scholarly journals Disparity In The Judge's Ruling About Community Property Disputes After Divorce (An Analysis of The Verdict In The South Jakarta Religious Court, Religious Court of Jakarta And Supreme Court)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-44
Author(s):  
Kamarusdiana Kamarusdiana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Theoretical Approach ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
The South ◽  
Community Property ◽  
Joint Property

Abstract. There is a discretion in the South Jakarta Religious Court with the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law. Thus, the fundamental problem of legal theory and theory which is used by the Judge to decide upon the joint property, why the decision is different between the judges at the first level, the appeal and the cassation, and how the parties' argument in acquiring the common property. The result shows that the argument used by the panel of judges at the first level is in fact of the law property obtained from the income of the wife in addition to meet the sense of justice and benefit. While the judges at the higher level and Cassation in the Supreme Court are more normative to the existing of legal norms. The theoretical approach used by judges at the first level is the theoretical approach of legal realism while the judges at appeal level and Cassation use theories of legal positivism. Keywords: Joint Property, Legal Positivism, The Ijtihad Of Judges, The Disparity Of The Verdict. Abstrak. Terdapat ketidaksesuaian putusan mengenai pembagian harta bersama pada Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan dengan ketentuan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Sehingga, yang menjadi permasalahan mendasar hukum dan teori apa yang digunakan oleh Hakim untuk memutus harta bersama tersebut, kenapa putusan tersebut berbeda antara hakim ditingkat pertama, banding dan Kasasi, serta bagaimana argumentasi para pihak dalam memperioleh harta bersama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian penulis, Argumentasi yang digunakan majelis hakim ditingkat pertama ialah secara fakta hukum harta yang diperoleh lebih banyak dari hasil penghasilan isteri disamping untuk memenuhi rasa keadilan dan kemaslahatan. Sedangkan hakim ditingkat II (PTA) dan Kasasi di Mahkamah Agung lebih normatif kepada norma hukum yang sudah ada. Pendekatan teori yang digunakan oleh hakim ditingkat pertama lebih kepada pendekatan teori realisme hukum sementara hakim ditingkat banding dan Kasasi lebih banyak menggunakan teori positivisme hukum.Kata Kunci: Harta Bersama, Positivisme Hukum, Ijtihad Hakim, Disparitas Putusan. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v6i1.8266

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GONO GINI'S ASSETS DUE TO A DEATH ACCORDING TO THE ISLAMIC LAW AND POSITIVE LAW

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pardan Syafrudin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Community Property ◽  
Communal Property ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
Legal Restriction ◽  
The Common ◽  
Husband And Wife

The Common properties (community property) is an asset that the husband and wife acquired during the household lifes, which both of them is agree that after united through marriage bonds, that the property produced by one or both of them will be common property. It shows, that if there's an agreement between husband and wife before marriage (did not to unify their property), then the property produced both will not become a joint treasure. Thus, if a husband or wife dies, or divorces, then the property owned by both of them can be distributed in accordance with their respective shares, another case when the two couples are not making an agreement, then the property gained during marriage bonds can be divided into types of communal property. In Islamic law, this kind of treasure is not contained in the Qur'an or Sunnah. Nor in Islamic jurisprudence. However, Islamic law legalizes the existence of common property as long as it is applicable in a society and the benefit in the distribution of such property. In contrast to the positive law, this property types have been regulated and described in the Marriage Law, as well as the Islamic Law Compilations, which became the legal restriction in the affairs of marriage in force in Indonesia. In this study, the author tries to compile the existence of common property according to the Islamic law reviews and positive law.

