Hak Cipta Karya Seni Lukis Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia

The use of copyright for painting artworks in the Intellectual Property Law system in Indonesia provides many benefits for painters as copyright owners or copyright holders. A creator or copyright holder has Economic Rights on his work which includes the right to duplicate, display, and lease his work to third parties. Copyright Law No. 28/2014 states that copyright can be used as an object of Fiduciary security. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the copyright of painting works that can be used as fiduciary guarantees to get credit in banking and to analyze the execution of copyright guarantees of painting works if the debtor defaults The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and the sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with literature collection techniques which are analyzed in descriptive analytical form. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the characteristics of copyright in painting are providing protection for works of art and providing economic rights for the creators or copyright holders and moral rights for the creators. The execution of copyright guarantees can be done by executorial method in accordance with article 29 of the Fiduciary Law.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Cipta Karya Fotografi yang Digunakan tanpa Izin

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.1.1.2159.203-208 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 203-208

Author(s):

Putu Rahayu Purnamasari ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Analytical Form ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Legal Provisions ◽

Legal Remedies ◽

Art Works ◽

Directorate General ◽

Materials Used

Photo is the result of an image taken by a camera through a photographic process carried out by a photographer and protected as one of the copyright works in the Prevailing Laws, namely the Copyright Law No. 28/2014. Violations against copyright works often occur, but there are still many photographers who do not understand or even know about copyright and the legal provisions governing and protecting it and do not register their creations with the Directorate General of IPR. So the problem that can be investigated is how the legal protection of the rights of the creator of photographic works and what legal remedies can the creator take on the work of photography that is used without permission by other people. This study aims to determine the level of legal protection for the rights of photographic creators as well as to find out the legal actions taken by the creators of photographic works that are used without the permission of others. The method used is legal research that is normative through a statutory approach as well as a conceptual approach, and the sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with literature collection techniques which are analyzed in descriptive analytical form. Based on the results of research and analysis, it can be concluded that the copyright of photographic works is to provide protection for photo art works and to provide economic rights for the creators or copyright holders and moral rights for the creators. The route outside the court and the court route are two legal routes that can be taken in making legal remedies.

Download Full-text

Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemilik Hak Cipta Musik dan Lagu dalam Pembayaran Royalti oleh Yayasan Karya Cipta Indonesia

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ◽

10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3111.89-94 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 89-94

Author(s):

Ni Made Harini ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

Desak Gde Dwi Arini

Keyword(s):

Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Legal Issues ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Data Sources ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Economic Rights

Copyright gives an exclusive title to the work of the author which is granted by law as an award. The copyright function protects creators from copyright infringement. This study aims to explain the form of legal protection for music and song copyright owners in royalty payments by the Indonesian copyright works foundation and to describe what factors influence royalty payments and dispute resolution efforts faced by music and song copyright holders in royalty payments by the Karya Foundation. Indonesian copyright. This type of research is an empirical legal research with a conceptual approach to legal issues of fact and sociology. The data sources used were primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study indicated that copyright is regulated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The form of copyright law protection, namely legal protection of moral rights and legal protection of economic rights. Creators and the KCI Foundation have rights and obligations, in the process of paying royalties experiencing several obstacles and supporters experienced by the KCI Foundation creators and copyright users. Dispute settlement efforts through alternative arbitration and court dispute resolution.

Download Full-text

PENGATURAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA PERMAINAN VIDEO

Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i08.p01 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (8) ◽

pp. 1129

Author(s):

Nusan Indah Permata Sari ◽

Anak Agung Gede Agung Dharma Kusuma

Keyword(s):

Video Games ◽

Scientific Journal ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Know How ◽

