scholarly journals Combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy nivolumab and ipilimumab associated with multiple endocrinopathies

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Gunawan ◽  
Elizabeth George ◽  
Adam Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Insipidus ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Acid Decarboxylase ◽  
Total Testosterone ◽  
High Dose ◽  
List Type ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Symptom Resolution

Summary Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the mainstay of treatment for advanced melanoma, and their use is being increasingly implicated in the development of autoimmune endocrinopathies. We present a case of a 52-year-old man with metastatic melanoma on combination nivolumab and ipilumimab therapy who developed concurrent hypophysitis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and diabetes insipidus. He presented prior to third cycle of combination treatment with a headache, myalgias and fatigue. Biochemistry and MRI pituitary confirmed anterior pituitary dysfunction with a TSH: 0.02 mU/L (0.5–5.5 mU/L), fT4: 5.2 pmol/L (11–22 pmol/L), fT3: 4.0 pmol/L (3.2–6.4 pmol/L), cortisol (12:00 h): <9 nmol/L (74–286 nmol/L), FSH: 0.7 IU/L (1.5–9.7 IU/L), LH: <0.1 IU/L (1.8–9.2 IU/L), PRL: 1 mIU/L (90–400 mIU/L), SHBG: 34 nmol/L (19–764 nmol/L) and total testosterone: <0.4 nmol/L (9.9–27.8 nmol/L). High-dose dexamethasone (8 mg) was administered followed by hydrocortisone, thyroxine and topical testosterone replacement. Two weeks post administration of the third cycle, he became unwell with lethargy, weight loss and nocturia. Central diabetes insipidus was diagnosed on the basis of symptoms and sodium of 149 mmol/L (135–145 mmol/L). Desmopressin nasal spray was instituted with symptom resolution and normalization of serum sodium. Three weeks later, he presented again polyuric and polydipsic. His capillary glucose was 20.8 mmol/L (ketones of 2.4 mmol), low C-peptide 0.05 nmol/L (0.4–1.5 nmol/L) and HbA1c of 7.7%. T1DM was suspected, and he was commenced on an insulin infusion with rapid symptom resolution. Insulin antibodies glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulin antibody-2 (IA-2) and zinc transporter-8 (ZnT8) were negative. A follow-up MRI pituitary revealed findings consistent with recovering autoimmune hypophysitis. Immunotherapy was discontinued based on the extent of these autoimmune endocrinopathies. Learning points: The most effective regime for treatment of metastatic melanoma is combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilumimab, and this therapy is associated with a high incidence of autoimmune endocrinopathies. Given the high prevalence of immune-related adverse events, the threshold for functional testing should be low. Traditional antibody testing may not be reliable to identify early-onset endocrinopathy. Routine screening pathways have yet to be adequately validated through clinical trials.

scholarly journals Severe Myositis, Myocarditis, and Myasthenia Gravis with Elevated Anti-Striated Muscle Antibody following Single Dose of Ipilimumab-Nivolumab Therapy in a Patient with Metastatic Melanoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdieh Fazel ◽  
Patrick M. Jedlowski
Keyword(s):  
Myasthenia Gravis ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Intravenous Immunoglobulin ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Supportive Therapy ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Myasthenic Crisis ◽  
Respiratory Compromise

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 have improved survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, especially in combination (i.e., ipilimumab-nivolumab). Postmarketing surveillance has identified rare but at times life-threatening adverse effects associated with these agents in combination and as monotherapy, which include myocarditis, myositis, myasthenia gravis (MG), and hepatotoxicity. Further evaluation of immune checkpoint therapy-induced MG identified the rapid clinical progression, prolonged treatment/supportive therapy course, and higher frequency of myasthenic crisis in these patients versus those with idiopathic MG. More rapid incorporation of aggressive treatment options (i.e., intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis) may be necessary in these cases. Anti-striational antibodies are often detected in individuals with myasthenia gravis and concurrent myositis and myocarditis. A high-index of suspicion is necessary to assist with rapid treatment initiation as these patients can rapidly deteriorate into respiratory compromise. A case of a 78-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma status after combination therapy with ipilimumab-nivolumab that developed transaminitis, myositis, myocarditis, and myasthenia gravis (with positive anti-striational antibodies) five days after the first cycle, is presented. Despite high dose intravenous methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, she ultimately entered hospice care eight days after hospital admission, 36 days after her first cycle.

