of moral rights as a means of providing protection not only of the authors’ personal interests but also the public interest before discussing the reasons why moral rights might conflict with parodies. It considers two competing theories underlying the protection of authorial interests—the ‘monist’ theory and the ‘dualist’ theory—and their implications for the parody exception. It also explains how jurisdictions differ in the nature and scope of protection afforded to moral rights, noting that the parody exception in ‘copyright’ law does not extend to moral rights. The chapter goes on to explore the author’s paternity and integrity rights as well as their right against false attribution. It shows that, in the case of parodies, an overlap exists between the regimes applied to moral and economic rights.

scholarly journals BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK TERKAIT (NEIGHBOURING RIGHTS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-35
Author(s):  
Zulvia Makka
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law ◽  
Neighbouring Rights ◽  
Scope Of Protection

ABSTRAKHak terkait adalah hak yang berkaitan dengan hak cipta yang merupakan hak ekslusif bagi pelaku pertunjukan, producer fonogram, atau lembaga penyiaran. Berdasarkan pengertian hak terkait tersebut maka dapat dipahami bahwa yang merupakan pemilik hak terkait adalah pelaku pertunjukan, produser fonogram (lebih dikenal sebagai produser rekaman), dan lembaga penyiaran. Perlu adanya perlindungan untuk pelaku karena pelaku pertunjukan memiliki hak moral dan hak ekonomi yang terdapat pada pasal 23 UUHC. Yang memuat pada pelaku pertunjukan yang tidak dapat dihilang atau tidak dapat dihapus dengan alasan apapun. Namun pada prakteknya seringkali hak terkait ini dikesampingkan, karena lingkup perlindungan tidak hanya mencakup hak ekonomi dan hak moral. Permasalahan diatas menimbulkan isi hukum bentuk perlindungan terhadap hak terkait menurut undang-undang Hak Cipta dan perolehan Hak Terkait dalam Hak Cipta Isu hukum ini diteliti dengan menggunakan metode dengan tipe penelitian Normatif.Bentuk pelindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Terkait menurut Undang-Undang Hak Cipta terdiri dari 2 (dua) yaitu, perlindungn hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perolehan hak terkait dalam UUHC yaitu hak moral dan hak ekonomis. Hak moral pelaku pertunjukan merupakan hak yang melekat pada pelaku pertunjukan yang tidak dapat dihilangkan atau tidak dapat dihapus dengan alasan apapun walaupun hak terkait telah dialihkan. Hak Ekonomi Pelaku Pertunjukan adalah suatu hak yang diberikan oleh Undang-undang secara eksklusif kepada Pencipta untuk untuk memanfaatkan keuntungan suatu ciptaan yang biasanya berupa publikasi suatu salinan ciptaan atau fonogram supaya dapat tersedia untuk publik dalam jumlah tertentu. Kata Kunci : Perlindungan, Hak Terkait, Hak Moral, Hak Ekonomi  AbstractRelated rights are rights relating to copyright which are exclusive rights for performers, producer phonograms, or broadcasters. Based on the understanding of related rights, it can be understood that those who are related rights holders are performers, phonogram producers (better known as record producers), and broadcasting institutions. There needs to be protection for the perpetrators because the performers have the moral rights and economic rights contained in article 23 of UUHC. Which includes the performers who cannot be lost or cannot be removed for any reason. But in practice often these related rights are ruled out, because the scope of protection does not only cover economic rights and moral rights. The above issues give rise to the contents of the law in the form of protection of related rights according to the Copyright law and the acquisition of Related Rights in Copyright This legal issue is examined using methods with normative research types.The form of legal protection against Related Rights according to the Copyright Act consists of 2 (two), namely, preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. The acquisition of related rights in the UUHC is moral rights and economic rights. The moral rights of performers are the rights inherent in the performers who cannot be removed or cannot be removed for any reason even though the related rights have been transferred. The Economic Rights of Performers is a right granted by the Law exclusively to the Creator to utilize the benefits of a work which is usually in the form of the publication of a copy of a work or phonogram so that it can be available to the public in a certain amount. Keywords: Protection, Related Rights, Moral Rights, Economic Rights

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN KARYA CIPTA FOTO CITIZEN JOURNALIST YANG DIPUBLIKASIKAN DI INSTAGRAM

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
Ni Made Dwi Marini Putri
Keyword(s):  
Moral Rights ◽  
Citizen Journalism ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
The Press ◽  
Public Citizen ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Current Paradigm

The development of the current paradigm demonstrate initiative of the citizens to share information in their possession to the public. Citizen who was only a reader, now turned into a citizen journalist, who sends the picture to the press on Instagram account on an event that attracts attention. In this research, there are two issues to be discussed namely 1) How is the protection of moral rights and economic rights over the photos produced by citizen journalist on Instagram? 2) How can the efforts of a citizen journalist to protect the copyrighted works uploaded on Instagram? This research is an empirical juridical study that examines the problem of copyright photography protection in Instagram. Moral rights protection of citizen journalist on Instagram photo is done with the mention of names of the photographer (citizen journalist) and copyright holder (press accounts on Instagram). Protection of economic rights of citizen journalism photo on Instagram as stipulated in the Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright only applies to photographs with human objects. Efforts that can be done by a citizen journalist to protect copyrighted works uploaded on Instagram are preventive efforts, respresive efforts and pre-emtive efforts. Perkembangan paradigma di era informasi saat ini menunjukkan inisiatif dari warga untuk membagikan informasi yang dimilikinya kepada publik secara cepat dan up to date. Warga yang tadinya hanya seorang pembaca, kini cenderung menjadi citizen journalist yang cenderung berinisiatif dan aktif mengirimkan hasil fotonya kepada akun pers di Instagram mengenai suatu peristiwa yang menarik perhatian. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan inti yaitu 1) Bagaimanakah perlindungan hak moral dan hak ekonomi atas foto yang dihasilkan oleh seorang citizen journalist di Instagram? 2) Bagaimanakah upaya-upaya yang dapat dilakukan seorang citizen journalist untuk melindungi karya cipta fotonya yang diunggah di Instagram? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris yang mengkaji mengenai masalah perlindungan karya cipta fotografi di Instagram. Perlindungan hak moral foto citizen journalist di Instagram dilakukan dengan penyebutan nama pencipta (citizen journalist) dan pemegang hak cipta (akun pers pada Instagram). Perlindungan hak ekonomi foto citizen journalist di Instagram sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta hanya berlaku pada karya foto dengan objek manusia. Upaya-upaya yang dapat dilakukan seorang citizen journalist untuk melindungi karya cipta fotonya yang diunggah di Instagram adalah upaya preventif, upaya respresif serta upaya pre-emtif.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCYLEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCY

