Does Carbon Dioxide Play a Role in Retrolental Fibroplasia?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-501
Author(s):  
M. L. Wolbarsht ◽  
Gregory S. George ◽  
Jan Kylstra ◽  
M. B. Landers

Gordon et al1 were the first to note the association of retrolental fibroplasia (RLF) with the administration of high concentrations of oxygen to premature infants. Since that time, clinical research has demonostrated that RLF can develop in a variety of circumstances. Typically, this retinopathy arises after the cessation of supplemental oxygen therapy to neonates. Currently, the most widely accepted paradigm proposes that the neovascularization of RLF is the immature vascular system's response to a retina that has become hypoxic after the withdrawal of supplemental oxygen.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-89
Author(s):  
William A. Silverman

The conference succeeded in emphasizing the current importance of increased understanding of mutual problems by pediatricians and ophthalmologists. Premature infants with major illnesses can be treated adequately only in optimally manned and fully equipped intensive care units. Current support for these facilities is woefully inadequate. Ophthalmologists must examine every premature baby receiving supplemental oxygen, and the eyes of children born prematurely should be examined regularly for the first 2 years of life. Participants in the conference agreed that revised recommendations for oxygen administration are highly desirable but that currently available data are insufficient to justify a revision of the present cautious recommendations. A vital need exists for extensive research in these areas, along with the accumulation of considerably more clinical data. Subsequent meetings of this kind are clearly necessary, and it was suggested that the American Academy of Pediatrics should be invited to participate officially in the next meeting.


Author(s):  
Mathias A. Christensen ◽  
Jacob Steinmetz ◽  
George Velmahos ◽  
Lars S. Rasmussen

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Catherine van der Eijk ◽  
Denise Rook ◽  
Jenny Dankelman ◽  
Bert Johan Smit

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 198.2-199
Author(s):  
L. Pupim ◽  
T. S. Wang ◽  
K. Hudock ◽  
J. Denson ◽  
N. Fourie ◽  
...  

Background:Granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine both vital to lung homeostasis and important in regulating inflammation and autoimmunity1,2,3 that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of respiratory failure and death in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation.4-6 Mavrilimumab is a human anti GM-CSF receptor α monoclonal antibody capable of blocking GM-CSF signaling and downregulating the inflammatory process.Objectives:To evaluate the effect of mavrilimumab on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation.Methods:This on-going, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled seamless transition Phase 2/3 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. The Phase 2 portion comprised two groups: Cohort 1 patients requiring supplemental oxygen therapy without mechanical ventilation (to maintain SpO2 ≥92%) and Cohort 2 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, initiated ≤48 hours before randomization. Here, we report results for Phase 2, Cohort 1: 116 patients with severe COVID- 19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation from USA, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and South Africa; randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single intravenous administration of mavrilimumab (10 or 6 mg/kg) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients alive and free of mechanical ventilation at Day 29. Secondary endpoints included [1] time to 2-point clinical improvement (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases COVID-19 ordinal scale), [2] time to return to room air, and [3] mortality, all measured through Day 29. The prespecified evidentiary standard was a 2-sided α of 0.2 (not adjusted for multiplicity).Results:Baseline demographics were balanced among the intervention groups; patients were racially diverse (43% non-white), had a mean age of 57 years, and 49% were obese (BMI ≥ 30). All patients received the local standard of care: 96% received corticosteroids (including dexamethasone) and 29% received remdesivir. No differences in outcomes were observed between the 10 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg mavrilimumab arms. Results for these groups are presented together. Mavrilimumab recipients had a reduced requirement for mechanical ventilation and improved survival: at day 29, the proportion of patients alive and free of mechanical ventilation was 12.3 percentage points higher with mavrilimumab (86.7% of patients) than placebo (74.4% of patients) (Primary endpoint; p=0.1224). Mavrilimumab recipients experienced a 65% reduction in the risk of mechanical ventilation or death through Day 29 (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.35; p=0.0175). Day 29 mortality was 12.5 percentage points lower in mavrilimumab recipients (8%) compared to placebo (20.5%) (p=0.0718). Mavrilimumab recipients had a 61% reduction in the risk of death through Day 29 (HR= 0.39; p=0.0726). Adverse events occurred less frequently in mavrilimumab recipients compared to placebo, including secondary infections and thrombotic events (known complications of COVID-19). Thrombotic events occurred only in the placebo arm (5/40 [12.5%]).Conclusion:In a global, diverse population of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation receiving supplemental oxygen therapy, corticosteroids, and remdesivir, a single infusion of mavrilimumab reduced progression to mechanical ventilation and improved survival. Results indicate mavrilimumab, a potent inhibitor of GM-CSF signaling, may have added clinical benefit on top of the current standard therapy for COVID-19. Of potential importance is that this treatment strategy is mechanistically independent of the specific virus or viral variant.References:[1]Trapnell, Nat Rev Dis Pri, 2019[2]Wicks, Nat Rev Immunology, 2015[3]Hamilton, Exp Rev Clin Immunol, 2015[4]De Luca, Lancet Rheumatol, 2020[5]Cremer, Lancet Rheumatol, 2021[6]Zhou, Nature, 2020Disclosure of Interests:Lara Pupim Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Tisha S. Wang Consultant of: Partner Therapeutics; steering committee for Kinevant BREATHE clinical trial, Kristin Hudock: None declared, Joshua Denson: None declared, Nyda Fourie: None declared, Luis Hercilla Vasquez: None declared, Kleber Luz: None declared, Mohammad Madjid Grant/research support from: Kiniksa, Kirsten McHarry: None declared, José Francisco Saraiva: None declared, Eduardo Tobar: None declared, Teresa Zhou Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Manoj Samant Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Joseph Pirrello Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Fang Fang Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, John F. Paolini Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Arian Pano Employee of: Kiniksa, Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Bruce C. Trapnell: None declared


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 894-894
Author(s):  
Susan S. Jacobs ◽  
Kathleen O. Lindell ◽  
Eileen G. Collins ◽  
Chris M. Garvey ◽  
Carme Hernandez ◽  
...  

