scholarly journals HEREDITARY ENDOCRINE TUMOURS: CURRENT STATE-OF-THE-ART AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES: The roles of AIP and GPR101 in familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. T77-T86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Vasilev ◽  
Adrian F Daly ◽  
Giampaolo Trivellin ◽  
Constantine A Stratakis ◽  
Sabina Zacharieva ◽  
...  

Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) is one of the most frequent conditions associated with an inherited presentation of pituitary tumors. FIPA can present with pituitary adenomas of any secretory/non-secretory type. Mutations in the gene for the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) have been identified in approximately 20% of FIPA families and are the most frequent cause (29%) of pituitary gigantism. Pituitary tumors in FIPA are larger, occur at a younger age and display more aggressive characteristics and evolution than sporadic adenomas. This aggressiveness is especially marked in FIPA kindreds with AIP mutations. Special attention should be paid to young patients with pituitary gigantism and/or macroadenomas, as AIP mutations are prevalent in these groups. Duplications on chromosome Xq26.3 involving the gene GPR101 lead to X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG), a syndrome of pituitary gigantism beginning in early childhood; three kindreds with X-LAG have presented in the setting of FIPA. Management of pituitary adenomas in the setting of FIPA, AIP mutations and GPR101 duplications is often more complex than in sporadic disease due to early onset disease, aggressive tumor growth and resistance to medical therapy.

2009 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 799-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet E Jennings ◽  
Marianthi Georgitsi ◽  
Ian Holdaway ◽  
Adrian F Daly ◽  
Maria Tichomirowa ◽  
...  

ObjectiveMutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) were recently shown to confer a pituitary adenoma predisposition in patients with familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). We report a large Samoan FIPA kindred from Australia/New Zealand with an R271W mutation that was associated with aggressive pituitary tumors.Design and methodsCase series with germline screening of AIP and haplotype analyses among R271W families.ResultsThis previously unreported kindred consisted of three affected individuals that either presented with or had first symptoms of a pituitary macroadenoma in late childhood or adolescence. The index case, a 15-year-old male with incipient gigantism and his maternal aunt, had somatotropinomas, and the maternal uncle of the index case had a prolactinoma. All tumors were large (15, 40, and 60 mm maximum diameter) and two required transcranial surgery and radiotherapy. All three affected subjects and ten other unaffected relatives were found to be positive for a germline R271W AIP mutation. Comparison of the single nucleotide polymorphism patterns among this family and two previously reported European FIPA families with the same R271W mutation demonstrated no common ancestry.ConclusionsThis kindred exemplifies the aggressive features of pituitary adenomas associated with AIP mutations, while genetic analyses among three R271W FIPA families indicate that R271W represents a mutational hotspot that should be studied further in functional studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A591-A591
Author(s):  
Carolina Marques Chaves ◽  
Mariana M Chaves ◽  
Joao Anselmo

Abstract Background: Germline mutations in the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-Interacting Protein (AIP) gene are associated with pituitary adenomas in young patients usually in the setting of Familial Isolated Pituitary Adenomas (FIPA). The majority of these adenomas are somatotropinomas followed by prolactinomas, and rarely non-secreting adenomas. AIP-mutation-related prolactinomas predominantly affect men, as opposed to sporadic prolactinomas, that typically affect women. Clinical Case: We previously described an AIP gene mutation in two patients affected by prolactinomas. During the past years, we continued our study and have identified two more male patients with macroprolactinomas originally from the same small village and harboring the same AIP gene mutation. These male patients aged 19 to 44 years at the time of diagnosis. Two of them had neurological manifestations as the first clinical manifestation of the disease, one was studied because of hypogonadism and two patients had visual field defects. All of them had prolactin levels above 1000 ng/dl (mean 2946.5±948.7 ng/dl, reference range 10-21). In the imaging exams (CT/MRI) they presented pituitary adenomas larger than 20 mm (macroprolactinomas) and in two of the cases, the adenomas were even larger than 40 mm (giant prolactinomas). In order to exclude mutations most often associated with prolactinomas, DNA samples were obtained and analyzed by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) using TruSightCancer Gene Set (Illumina) methodology. Investigation of significant deletions and/or duplications was performed using the MLPA (Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) technique. None of the patients were positive for mutations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene. A variant of the AIP gene c.47G>A, expecting to lead to a substitution of arginine by histidine at position 16 (p.Arg16His) of the AIP was found in these four patients, including a father and his son. Seven asymptomatic carriers were identified among their first-degree relatives. In silico analysis and the information available in the literature, as well as in databases is not in agreement with the pathogenicity of this variant of the AIP gene. However, our findings point to a founder effect transmitted as a dominant trait with incomplete penetrance (4 out of 11 patients, 36%). Conclusion: The variant of the AIP gene identified in our patients behaved as a pathogenic mutation and was only associated with prolactinomas, including two giant prolactinomas.


