PEMBELAJARAN DALAM JARINGAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK BERBANTUAN PLATFORM EDMODO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA SMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-115
Author(s):  
Nindy Ivalyn ◽  
Andi Pujo Rahadi

The mathematics problem-solving ability of students in Indonesia is not high yet. The students found it difficult to do the mathematics problems that lead to solving a problem. This study aims to improve students' mathematical problem-solving skills using the Edmodo platform. The study used a quasi-experimental design to find out whether the enhancement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities that obtain using the Edmodo Platform with a scientific approach is significantly higher than the students who obtain scientific approach learning models. The sample of the research was students in two classes X grade student Negeri 1 Parongpong, West Bandung 2019/2020. The first-class students obtained an using the Edmodo Platform with a scientific approach, while the students in the second class obtained a scientific approach learning with a scientific approach. The results showed that the enhancement of the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities in both classes was included in the moderate category. Based on the statistical tests, the students in the first class have a significant enhancement in mathematical problem-solving abilities compared with the students in the second class. Furthermore, student responses to use the Edmodo Platform with a scientific approach are categorized as "very like" and student responses to a scientific approach are categorized as "very like".

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Alman Alman

This study is a quasi-experimental research using factorial design. This study aimed at finding the facts that had been resulted from the different influence caused by the use of Open-Ended method and that of STAD method on the students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in terms of learning achievement. The learning achievement was categorized into two types namely the high achievement and the low achievement. The population in this study was Grade V students from SD Negeri Serayu. The data were analyzed by ANAVA univariate test. The results of the study were as follows. First, there have been differences in the mathematical problem-solving skills of the students who had been taught using Open-Ended method and those who had been taught using the STAD method. Second, there were also differences on the students’ score. For the students who had been taught using the Open-Ended method, the highest posttest average score of their learning achievement was 95.71 while the lowest post-test average score of their learning achievement was 63.92. These students’ total average score of learning achievement was 81.04. On the other hand, for the students who had been taught using STAD the highest posttest average score of their learning achievement was 95.50 while the lowest posttest average score of their learning achievement was 70.00. These students’ total average score of learning achievement was 89.13. Third, there has not been any differences between the Open-Ended method and the STAD method.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
Deddy Sofyan ◽  
Sukanto Sukandar Madio

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan siswa SMA dalam pemecahan masalah dan komunikasi matematik melalui pendekatan problem posing dalam pembelajaran matematika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kuasi eksperimen. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa di salah satu SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Garut. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak berdasarkan kelas, sampelnya adalah kelas XII IPA 1 yang mendapat pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan problem posing dan siswa kelas XII IPA 3 yang mendapat pembelajaran konvensional. Simpulan hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa dalam pembelajaran matematika di SMA: 1. Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa yang mendapatkan pendekatan problem posing lebih baik dibandingkan dengan konvensional, 2. Tidak terdapat perbedaan kemampuan komunikasi matematik antara siswa yang mendapatkan pendekatan problem posing dengan konvensional, 3. Tidak terdapat kaitan yang signifikan antara kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik dengan kemampuan komunikasi matematik pada siswa yang mendapatkan pendekatan problem posing. The purpose of this research is to improve the ability of high school students in problem solving and communication of mathematics through problem posing approach to learning mathematics. The method used is a quasi-experimental method. The study population was one of the students in high schools in Garut. Samples were selected randomly based on the class, the sample is a class XII IPA 1 gets learning using problem posing approach and class XII IPA 3 students who received conventional learning. Conclusion The results of this study is that the study of mathematics in high school: 1. mathematical problem solving ability of students to get a better problem posing approach compared to conventional, 2. there is no difference in the ability of mathematical communication between students who received conventional approach to problem posing, 3. there was no significant association between mathematical problem solving skills with communication skills in students who get a mathematical problem posing approach.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Kholiqul Amin ◽  
I Nyoman Degeng Sudana ◽  
Punaji Setyosari ◽  
Ery Tri Djatmika

<p>This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of mobile blended compared to conventional problem-based learning on mathematical problem-solving skills and look for students' responses about the use of online learning. The study was conducted using a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental research design supported with descriptive qualitative responses involving 188 students taken by applying cluster random sampling as subjects of research distributed from vocational high schools in <em>Bojonegoro</em> City, East Java, Indonesia. Research findings revealed that mathematical problem-solving skills for students treated with mobile blended problem-based learning were higher than those who have been treated with purely problem-based learning. In addition, students have responded positively to the usage of mobile blended problem-based learning that was applicable and acceptable for effectively improving mathematical problem-solving skills.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-129
Author(s):  
Yuli Kurniyawati ◽  
Ali Mahmudi ◽  
Endang Wahyuningrum