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Riska Andi Fitriono ◽  
Sarwono .
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Art Conservation ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

This article aimed to analyze legal protection of Lurik Art Conservation Through <br />Intellectual Property Rights in Klaten Regency. Klaten is the area that is most<br />concerned with the survival of lurik weaving. There is someone mentioned that the<br />Klaten Regency was the capital of lurik weaving. Because the weaving of Looms<br />are not machines or Alat Tenun Bukan Mesin (hereinafter abbreviated to ATBM) <br />is a mainstay of this city. There are countless villages that become centers of lurik <br />craftsmen. This research is empirical or non-doctrinal research, which is a study<br />that sees the law not only from the perspective of legislation, but also sees the law<br />in its implementation. The results of the study show that the first legal protection in<br />preserving the current lurik art in Klaten, namely the Klaten Regency Government,<br />then stipulates the Regent's Regulation Number 53 of 2010 Article 23 Paragraph (9)<br />on the Daily Batik and Traditional Weaving Lurik Service or ATBM Striated and<br />the Klaten Regent's Decree Number : 065/1014/06 December 30, 2010 on Wearing<br />Traditional Weaving, Motives, Colors and Free Models with Attributes. Furthermore,<br />based on the Decree of the Regent of Klaten Number 050/84 of 2016 on Klaten<br />Regency's Superior Products, batik striated is one of the superior products of Klaten<br />Regency. With the issuance of these rules as an effort to protect and preserve lurik<br />art in Klaten district and referring to Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, it has<br />regulated the forms of protection of lurik art in Klaten through Article 40 paragraph<br />(1). The Second Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Against Lurik Art, namely<br />Protection of lurik artworks, besides being accommodated in Law Number 28 of 2014<br />on Copyright (Copyright Law) and Trademark Law and other intellectual property<br />right laws. Elucidation of Article 40 paragraph (1) letter j of the Copyright Law. The<br />work is protected because it has artistic value, both in relation to the picture, style,<br />and color composition. The Copyright Act also emphasizes that it is important to<br />protect Copyright because every creator, in this case, the creator of the lurik motif<br />has the right to moral rights and economic rights.

scholarly journals Digital Curation, Copyright, and Academic Research

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 17-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Charlesworth
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Digital Curation ◽  
Copyright Laws ◽  
The Impact

A defining characteristic of contemporary copyright law is the willingness of governments to accept the argument that the impact of digital technologies requires copyright owners to be given ever greater control over the use of their works, regardless of the detriment to the copyright regime's 'public interest' elements. Yet a one-size-fits-all 'all rights reserved' copyright regime clearly fails to meet the requirements of many rightsholders. One response has been the Creative Commons movement which seeks, through licences based on existing copyright laws, to provide a simple mechanism for rightsholders to disseminate their works under less restrictive conditions. The Creative Commons' initial success has led to suggestions that its principles could be equally applied to scientific research outputs, such as publications, licensing of research materials, and datasets. This article argues that the Science Commons approach, if based on the Creative Commons model, and premised at its root on utilitarian copyright law, will both fail to address contemporary policy drivers in research, or to provide researchers with the type of rights that they actually want. It suggests that constructing an appropriate set of rights for the Science Commons, particularly for datasets, will require a willingness to step outside the utilitarian model and look to the Continental copyright tradition, which sets less store in economic rights and gives greater weight to moral rights.

scholarly journals The Sampling and Remix Dilemma: What is the Role of Moral Rights in the Encouragement and Regulation of Derivative Creativity?

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Adeney
Keyword(s):  
Community Support ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Copyright Material

The borrowing and rearrangement of musical content, especially in the digital context, raises difficult questions for copyright law. There is significant community support for a loosening of the restrictions on the derivative (and particularly creative) use of copyright material. Law reform is called for. This paper discusses the possible introduction of a new exception to copyright infringement but notes that in the drafting of any such exception not only the economic rights but also the moral rights of the originating author need to be taken into account.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI DOKTRIN “FAIR USE” TERHADAP PENGEMBANGAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN OLEH AKADEMISI (DOSEN) ATAU PENELITI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 493-514
Author(s):  
Sudjana Sudjana
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Legal Discourse ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Fair Use ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Legal Practice ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Prior Consent

In this article the author discusses the fair use (Art. 43-49 Law 28/2014 re. copyright) in relation scientific work performed by lecturers and researchers.  This legal discourse in the field of copyright law will be performed using a juridical normative approach. One important finding is that the fair use doctrine allows lecturers and researchers to utilize copyright protected work from others – in the name of scientific progress or educational purposes – without having to obtain prior consent or license. Nonetheless, user of copyright protected works must pay attention to reasonable interest of copyright holder, the meaning of which is left to legal practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document