Anti-nucleosome, anti-chromatin, anti-dsDNA and anti-histone antibody reactivity in systemic lupus erythematosus

2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Concepción González ◽  
Belen Garcia-Berrocal ◽  
Oscar Herráez ◽  
José Alejandro Navajo ◽  
José ManuelGonzález-Buitrago
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Dsdna Antibodies

AbstractAnti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies play a key role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-histone antibodies in patients with SLE in relation to patients with positive nuclear antibodies and healthy controls. We measured anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-histone antibodies in 70 patients with SLE, 35 antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive subjects without autoimmune disease and 35 blood donors. All antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We obtained the receiver operating caracteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) for each autoantibody. Likewise, we obtained the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each autoantibody. The highest AUC was obtained for anti-nucleosome (0.898) and the lowest AUC for a kit for anti-dsDNA (0.725). Stratification of the control group (ANA-positive subjects without autoimmune disease and blood donors) produced significant changes in the AUCs; all AUCs decreased when ANA-positive patients without autoimmune disease were considered as controls and all AUCs increased when blood donors were considered as controls. These effects were less marked in anti-dsDNA antibodies. We observed discrepancies between kits (anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin and two for anti-dsDNA). The highest sensitivity for SLE was obtained for anti-nucleosome antibodies (86%) and the highest specificity was obtained for anti-dsDNA antibodies (90%). In conclusion, anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin kits show different degrees of clinical accuracy due to the cut-off selected by the manufacturer. Once the kits with the best performance and the optimal cut-offs have been selected, anti-nucleosome antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies provide similar information in established SLE.

Urine β-2-glycoprotein 1 as a biomarker for diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110142
Author(s):  
Jung Sun Lee ◽  
Eun-Ju Lee ◽  
Jeonghun Yeom ◽  
Ji Seon Oh ◽  
Seokchan Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Asan Medical

Objective The need for a biomarker with robust sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains unmet. Compared with blood samples, urine samples are more easily collected; thus, we aimed to identify such a biomarker based on urinary proteomics which could distinguish patients with SLE from healthy controls (HCs). Methods Urine samples were collected from 76 SLE patients who visited rheumatology clinic in 2019 at Asan medical center and from 25 HCs. Urine proteins were analyzed using sequential windowed acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra-mass spectrometry, and the candidate marker was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate biomarker. Results Of 1157 proteins quantified, 153 were differentially expressed in urine samples from HCs. Among them were previously known markers including α-1-acid glycoprotein 1, α-2-HS-glycoprotein, ceruloplasmin, and prostaglandin-H2 D-isomerase. Moreover, the amount of β-2 glycoprotein (APOH) was increased in the urine of patients with SLE. The ELISA results also showed the level of urine APOH was higher in patients with SLE than in HCs and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, the level was not different between SLE patients with and without nephritis. The urine APOH had an area under the curve value of 0.946 at a cut-off value of 228.53 ng/mg (sensitivity 91.5%, specificity 92.0%) for the diagnosis of SLE. Conclusion The results indicate that the urine APOH level can be an appropriate screening tool in a clinical setting when SLE is suspected.

Anti-recoverin antibodies indicate fundus abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1346-1352
Author(s):  
Min Li ◽  
Gong Cheng ◽  
Zongyi Wang ◽  
Wen Liu ◽  
Yuebo Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Complement C3 ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Sledai Score ◽  
Dsdna Antibody