Commercial Activities ◽

Tujuan penulisan jurnal ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaturan permainan video dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap pelanggaran permainan video. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekaburan norma pada Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yaitu pada ketentuan pasal 40 ayat (1) huruf r “permainan video”. Kekaburan norma ini terlihat jelas karena tidak adanya penjelasan lebih lanjut terkait dengan pengertian permainan video serta pengklasifikasiannya. Selain itu terlihat jelas pula bahwa terdapat kekosongan norma terkait dengan sanksi bagi pelanggar hak moral pencipta yang tidak dilakukan tidak untuk kegiatan komersiil. Selanjutnya kesimpulan kedua bahwa permainan video merupakan salah satu objek dari suatu ciptaan yang dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yang perlindungannya berlaku selama 50 tahun sejak permainan video tersebut dipublikasikan. Berdasarkan ketentuan pasal 95 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta atau ahli waris dari pencipta permainan video dapat mengajukan tuntutan ganti rugi ke Pengadilan Niaga kepada pelaku pelanggaran hak ekonomi pencipta permainan video. The purpose of this scientific journal is to know the rules of the video games in the Copyright law and to know how the copyright legal protection against video games violations. In this paper, the research method used is normative legal research which uses a statutory approach. The result of this journal are indicate there is a blurry norm in Article 40 paragraph letter r of Copyright law. The ambiguity of norm is cleary seen because there is no further explanation related to the understanding of video games and their classification and it is also cleary that there are void norm related to sanction for violators of the creator’s moral rights wich are not carried out not for commercial activities. Then, the second conclusions is that video games are one of the object of a creation that get protection from Copyright laws, the protection os valid for 50 years since the video games was published. Based on the Article 95 of Copyright law, the creator or copyright holder or the heirs of creator of video games can submit compensations claims to the Commersial Court to the perpretators of violations of the economic rights of the video games creator’s.

Download Full-text

LEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCYLEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCY

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.20162 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 354

Author(s):

Riska Andi Fitriono ◽

Sarwono .

Keyword(s):

Intellectual Property ◽

Property Rights ◽

Intellectual Property Rights ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Art Conservation ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The Law ◽

The Right

This article aimed to analyze legal protection of Lurik Art Conservation Through Intellectual Property Rights in Klaten Regency. Klaten is the area that is most concerned with the survival of lurik weaving. There is someone mentioned that the Klaten Regency was the capital of lurik weaving. Because the weaving of Looms are not machines or Alat Tenun Bukan Mesin (hereinafter abbreviated to ATBM) is a mainstay of this city. There are countless villages that become centers of lurik craftsmen. This research is empirical or non-doctrinal research, which is a study that sees the law not only from the perspective of legislation, but also sees the law in its implementation. The results of the study show that the first legal protection in preserving the current lurik art in Klaten, namely the Klaten Regency Government, then stipulates the Regent's Regulation Number 53 of 2010 Article 23 Paragraph (9) on the Daily Batik and Traditional Weaving Lurik Service or ATBM Striated and the Klaten Regent's Decree Number : 065/1014/06 December 30, 2010 on Wearing Traditional Weaving, Motives, Colors and Free Models with Attributes. Furthermore, based on the Decree of the Regent of Klaten Number 050/84 of 2016 on Klaten Regency's Superior Products, batik striated is one of the superior products of Klaten Regency. With the issuance of these rules as an effort to protect and preserve lurik art in Klaten district and referring to Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, it has regulated the forms of protection of lurik art in Klaten through Article 40 paragraph (1). The Second Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Against Lurik Art, namely Protection of lurik artworks, besides being accommodated in Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright (Copyright Law) and Trademark Law and other intellectual property right laws. Elucidation of Article 40 paragraph (1) letter j of the Copyright Law. The work is protected because it has artistic value, both in relation to the picture, style, and color composition. The Copyright Act also emphasizes that it is important to protect Copyright because every creator, in this case, the creator of the lurik motif has the right to moral rights and economic rights.

