scholarly journals Aggressive pituitary adenomas occurring in young patients in a large Polynesian kindred with a germline R271W mutation in the AIP gene

2009 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 799-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet E Jennings ◽  
Marianthi Georgitsi ◽  
Ian Holdaway ◽  
Adrian F Daly ◽  
Maria Tichomirowa ◽  
...  

ObjectiveMutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) were recently shown to confer a pituitary adenoma predisposition in patients with familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). We report a large Samoan FIPA kindred from Australia/New Zealand with an R271W mutation that was associated with aggressive pituitary tumors.Design and methodsCase series with germline screening of AIP and haplotype analyses among R271W families.ResultsThis previously unreported kindred consisted of three affected individuals that either presented with or had first symptoms of a pituitary macroadenoma in late childhood or adolescence. The index case, a 15-year-old male with incipient gigantism and his maternal aunt, had somatotropinomas, and the maternal uncle of the index case had a prolactinoma. All tumors were large (15, 40, and 60 mm maximum diameter) and two required transcranial surgery and radiotherapy. All three affected subjects and ten other unaffected relatives were found to be positive for a germline R271W AIP mutation. Comparison of the single nucleotide polymorphism patterns among this family and two previously reported European FIPA families with the same R271W mutation demonstrated no common ancestry.ConclusionsThis kindred exemplifies the aggressive features of pituitary adenomas associated with AIP mutations, while genetic analyses among three R271W FIPA families indicate that R271W represents a mutational hotspot that should be studied further in functional studies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A591-A591
Author(s):  
Carolina Marques Chaves ◽  
Mariana M Chaves ◽  
Joao Anselmo

Abstract Background: Germline mutations in the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-Interacting Protein (AIP) gene are associated with pituitary adenomas in young patients usually in the setting of Familial Isolated Pituitary Adenomas (FIPA). The majority of these adenomas are somatotropinomas followed by prolactinomas, and rarely non-secreting adenomas. AIP-mutation-related prolactinomas predominantly affect men, as opposed to sporadic prolactinomas, that typically affect women. Clinical Case: We previously described an AIP gene mutation in two patients affected by prolactinomas. During the past years, we continued our study and have identified two more male patients with macroprolactinomas originally from the same small village and harboring the same AIP gene mutation. These male patients aged 19 to 44 years at the time of diagnosis. Two of them had neurological manifestations as the first clinical manifestation of the disease, one was studied because of hypogonadism and two patients had visual field defects. All of them had prolactin levels above 1000 ng/dl (mean 2946.5±948.7 ng/dl, reference range 10-21). In the imaging exams (CT/MRI) they presented pituitary adenomas larger than 20 mm (macroprolactinomas) and in two of the cases, the adenomas were even larger than 40 mm (giant prolactinomas). In order to exclude mutations most often associated with prolactinomas, DNA samples were obtained and analyzed by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) using TruSightCancer Gene Set (Illumina) methodology. Investigation of significant deletions and/or duplications was performed using the MLPA (Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) technique. None of the patients were positive for mutations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene. A variant of the AIP gene c.47G>A, expecting to lead to a substitution of arginine by histidine at position 16 (p.Arg16His) of the AIP was found in these four patients, including a father and his son. Seven asymptomatic carriers were identified among their first-degree relatives. In silico analysis and the information available in the literature, as well as in databases is not in agreement with the pathogenicity of this variant of the AIP gene. However, our findings point to a founder effect transmitted as a dominant trait with incomplete penetrance (4 out of 11 patients, 36%). Conclusion: The variant of the AIP gene identified in our patients behaved as a pathogenic mutation and was only associated with prolactinomas, including two giant prolactinomas.


2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1891-1896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian F. Daly ◽  
Jean-François Vanbellinghen ◽  
Sok Kean Khoo ◽  
Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea ◽  
Luciana A. Naves ◽  
...  

