Clinical Social Psychology and Social Clinical Psychology: A Proposal for Peaceful Coexistence

1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Maddux ◽  
Cal D. Stoltenberg
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Peaceful Coexistence

scholarly journals Remaining Human in COVID-19: Dialogues on Psychogeography

Human Arenas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna L. Degen ◽  
Gemma Lucy Smart ◽  
Rosanne Quinnell ◽  
Kieran C. O’Doherty ◽  
Paul Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Ways Of Coping ◽  
New Meanings ◽  
Living Theory ◽  
Ways Of Being ◽  
Emergent Knowledge

AbstractPost-COVID-19 environments have challenged our embodied identities with these challenges coming from a variety of domains, that is, microbiological, semiotic, and digital. We are embedded in a new complex set of relations, with other species, with cultural signs, and with technology and venturing further into an era that pushes back on our anthropocentrism to create a post-human dystopia. This does not imply that we are less human or forfeit ethics in this state of flux, but can lead to considering new ways of being alive and humanists. The aim of this project was to explore walking through our associated psychogeographies as captured in photographs and text from individual walks, as the means by which to characterize responses to the distress of the pandemic and to assess resistance to non-being. The psychogeographies were the starting points for our dialogic enquiry between authors who each represent living theory, representing their own emergent knowledge, inseparable from personal commitments and history. Walking and the associated images and reflections, provided a way to regulate our affect, reconnecting with our bodies, leading to understand and adapt to new meanings of context and ways of coping and healing in this new becoming. The interdisciplinarity of philosophy, social psychology, botany, and clinical psychology is nonetheless rejected in favour of multi-vocality; each author representing their own emergent, living theory, inseparable from personal commitments, and history.

Notes on the development of health psychology and behavioral medicine in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 492-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Lubek ◽  
Monica Ghabrial ◽  
Naomi Ennis ◽  
Sara Crann ◽  
Amanda Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
United States ◽  
Health Psychology ◽  
New York ◽  
Behavioral Medicine ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
The United States ◽  
State University ◽  
1960S And 1970S ◽  
The 1960S

A “standard” historiographical overview of the development of health psychology in the United States, alongside behavioral medicine, first summarizes previous disciplinary and professional histories. A “historicist” approach follows, focussing on a collective biographical summary of accumulated contributions of one cohort (1967–1971) at State University of New York at Stony Brook. Foundational developments of the two areas are highlighted, contextualized within their socio-political context, as are innovative cross-boundary collaboration on “precursor” studies from the 1960s and 1970s, before the official disciplines emerged. Research pathways are traced from social psychology to health psychology and from clinical psychology to behavioral medicine.

Citation Patterns in Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology Articles in 1986 and 1996: Good News for the Social-Clinical Interface

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Hamilton ◽  
Virginia Sparrow ◽  
Jeanette Waxmonsky ◽  
Holly N. Deemer
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Good News ◽  
The Social

Psychology Applications & Developments VI

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Public Engagement ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Educational Psychology ◽  
Experimental Psychology ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Legal Psychology ◽  
Creative Solutions ◽  
The World

In this sixth volume, a committed set of authors explore the Psychology field, therefore contributing to reach the frontiers of knowledge. Success depends on the participation of those who wish to find creative solutions and believe in their potential to change the world, altogether, to increase public engagement and cooperation from communities. Part of our mission is to serve society with these initiatives and promote knowledge. Therefore, it is necessary the strengthening of research efforts in all fields and cooperation between the most assorted studies and backgrounds. In particular, this book explores five major areas (divided into five sections) within the broad context of Psychology: Social Psychology, Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Legal Psychology and Educational Psychology. Each section comprises chapters that have emerged from extended and peer reviewed selected papers originally published in the proceedings of the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT 2020) conference series (http://www.inpact-psychologyconference.org/). This conference occurs annually with successful outcomes. Original papers have been selected and its authors were invited to extend them significantly to once again undergo an evaluation process, afterwards the authors of the accepted chapters were requested to make corrections and improve the final submitted chapters. This process has resulted in the final publication of 33 high quality chapters.

How Can We Respond to Complex Social Events Before We Are Aware of What We Think?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Leonard Shedletsky
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Behavioral Economics ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Developmental Psychology ◽  
Brain Research ◽  
Human Communication ◽  
Social Events ◽  
Research Studies

This chapter asks, How can we respond to complex social events before we are aware of what we think? It answers that question by reviewing research studies that show that humans can make use of what they have stored in memory without being aware of that knowledge. Evidence gathered from behavioral economics, social psychology, developmental psychology, discourse analysis, brain research, physiology, linguistics, and clinical psychology points to a view of how we think that should change our understanding of how we communicate. Social intuition theory captures that view and entails our rethinking how human communication works.

Benefits of Negative Thinking and Negative Affect: Analyses of Answers to an Open-Ended Question by Japanese Undergraduates

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Sakamoto ◽  
Aiko Moriwaki ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Yukari Miyata ◽  
Osamu Kobori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Negative Affect ◽  
Evolutionary Psychology ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Interpersonal Relations ◽  
The Self ◽  
Perceived Benefits ◽  
Negative Thinking

What are the benefits of negative thinking and negative affect? Although previous studies in evolutionary psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology have clarified the question, there has been no definitive study asking people directly about the perceived benefits. In the present study, 119 Japanese undergraduates were asked how they recognized the benefits of negative thinking and negative affect. Their answers were analyzed qualitatively. The answers were arranged into 30 smaller categories and 12 superordinate ones. The benefits were divided into “benefits to the self” and “benefits to interpersonal relations.” Finally, the conditions necessary for the negative thinking and negative affect being benign, and possible cultural differences, were discussed.

scholarly journals Clinical Science and the Replicability Crisis

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Tackett ◽  
scott lilienfeld ◽  
Christopher Patrick ◽  
Sheri Johnson ◽  
Robert Krueger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Cognitive Psychology ◽  
School Psychology ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Experimental Psychology ◽  
Active Participation ◽  
Clinical Science ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Psychological Science ◽  
Early Stages

Psychology is in the early stages of examining a crisis of replicability stemming from several high-profile failures to replicate studies in experimental psychology. This important conversation has largely been focused on social psychology, with some active participation from cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, several other major domains of psychological science – including clinical science – have remained insulated from this discussion. The goals of this article are to (a) examine why clinical psychology and allied fields, such as counseling and school psychology, have not been central participants in the replicability conversation, (b) review concerns and recommendations that are less (or more) applicable to or appropriate for research in clinical psychology and allied fields, and (c) generate take-home messages for scholars and consumers of the literature in clinical psychology and allied fields, as well as reviewers, editors, and colleagues from other areas of psychological science.

Eminence Rankings of Personality Psychologists as a Reflection of the Field

1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 707-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Mayer ◽  
Kevin M. Carlsmith
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Personality Psychology ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Psychology Today ◽  
First Time ◽  
Conceptual Work

The eminence of scholars within a given field can reveal which conceptual work and scientific methods in the field are most prized and valued. The authors follow procedures employed in other disciplines to calculate the eminence of personality psychologists for the first time. The top 60 individuals are classified according to rank, years of productivity, and type of research. The authors found two distinct rankings of eminent individuals depending on the type of textbook surveyed and found that the ranking of eminence overlaps clinical psychology more than social psychology. These and other results are used to discuss the nature of personality psychology today.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document