scholarly journals Different Prevalence of Alarm, Dyspeptic and Reflux Symptoms in Patients with Cardia and Non-cardia Gastric Cancer

Author(s):  
Caspar Franck ◽  
Nadja Zimmermann ◽  
Elisabetta Goni ◽  
Hans Lippert ◽  
Karsten Ridwelski ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Symptoms of patients with gastric cancer (GC) are often unspecific and differences in symptoms between patients with cardia and non-cardia GC have been poorly investigated. We aimed to characterize symptoms of patients with cardia and non-cardia GC. Methods: Patients with cardia (Siewert type II and III) and non-cardia GC were recruited in the German multicenter cohort of the Gastric Cancer Research (staR) study between 2013 and 2017. Alarm, dyspeptic and reflux symptoms at the time of presentation were documented using a self-administered questionnaire. Results: A completed self-administered questionnaire was available for 568/759 recruited patients (132 cardia GC, 436 non-cardia GC, male 61%, mean age 64 years). Dyspeptic symptoms were more common in patients with non-cardia GC (69.0 vs. 54.5%, p=0.0024). Cardia GC patients reported more frequently alarm symptoms (69.7 vs. 44.7%, p<0.0001), and were more likely to have Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III-IV (54.1vs. 38.9%, p=0.0034). Especially, dysphagia and weight loss were more common in patients with cardia GC (49.2 vs. 6.4 %, p<0.0001 and 37.1 vs. 25.7%, p=0.02, respectively). No differences between the two groups were observed with respect to reflux symptoms. Patients with alarm symptoms were more likely to have UICC stage III-IV at presentation (69.4 vs. 42.9%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In clinical practice the symptom pattern at presentation may serve as a hint for tumor localization. Despite the fact that they are common in the general population, dyspeptic symptoms offer a chance for earlier GC detection. Thus, in patients with dyspeptic symptoms who fail empiric approaches, endoscopy should not be delayed.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanrui Liang ◽  
Liying Zhao ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Tian Lin ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with gastric cancer (GC) remain unknown because elderly patients are underrepresented in most clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients > 65 years of age after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy. Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of elderly patients (> 65 years) with stage II/III GC who underwent curative laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy with R0 resection between 2004 and 2018. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimens included monotherapy (oral capecitabine) and doublet chemotherapy (oral capecitabine plus intravenous oxaliplatin [XELOX] or intravenous oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil [FOLFOX]). The data were retrieved from a prospectively registered database maintained at the Department of General Surgery in Nanfang Hospital, China. The patients were divided as surgery alone and surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo group). The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), chemotherapy duration, and toxicity were examined. Results There were 270 patients included: 169 and 101 in the surgery and chemo groups, respectively. There were 10 (10/101) and six (6/101) patients with grade 3+ non-hematological and hematological adverse events. The 1−/3−/5-year OS rates of the surgery group were 72.9%/51.8%/48.3%, compared with 90.1%/66.4%/48.6% for the chemo group (log-rank test: P = 0.018). For stage III patients, the 1−/3−/5-year OS rates of the surgery group were 83.7%/40.7%/28.7%, compared with 89.9%/61.2%/43.6% for the chemo group (log-rank test: P = 0.015). Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with higher OS (HR = 0.568, 95%CI: 0.357–0.903, P = 0.017) and DFS (HR = 0.511, 95%CI: 0.322–0.811, P = 0.004) in stage III patients. Conclusions This study suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves OS and DFS compared with surgery alone in elderly patients with stage III GC after D2 laparoscopic gastrectomy, with a tolerable adverse event profile.


2012 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jee Suk Chang ◽  
Joon Seok Lim ◽  
Sung Hoon Noh ◽  
Woo Jin Hyung ◽  
Ji Yeong An ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Ming Huang ◽  
Jian-Xian Lin ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Jian-Wei Xie ◽  
...  

Objectives. To investigate the prognostic impact of the number of dissected lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.Methods. The survival of 634 patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy from 1995 to 2004 was retrieved. Long-term surgical outcomes and associations between the number of dissected LNs and the 5-year survival rate were investigated.Results. The number of dissected LNs was one of the most important prognostic indicators. Among patients with comparable T category, the larger the number of dissected LNs was, the better the survival would be (). The linear regression showed that a significant survival improvement based on increasing retrieved LNs for stage II, III and IV (). A cut-point analysis yields the greatest variance of survival rate difference at the levels of 15 LNs (stage I), 25 LNs (stage II) and 30 LNs (stage III).Conclusion. The number of dissected LNs is an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer. To improve the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer, removing at least 15 LNs for stage I, 25 LNs for stage II, and 30 LNs for stage III patients during curative distal gastrectomy is recommended.


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S102
Author(s):  
L. Cirera ◽  
T. Cardona ◽  
E. Batiste ◽  
A. Arcusa ◽  
I. Tusquets ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Okabe ◽  
Hiroaki Hata ◽  
Shugo Ueda ◽  
Masazumi Zaima ◽  
Atsuo Tokuka ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-106
Author(s):  
A. S. Abdullin ◽  
F. Sh. Akhmetzyanov ◽  
A. A. Samigullin ◽  
Z. N. Shemeunova ◽  
V. A. Arinin ◽  
...  

We analyzed long-term outcomes of the treatment of 217 patients (men - 126, women - 91), who underwent radical operations for stomach cancer in the period of 1972 till 1976. 14 patients were under 39, 52 - from 40 to 49, 50 to 59 - 52, 60 to 69 - 80, over 70 years old - 19. The youngest patient was 28 years old and the oldest - 76 years old. Most patients (185) were operated on at stage III of the disease, stage II was diagnosed in 27 patients, and stage IV - in 5 patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang Hee Hong ◽  
Eun-Heui Jin ◽  
Hyojin Kang ◽  
In Ae Chang ◽  
Sang-Il Lee ◽  
...  

We evaluated the association between prostate cancer non-coding RNA 1 (PRNCR1) polymorphisms and the risk of developing gastric cancer (GC) and GC subgroups in Korea. A case–control study was conducted with 437 GC patients and 357 healthy controls using a TaqMan genotyping assay. A chi-squared test, binary logistic regression, and genetic models were used to explore the association between five PRNCR1 polymorphisms and GC risk. After adjusting for gender and age, overall analyses using the recessive model indicated that the rs13252298 GG genotype was significantly associated with increased risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). In the stratification analyses, the recessive model indicated that the rs1016343 TT genotype was significantly associated with decreased GC risk in individuals aged <60 years showing lymph node metastasis (LNM)-negative results. The rs13252298 GG genotype in the recessive model showed increased GC risk in subjects aged ≥60 years showing LNM-positive results and those aged ≥60 years in tumor stage III. In the dominant model, the rs16901946 combined genotype (AG/GG) was significantly associated with increased GC risk in subjects aged <60 years with tumor stage III. In the recessive model, the rs16901946 GG genotype was associated with decreased risk of GC and IGC in males aged ≥60 years. Thus, genetic variations in PRNCR1 may contribute to susceptibility to GC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document