Objectives Lupus fundus abnormalities are a sight-threatening complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its pathogenesis remains to be studied. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics associated with the presence of anti-recoverin antibodies in patients with SLE, especially those with fundus abnormalities. Methods Seventy-six participants were enrolled, including 21 patients with fundus abnormalities (fundus group), 30 patients without fundus abnormalities (non-fundus group) and 25 healthy individuals. Serum anti-recoverin antibody levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and clinical and laboratory data were obtained from medical records. Results Compared with the non-fundus group, the fundus group had a higher incidence of hematuria ( p < 0.05). The Systemic Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score in the fundus group was significantly higher than the non-fundus group (21.48 ± 8.06 versus 10.80 ± 5.74, p < 0.001). The levels of serum anti-recoverin antibodies in the fundus group were significantly higher than the non-fundus group ( p = 0.029) or the healthy control group ( p = 0.011). Anti-recoverin-negative and -positive patients differed on a number of clinical parameters, including incidence of fever, rash, antinuclear antibody, anti-dsDNA antibody, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, immunoglobulin G, complement C3 and complement C4. The average SLEDAI score of anti-recoverin-positive patients was significantly higher than anti-recoverin-negative patients (17.73 ± 8.11 versus 12.56 ± 8.37, p < 0.05). Conclusions Anti-recoverin antibodies were related to higher disease activities in SLE, especially those with fundus abnormalities, suggesting that anti-recoverin antibodies may play an important role in the pathogenesis of fundus abnormalities in SLE.

Negative Double Stranded DNA and Anti-Smith Antibodies in Lupus Nephritis

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-57
Author(s):  
Gagangeet Sandhu ◽  
Anip Bansal ◽  
Aditi Ranade ◽  
Ritu Aggarwal ◽  
Gopal Narayanswami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Serological Screening ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Dsdna Antibodies

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which auto-antibodies are generated against a variety of intracellular antigens. Anti-Smith (Sm) and anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies in particular are considered to be nephritogenic and their role and correlation with lupus nephritis (LN) has been well established. We present here a case in which the patient had diffuse proliferative full house severe LN, yet negative ds-DNA and anti-Sm antibodies. Although extremely rare, a few subsets of patients with drug-induced LN (hydralazine) have been described in the literature to have negative dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies on serological screening. Our patient, however, had no evidence of drug induced LN. On further review, and similar to our case, we found only 6 additional well documented cases of non-drug induced severe LN with negative dsDNA antibodies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of SIGLEC1 in the diagnosis of suspected systemic lupus erythematosus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Zorn-Pauly ◽  
Anne Sae Lim von Stuckrad ◽  
Jens Klotsche ◽  
Thomas Rose ◽  
Tilmann Kallinich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Type I ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Pathway Activation ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Dsdna Antibodies

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of SIGLEC1, a surrogate marker of type I IFN, with established biomarkers in an inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsSIGLEC1 was analysed by flow cytometry in 232 patients referred to our institution with suspected SLE between October 2015 and September 2020.ResultsSLE was confirmed in 76 of 232 patients (32.8%) according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria and their SIGLEC1 values were significantly higher compared to patients without SLE (p<0.0001). A sensitivity of 98.7 %, a specificity of 82.1 %, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2 % and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.8 % were calculated for SIGLEC1. Adjusted to the highest reported prevalence of SLE, the NPV and PPV were > 99.9 % and 0.1 %, respectively. Using ROC analysis and Delong testing, the area under the curve (AUC) for SIGLEC1 (AUC=0.95) was significantly higher than for ANA (AUC=0.88, p=0.031), C3 (AUC=0.83, p=0.001) and C4 (AUC=0.83, p=0.002) but not for anti-dsDNA antibodies (AUC=0.90, p=0.163).ConclusionIFN-I pathway activation is detectable in almost all newly diagnosed SLE patients. Thus, a negative test result for SIGLEC1 is powerful to exclude SLE in suspected cases.

scholarly journals Induction of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-like Syndrome in BALB/c Mice Leads to Disturbance in Splenic T Cell Subpopulations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Rahimzadeh ◽  
Sahar Mortezagholi ◽  
Mojgan Ghaedi ◽  
Haideh Namdari ◽  
Mitra Rahimzadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Con A ◽  
Dsdna Antibody ◽  
Group A