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan efektifitas problem-based learning ditinjau dari keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan kemandirian belajar matematis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Quasi Experimental dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Ngadirejo Temanggung tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara acak dengan mengambil 3 kelas dari 7 kelas yang ada, dan terpilih kelas VIII A sebagai kelas ujicoba, kelas VIIIB sebagai kelas eksperimen, dan kelas VIIIC sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah tes keterampilan pemecahan masalah matematis dan skala kemandirian belajar matematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa problem-based learning efektif ditinjau dari keterampilan pemecahan dan kemandirian belajar matematis. Terdapat perbedaan efektivitas antara problem-based learning dan pembelajaran konvensional ditinjau dari keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan kemandirian belajar matematis. Terdapat hubungan signifikan antara keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan kemandirian belajar matematis.The effectiveness of problem-based learning in terms of mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulatedAbstractThis study aims to determine the effectiveness of problem-based learning in terms of mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated. This study is quasi-experimental with a population of students of grade VIII SMP Negeri 1 Ngadirejo Temanggung academic year 2017/2018. The sampling was done randomly by taking 3 of 7 classes, and the elected class was VIII A, VIIIB, and VIIIC. Then, the three classes were randomized to determine the tryout class, control, and experimental class. Class VIIIB was selected as an experimental class, VIIIC as a control class and VIIIA as a tryout class. The instrument used was the test of mathematical problem-solving skills, the scale of self-regulated learning and observation sheet of learning implementation. The results of this study showed that problem-based learning is effective in terms of mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning. There is a difference in effectiveness between problem-based learning and conventional learning in terms of mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning. There is a significant relationship between mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Sindi Amelia

Mathematical problem solving ability is an ability that is included in Indonesia national education goals, but its achievement is still relatively low. This quasi-experimental research examines the ability of solving mathematical problems through the application of Accelerated Learning Cycle. The subjects were seventh grade students in Riau Province, which were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The research instrument used was mathematical problem solving ability test, and the data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test and two ways ANOVA. The results of this study indicate that there was a significant effect of Accelerated Learning Cycle on the overall students’ mathematical problem-solving skills (p =0.000, p <0.05) and in all categories of KAM. Keywords: accelerated learning cycle, mathematical problem solving abilityABSTRAK Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis merupakan kemampuan yang termasuk kedalam tujuan pendidikan nasional, tetapi pencapaiannya masih tergolong rendah. Penelitian kuasi eksperimen ini mengkaji kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis melalui penerapan Accelerated Learning Cycle. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII salah satu SMP Negeri di Provinsi Riau, yang dibagi menjadi satu kelas eksperimen  dan  satu  kelas kontrol. Instrumen  penelitian  yang digunakan  adalah perangkat tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, dan data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney  dan  ANOVA dua  jalur.  Hasil  penelitian  ini  menunjukkan  bahwa  terdapat  pengaruh Accelerated Learning Cycle terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis untuk keseluruhan siswa (p = 0,000, p < 0,05) dan semua kategori KAM.Kata kunci: accelerated learning cycle, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-370
Author(s):  
Rilla Gina Gunawan ◽  
Aan Putra

The aim of this research is finding students' mathematical problem-solving skills based on high, medium and low initial knowledge. This research is a quasi-experimental study. The research sample used students in VIIIA and students in VIIIB SMPN 1 Kerinci that selected using random sampling techniques. The research data were processed using the t-test and the Mann Whitney test to comparing students' problem-solving skills that using active learning strategy sorting cards and problem-solving skills of students using ordinary learning. The result of data analysis showed that the mathematical problem-solving skill of students with high, medium and low initial knowledge was better than the mathematical problem-solving skill of students with the same initial knowledge that used ordinary learning. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa berdasarkan pengetahuan awal tinggi, sedang dan rendah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu. Sampel penelitian yang digunakan adalah siswa di VIIIA dan siswa di VIIIB SMPN 1 Kerinci yang dipilih menggunakan teknik random sampling. Data hasil penelitian diolah menggunakan uji t dan uji Mann Whitney dengan tujuan membandingkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang menggunakan strategi belajar aktif sortir kartu dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang menggunakan pembelajaran biasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dengan pengetahuan awal tinggi, sedang dan rendah lebih baik daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dengan kemampuan awal yang sama yang menggunakan pembelajaran biasa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Thalia Thamsir ◽  
Destya Waty Silalahi ◽  
Robert Harry Soesanto