Download Full-text

The Parody Exception in Copyright Law

10.1093/oso/9780198806936.001.0001 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sabine Jacques

Keyword(s):

Freedom Of Expression ◽

The United States ◽

Fundamental Rights ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Artistic Expression ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The United Kingdom ◽

Ultimate Objective ◽

The Right

Parodies have been created throughout times and cultures. A glimpse at the judicial latitude generally afforded to parodies, satires, caricatures, and pastiches demonstrates the social and cultural value of this particular form of artistic expression. With the advent of technologies and the evolution of copyright legislation, creative endeavours in the form of parody were rejuvenated but became unlawful. While copyright law grants exclusive rights to right-holders, these rights are not absolute. Legislation includes specific exceptions, which preclude right-holders from exercising their prerogatives in particular cases which foster creativity and cultural diversity within that society. The parody exception pertains to this ultimate objective by permitting users to reproduce copyright-protected materials for the purpose of parody. To understand the meaning and scope of the parody exception, this book examines and compares five jurisdictions which differ in their protection of parodies: France, Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It is concerned with finding an appropriate balance between the protection awarded to right-holders and the public interest. This is achieved by analysing the parody exception to the economic rights of right-holders, the preservation of moral rights, and the interaction of the parody exception with contract law. As parodies constitute an artistic expression protected under the right to freedom of expression, this book also considers the influence of freedom of expression on the interpretation of this specific copyright exception. Furthermore, this book aims at providing guidance on how to resolve disputes where fundamental rights are in conflict.

Download Full-text

A LEGAL AWARENESS OF COPYRIGHT ON REGIONAL SONG CREATORS

International Journal of Law Reconstruction ◽

10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 49

Author(s):

Muchtar A H Labetubun

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Specific Information ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Collective Management ◽

Right To Copy ◽

The Right ◽

Exclusive Right ◽

Economic Standpoint

Copyright as an exclusive right for the creator or copyright holder to carry out the results of his ideas or ideas in the form of specific information or certain. Basically, copyright is the right to copy, adapt or produce a work, copyright is possible for the right holder to limit the copying or in any form without the illegitimate permission of a work, it can be realized by registration copyright, in its application, of course, there are obstacles that exist in the enforcement of copyright law itself. One example is the lack of awareness in registration copyright of songs by the creator. The research objective was to determine and analyze the legal awareness of regional pop songwriters to register their copyright. The research method uses normative research through a conceptual approach and a statue approach. The results show that the composers of regional pop songs know the importance of recording copyright because it is in accordance with the mandate of Act No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and has also participated in the socialization carried out by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, but songwriters do not record their work. Some songwriters consider that the registration is of no use because, from an economic standpoint, they cannot profit or lose personally, besides that their aspirations have not been fully channeled by the related institutions they shelter in this case the Collective Management Institute. Therefore to decide on the sale of the song's copyrighted work rather than registering it to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in the Field of Intellectual Property.

Download Full-text

Redesigning Indonesia Copyright Act to Accommodate Autonomous Intelligent System: Status Quo and Room for Improvement

Asian Journal of Law and Economics ◽

10.1515/ajle-2018-0013 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

Author(s):

Laurensia Andrini

Keyword(s):

Intelligent System ◽

Legal Framework ◽

Status Quo ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Literature Study ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Normative Approach ◽

Duration Of Protection

Abstract It is an undeniable fact that artificial intelligence has been developed up until the point that it requires a very minimum human involvement. In other words, the current development has brought an Autonomous Intelligent System (AIS) into reality. On one hand, an AIS plays a significant role in creating easier life for human being. On the other hand, however, AIS’ existence creates too much challenge for the current legal framework. In the realm of Copyright law, the very fundamental question is based on the fact that AIS can create copyrightable works on its own. It can create songs, music, paintings, or even a cook-book. In such kind of circumstances, scholars have a thought-provoking debate on whether or not AIS shall be given Copyright. It is the purpose of my research to take a look into Indonesia’s current Copyright Act to analyse (i) to what extent Indonesia’s Copyright Act can be utilised to accommodate AIS and (ii) the aspects of Copyright Act need to be improved in order to accommodate AIS in the Indonesia’s Copyright Act. In order to address the research objectives, I use normative approach by way of literature study. The temporary data gathered from my literature study is then analysed qualitatively in order to reach desirable conclusion. This study finds that (i) there is a very minimum provision with regard to AIS in the Indonesia’s Copyright Act. There have been stipulations to determine who shall be entitled to hold copyright upon a creation. However, there has not been any stipulations allowing the possibility for AIS to be regarded as copyright holder; and therefore (ii) the re-design of Indonesia’s Copyright Act need to accommodate the issues of (a) copyrightability of AIS’ work, (b) the moral rights and economic rights given to AIS, as well as (c) the duration of protection if AIS is to be regarded as a copyright holder.