scholarly journals Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction following nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy for metastatic melanoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mami Ishibashi ◽  
Yoshihiro Ishida ◽  
Atsushi Otsuka ◽  
Shuji Yamamoto ◽  
Kenji Kabashima
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prompt Treatment ◽  
Prompt Diagnosis

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are commonly observed in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and prompt diagnosis and treatment of irAEs is of utmost importance. Gastrointestinal (GI) events are among the most frequent irAEs and the hallmark symptom is diarrhea. Intestinal hypomotility as irAEs is exceedingly rare, and needs wider recognition given that the presentation is insidious.Here, we report a case of 79-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma under nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy. She developed ileus symptom, and was diagnosed with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. The symptom relieved soon after administering high-dose prednisolone five days after the onset. ICI therapy was discontinued.Intestinal hypomotility as GI irAEs is exceedingly rare and there have been five reported cases to our knowledge. In reviewing past cases, we speculate that the prompt initiation of corticosteroids resulted in a favorable outcome. Our case illustrates that early recognition of these rare irAEs is essential in order to ensure prompt treatment.

Concurrent Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease and impressive response to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic melanoma

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Gambichler ◽  
C Seifert ◽  
M Lehmann ◽  
C Lukas ◽  
C Scheel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ocular Ultrasound ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Dose Corticosteroid

Background: Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease (VKHD)-like symptoms have previously been reported in 11 melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Materials & methods: We report a female patient with multilocular metastatic melanoma who was treated with nivolumab. Results: Following the first nivolumab dose, she experienced bilateral blurry vision, hearing loss, vertigo and ataxia. Ocular ultrasound was consistent with the diagnosis of uveitis. Audiography revealed severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A high-dose corticosteroid regimen was initiated under which the patient developed generalized vitiligo. Abdominal and thoracic CT scans showed an almost complete response to nivolumab therapy. This patient fulfilled all criteria of VKHD which is characterized pathogenetically by an antimelanocytic autoimmune process. Conclusion: The present case showed an impressive response to antimelanoma immunotherapy. Based on these data, the occurrence of VKHD in melanoma patients appears to be a strong indicator for immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Induced Pericarditis and Encephalitis in a Patient Treated With Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Metastatic Melanoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorja Braden ◽  
Jenny H. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Autoimmune Encephalitis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Pericardial Disease ◽  
Improved Outcomes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically improved outcomes in melanoma. Common ICI toxicities have become familiar to clinicians; however, rare delayed toxicities remain challenging given the paucity of data with such presentations. We present the unique case of a 61-year-old with metastatic melanoma with two rare, delayed ICI-induced toxicities. After resection of a large symptomatic parietal metastases, this patient received two doses of combination ipilimumab and nivolumab. Five weeks following his second dose, he developed ICI-induced pericarditis with associated pericardial effusion and early signs of tamponade. Corticosteroids were not administered due to a concurrent cerebral abscess. Administration of colchicine, ibuprofen, judicious monitoring, and cessation of immunotherapy led to the complete resolution of the effusion over several weeks. Seven months following his last dose of immunotherapy, the patient developed ICI-associated grade four autoimmune encephalitis, presenting as status epilepticus. High-dose steroid initiation led to rapid clinical improvement. The patient remains in near-complete response on imaging with no recurrence of pericardial effusion and partial resolution of neurological symptoms. ICI-induced pericardial disease and encephalitis carry substantial mortality rates and prompt diagnosis and management is critical. Clinicians must therefore remain vigilant for these rare toxicities regardless of duration of drug exposure or time since cessation of therapy.

