scholarly journals Research Article. A new gravity laboratory in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Breili ◽  
R. Hougen ◽  
D. I. Lysaker ◽  
O. C. D. Omang ◽  
B. Tangen
Keyword(s):  
Noise Level ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Gravity Gradients ◽  
Svalbard Archipelago ◽  
Ocean Tide Loading ◽  
Lower Elevation ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Space Geodetic Techniques ◽  
Under Construction

AbstractThe Norwegian Mapping Authority (NMA) has recently established a new gravity laboratory in Ny-Ålesund at Svalbard, Norway. The laboratory consists of three independent pillars and is part of the geodetic core station that is presently under construction at Brandal, approximately 1.5 km north of NMA’s old station. In anticipation of future use of the new gravity laboratory, we present benchmark gravity values, gravity gradients, and final coordinates of all new pillars. Test measurements indicate a higher noise level at Brandal compared to the old station. The increased noise level is attributed to higher sensitivity to wind.We have also investigated possible consequences of moving to Brandal when it comes to the gravitational signal of present-day ice mass changes and ocean tide loading. Plausible models representing ice mass changes at the Svalbard archipelago indicate that the gravitational signal at Brandal may differ from that at the old site with a size detectable with modern gravimeters. Users of gravity data from Ny-Ålesund should, therefore, be cautious if future observations from the new observatory are used to extend the existing gravity record. Due to its lower elevation, Brandal is significantly less sensitive to gravitational ocean tide loading. In the future, Brandal will be the prime site for gravimetry in Ny-Ålesund. This ensures gravity measurements collocated with space geodetic techniques like VLBI, SLR, and GNSS.

Interval gravity‐gradient determination concepts

Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 828-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwain K. Butler
Keyword(s):  
Finite Difference ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Vertical Gradient ◽  
Gravity Gradient ◽  
Gravity Gradients ◽  
Tower Structure ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Vertical Gradients

Considerable attention has been directed recently to applications of gravity gradients, e.g., Hammer and Anzoleaga (1975), Stanley and Green (1976), Fajklewicz (1976), Butler (1979), Hammer (1979), Ager and Liard (1982), and Butler et al. (1982). Gravity‐gradient interpretive procedures are developed from properties of true or differential gradients, while gradients are determined in an interval or finite‐difference sense from field gravity data. The relations of the interval gravity gradients to the true or differential gravity gradients are examined in this paper. Figure 1 illustrates the concepts of finite‐difference procedures for gravity‐gradient determinations. In Figure 1a, a tower structure is illustrated schematically for determining vertical gradients. Gravity measurements are made at two or more elevations on the tower, and various finite‐difference or interval values of vertical gradient can be determined. For measurements at three elevations on the tower, for example, three interval gradient determinations are possible: [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] etc. For a positive downward z-;axis, these definitions for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] will result in positive values for the vertical gradient. Relations of the interval gradients to each other and to the true or differential gradient are examined in this paper.

scholarly journals OCEAN TIDE LOADING AND RELATIVE GNSS IN THE BRITISH ISLES

Survey Review ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (317) ◽  
pp. 212-228
Author(s):  
P. J. Clarke ◽  
N. T. Penna
Keyword(s):  
Ocean Tide ◽  
British Isles ◽  
Ocean Tide Loading

scholarly journals Forty-three years of absolute gravity observations of the Fennoscandian postglacial rebound in Finland

2021 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Bilker-Koivula ◽  
Jaakko Mäkinen ◽  
Hannu Ruotsalainen ◽  
Jyri Näränen ◽  
Timo Saari
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Gravity Change ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Absolute Gravity ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Postglacial Rebound ◽  
Land Uplift ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