Mechanisms underlying the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have not yet been elucidated. In this study, we evaluated the balance of T cell subsets in BALB/c mice model of SLE induced; using Con A and polyamines as DNA immunogenicity modifiers. BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with 50 µg extracted DNA from cells cultured in different conditions: splenocytes+ polyamines (group P), splenocytes+ Con A (group A), splenocytes+ polyamines+ Con A (group PA) and splenocytes only (control). Anti-double-stranded DNA –(ds-DNA) antibodies, proteinuria, and antinuclear autoantibodies were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Bradford method, and immunofluorescence respectively. Transcription factors of different T helper subsets were examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The serum level of the anti-dsDNA antibody in group PA was higher than that in the other groups (p>0.05). Antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer increased in groups A and PA. Proteinuria level in group PA was significantly higher than that in the control group (p<0.001). Expression of Foxp3 was decreased in group A (p=0.001). Additionally, the ratios of T-bet/GATA3 and T-bet/Foxp3 were also increased in group A. (p>0.05). Our results revealed an increased ratio of Th1 to Th2 and decreased expression of Foxp3 in group A, but group PA manifested more obvious signs of the disease. These results suggest that other mechanisms rather than disturbance in T cells' balance may involve the development of disease symptoms.

Impact of markers of endothelial injury and hypercoagulability on systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-190
Author(s):  
W Batista Cicarini ◽  
R C Figueiredo Duarte ◽  
K Silvestre Ferreira ◽  
C de Mello Gomes Loures ◽  
R Vargas Consoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Endothelial Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
The Relationship

We have explored the relationship between possible hemostatic changes and clinical manifestation of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as a function of greater or lesser disease activity according to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) criteria. Endothelial injury and hypercoagulability were investigated in patients with SLE by measuring thrombomodulin (TM), D-dimer (DDi) and thrombin generation (TG) potential. A total of 90 participants were distributed into three groups: 1) women with SLE presenting with low disease activity (laSLE) (SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4), 2) women with SLE presenting with moderate to high disease activity (mhaSLE) (SLEDAI-2K > 4), and 3) a control group comprising healthy women. Levels of TM and DDi were higher both in the laSLE and mhaSLE groups compared to controls and in mhaSLE compared to the laSLE group. With respect to TG assay, lagtime and endogen thrombin potential, low concentrations of tissue factor provided the best results for discrimination among groups. Analysis of these data allow us to conclude that TM, DDi and TG are potentially useful markers for discriminating patients with very active from those with lower active disease. Higher SLE activity may cause endothelial injury, resulting in higher TG and consequently a hypercoagulability state underlying the picture of thrombosis common in this inflammatory disease.

scholarly journals AB0507 INVASIVE ASPERGILLOSIS IN ADULT RHEUMATOLOGICAL PATIENTS IN SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1551.1-1552
Author(s):  
V. Mazurov ◽  
O. Shadrivova ◽  
M. Shostak ◽  
L. Martynova ◽  
M. Tonkoshkur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Invasive Aspergillosis ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis ◽  
Underlying Diseases