231 A novel discovery pipeline identifies melanoma-specific antibodies in patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A249-A249
Author(s):  
Daniel Delitto ◽  
Evan Lipson ◽  
Laura Cappelli ◽  
Klaus Busam ◽  
Antony Rosen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Antibodies ◽  
Cancer Testis Antigens ◽  
Circulating Antibodies ◽  
Cancer Testis

BackgroundTumor-specific antibodies have been reported in patients with cancers responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and there is an increasing appreciation for the potential role of B cells in mediating ICI responses. However, the humoral immune response to melanoma remains incompletely defined. We hypothesized that screening sera for antibodies by immunoprecipitation with lysates of cultured melanoma cells would increase the likelihood of detecting circulating antibodies in melanoma patients receiving ICI, and potentially identify novel antibody targets associated with treatment response and/or immune-related adverse events (IRAEs).MethodsPre-and on/post-treatment sera or plasma from 12 clinically-annotated patients with advanced metastatic melanoma receiving ICI were assayed for tumor-specific antibodies with an established immunoprecipitation platform. 35S-methionine-labeled lysates from cultured 624Mel cells were used for immunoprecipitation. 624Mel expresses several shared non-mutated melanoma antigens (e.g., MAGEA3, tyrosinase, MART-1/Melan-A, gp75, and gp100). Antigen identity was determined using on-bead digests followed by mass spectrometry, and was confirmed by immunoprecipitation with in vitro transcription/translation (IVTT) products.ResultsAntibodies reactive against 624Mel proteins were detected in 4 of 12 (33%) patients (table 1). Mass spectrometric sequencing performed on proteins captured with sera from 3 of 4 patients identified several putative antigens. Immunoprecipitation with IVTT candidate proteins confirmed antibodies against melanoma-associated and cancer testis antigens NY-ESO-1, SSX2 and MAGEA10. Antibodies were observed in 1 of 1 (100%) patient with a complete response, 2 of 4 (50%) with a partial response, 1 of 1 (100%) with stable disease, and 0 of 6 (0%) with progressive disease. Antibody levels varied over the course of therapy, with previously undetectable specificities arising during treatment response in patients #1–3. Patient #1 with a complete tumor regression developed antibodies to SSX2 and MAGEA10 that were absent before treatment. Further, detection of these antibodies coincided with diagnosis of IRAEs (anti-SSX2 with pancreatitis and anti-MAGEA10 with dermatitis). In contrast, patient #3, initially with a partial tumor regression, demonstrated a loss of detectable anti-NY-ESO-1 antibodies upon disease progression, and subsequent metastasectomy demonstrated loss of NY-ESO-1 protein expression in the progressing tumor. Testing sera from all 12 patients with IVTT products for NY-ESO-1, SSX2 and MAGEA10 did not reveal additional humoral responses.Abstract 231 Table 1Antibodies detected in the serum or plasma of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICI therapy. Treatment response indicates best overall response according to RECIST v1.1. Post-treatment blood collections were drawn during or after ICI therapy.ConclusionsOur comprehensive screening platform detected circulating antibodies specific to multiple melanoma-associated and cancer testis antigens in patients deriving clinical benefit from ICI. Expanded investigations of the evolution of antibody production over the course of ICI therapy, associated with tumor response to treatment and development of IRAEs, are warranted.AcknowledgementsThis study was supported by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and NIH P30-AR070254.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board, approval #NA_00090257.

scholarly journals Refractory constrictive pericarditis caused by an immune checkpoint inhibitor properly managed with infliximab: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shohei Moriyama ◽  
Mitsuhiro Fukata ◽  
Ryoma Tatsumoto ◽  
Mihoko Kono
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Constrictive Pericarditis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Acute Pericarditis ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Steroid Refractory

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause cardiac immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including pericarditis. Cardiovascular events related to pericardial irAE are less frequent, but fulminant forms can be fatal. However, the diagnosis and treatment strategies for pericardial irAE have not established. Case summary A 58-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and nivolumab was administered as 5th-line therapy. Eighteen months after the initiation of nivolumab, the patient developed limb oedema and increased body weight. Although a favourable response of the cancer was observed, pericardial thickening and effusion were newly detected. He was diagnosed with irAE pericarditis after excluding other causes of pericarditis. Nivolumab was suspended and a high-dose corticosteroid was initiated. However, right heart failure (RHF) symptoms were exacerbated during the tapering of corticosteroid because acute pericarditis developed to steroid-refractory constrictive pericarditis. To suppress sustained inflammation of the pericardium, infliximab, a tumour necrosis factor-alfa inhibitor, was initiated. After the initiation of infliximab, the corticosteroid dose was tapered without deterioration of RHF. Exacerbation of lung cancer by irAE treatment including infliximab was not observed. Discussion IrAE should be considered when pericarditis develops after the administration of ICI even after a long period from its initiation. Infliximab rescue therapy may be considered as a 2nd-line therapy for steroid-refractory irAE pericarditis even with constrictive physiology.