Keadilan Distributif atas Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan bagi Keluarga Muslim di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Siah Khosyi’ah
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Dropping Out ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife ◽  
Muslim Scholars

The division of marital joint property after the breakup of marriage, whether dropping out of marriage due to divorce or due to death, is a new thing in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). This is because the concept of mutual treasure is not known in the books of classical Islamic jurisprudence of Muslim scholars of the schools at their times, in which their work are always made as referral in the legal cases up to the present days. In Indonesia, the distribution of common property is regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Laws Articles 96 and 97, which stipulate the rules of distribution of joint property for married couples whose married are off as a result of divorce or death. Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law actually provides an overview of the flexibility of the distribution of common marital property, including in certain cases because the article is regulating (regelen) rather than forcing (dwigen), so that the division is not absolutely divided equally between husband and wife, and casuistically the provisions of that article may be disregarded.

scholarly journals Konsep Harta Bersama dan Implementasinya di Pengadilan Agama

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesraini Mesraini
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Community Property ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

Abstract: The Concept of  Joint Assets and its Implementation in the  Religious Court. Legislation in Indonesia stipulates that any property acquired during marriage becomes joint property of husband and wife, without distinguishing who works and who registered the property. If the marriage come to an ends, either through death or divorce, the property must be divided equally. In general, this study found that a panel of judges in the religious court division decided a case of the distribution of joint property is not outside of the statutory rules. Since no agreement or reconciliation had been made   by the husband and wife in dispute about the portion of the division of their property, the judge decided that the joint property be divided in the same amount. However, if there is an agreement between husband and wife, the division of the joint property will be based on that agreement.Keywords: community property, Compilation of Islamic Law, judgment, Court of Religion.Abstrak: Konsep Harta Bersama dan Implementasinya di Pengadilan Agama. Perundang-undangan di Indonesia mengatur bahwa setiap harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan dijadikan sebagai harta bersama suami isteri, tanpa membedakan siapa yang bekerja dan harta itu terdaftar atas nama siapa. Apabila perkawinan itu berakhir, baik karena kematian maupun karena perceraian, maka harta tersebut harus dibagi dua sama banyak nilainya. Penelitian ini menemukan data bahwa secara umum majelis hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam memutuskan perkara pembagian harta bersama tidak keluar dari aturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Selama tidak ada kesepakatan atau perdamaian yang dibuat oleh suami dan isteri yang bersengketa tentang porsi pembagian harta bersama, majelis hakim memutuskan harta bersama tersebut dibagi sama banyak. Namun, apabila terdapat kesepakatan antara suami dan isteri, pembagian harta bersama didasarkan atas kesepakatan yang mereka buat.Kata Kunci: harta bersama, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, putusan hakim, Pengadilan AgamaDOI: 10.15408/ajis.v12i1.980

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN MAJLIS HAKIM TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI DALAM KASUS PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA /GONO GINI (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Surabaya Nomor 308/Pdt.G/2017/PTA.Sby)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Sholahuddin Fathurrahman ◽  
Ali Wasiin
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Empirical Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Joint Property

Division of joint property due to this divorce the authors want to review further that is by doing research on the Implementation of Sharing of Joint Property in Practice in High Religious Court Surabaya No. 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby The plaintiff/Appel made a legal effort ( Appeals) after the plaintiff/complaint lawsuit in the Religious Court of Nganjuk with the case number,1339/Pdt.G/2016/PA Ngj dated 5 April 2017 the rejectThe formulation of the problem in this thesis is: (1) What is the judge judge's consideration in the distribution of common property in the High Court of Religion Surabaya Number 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby? (2) How is the execution / execution of the sharing of common property in the High Court of Religion Surabaya in case No. 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby?The type of this research is Empirical law research which depart from the study of the validity of the Law is a legal research that examines the comparison between the Law Reality with Ideal Law.The results of this study are: (1) The distribution of joint property in the High Court of Religion Surabaya Number 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby conducted on the basis of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage and Compilation of Islamic Law, the assets acquired whether the husband or wife is a joint right so long as no other is specified in the marriage agreement and if the marriage is terminated, each is entitled 1/2 (half) of the property, because during the marriage there is a common property, the Judge here gives a decision on the magnitude part of each. The court shall determine the division of such joint property ½ (half) to the plaintiff and 1/2 (half) of the part for the defendant. (2) Implementation of the execution of the sharing of common property in the High Religious Court of Surabaya The case number 308 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PTA.Sby is voluntary by the parties because they are less concerned about the decision of the Nganjuk Religious court, because their main purpose (the plaintiff and defendant) is divorced