Background:Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe opportunistic infection that is not well understood in rheumatological patients.Objectives:To study risk factors, etiology, clinical manifestations and results of treatment of IA in adult rheumatological patients.Methods:Retrospective analysis of 830 patients (1998-2019) with “proven” and “probable” IA (EORTC / MSG, 2019), adults - 699 (84%). The main group included 18 (3%) adult rheumatological patients with IA, a control group included 610 (87%) adult hematological patients. Rheumatological patients were older, the average age was 59 years (21–75) vs 45 years (18–79), p = 0.005, and among them there were more women – 56% vs 42%, p = 0.01.Results:In rheumatological patients with IA, underlying diseases were ANCA-associated vasculitis (28%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (22%), periarteritis (11%), systemic lupus erythematosus (22%), rheumatic heart disease (11%) and ankylosing spondylitis (6%). In the control group, underlying diseases were acute leukemia (45%), lymphomas (34%), chronic leukemia (9%), multiple myeloma (7%), myelodysplastic syndrome (3%), and other hematological diseases (2%).The main risk factors for IA development in rheumatological patients were: systemic steroids use (89% vs 69%), prolonged lymphocytopenia (76% vs 65%, median - 14 vs 12 days), treatment in ICU (44% vs 18%, p = 0.01), acute or chronic renal failure (39% vs 1%, p = 0.0008) and immunosuppressive therapy (28% vs 25%). Severe neutropenia was noted significantly less frequently (18% vs 83%, p = 0.0001). Additional risk factors were decompensated diabetes mellitus (17% vs 2%, p = 0.004), previous surgery (17% vs 1%, p = 0.001) and organ transplantation (6% vs 0%). In rheumatological patients, lung (83% vs 98%, p = 0.0001) and ≥2 organs (6% vs 8%) involvement were less common. Heart (11% vs 0%), sinuses (6% vs 5%) and central nervous system (6% vs 4%) involvement more often developed. In rheumatological patients, respiratory failure (61 vs 37%, p = 0.03), hemoptysis (28% vs 7%, p = 0.0001) and chest pain (17% vs 7%, p = 0, 04) were noted more often, less often - fever ≥380С (67% vs 85%, p = 0.01) and cough (61% vs 70%). CT signs of lung damage were similar in both groups, but rheumatologic patients were more likely to show an «air crescent» sign and / or destruction cavity (44% vs 10%, p = 0.0001). In rheumatologic patients, IA was more often confirmed by isolation ofAspergillusspp. from BAL (80% vs 45%, p = 0.005) and by histological examination (22% vs 7%, p = 0.01). The main pathogens wereA. fumigatus(50% vs 43%),A. niger(29% vs 32%), andA. flavus(14% vs 17%).Rheumatological patients were less likely to receive antifungal therapy 89% vs 99%, p = 0,0003. The main drug in both groups was voriconazole. The overall 12-week survival did not significantly differ between groups, but was lower in rheumatological patients with IA (69% vs 81%).Conclusion:In rheumatological patients, invasive aspergillosis more often developed at an older age, mainly in women. The main background diseases were ANCA-associated vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Typical risk factors were steroids and immunosuppressants use, prolonged lymphocytopenia, ICU stay, and renal failure. The main causative agents wereA. fumigatus,A. niger, andA. flavus. The main localization of infection were lungs. Respiratory failure, hemoptysis and heart involvement were typical. The overall 12-week survival of rheumatological patients with invasive aspergillosis was 69%.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0007 STAT4 RS7574865 G/T POLYMORPHISM AS MARKER OF PREDISPOSITION TO SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS WITH JUVENILE ONSET

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1038.2-1039
Author(s):  
M. Kaleda ◽  
M. Krylov ◽  
I. Nikishina
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Renal Involvement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Coombs Test ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Direct Coombs Test ◽  
Positive Direct ◽  
Cutaneous Lupus

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a significant genetic predisposition. Recent studies have identified STAT4 (signal transducers and transcription activators 4) as a susceptibility gene for SLE.Objectives:To investigate the hypothesis of the association of STAT4 rs7574865 G/T polymorphism with the predisposition to SLE in children and its relationship with some of SLE manifestations.Methods:The case-control pilot study included 143 children (39 with SLE and 103 healthy unrelated volunteers as a control group). Diagnosis of SLE was based on 2012 SLICC criteria. STAT4 rs7574865 G/T polymorphism was investigated using allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).Results:The group of pts with SLE consisted of 29 girls and 10 boys, with an average age of 11.8±3.7 years (from 3 to 17 years) and an average disease duration of 4.1±2.4 years. 79.5% pts had acute cutaneous lupus at the onset, 46.1% - nonscarring alopecia, 71.8% - arthritis, 23.1% - oral and nasal ulcers, 23.1% - serositis, 43.6% - renal involvement, 35.9% –neuropsychiatric disorders. Leucopenia/lymphopenia was found in 71.8% of pts, thrombocytopenia – in 23,1%. ANA were detected in 100% pts, anti-dsDNA – in 79.5%, anti-Sm – in 31.6%, antiphospholipid antibodies - in 7,3%, hypocomplementemia – in 61.5%, positive direct Coombs test – in 35.9 %. Macrophage activation syndrome at the onset was documented in 15.4 % of pts. The distribution of rs7574865 genotypes in the control group showed no significant deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distribution of genotype frequencies among pts had statistically significant differences compared to the control (χ2=12.95, p=0.0015): GG-30.8% and 63.1% (p=0.001), GT-56.4% and 33.0% (p=0.018), TT-12.8% and 3.9% (p=0.114), GT+TT - 69.2% and 36.9% (p=0.0005). The frequency of the mutant STAT 4 allele T (polymorphism), was significantly higher in the SLE group than in the control group (41% and 20.4%, respectively; p=0.0007). We identified an association of the T allele with some clinical, laboratory, and immunological disorders in SLE: arthritis (OR 3.9, p=0.0002), acute cutaneous lupus (OR 2.47, p=0.003), nonscarring alopecia (OR 3.12, p=0.002), renal involvement (OR 2.42, p=0.022), leucopenia (OR 2.72, p=0.003), thrombocytopenia (OR 4.88, p=0.002), anti-dsDNA (OR 2.82, p=0.0006), hypocomplementemia (OR 2.34, p=0.012), positive direct Coombs test (OR 3.38, p=0.002).Conclusion:Our pilot study confirmed that the STAT4 rs7574865 G/T polymorphism was associated with the risk of SLE in children and some of SLE manifestations.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals POS0058-PARE INCREASING PREECLAMPSIA KNOWLEDGE IN SLE WITH A SPECIFIC EDUCATIONAL TOOL: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 235.2-235
Author(s):  
J. Y. E. Lee ◽  
A. Mendel ◽  
I. Malhamé ◽  
S. Bernatsky ◽  
E. Vinet
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Vulnerable Population ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Educational Tool ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Systemic Lupus

