“What They Are to Us, We Are to Them”
This chapter argues that the balance of power in Vandal Africa’s ecclesiastical controversy has consistently been misunderstood. It reconstructs the self-presentation and heresiological polemic of African Homoian clerics. These authors appropriated the legitimizing standards of the late-antique Christian community to portray themselves as members of the one true Christian Church, while painting their Nicene opponents as Homoousian heretics, whose beliefs were similar to other heresies and tantamount to paganism. The sophistication of this heresiology, its effective use of legal precedent, and the furious Nicene responses it received should force contemporary perceptions of the African Christian community to be rethought. For at least some Christians in Vandal Africa, Homoian Christianity would have been orthodox; the Nicene Church, a heretical sect.