Vitamin D Intake and the Hypercalcemic Syndrome

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1023
Author(s):  

The Committee on Nutrition of the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1963 published a memorandum entitled. "The Prophylactic Requirement and the Toxicity of Vitamin D," (Pediatrics, 31:512, 1963). The Committee believed at that time that there was circumstantial evidence relating vitamin D intake to the pathogenesis of the mild form of infantile hypercalcemia, and probably also of the severe form, which, in addition to hypercalcemia, manifests typical facies, supravalvular aortic stenosis, and a mental defect.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-204
Author(s):  
Gilbert B. Forbes ◽  
Cenie Cafarelli ◽  
James Manning

The etiology of the severe form of this syndrome ( which includes supravalvular aortic stenosis, peculiar facies, and mental retardation) is still a matter of debate. Particularly vexing is the possible relationship to vitamin D. Massive amounts (of the order of 104 units per kilogram daily) given to pregnant or young animals have led to aortic lesions,1,2 and it is postulated (that the human syndrome may represent a form of hypersensitivity to the vitamin. On the other hand, Fraser, et al.3 and Antia, et al.4 are of the opinion that the evidence See Table in PDF file does not warrant such an implication. A recent experience of ours supports the latter view.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-371
Author(s):  
George L. Daeschner ◽  
C. William Daeschner

A syndrome occurring in infants and characterized clinically by anorexia, vomiting, constipation, hypotonia, hypertension, characteristic facies, and severe mental-motor retardation, and by the laboratory findings of hypercalcemia, azotemia and impaired renal function has recently been described by British and Swiss workers. The disease apparently occurs in two forms, referred to as mild and severe. The literature concerning the severe form has been reviewed and an additional case reported. Hypersensitivity to vitamin D with excessive calcium absorption has been demonstrated in the mild form of this syndrome and has also been proposed as the metabolic abnormality responsible for the pathologic features of the severe form of the disease.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
HARRY BAKWIN

In the report of the Nutrition Committee, American Academy of Pediatrics on the "Prophylactic Requirement and the Toxicity of Vitamin D" (Pediatrics, 31:512) the same prophylactic dose of vitamin D is recommended for children and adolescents as for infants. This seems to me unrealistic. Before the introduction of widespread vitamin D prophylaxis, all the babies over 3 or 4 months on the infant's ward at Bellevue Hospital had rickets during the late winter and spring. The only variation was in degree. Rickets was never seen after the first year or two except for an occasional case of "renal rickets" and "coeliac rickets."


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (4 (72)) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Povorozniuk ◽  
I. V. Pankiv

The adequate vitamin D intake is found only in 19,5 % of inspected habitants of Carpathian region. The vitamin D deficiency is marked in 135 (80,5 %) and among them severe form is detected in 48 (28,4 %) of the inspected people. Frequency of vitamin D deficiency depends on a residence and increases with the height above a sea level. 25 (ОН) D level is higher among the ihabitants of low altitude region (27,14±1,26 nmol/l) comparatively with data of middle altitude region (21,37±1,34 nmol/l) and high altitude region (15,56±1,04 nmol/l).


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaori Sugiyama ◽  
Hitoshi Horigome ◽  
Lisheng Lin ◽  
Takashi Murakami ◽  
Junko Shiono ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Bijal Shrivastava ◽  
Rashi Aryan ◽  
Abhinav Tiwari ◽  
Lekha Tiwari ◽  
Nimmkayala Pravallika

Background: There are currently two different guidelines for treatment of Vitamin D deficiency in infants, one is that of American Academy of Pediatrics and the other being Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Endocrine Society. This study was done to compare the two guidelines for treatment of Vitamin D deficiency in infants.Methods: A hospital based, longitudinal interventional study was conducted for 2 years and 115 babies having vitamin d deficiency (Vitamin D less than or equal to 20ng/dl) were divided into group A and group B. Group A babies were treated as per American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines whereas Group Cases were treated as per International Endocrine Society guidelines. All babies were followed up after 3-4 months when repeat Vitamin D levels were checked and then compared.Results: In present study, Vitamin D level had increased by 0.6 times in Group A whereas it had increased by 1.3 times in group B and it was significant.Conclusions: Study results were in favour of the guidelines recommended by the International Endocrine Society.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-544
Author(s):  
Harold E. Harrison