AbstractPostglacial rebound in Fennoscandia causes striking trends in gravity measurements of the area. We present time series of absolute gravity data collected between 1976 and 2019 on 12 stations in Finland with different types of instruments. First, we determine the trends at each station and analyse the effect of the instrument types. We estimate, for example, an offset of 6.8 μgal for the JILAg-5 instrument with respect to the FG5-type instruments. Applying the offsets in the trend analysis strengthens the trends being in good agreement with the NKG2016LU_gdot model of gravity change. Trends of seven stations were found robust and were used to analyse the stabilization of the trends in time and to determine the relationship between gravity change rates and land uplift rates as measured with global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) as well as from the NKG2016LU_abs land uplift model. Trends calculated from combined and offset-corrected measurements of JILAg-5- and FG5-type instruments stabilized in 15 to 20 years and at some stations even faster. The trends of FG5-type instrument data alone stabilized generally within 10 years. The ratio between gravity change rates and vertical rates from different data sets yields values between − 0.206 ± 0.017 and − 0.227 ± 0.024 µGal/mm and axis intercept values between 0.248 ± 0.089 and 0.335 ± 0.136 µGal/yr. These values are larger than previous estimates for Fennoscandia.

scholarly journals Ocean Tide Loading Effects on InSAR Observations Over Wide Regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Yu ◽  
Nigel T. Penna ◽  
Zhenhong Li
Keyword(s):  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Ocean Tide Loading ◽  
Loading Effects

Estimating saturation and density changes caused by CO2 injection at Sleipner — Using time-lapse seismic amplitude-variation-with-offset and time-lapse gravity

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. T243-T257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Landrø ◽  
Mark Zumberge
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Injection Point ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Seismic Method ◽  
Seismic Amplitude ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Measured Time ◽  
Best Fit

We have developed a calibrated, simple time-lapse seismic method for estimating saturation changes from the [Formula: see text]-storage project at Sleipner offshore Norway. This seismic method works well to map changes when [Formula: see text] is migrating laterally away from the injection point. However, it is challenging to detect changes occurring below [Formula: see text] layers that have already been charged by some [Formula: see text]. Not only is this partly caused by the seismic shadow effects, but also by the fact that the velocity sensitivity for [Formula: see text] change in saturation from 0.3 to 1.0 is significantly less than saturation changes from zero to 0.3. To circumvent the seismic shadow zone problem, we combine the time-lapse seismic method with time-lapse gravity measurements. This is done by a simple forward modeling of gravity changes based on the seismically derived saturation changes, letting these saturation changes be scaled by an arbitrary constant and then by minimizing the least-squares error to obtain the best fit between the scaled saturation changes and the measured time-lapse gravity data. In this way, we are able to exploit the complementary properties of time-lapse seismic and gravity data.

scholarly journals Accuracy Analysis of Gravity Field Changes from Grace RL06 and RL05 Data Compared to in Situ Gravimetric Measurements in the Context of Choosing Optimal Filtering Type

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-117
Author(s):  
Viktor Szabó ◽  
Dorota Marjańska
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
The Other ◽  
Subsurface Water ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Absolute Gravimetry ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Gravity Recovery

AbstractGlobal satellite gravity measurements provide unique information regarding gravity field distribution and its variability on the Earth. The main cause of gravity changes is the mass transportation within the Earth, appearing as, e.g. dynamic fluctuations in hydrology, glaciology, oceanology, meteorology and the lithosphere. This phenomenon has become more comprehensible thanks to the dedicated gravimetric missions such as Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) and Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE). From among these missions, GRACE seems to be the most dominating source of gravity data, sharing a unique set of observations from over 15 years. The results of this experiment are often of interest to geodesists and geophysicists due to its high compatibility with the other methods of gravity measurements, especially absolute gravimetry. Direct validation of gravity field solutions is crucial as it can provide conclusions concerning forecasts of subsurface water changes. The aim of this work is to present the issue of selection of filtration parameters for monthly gravity field solutions in RL06 and RL05 releases and then to compare them to a time series of absolute gravimetric data conducted in quasi-monthly measurements in Astro-Geodetic Observatory in Józefosław (Poland). The other purpose of this study is to estimate the accuracy of GRACE temporal solutions in comparison with absolute terrestrial gravimetry data and making an attempt to indicate the significance of differences between solutions using various types of filtration (DDK, Gaussian) from selected research centres.

scholarly journals Improvement of density models of geological structures by fusion of gravity data and cosmic muon radiographies