2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (5) ◽  
pp. 659-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Preda ◽  
Márta Korbonits ◽  
Simon Cudlip ◽  
Niki Karavitaki ◽  
Ashley B Grossman

AimTo study the prevalence of germline mutations of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene in a large cohort of patients seen in the Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), UK, with apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas, who were either diagnosed or had relevant clinical manifestations by the age of 40 years.PatientsWe prospectively investigated all patients who were seen at Oxford University Hospital, OCDEM, and a tertiary referral centre, between 2012 and 2013, and presented with pituitary tumours under the age of 40 years and with no family history: a total of 127 patients were enrolled in the study.MethodsLeukocyte-origin genomic DNA underwent sequence analysis of exons 1–6 and the flanking intronic regions of theAIPgene (NM_003977.2), with dosage analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.ResultsAIPvariants were detected in 3% of the 127 patients, comprising four of 48 patients with acromegaly (8%), 0 of 43 with prolactinomas, 0 of the 20 patients with non-functioning adenomas, 0 of 15 with corticotroph adenomas and 0 of one with a thyrotroph adenomas. Definite pathogenetic mutations were seen in 2/4 variants, comprising 4.2% of patients with acromegaly.ConclusionsThis prospective cohort study suggests a relatively low prevalence ofAIPgene mutations in young patients with apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas presenting to a tertiary pituitary UK centre. Those with somatotroph macroadenomas have a higher rate ofAIPmutation. These findings should inform discussion of genetic testing guidelines.


2008 ◽  
Vol 159 (6) ◽  
pp. 699-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Cecilia Pesatori ◽  
Andrea Baccarelli ◽  
Dario Consonni ◽  
Andrea Lania ◽  
Paolo Beck-Peccoz ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe pathogenesis of sporadic pituitary tumors is unknown. Loss-of-function mutations of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) have been identified in patients with familial pituitary tumors. AIP is a chaperone protein with multifunction properties, including modulation of the transcriptional activity of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, which mediates toxicological and carcinogenic dioxin effects.DesignWe investigated the incidence of pituitary tumors in the Seveso population exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin following an industrial accident in 1976.MethodsThrough the hospital discharge registration system of Lombardy Region, we identified incident cases of pituitary adenomas between 1976 and 1996 in the Seveso population, subdivided in zone A (n=804), B (n=5.941), and R (n=38.624) according to high, intermediate, and low exposure to dioxin respectively, and in the surrounding non-contaminated area, as reference (n=232 745).ResultsWe identified 42 pituitary adenomas in the reference area, 1 prolactinoma in zone A (rate ratio (RR) 6.2; 95% CI 0.9–45.5, P=0.07), 2 nonfuctioning pituitary tumors (NFPAs) in zone B (RR 1.9; 95% CI 0.5–7.7, P=0.39), and 3 prolactinomas and 2 NFPAs in zone R (RR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3–1.8, P=0.48).ConclusionsThe study is unique with regard to the availability of epidemiological and clinical data in an area of relatively pure dioxin exposure. The study indicates no statistically significant increase of incident pituitary tumors in this area, although the tendency toward a higher risk (three cases in zones A and B) of pituitary tumors in subjects exposed to high–intermediate dioxin concentrations in comparison with nonexposed population suggests the need for extended follow-up.


2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1891-1896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian F. Daly ◽  
Jean-François Vanbellinghen ◽  
Sok Kean Khoo ◽  
Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea ◽  
Luciana A. Naves ◽  
...  

Abstract Context: An association between germline aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene mutations and pituitary adenomas was recently shown. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the frequency of AIP gene mutations in a large cohort of patients with familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA). Design: This was a multicenter, international, collaborative study. Setting: The study was conducted in 34 university endocrinology and genetics departments in nine countries. Patients: Affected members from each FIPA family were studied. Relatives of patients with AIP mutations underwent AIP sequence analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Presence/absence and description of AIP gene mutations were the main outcome measures. Intervention: There was no intervention. Results: Seventy-three FIPA families were identified, with 156 patients with pituitary adenomas; the FIPA cohort was evenly divided between families with homogeneous and heterogeneous tumor expression. Eleven FIPA families had 10 germline AIP mutations. Nine mutations, R16H, G47_R54del, Q142X, E174frameshift, Q217X, Q239X, K241E, R271W, and Q285frameshift, have not been described previously. Tumors were significantly larger (P = 0.0005) and diagnosed at a younger age (P = 0.0006) in AIP mutation-positive vs. mutation-negative subjects. Somatotropinomas predominated among FIPA families with AIP mutations, but mixed GH/prolactin-secreting tumors, prolactinomas, and nonsecreting adenomas were also noted. Approximately 85% of the FIPA cohort and 50% of those with familial somatotropinomas were negative for AIP mutations. Conclusions: AIP mutations, of which nine new mutations have been described here, occur in approximately 15% of FIPA families. Although pituitary tumors occurring in association with AIP mutations are predominantly somatotropinomas, other tumor types are also seen. Further study of the impact of AIP mutations on protein expression and activity is necessary to elucidate their role in pituitary tumorigenesis in FIPA.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Beckers ◽  
Lauri A. Aaltonen ◽  
Adrian F. Daly ◽  
Auli Karhu