<strong></strong><p>The purpose of learning mathematics is to obtain life skills through problem solving. Problem solving skills are one of mathematics skills that must be possessed by students. The result of the pre-cycle in this research showed that 83.33% of students had not achieved the minimum predicate “B-” in solving non-routine problems. It proved that students’ abilities in mathematics problem solving in non-routine problems were still low. During the pre-cycle, the researcher also observed some students who were not brave enough yet to ask questions of the teacher directly during the learning process. Besides that, almost all the students still had high individualistic and low awareness. Based on the problems that happened in the class, the researcher offered the peer tutoring method as a solution to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in non-routine problems. The research method used in this research was Classroom Action Research using the Kemmis and McTaggart model. The instruments used in this research were tests, observation sheets, students’ questionnaires, and journal reflections. Based on the data analysis, students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in non-routine problems improved to 29.17% by implementing the peer tutoring<em> </em>method with the steps (1) choosing the tutors, (2) guiding the tutors, (3) students doing the tutoring activity, and (9) evaluating the learning process</p><p class="abstrak"><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK: </strong>Tujuan dari mempelajari matematika ialah untuk memperoleh kecakapan hidup salah satunya melalui pemecahan masalah. Kemampuan pemecahan masalah merupakan salah satu standar kemampuan matematika yang harus dimiliki oleh siswa. Hasil tes pra siklus pada penelitian ini menunjukkan sebanyak 83.33% siswa belum mampu mencapai predikat minimal ‘B-’ dalam menyelesaikan soal non-rutin. Ini membuktikan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada soal non-rutin masih kurang. Selama pra siklus berlangsung, peneliti juga mengamati beberapa siswa belum berani untuk bertanya langsung kepada guru selama proses pembelajaran berlangsung. Selain itu, sebagian besar siswa masih memiliki sikap individualis yang tinggi dan juga rasa kepedulian antar siswa masih rendah. Berdasarkan masalah yang terjadi di dalam kelas tersebut maka peneliti menawarkan metode <em>peer tutoring </em>sebagai solusi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada soal non-rutin. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dengan model Kemmis dan Mc. Taggart. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah tes, lembar observasi, angket siswa dan jurnal refleksi. Berdasarkan analisis data, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada soal non-rutin mengalami peningkatan hingga 29,17% menggunakan metode <em>peer tutoring </em>dengan langkah-langkah penerapan yaitu (1) memilih tutor, (2) membimbing tutor, (3) siswa melakukan kegiatan tutorial, dan (4) mengevaluasi pembelajaran</p><strong></strong>


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44
Author(s):  
Irkham Ulil Albab ◽  
Bagus Ardi Saputro ◽  
Farida Nursyahidah

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa dengan menerapkan Collaborative Analysis of Sample Student Responses. Subjek Penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa yang mengambil mata kuliah matematika SLTP di Universitas PGRI Semarang. Objek penelitian ini adalah kemampuan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa ketika belajar menggunakan Collaborative Analysis of Sample Student Responses. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas. Data penelitian diperoleh dengan cara test kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, wawancara, observasi dan video – typing. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis mahasiswa meningkat ketika menggunakan pembelajaran Collaborative Analysis of Sample Student Responses.This study aims to determine the increase in mathematical problem solving skills of students to apply Collaborative Analysis of Sample Student Responses. Subjects of this study is students taking junior high school mathematics courses at the University of PGRI Semarang. The object of this research is problem-solving ability of students when learning to use the Collaborative Analysis of Sample Student Responses. This research is a classroom action research. Data were obtained by means of mathematical problem solving ability tests, interviews, observations and video - typing. The results of this study indicate that the mathematical problem solving ability of students increased when using learning Collaborative Analysis of Sample Student Responses.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Nur Azizah ◽  
Rostina Sundayana

AbstrakMatematika masih dianggap sulit bagi kebanyakan siswa. Hal itu menyebabkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa masih rendah. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah penerapan model pembelajaran yang kurang tepat. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji perbedaan pencapaian dan kualitas peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis serta sikap siswa antara siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) dengan tipe Probing-Prompting. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kuasi eksperimen. Instrumen yang digunakan berbentuk soal uraian, angket, dan lembar observasi. Materi yang digunakan adalah Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (PLDV). Populasi penelitian ini yaitu seluruh siswa kelas VIII di SMPN 2 Garut tahun ajaran 2015/2016 dengan sampel kelas yang dipilih yaitu kelas VIII-D dan kelas VIII-E dengan jumlah masing-masing 36 siswa. Dari hasil penelitian, diperoleh kemampuan awal dan kemampuan akhir siswa menghasilkan pencapaian kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis yang sama, namun peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis pada kelas AIR mendapatkan peningkatan yang sedang, sedangkan pada kelas Probing-Prompting mendapatkan peningkatan yang tinggi. Adapun sikap siswa terhadap kedua model pembelajaran menghasilkan respon yang sama yaitu tergolong baik.AbstractMathematics is still considered difficult for many students. This leads to students' mathematical problem solving skill remains low. One of reasons is the implementation of inappropriate learning model. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the differences of students' achievement and quality in mathematical problem solving skill enhancement as well as students' attitudes between those who received Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) cooperative learning and those who received Probing-Prompting type. The research method used in this study was quasi-experimental method. Meanwhile, the research instruments used in this study were test, questionnaire, and observation sheet. Material used was the linear equation of two variables (PLDV). The population in this study was all VIII-grade students in Garut Junior High School academic year 2015/2016 with two classes selected as sample. The classes used as sample were VIII-D class and VIII-E class with 36 students respectively for each class. Based on the results of this study, it was found that the students' prior and final mathematical problem skills produced similar achievement. However, the increase of students' mathematical problem solving skills in AIR class achieved medium increase. Meanwhile, in Probing-Prompting class the increase was high. Then, students' attitudes towards both learning models produced similar responses. The responses could be categorized as good.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document