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMIKIRAN IBNU AL-QAYYIM AL-JAUZIYYAH TENTANG PERUBAHAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN SOSIAL HUKUM ISLAM DI LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN AGAMA WILAYAH SULAWESI SELATAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-207
Author(s):  
Hj. Rusdaya Basri
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
The South ◽  
Local Conditions ◽  
South Sulawesi ◽  
The Social

This study examines the urgency of Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jauziyyah's thinking about legal changes to the social development of Islamic law in the Religion Court area of ??South Sulawesi. The thought of Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jauziyyah concerning legal changes to the social development of Islamic law based on changes in time, place, conditions, intentions and customs. Maslahah is the principle to change of legal fatwa based on changes in time, place, circumstances, and customs that apply in a place in accordance with the goals and the benefits desired by the Shari'a. The legal theory of Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jauziyyah in general has been implemented in the ruling or legal stipulation in the Religion Court in the South Sulawesi region. The theory is implicitly used. The judge decides the case with regard to local conditions and conditions.

scholarly journals Juridical Review on Grants of Treasure Together Of Child Due Divorce In Religious/ Islamic Courts of Kendal

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 741
Author(s):  
Bagus Malik Hakim ◽  
Akhmad Khisni ◽  
Munsharif Abdul Chalim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Children Of Divorce ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Community Property ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

Divorce in the event, then the entire joint property, the property acquired during the marriage is divided into two parts, namely the upper half of the husband and half to the wife. Kendal Religious Court in deciding the division of joint property, there are in accordance with the provisions of Islamic Law Compilation, is half portion for half of the husband and wife to. But there is also, Kendal Religious Courts decide part of the joint property of the wife is greater, which is part of the joint property to the wife more than in the joint property of the husband. There is also, the Religious Courts Kendal cut off all joint property is granted (given) to his son.The purpose of this research are: 1) To know and understand the implementation of joint property grants to children of divorce in the Religious Kendal. 2) To know and understand the considerations related decision Religious Court judges Kendal in community property donated to the children of divorce. 3) To know and understand the barriers and solutions implementation of joint property grants to children of divorce in the Religious Kendal. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analytical method.Kendal Religious Court Decision on the Implementation of the Joint Grant Treasure Kids Due To Divorce Court Kendal Religion is a decision that truly reflects the sense of justice, reflect expediency and legal certainty. Therefore, when the divorced husband and wife agreed to grant the joint property willed to his son, accompanied by a deed of peace. Therefore, the verdict ideal is when it contains elements of Gerechtigekeit (justice), Zweckmassigkeit (benefit), and Rechtssicherheit (rule of law) in proportion.Keywords: Overview of Juridical; Grant; Treasure Together; Divorce.

scholarly journals PERLUASAN MAKNA HARTA BERSAMA PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI HUKUM ISLAM

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Isnadul Hamdi
Keyword(s):  
Life Insurance ◽  
Traffic Accident ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Insurance Fund ◽  
The Common ◽  
Joint Property

This research is based on the problems in the distribution of common property. First, the emerging of differences in the system of distributing of common property in talak raj'i and talak ba'in. Second, the occurrence of expansion in terms of income during marriage such as the existence of insurance. Third, the existence of the agreement in marriage before the joint property is shared. The result of the research shows that in the sociology perspective of Islamic law the effort to share the common property: first, in the case of divorce because the situation is still in the iddah period of talak raj'i, property should not be divided because it minimizes the possibility of reunification. Unlike the case if talak ba'in, property should be devidedd soon because it certainly will not be reunited. Second, in response to the expansion of common property such as the existence of insurance money, all Indonesian Judge agreed that all property acquired during marriage is related to Taspen Insurance, Asabri Fund, Labor Insurance, Traffic Accident Fund, Passenger Accident Fund, Life Insurance Fund, Property of Luggage, Credit that has not paid off. Third, the agreement in marriage greatly affects the distribution of common property given the existence of Article 45, 52, and 97 Compilation of Islamic Law "divorced or divorced widow respectively entitled to two joint property as long as not specified in the marriage agreement.

PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 266K/AG/2010)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darmi Wati
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Joint Property

Shared assets are abattoir items obtained during marriage. If the divorce of the joint property is divided in two, except for the marriage agreement. This is regulated in Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law as a basis for legal certainty. But the fact is that the sharing of the collective shares is not in accordance with Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law, namely the division is not divided in two as occurred in the Supreme Court decision Number 266K / AG / 2010, namely the Plaintiff / Cassation Respondent ex-husband gets ¼ (one quarter). This is the object of the author's research by reviewing the principles of legal certainty. Keywords : Sharing of Joint Assets, Principle of Legal Certainty

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA DALAM PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Zainul Fanani
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Polygamous Marriage ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
The Common ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
Joint Property

Abstrak Pasal 94 ayat (1) kompilasi Hukum Islam menyebutkan harta bersama dari perkawinan seorang suami yang mempunyai istri lebih dari seorang, masing-masing terpisah dan berdiri sendiri, ayat (2) menyebutkan pemilikan harta bersama dari perkawinan seorang suami yang mempunyai isteri lebih dari seorang dihitung pada saat berlangsungnya akad perkawinan yang kedua, ketiga dan keempat. Dengan demikian momentum pelaksanaan perkawinan merupakan hal yang sangat signifikan dalam penentuan harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami. Hal ini akan menjadi hambatan dalam pembagian harta bersama, khususnya menyangkut masalah pembuktian harta bersama tersebutKata kunci:  harta Bersama, poligami, pembagian Abstract Article 94 paragraph (1) compilation of Islamic law mentions joint property of marriage of more than one spouse, separate and independent, paragraph (2) mentions the joint ownership of marriage of husband of more than one spouse at the time of the second, third and fourth marriages. Thus the momentum of the marriage exercise is a very important factor in the determination of common property in polygamous marriage. This would be a hindrance in the sharing of common property, especially with regard to the issue of proof of the common propertyKeywords: Shared property, polygamy, subdivision

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PENGAMBILALIHAN TANAH WAKAF YANG BATAL DEMI HUKUM UNTUK DIBAGIKAN SEBAGAI HARTA WARISAN DALAM KAJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 41 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG WAKAF

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Lambang Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Research Show

<p>ABSTRACT<br />Wakaf is legal act of a person or legal entity that separates part of the <br />property in the form of land property and institutionalize it forever for the sake of worship or other public purposes in accordance with the teachings of Islam. <br />The purpose of this study is: To understand the process of the acquisition of<br />wakaf land which is canceled by law for being shared as heritage and the legal<br />status of wakaf land acquisition which is canceled by law for being shared as<br />heritage in accordance with Act No. 41 Year 2004 about wakaf. <br />The research methodology used in this study is juridical normative<br />approach, with specification of analytic descriptive. The sources of the research<br />are derived from the primary and secondary law materials with the technique of<br />collection through the literature and library research. The method of data<br />presentation is descriptive, the method of analyzing the law materals is done by<br />using qualitative analysis. <br />The results of the research show that: 1) The process of acquisition of wakaf<br />land that is canceled by law for being shared as inheritance is carried out by<br />Semarang Religious Court by determining the joint property of wakif and the<br />wakif‟s wife, then set half of the joint property is the wakif part which has not<br />been shared and stated the heirs and their parts according to the provision of<br />Islamic inheritance. This is in accordance with Article 97 of the Compilation of<br />Islamic Law which states that the wakif (widower) should be given half of the<br />common property as long as it is not specified otherwise in the marriage<br />agreement. 2) Legal status of the acquisition of wakaf land which is canceled by<br />law for being shared as inheritance based on Act No. 41 Year 2004 about wakaf,<br />In principle, Act No.41 Year 2004 affirms that wakif‟s land that has been shared<br />can not be canceled, but of course the principle of law certainty must synergize<br />with the value of fairness to the perpetrator or heirs. This is where the role of the judges are required to provide fair justice if found wakaf case.</p><p> </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document