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Jourde ◽  
D. Gibert ◽  
J. Marteau
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Density Structure ◽  
Spatial Filters ◽  
Muon Tomography ◽  
Mathematical Expressions ◽  
Integration Formulas ◽  
Muon Radiography ◽  
Gravity Measurements

Abstract. This paper examines how the resolution of small-scale geological density models is improved through the fusion of information provided by gravity measurements and density muon radiographies. Muon radiography aims at determining the density of geological bodies by measuring their screening effect on the natural flux of cosmic muons. Muon radiography essentially works like medical X-ray scan and integrates density information along elongated narrow conical volumes. Gravity measurements are linked to density by a 3-D integration encompassing the whole studied domain. We establish the mathematical expressions of these integration formulas – called acquisition kernels – and derive the resolving kernels that are spatial filters relating the true unknown density structure to the density distribution actually recovered from the available data. The resolving kernels approach allows to quantitatively describe the improvement of the resolution of the density models achieved by merging gravity data and muon radiographies. The method developed in this paper may be used to optimally design the geometry of the field measurements to perform in order to obtain a given spatial resolution pattern of the density model to construct. The resolving kernels derived in the joined muon/gravimetry case indicate that gravity data are almost useless to constrain the density structure in regions sampled by more than two muon tomography acquisitions. Interestingly the resolution in deeper regions not sampled by muon tomography is significantly improved by joining the two techniques. The method is illustrated with examples for La Soufrière of Guadeloupe volcano.

Airborne gravity measurements over mountainous areas by using a LaCoste & Romberg air‐sea gravity meter

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Verdun ◽  
Roger Bayer ◽  
Emile E. Klingelé ◽  
Marc Cocard ◽  
Alain Geiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Reduction ◽  
Classical Method ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Vertical Acceleration ◽  
Mountainous Areas ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Free Air Anomaly

This paper introduces a new approach to airborne gravity data reduction well‐suited for surveys flown at high altitude with respect to gravity sources (mountainous areas). Classical technique is reviewed and illustrated in taking advantage of airborne gravity measurements performed over the western French Alps by using a LaCoste & Romberg air‐sea gravity meter. The part of nongravitational vertical accelerations correlated with gravity meter measurements are investigated with the help of coherence spectra. Beam velocity has proved to be strikingly correlated with vertical acceleration of the aircraft. This finding is theoretically argued by solving the equation of the gravimetric system (gravity meter and stabilized platform). The transfer function of the system is derived, and a new formulation of airborne gravity data reduction, which takes care of the sensitive response of spring tension to observable gravity field wavelengths, is given. The resulting gravity signal exhibits a residual noise caused by electronic devices and short‐wavelength Eötvös effects. The use of dedicated exponential filters gives us a way to eliminate these high‐frequency effects. Examples of the resulting free‐air anomaly at 5100‐m altitude along one particular profile are given and compared with free‐air anomaly deduced from the classical method for processing airborne gravity data, and with upward‐continued ground gravity data. The well‐known trade‐off between accuracy and resolution is discussed in the context of a mountainous area.

scholarly journals Grid preparation for magnetic and gravity data using fractal fields

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pilkington ◽  
P. Keating
Keyword(s):  
Potential Field ◽  
Fourier Transforms ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Fractal Model ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Spectral Character ◽  
Aeromagnetic Survey ◽  
Fractal Method ◽  
Gravity Measurements ◽  
Interpretive Method

Abstract. Most interpretive methods for potential field (magnetic and gravity) measurements require data in a gridded format. Many are also based on using fast Fourier transforms to improve their computational efficiency. As such, grids need to be full (no undefined values), rectangular and periodic. Since potential field surveys do not usually provide data sets in this form, grids must first be prepared to satisfy these three requirements before any interpretive method can be used. Here, we use a method for grid preparation based on a fractal model for predicting field values where necessary. Using fractal field values ensures that the statistical and spectral character of the measured data is preserved, and that unwanted discontinuities at survey boundaries are minimized. The fractal method compares well with standard extrapolation methods using gridding and maximum entropy filtering. The procedure is demonstrated on a portion of a recently flown aeromagnetic survey over a volcanic terrane in southern British Columbia, Canada.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document