I am indeed grateful for the honor of the Borden Award of the American Academy of Pediatrics. At this time it is fitting that I express my indebtedness to three great teachers in pediatrics whose influence has been of the utmost importance to me: Grover Powers, Daniel Darrow and Edwards Park. I should also remind you that this award is really a recognition of the joint work of my wife, Dr. Helen C. Harrison, and myself. We have both participated in all aspects of experiment and theory which will be summarized in this paper. It is a great privilege to be asked to present to the American Academy of Pediatrics observations that we have made on a problem that historically has had tremendous significance to pediatricians. A review of the history of rickets and of the discovery of vitamin D is exciting in part because of the brilliant success achieved in the solution of all important problem, but also because of the number of American leaders in pediatrics who participated in this triumph over a disease that had afflicted children in Europe and the United States for generations. THE FIRST experimental evidence of the existence of a fat-soluble organic substance with antirachitic properties was submitted by the British nutritionist Mellanby in 1918.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
William F. Friedman ◽  
Loren F. Mills

There is evidence that a derangement in vitamin D metabolism on the part of the mother, the fetus, or both may be responsible for supravalvular aortic stenosis, especially when the latter is associated with infantile hypercalcemia. It has been shown that the offspring of rabbits given large amounts of parenteral vitamin D throughout pregnancy may be born with aortic lesions resembling supravalvular aortic stenosis as seen in man. The present study was designed to explore experimentally the relationship between exposure to excessive amounts of vitamin D during pregnancy and the development of the craniofacial complex and dentition because children with the multiple system abnormalities of the supravalvular aortic stenosis syndrome (SASS) share a characteristic craniofacial appearance and exhibit, in common, many abnormalities of dentition. Examination of their jaws and teeth reveals hypoplasia of the mandible, congenital absence of teeth (usually the lateral incisors and second premolars of the maxilla), microdontia, dysgnathia, enamel hypoplasia, and a narrowed occlusal table. In the present study, analogous findings were observed in rabbit offspring whose mothers received large amounts of vitamin D during pregnancy. The most marked functional accompaniment of these abnormalities was severe malocclusion of the teeth. Peculiar facies, premature closure of the cranial bones, strabismus, odd shaped ears, and a low birth weight were additional features of SASS that were noted in many test animals. Buphthalmos was also noted occasionally, probably related to maldevelopment of the bony ocular orbits. Thus, these experimental observations suggest that the cranial, facial, and dental peculiarities as well as the aortic lesion of the supravalvular aortic stenosis syndrome may be related to a derangement in vitamin D metabolism during pregnancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara S. Oberhelman ◽  
Elizabeth W. Cozine ◽  
Puja J. Umaretiya ◽  
Julie A. Maxson ◽  
Tom D. Thacher

Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Academy of Medicine recommend vitamin D supplementation for breastfeeding infants. However, compliance with this recommendation is poor. Maternal supplementation with vitamin D is a safe and effective alternative to achieving vitamin D sufficiency in breastfeeding infants, and mothers have indicated a preference for self-supplementation over infant supplementation. Research aim: We sought to explore Family Medicine clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vitamin D supplementation recommendations for breastfeeding dyads. Methods: Fifty-six Family Medicine clinicians (including faculty physicians, resident physicians, and nurse practitioners/physician assistants) completed an online, anonymous survey regarding their knowledge and practices concerning vitamin D supplementation for breastfeeding infants. Results: The vast majority of clinicians (92.9%) correctly identified the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2008 recommended dose for vitamin D supplementation in breastfeeding infants and estimated recommending vitamin D supplementation of exclusively breastfeeding infants 70.1% of the time. If all options were equivalent, clinicians would prefer to offer maternal or infant supplementation (50%) or maternal supplementation (37.5%) over infant supplementation (12.5%). Most (69.6%) preferred daily over monthly supplementation regimens. Conclusion: Family Medicine clinicians are knowledgeable regarding current recommendations for vitamin D supplementation in breastfeeding infants. They are also open to recommending maternal supplementation or offering parents a choice of maternal or infant vitamin supplementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document