Abstract Pituitary adenomas are one of the most frequent intracranial tumors and occur with a prevalence of approximately 1:1000 in the developed world. Pituitary adenomas have a serious disease burden, and their management involves neurosurgery, biological therapies, and radiotherapy. Early diagnosis of pituitary tumors while they are smaller may help increase cure rates. Few genetic predictors of pituitary adenoma development exist. Recent years have seen two separate, complimentary advances in inherited pituitary tumor research. The clinical condition of familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) has been described, which encompasses the familial occurrence of isolated pituitary adenomas outside of the setting of syndromic conditions like multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Carney complex. FIPA families comprise approximately 2% of pituitary adenomas and represent a clinical entity with homogeneous or heterogeneous pituitary adenoma types occurring within the same kindred. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene has been identified as causing a pituitary adenoma predisposition of variable penetrance that accounts for 20% of FIPA families. Germline AIP mutations have been shown to associate with the occurrence of large pituitary adenomas that occur at a young age, predominantly in children/adolescents and young adults. AIP mutations are usually associated with somatotropinomas, but prolactinomas, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, Cushing disease, and other infrequent clinical adenoma types can also occur. Gigantism is a particular feature of AIP mutations and occurs in more than one third of affected somatotropinoma patients. Study of pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations has demonstrated that these cases raise clinical challenges to successful treatment. Extensive research on the biology of AIP and new advances in mouse Aip knockout models demonstrate multiple pathways by which AIP may contribute to tumorigenesis. This review assesses the current clinical and therapeutic characteristics of more than 200 FIPA families and addresses research findings among AIP mutation-bearing patients in different populations with pituitary adenomas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 181 (6) ◽  
pp. R235-R254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Vandeva ◽  
Adrian F Daly ◽  
Patrick Petrossians ◽  
Sabina Zacharieva ◽  
Albert Beckers

Pituitary adenomas are frequently occurring neoplasms that produce clinically significant disease in 1:1000 of the general population. The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors is a matter of interest as it could help to improve diagnosis and treatment. Until recently, however, disruptions in relatively few genes were known to predispose to pituitary tumor formation. In the last decade, several more genes and pathways have been described. Germline pathogenic variants in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene were found in familial or sporadic pituitary adenomas, usually with an aggressive clinical course. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (CDKN1B) pathogenic variants lead to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4) syndrome, in which pituitary adenomas can occur. Xq26.3 duplications involving the gene GPR101 cause X-linked acrogigantism. The pheochomocytoma and/or paraganglioma with pituitary adenoma association (3PAs) syndrome suggests that pathogenic variants in the genes of the succinate dehydrogenase complex or MYC-associated factor X (MAX) might be involved in pituitary tumorigenesis. New recurrent somatic alterations were also discovered in pituitary adenomas, such as, ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) and USP48 pathogenic variants in corticotropinomas. The aim of the present review is to provide an overview of the genetic pathophysiology of pituitary adenomas and their clinical relevance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 914-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Bruna Araujo ◽  
Leandro Kasuki ◽  
Carlos Henrique de Azeredo Lima ◽  
Liana Ogino ◽  
Aline H S Camacho ◽  
...  

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene mutations (AIPmut) are the most frequent germline mutations found in apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas (SPA). Our aim was to evaluate the frequency of AIPmut among young Brazilian patients with SPA. We performed an observational cohort study between 2013 and 2016 in a single referral center. AIPmut screening was carried out in 132 SPA patients with macroadenomas diagnosed up to 40 years or in adenomas of any size diagnosed until 18 years of age. Twelve tumor samples were also analyzed. Leukocyte DNA and tumor tissue DNA were sequenced for the entire AIP-coding region for evaluation of mutations. Eleven (8.3%) of the 132 patients had AIPmut, comprising 9/74 (12%) somatotropinomas, 1/38 (2.6%) prolactinoma, 1/10 (10%) corticotropinoma and no non-functioning adenomas. In pediatric patients (≤18 years), AIPmut frequency was 13.3% (2/15). Out of the 5 patients with gigantism, two had AIPmut, both truncating mutations. The Y268* mutation was described in Brazilian patients and the K273Rfs*30 mutation is a novel mutation in our patient. No somatic AIP mutations were found in the 12 tumor samples. A tumor sample from an acromegaly patient harboring the A299V AIPmut showed loss of heterozygosity. In conclusion, AIPmut frequency in SPA Brazilian patients is similar to other populations. Our study identified two mutations exclusively found in Brazilians and also shows, for the first time, loss of heterozygosity in tumor DNA from an acromegaly patient harboring the A299V AIPmut. Our findings corroborate previous observations that AIPmut screening should be performed in young patients with SPA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document