Nivolumab-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus as an immune-related adverse event

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 236-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesut Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Pancreatic Beta Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Islet Cell Antibodies ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Acid Decarboxylase ◽  
Family History Of Diabetes ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
History Of ◽  
Fulminant Diabetes

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors are medications that activate anti-tumor responses by disrupting the inhibitory signaling to T cells. Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that selectively blocks the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). Anti-PD-1 agents can breach immunologic tolerance. Fulminant diabetes is an immune endocrinopathy that results from a violent immune attack leading to complete destruction of pancreatic beta cells. We present a rare case of fulminant diabetes precipitated by anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Case A 49-year-old male with a body mass index of 26.4 kg/m2, a history of Dandy–Walker syndrome and epilepsy, and no personal or family history of diabetes underwent left radical nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage IV metastatic renal cell carcinoma (metastases to lungs). He received first-line sunitinib treatment for three months. He developed new hepatic metastasis, and a second-line treatment with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every two weeks was introduced. At 10 months of nivolumab, before the 22nd infusion, the patient suddenly complained of severe asthenia, somnolence, weight loss, polydipsia, and polyuria. Laboratory tests revealed potassium 4.2 mmol/L, sodium 138 mmol/L, bicarbonate 17.8 mmol/L, blood glucose 801 mg/dL, and arterial blood pH 7.27. He was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis. Hemoglobin A1C was 10.9%. C-peptide was so low as 0.24. Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies, insulin autoantibodies and islet cell antibodies were all negative. Conclusion Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is effective in the treatment of cancers. These agents can precipitate autoimmune disorders. As the use of anti-PD-1 agents is expected to rise, physicians should be educated about the potential side effects.

Effect of high-dose corticosteroid use on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4583-4583
Author(s):  
Chris Labaki ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
Andrew Lachlan Schmidt ◽  
Talal El Zarif ◽  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Of Therapy

4583 Background: The use of High-Dose Corticosteroids (HDC) has been linked to poor outcomes in patients with lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (Ricciuti B, JCO, 2019). There is no data on the effect of HDC on renal cell carcinoma patients (RCC) treated with immunotherapy. We hypothesized that HDC use would be associated with worse outcomes in RCC patients receiving ICIs. Methods: This study evaluated a retrospective cohort of patients with RCC at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA. Clinical information including demographics, IMDC risk score, RCC histology, steroid administration, ICI regimen, line of therapy, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Patients were divided into those receiving HDC (prednisone ≥10 mg or equivalent for ≥ 1 week, HDC group) or not receiving HDC (No-HDC group). HDC administration was evaluated in relation to TTF and OS in a univariate analysis (Log-rank test) and a multivariate analysis (Cox regression). Results: 190 patients with RCC receiving ICIs were included, with a median age of 59 years. HDC were administered to 56 patients and 134 patients received no (N= 116) or only low-dose (N=18) steroids. In the HDC group, 40 patients received steroids for immune-related adverse events, 8 for other cancer-related indications, and 8 for non-oncological indications. There was no difference in TTF between the HDC and No-HDC groups (12-mo TTF rate: 34.8 vs. 32.3%, respectively; log-rank p=0.65). Similarly, there was no difference in OS between the HDC and No-HDC groups (36-mo OS rate: 56.7 vs. 62.4%, respectively; log-rank p=0.97). After adjusting for IMDC risk group, RCC histology, ICI regimen type, and line of therapy, TTF and OS did not differ in the HDC group as compared to No-HDC group (HR=1.14 [95%CI: 0.80-1.62], p=0.44 and HR=1.17 [95%CI: 0.65-2.11], p=0.59, respectively). Conclusions: In this retrospective study of patients with RCC treated with ICIs, administration of high-dose corticosteroids was not associated with worse outcomes.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document