Download Full-text

Kajian Hukum Hak Cipta Penggunaan Audio Populer Dalam Pembuatan Vidio Menggunakan Aplikasi Dubsmash

Jurnal Akta ◽

10.30659/akta.v5i1.2541 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 141

Author(s):

Dimas Hamdanniam ◽

Akhmad Khisni

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Legal Provisions ◽

State Administration ◽

Directorate General ◽

Video Creation

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji dan menganalisa: (1) penggunaan audio populer dalam pembuatan video menggunakan aplikasi dubsmash melanggar hak cipta ditinjau dari UUHC. (2) peran dari Notaris dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta dalam hal adany penggunaan audio populer yang membuat video menggunakan aplikasi dubsmash tanpa izin (3) kendala dan solusi dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta.Hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) Pelanggaran atas penggunaan audio populer dalam pembuatan video menggunakan aplikasi dubsmash ditinjau dari UUHC dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan yang termasuk pelanggaran hak ekonomi dimana Pencipta atau pemegang hak ekonominya terenggut. (2) Peran dari Notaris dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta dalam hal adanya penggunaan audio populer yang pembuatan video menggunakan aplikasi Dubsmash tanpa izin ditinjau dari UUHC adalah sebagai konsultan yang terdaftar pada Direktorat Jendral. Perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap pencipta lagu yang diunduh melalui internet dapat dilakukan dengan cara yaitu secara hukum administrasi negara, hukum pidana dan hukum perdata. (3) Kendalanya adalah terikatannya pencipta aplikasi Dubsmash ketika mengupload dengan ketentuan dari Mobile Motion dan dalam hal penyidikan dilakukan oleh PPNS berdasarkan surat perintah penyidikan yang dikeluarkan oleh pejabat yang memiliki kompetensi terhadap hak cipta. Solusinya adalah dengan upaya preventif dan represif. Upaya preventif dilakukan dengan melakukan pencatatan hak cipta pencipta aplikasi Dubsmash atas karya ciptanya dan peran pihak pemerintah melalui Kementerian Informasi dan Teknologi untuk berperan lebih aktif dan upaya represif dilakukan dengan cara penegakan hukum berdasarkan Pasal 113 Ayat (3) UUHC.Saran dari penelitian ini adalah bagi para editor aplikasi dubsmash hendaknya harus lebih memperhatikan ketentuan hukum dalam bidang Hak Cipta di indonesia sebagaimana diatur dalam UUHC, bagi para masyarakat hendaknya mengindahkan UUHC sehingga hak pencipta dapat dilindungi.Kata kunci : Hak Cipta, Audio Populer, Dubsmash ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to examine and analyze: (1) the use of popular audio in video creation using copyright infringing dubsmash apps reviewed from UUHC. (2) the role of a Notary in the legal protection of the creator in terms of the use of popular audio which makes the video use unauthorized dubsmash applications (3) constraints and solutions in the legal protection of the creator.The results of this study are: (1) Violation of the use of popular audio in the making of video using dubsmash application viewed from UUHC can be categorized as an act which includes violation of economic rights where the Creator or his economic rights holder is taken away. (2) The role of the Notary in the legal protection of the creator in the case of the use of the popular audio-making video using the unlicensed Dubsmash app reviewed from UUHC is as a consultant registered with the Directorate General. Such provisions have privileges, as they comply with the principles of the establishment of good legislation. The protection of copyright law against songwriters downloaded through the internet may be done in a manner that is legally state administration, criminal law and civil law. (3) Constraints and solutions in the legal protection of the creator in the form of weakness of the application of compensation sanction to the offender in accordance with the value of the loss of exclusive rights in the form of moral rights and economic rights of the creator and the copyright holder. And the solution is through copyright registration through Notary to obtain legal certainty over the copyrights.Suggestion from this research is for editor of dubsmash application should have to pay more attention to legal provisions in the field of Copyright in Indonesia as regulated in UUHC, for the society should heed UUHC so that the rights of creator can be protected for the sake of nation development.Keywords: Copyright, Popular Audio, Dubsmash