Background:Pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at high risk of preeclampsia, leading to substantial maternal and fetal morbidity. Aspirin reduces preeclampsia risk but recent studies suggest aspirin is used only in a minority of SLE pregnancies. There is an urgent need to improve preeclampsia counselling and management in this vulnerable population.Objectives:We are conducting the PREPARE (PREeclamPsia knowledge & Aspirin adheRence in lupus prEgnancies) trial, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an educational tool on preeclampsia knowledge and aspirin adherence among pregnant women with SLE. We present preliminary analyses of the effect of this tool on preeclampsia knowledge.Methods:Consecutive pregnant SLE women are recruited until the 16th gestational week at 5Canadian Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics centres (i.e. Montreal, Halifax, Quebec, Winnipeg, and Calgary) since 05/2018. Subjects are randomly assigned to receive either the specifically-designed educational tool (intervention group) or standard of care (control group). At baseline (i.e. first trimester) and second trimester visits, the participants complete self-administered preeclampsia knowledge questionnaires (scored out of 30 by the research team blinded to the intervention). We restricted the current analysis to participants enrolled in Montreal (accounting for nearly half of the total planned sample size). We performed a univariate linear regression analysis to assess the effect of the educational tool on preeclampsia knowledge (i.e. mean score difference between the two groups from baseline to second trimester visit).Results:Thirty-three pregnant SLE women were included in the study, among which 16 were exposed to the intervention and 17 were unexposed. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups with similar mean maternal age between intervention group (32.2 years, standard deviation, SD, 4.6) and control group (34.1 years, SD 4.2) and identical proportion of subjects with post-secondary education (i.e. 80%). The difference in mean preeclampsia knowledge scores between second trimester and baseline visits in the intervention group was 4.4 points (95% CI -0.1, 9.0) and in the control group was 1.5 points (95% CI -2.7, 5.7). The mean difference in knowledge scores (from baseline to second trimester) for those receiving the educational tool was 2.7 points higher (95% CI -1.5, 6.9) than those receiving standard of care.Conclusion:Approximately midway into the PREPARE trial, we observed a trend for improvement in preeclampsia knowledge from the baseline to the second trimester visit in pregnant women with SLE who received a specifically-designed educational tool compared to the control group, although the CIs included the null. Our RCT is well-poised to provide a new evidence-based approach to improve preeclampsia knowledge in pregnant women with SLE, which could help to optimize aspirin use and outcomes in this vulnerable population.References:[1]Schramm AM, Clowse ME. Aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in lupus pregnancy. Autoimmune Dis. 2014;2014:920467. doi:10.1155/2014/920467[2]Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):402-414. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a[3]Andreoli L, Bertsias GK, Agmon-Levin N, et al. EULAR recommendations for women’s health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):476–85. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209770.[4]Mendel A, Bernatsky SB, Hanly JG, et al. Low aspirin use and high prevalence of preeclampsia risk factors among pregnant women in a multinational SLE inception cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(7):1010-1012. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214434Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document