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (20) ◽  
pp. 1691-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nariman Sepehrvand ◽  
Stefan K James ◽  
Dion Stub ◽  
Ardavan Khoshnood ◽  
Justin A Ezekowitz ◽  
...  

BackgroundAlthough oxygen therapy has been used for over a century in the management of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), recent studies have raised concerns around the efficacy and safety of supplemental oxygen in normoxaemic patients.ObjectiveTo synthesise the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of supplemental oxygen therapy compared with room air in patients with suspected or confirmed AMI.MethodsFor this aggregate data meta-analysis, multiple databases were searched from inception to 30 September 2017. RCTs with any length of follow-up and any outcome measure were included if they studied the use of supplemental O2 therapy administered by any device at normal pressure compared with room air. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, an investigator assessed all the included studies and extracted the data. Outcomes of interests included mortality, troponin levels, infarct size, pain and hypoxaemia.ResultsEight RCTs with a total of 7998 participants (3982 and 4002 patients in O2 and air groups, respectively) were identified and pooled. In-hospital and 30-day death occurred in 135 and 149 patients, respectively. Oxygen therapy did not reduce the risk of in-hospital (OR, 1.11 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.77)) or 30-day mortality (OR, 1.09 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.50)) in patients with suspected AMI, and the results remained similar in the subgroup of patients with confirmed AMI. The infarct size (based on cardiac MRI) in a subgroup of patients was not different between groups with and without O2 therapy. O2 therapy reduced the risk of hypoxaemia (OR, 0.29 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.47)).ConclusionAlthough supplemental O2 therapy is commonly used, it was not associated with important clinical benefits. These findings from eight RCTs support departing from the usual practice of administering oxygen in normoxaemic patients.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1952 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-236
Author(s):  
JULIUS H. COMROE

A. Physiologic Factors Concerned in the Regulation of Respiration Physiologists now agree that there is a medullary respiratory center which has intrinsic rhythmicity. Nevertheless this center can be influenced profoundly by many chemical and nervous factors. One of the most important of these is carbon dioxide. Under ordinary conditions the medullary center is exquisitely sensitive to changes in carbon dioxide pressure. When the respiratory center is depressed (by deep anesthesia, large doses of morphine or barbiturates, trauma, cerebral edema, increased intra-cranial pressure, severe anoxia or by high concentrations of carbon dioxide itself) it is no longer responsive to carbon dioxide though it may still permit reflex activity and continuation of respiration. Anoxemia may also stimulate respiration; this occurs through reflexes originating in chemoreceptors of the carotid and aortic bodies. It appears certain that these chemoreceptors are functioning in the normal full-term newborn though they may not be functioning or functioning properly in prematures. When these chemoreceptors are in operation, anoxia will stimulate respiration and oxygen therapy will abolish such hyperpnea. When the chemoreceptors are not in action, one would expect no reflex effects from either oxygen or anoxia; oxygen therapy, however, might relieve cerebral ischemia and permit respiration to improve. B. Physiologic Methods for Evaluating Respiratory and Pulmonary Function The function of the lungs is primarily to oxygenate the venous blood and to remove excess carbon dioxide from it. To accomplish this, there must be normal respiratory volumes, normal lung volumes and aerating surface, even distribution of the inspired gas to the alveoli, unimpaired diffusion across the alveolar capillary membrane, and uniform distribution of pulmonary capillary blood flow to the functioning alveoli.


2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Elly Morros González ◽  
Diana Estrada Cano ◽  
Marcela Murillo Galvis ◽  
Jos Carlos Montes Correa ◽  
Nelcy Rodríguez Malagón ◽  
...  

Introduction: Supplemental oxygen is considered a pharmaceutical drug; therefore, it can produce adverse effects. Lack of consensus regarding the reading of oxygen flowmeters and the peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) goals can influence clinical and paraclinical decisions and hospital stay length. Objective: To assess knowledge on oxygen therapy, adverse effects, SpO2 goals and reading of oxygen flowmeters among personnel in the Pediatric Unit at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. Methodology: Cross-sectional study derived from convenience sampling through a self-applied survey between December 2016 and January 2017. The poll evaluated topics on supplemental oxygen therapy fundamentals and adverse effects, SpO2 goals and flowmeter readings through flowmeters photographs indicating a specific fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). Results: The response rate was 77% from 259 subjects. 22% considered that the oxygen saturation either increases or remains the same during sleep periods in children. 78% of participants knew at least one complication associated to prolonged oxygen therapy and 67% due to supplemental oxygen concentration greater than required. In neonatal population, 10% considered oxygen saturation goals equal to or greater than 96%. In the flowmeter’s reading evaluation, incorrect answers ranged from 9 to 19%. Conclusion: It is imperative to reinforce updated concepts on oxygen therapy, with emphasis in SpO2 goals, adverse effects and appropriate flowmeter’s readings through periodic educational campaigns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document