Download Full-text

UPAYA HUKUM TERHADAP ORANGTUA YANG TIDAK MELAKSANAKAN KEWAJIBAN ALIMENTASI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN ANAK

Jurnal Privat Law ◽

10.20961/privat.v7i2.39341 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 307

Author(s):

Tyas Sekar Mawarni ◽

Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni

Keyword(s):

Child Protection ◽

Theoretical Studies ◽

Cost Of Living ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Family Problems ◽

The Law ◽

The Right ◽

Legal Substances

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to explain the legal efforts that can be done if the parents do not implement the obligation of alimentation in the perspective of child protection. The method used is the method of legal research normatif (legal research), with the approach of the law (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conseptual approach). The legal substances used in this study include primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study explain the parental remedies that do not carry out alimentation obligations in theoretical studies can be done by litigation or court and non-litigation or out of court. However, for non-litigation settlement in Indonesia is not yet available for family problems. Legal efforts through litigation may include the filing of livelihood rights and the execution of a permanent judge’s decision regarding the right of alimentation (cost of living).Keywords: Legal effort;alimentation obligation; child; and child protection. AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menjelaskan upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan apabila orangtua tidak melaksanakan kewajiban alimentasi dalam perspektif perlindungan anak.Metode yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif (legal research), dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach).Bahan hukum yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan mengenai upaya hukum orangtua yang tidak melaksanakan kewajiban alimentasi secara kajian teoritis dapat dilakukan dengan litigasi atau pengadilan dan non-litigasi atau di luar pengadilan.Namun, untuk penyelesaian melalui nonlitigasi di Indonesia belum difasilitasi Negara Mengenai masalah keluarga. Upaya hukum melalui Litigasi dapat berupa pengajuan hak nafkah dan eksekusi putusan hakim yang berkekuatan tetap mengenai hak alimentasi (biaya nafkah).Kata Kunci: Upaya hukum; kewajiban alimentasi;anak;dan perlindungan anak.

Download Full-text

Copyright and Copyright Protection

European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies ◽

10.26417/ejis.v2i4.p36-40 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2 (4) ◽

pp. 36

Author(s):

Safet Emruli ◽

Agim Nuhiu ◽

Besa Kadriu

Keyword(s):

Key Agreement ◽

Third Parties ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Legal Rights ◽

Financial Reward ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Bern Convention ◽

Artistic Works ◽

The Right

One of the legal intellectual property disciplines are copyrights which concerns artistic and literary works. Copyright is: bundle of exclusive legal rights that has to do with protection of literary and artistic works. It is granted to authors and artists to protect expressive works against unauthorized reproduction or distribution by third parties. Copyright protect “works”, expression of thoughts and ideas. Literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works must be original, it means not to be a copy. Copyright covers two other types of right: economic rights, the right of the owner to benefit financial reward from use of his work by others and moral rights which always have to do with original holder no matter if economic rights are transferred or not. Economic rights can be transferred. Bern Convention for the Protection of the Literary and Artistic Works is international key agreement and the oldest multilateral agreement in the field of copyright. Copyright subsists automatically on the creation of a work, no application needed, nor do any formalities apply. Nature of copyright is territorial and the minimum term of protection is life of the author plus 50 years after his/her death. In European Union and in certain number of countries, terms of protections of are extended to life of the author plus 70 years after his/her death.

Download Full-text