Stress-Triaxiality in Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tube Materials

Author(s):  
B. W. Leitch ◽  
S. St. Lawrence
Author(s):  
Shin-Jang Sung ◽  
Jwo Pan ◽  
Poh-Sang Lam ◽  
Douglas A. Scarth

Fracture initiation for axial cracks in pressure tube (PT) specimens of hydrided irradiated Zr-2.5Nb materials with split circumferential hydrides at room temperature is examined by conducting three-dimensional finite element analyses. With a strain-based fracture criterion with consideration of stress triaxiality, the location for the earliest crack initiation is determined near the middle of the axial crack front. For PT specimens with split circumferential hydrides, three types of strain concentration are observed in the ligaments ahead of the crack front. The computational results suggest that the internal pressure for crack initiation of hydrided irradiated PT specimens with many randomly distributed split circumferential hydrides needs only 55% to 70% of that for unhydrided irradiated PT specimens. The computational results can be used to explain the near 40% reduction of the fracture toughness at room temperature obtained from hydrided irradiated PT specimens when compared with that from unhydrided irradiated ones.


2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101555 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. W. Leitch ◽  
S. St. Lawrence ◽  
Richard Neu ◽  
Kim Wallin ◽  
Steven R. Thompson ◽  
...  

Kerntechnik ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-243
Author(s):  
R. Kumar ◽  
A. J. Gaikwad ◽  
A. D. Contractor ◽  
A. Srivastava ◽  
H. G. Lele ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Satoshi Igi ◽  
Mitsuru Ohata ◽  
Takahiro Sakimoto ◽  
Kenji Oi ◽  
Joe Kondo

This paper presents experimental and analytical results focusing on the strain limit of X80 linepipe. Ductile crack growth behavior from a girth weld notch is simulated by FE analysis based on a proposed damage model and is compared with the experimental results. The simulation model for ductile crack growth accompanied by penetration through the wall thickness consists of two criteria. One is a criterion for ductile crack initiation from the notch-tip, which is described by the plastic strain at the notch tip, because the onset of ductile cracking can be expressed by constant plastic strain independent of the shape and size of the components and the loading mode. The other is a damage-based criterion for simulating ductile crack extension associated with damage evolution influenced by plastic strain in accordance with the stress triaxiality ahead of the extending crack tip. The proposed simulation model is applicable to prediction of ductile crack growth behaviors from a circumferentially-notched girth welded pipe with high internal pressure, which is subjected to tensile loading or bending (post-buckling) deformation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianye Gao ◽  
Tao He ◽  
Yuanming Huo ◽  
Miao Song ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
...  

AbstractDuctile fracture of metal often occurs in the plastic forming process of parts. The establishment of ductile fracture criterion can effectively guide the selection of process parameters and avoid ductile fracture of parts during machining. The 3D ductile fracture envelope of AA6063-T6 was developed to predict and prevent its fracture. Smooth round bar tension tests were performed to characterize the flow stress, and a series of experiments were conducted to characterize the ductile fracture firstly, such as notched round bar tension tests, compression tests and torsion tests. These tests cover a wide range of stress triaxiality (ST) and Lode parameter (LP) to calibrate the ductile fracture criterion. Plasticity modeling was performed, and the predicted results were compared with corresponding experimental data to verify the plasticity model after these experiments. Then the relationship between ductile fracture strain and ST with LP was constructed using the modified Mohr–Coulomb (MMC) model and Bai-Wierzbicki (BW) model to develop the 3D ductile fracture envelope. Finally, two ductile damage models were proposed based on the 3D fracture envelope of AA6063. Through the comparison of the two models, it was found that BW model had better fitting effect, and the sum of squares of residual error of BW model was 0.9901. The two models had relatively large errors in predicting the fracture strain of SRB tensile test and torsion test, but both of the predicting error of both two models were within the acceptable range of 15%. In the process of finite element simulation, the evolution process of ductile fracture can be well simulated by the two models. However, BW model can predict the location of fracture more accurately than MMC model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-558
Author(s):  
Mohammadmehdi Shahzamanian ◽  
David Lloyd ◽  
Amir Partovi ◽  
Peidong Wu

The effect of the width to thickness ratio on the bendability of sheet metal is investigated using the finite element method (FEM) employing the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) model. Strain path changes in the sheet with change in the width/thickness ratio. It is shown that bendability and fracture strain increase significantly by decrease in the width/thickness ratio. The stress state is almost uniaxial when the stress ratio (α) is close to zero for narrow sheets. Stress ratio is nothing but the major stress to minor stress ratio. This delays the growth and coalescence of micro-voids as the volumetric strain and stress triaxiality (pressure/effective stress) decrease. On the other hand, ductility decreases with increase in α for wider sheets. Fracture bending strain is calculated and, as expected, it increases with decrease in the width/thickness ratio. Furthermore, a brief study is performed to understand the effect of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on fracture strain for various sheet metals with different width/thickness ratios. It is found that the superimposed hydrostatic pressure increases the ductility, and that the effect of the width/thickness ratio in metals on ductility is as significant as the effect of superimposed hydrostatic pressure. Numerical results are found to be in good agreement with experimental observations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 108160
Author(s):  
Ankit R. Singh ◽  
Andallib Tariq ◽  
Pradeep K. Sahoo ◽  
Prasanna Majumdar ◽  
Deb Mukhopadhyay

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (13) ◽  
pp. 27260-27268
Author(s):  
K. Bhattacharyya ◽  
S. Acharyya ◽  
S. Dhar ◽  
J. Chattopadhyay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document