Abstract Context: An association between germline aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene mutations and pituitary adenomas was recently shown. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the frequency of AIP gene mutations in a large cohort of patients with familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA). Design: This was a multicenter, international, collaborative study. Setting: The study was conducted in 34 university endocrinology and genetics departments in nine countries. Patients: Affected members from each FIPA family were studied. Relatives of patients with AIP mutations underwent AIP sequence analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Presence/absence and description of AIP gene mutations were the main outcome measures. Intervention: There was no intervention. Results: Seventy-three FIPA families were identified, with 156 patients with pituitary adenomas; the FIPA cohort was evenly divided between families with homogeneous and heterogeneous tumor expression. Eleven FIPA families had 10 germline AIP mutations. Nine mutations, R16H, G47_R54del, Q142X, E174frameshift, Q217X, Q239X, K241E, R271W, and Q285frameshift, have not been described previously. Tumors were significantly larger (P = 0.0005) and diagnosed at a younger age (P = 0.0006) in AIP mutation-positive vs. mutation-negative subjects. Somatotropinomas predominated among FIPA families with AIP mutations, but mixed GH/prolactin-secreting tumors, prolactinomas, and nonsecreting adenomas were also noted. Approximately 85% of the FIPA cohort and 50% of those with familial somatotropinomas were negative for AIP mutations. Conclusions: AIP mutations, of which nine new mutations have been described here, occur in approximately 15% of FIPA families. Although pituitary tumors occurring in association with AIP mutations are predominantly somatotropinomas, other tumor types are also seen. Further study of the impact of AIP mutations on protein expression and activity is necessary to elucidate their role in pituitary tumorigenesis in FIPA.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Beckers ◽  
Lauri A. Aaltonen ◽  
Adrian F. Daly ◽  
Auli Karhu

Abstract Pituitary adenomas are one of the most frequent intracranial tumors and occur with a prevalence of approximately 1:1000 in the developed world. Pituitary adenomas have a serious disease burden, and their management involves neurosurgery, biological therapies, and radiotherapy. Early diagnosis of pituitary tumors while they are smaller may help increase cure rates. Few genetic predictors of pituitary adenoma development exist. Recent years have seen two separate, complimentary advances in inherited pituitary tumor research. The clinical condition of familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) has been described, which encompasses the familial occurrence of isolated pituitary adenomas outside of the setting of syndromic conditions like multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Carney complex. FIPA families comprise approximately 2% of pituitary adenomas and represent a clinical entity with homogeneous or heterogeneous pituitary adenoma types occurring within the same kindred. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene has been identified as causing a pituitary adenoma predisposition of variable penetrance that accounts for 20% of FIPA families. Germline AIP mutations have been shown to associate with the occurrence of large pituitary adenomas that occur at a young age, predominantly in children/adolescents and young adults. AIP mutations are usually associated with somatotropinomas, but prolactinomas, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, Cushing disease, and other infrequent clinical adenoma types can also occur. Gigantism is a particular feature of AIP mutations and occurs in more than one third of affected somatotropinoma patients. Study of pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations has demonstrated that these cases raise clinical challenges to successful treatment. Extensive research on the biology of AIP and new advances in mouse Aip knockout models demonstrate multiple pathways by which AIP may contribute to tumorigenesis. This review assesses the current clinical and therapeutic characteristics of more than 200 FIPA families and addresses research findings among AIP mutation-bearing patients in different populations with pituitary adenomas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. T77-T86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Vasilev ◽  
Adrian F Daly ◽  
Giampaolo Trivellin ◽  
Constantine A Stratakis ◽  
Sabina Zacharieva ◽  
...  

Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) is one of the most frequent conditions associated with an inherited presentation of pituitary tumors. FIPA can present with pituitary adenomas of any secretory/non-secretory type. Mutations in the gene for the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) have been identified in approximately 20% of FIPA families and are the most frequent cause (29%) of pituitary gigantism. Pituitary tumors in FIPA are larger, occur at a younger age and display more aggressive characteristics and evolution than sporadic adenomas. This aggressiveness is especially marked in FIPA kindreds with AIP mutations. Special attention should be paid to young patients with pituitary gigantism and/or macroadenomas, as AIP mutations are prevalent in these groups. Duplications on chromosome Xq26.3 involving the gene GPR101 lead to X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG), a syndrome of pituitary gigantism beginning in early childhood; three kindreds with X-LAG have presented in the setting of FIPA. Management of pituitary adenomas in the setting of FIPA, AIP mutations and GPR101 duplications is often more complex than in sporadic disease due to early onset disease, aggressive tumor growth and resistance to medical therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
N S Dalantaeva ◽  
I I Dedov

Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) – a relatively new term for the disease, which is characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance, resulting in the development of pituitary tumors with no distinguishing features other endocrine diseases or syndromes, such as, for example, the syndrome multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1 syndrome) or the Carney complex. FIPA-families account for about 2% of all cases of pituitary adenomas. Among the FIPA-family about 15–20% have mutations in the gene encoding the protein aryl hydrocarbon receptor. This suppressor gene located on the long arm of chromosome 11. Etiological gene for the rest of the greater percentage of FIPA-family is still unknown. Germline mutations in the AIP gene have also been found in patients with early development of pituitary adenomas, mainly secreting growth hormone, much rarely – prolactin and adrenocorticotropic hormone without a clear family history. Such cases are called "simple". Somatic mutations of the AIP gene in pituitary tumors or other sites has not yet been described


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  
pp. E2789-E2793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christof Schöfl ◽  
Jürgen Honegger ◽  
Michael Droste ◽  
Martin Grussendorf ◽  
Reinhard Finke ◽  
...  

Context: Familial and sporadic GH-secreting pituitary adenomas are associated with mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene. Patients with an AIP mutation (AIPmut) tend to have more aggressive tumors occurring at a younger age. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the frequency of AIPmut in patients diagnosed at 30 years of age or younger. Design: The German Acromegaly Registry database (1795 patients in 58 centers) was screened for patients diagnosed with acromegaly at 30 years of age or younger (329 patients). Sixteen centers participated and 91 patients consented to AIPmut analysis. Intervention: DNA was analyzed by direct sequencing and multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification Main outcome Measures: The number of patients with AIPmut was measured. Results: Five patients had either a mutation (c.490C>T, c.844C>T, and c.911G>A, three males) or gross deletions of exons 1 and 2 of the AIP gene (n = 2, one female). The overall frequency of an AIPmut was 5.5%, and 2.3% or 2.4% in patients with an apparently sporadic adenoma or macroadenoma, respectively. By contrast, three of four patients (75%) with a positive family history were tested positive for an AIPmut. Except for a positive family history, there were no significant differences between patients with and without an AIPmut. Conclusions: The frequency of AIPmut in this registry-based cohort of young patients with acromegaly is lower than previously reported. Patients with a positive family history should be tested for an AIPmut, whereas young patients without an apparent family history should be screened, depending on the individual cost to benefit ratio.


2008 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianthi Georgitsi ◽  
Ernesto De Menis ◽  
Salvatore Cannavò ◽  
Markus J. Mäkinen ◽  
Karoliina Tuppurainen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 165 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A Tichomirowa ◽  
Anne Barlier ◽  
Adrian F Daly ◽  
Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea ◽  
Cristina Ronchi ◽  
...  

BackgroundAryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) mutations (AIPmut) cause aggressive pituitary adenomas in young patients, usually in the setting of familial isolated pituitary adenomas. The prevalence of AIPmut among sporadic pituitary adenoma patients appears to be low; studies have not addressed prevalence in the most clinically relevant population. Hence, we undertook an international, multicenter, prospective genetic, and clinical analysis at 21 tertiary referral endocrine departments.MethodsWe included 163 sporadic pituitary macroadenoma patients irrespective of clinical phenotype diagnosed at <30 years of age.ResultsOverall, 19/163 (11.7%) patients had germline AIPmut; a further nine patients had sequence changes of uncertain significance or polymorphisms. AIPmut were identified in 8/39 (20.5%) pediatric patients. Ten AIPmut were identified in 11/83 (13.3%) sporadic somatotropinoma patients, in 7/61 (11.5%) prolactinoma patients, and in 1/16 non-functioning pituitary adenoma patients. Large genetic deletions were not seen using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Familial screening was possible in the relatives of seven patients with AIPmut and carriers were found in six of the seven families. In total, pituitary adenomas were diagnosed in 2/21 AIPmut-screened carriers; both had asymptomatic microadenomas.ConclusionGermline AIPmut occur in 11.7% of patients <30 years with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas and in 20.5% of pediatric patients. AIPmut mutation testing in this population should be considered in order to optimize clinical genetic investigation and management.


2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (5) ◽  
pp. 659-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Preda ◽  
Márta Korbonits ◽  
Simon Cudlip ◽  
Niki Karavitaki ◽  
Ashley B Grossman

AimTo study the prevalence of germline mutations of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene in a large cohort of patients seen in the Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), UK, with apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas, who were either diagnosed or had relevant clinical manifestations by the age of 40 years.PatientsWe prospectively investigated all patients who were seen at Oxford University Hospital, OCDEM, and a tertiary referral centre, between 2012 and 2013, and presented with pituitary tumours under the age of 40 years and with no family history: a total of 127 patients were enrolled in the study.MethodsLeukocyte-origin genomic DNA underwent sequence analysis of exons 1–6 and the flanking intronic regions of theAIPgene (NM_003977.2), with dosage analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.ResultsAIPvariants were detected in 3% of the 127 patients, comprising four of 48 patients with acromegaly (8%), 0 of 43 with prolactinomas, 0 of the 20 patients with non-functioning adenomas, 0 of 15 with corticotroph adenomas and 0 of one with a thyrotroph adenomas. Definite pathogenetic mutations were seen in 2/4 variants, comprising 4.2% of patients with acromegaly.ConclusionsThis prospective cohort study suggests a relatively low prevalence ofAIPgene mutations in young patients with apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas presenting to a tertiary pituitary UK centre. Those with somatotroph macroadenomas have a higher rate ofAIPmutation. These findings should inform discussion of genetic testing guidelines.


2008 ◽  
Vol 159 (6) ◽  
pp. 699-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Cecilia Pesatori ◽  
Andrea Baccarelli ◽  
Dario Consonni ◽  
Andrea Lania ◽  
Paolo Beck-Peccoz ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe pathogenesis of sporadic pituitary tumors is unknown. Loss-of-function mutations of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) have been identified in patients with familial pituitary tumors. AIP is a chaperone protein with multifunction properties, including modulation of the transcriptional activity of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, which mediates toxicological and carcinogenic dioxin effects.DesignWe investigated the incidence of pituitary tumors in the Seveso population exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin following an industrial accident in 1976.MethodsThrough the hospital discharge registration system of Lombardy Region, we identified incident cases of pituitary adenomas between 1976 and 1996 in the Seveso population, subdivided in zone A (n=804), B (n=5.941), and R (n=38.624) according to high, intermediate, and low exposure to dioxin respectively, and in the surrounding non-contaminated area, as reference (n=232 745).ResultsWe identified 42 pituitary adenomas in the reference area, 1 prolactinoma in zone A (rate ratio (RR) 6.2; 95% CI 0.9–45.5, P=0.07), 2 nonfuctioning pituitary tumors (NFPAs) in zone B (RR 1.9; 95% CI 0.5–7.7, P=0.39), and 3 prolactinomas and 2 NFPAs in zone R (RR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3–1.8, P=0.48).ConclusionsThe study is unique with regard to the availability of epidemiological and clinical data in an area of relatively pure dioxin exposure. The study indicates no statistically significant increase of incident pituitary tumors in this area, although the tendency toward a higher risk (three cases in zones A and B) of pituitary tumors in subjects exposed to high–intermediate dioxin concentrations in comparison with nonexposed population suggests the need for extended follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document