Dynamics of Living Subsistence Systems in Merapi Disaster Prone Area and Non-Merapi Disaster Prone Area, Cangkringan District, Sleman Regency, Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 20181-20185
Author(s):  
Surani Hasanati ◽  
Alia Fajarwati ◽  
Estuning Tyas Wulan Mei

Merapi is one of the most active Volcano in the world with more than 70 eruptions since 1548. Merapi Volcano Eruption in 2010 was incline destroyed most of the assets, activities or access of households capability by loss of any assets that put the victims at the desperate situation, especially to those who got direct impact of Merapi Volcano Eruption. This research explain how the household that live in KRB (Merapi disaster prone area) and non-KRB developed system for their living subsistence to fulfill the minimum survival subsistence after Merapi Eruption in 2010. This study linked to disaster risk reduction that needed as one of way of mitigation by local people. This research held in selected village that are fix settlement relocation “Plosokerep” in KRB and “Kuwang” in non-KRB, Cangkringan District, Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Those location is the representative of rural community in Merapi area. The research analysis is descriptive qualitative. The unit of analysis is household. Result shows that living subsistence systems in each household may varied but in general, one village has the likely same system, but differs in KRB and Non-KRB.

Author(s):  
Dejo Olowu

At the World Conference on Disaster Reduction, Hyogo, Japan, in January 2005, the international community adopted a 10-year plan to make the world safer from disasters. The resultant Hyogo Framework for Action is the global blueprint for disaster risk reduction with the goal of substantially reducing disaster losses in human lives and socio-economic assets. What is the signi!cance of the HFA for the adoption of disaster prevention, management and risk reduction frameworks in African States? Since 2005, what has been the attitude of African States to the promise of the HFA? In terms of policy and planning, how should African States engage the HFA towards securing human lives and properties against natural and human-induced disasters? With the myriad challenges of mass poverty and underdevelopment across Africa, what implications does the HFA hold for disaster risk reduction and management in African States? This article attempts to address this plethora of questions, drawing on lessons learned in Africa and beyond. The article examines the background of the HFA and its progress in shaping the global policy agenda towards disaster management and reduction. While the article acknowledges some of the inherent weaknesses in the promise of the HFA, it nonetheless accentuates its inimitable implications for broad legal and policy strategies towards ameliorating the usual horrific aftermath of disasters in Africa.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohana Noradika Maharani ◽  
Arif Rianto Budi Nugroho ◽  
Dzikrina Farah Adiba ◽  
Iin Sulistiyowati

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Sutherland ◽  
Debra Roberts ◽  
Jo Douwes

Resilience is a ‘re-emerging concept’ which is being applied to deal with the shocks and stresses facing society and the environment as a result of both human induced and physical hazards. Resilience thinking is shaping policy and practice across the world through global programmes such as the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)'s Making Cities Resilient Campaign; UN Habitat's City Resilience Profiling Programme; and Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100 RC). The global post-2015 sustainable development and climate change frameworks and related agreements all have resilience embedded in them. However, the concept of resilience remains contested, with resilience reflecting a continuum of approaches from those that are more deliberative, political, systemic, relational and transformational, to those that are more consultative, post-political, systems based, sectoral and instrumental. Questions of how resilience is being constructed, by whom and for whom therefore need to be explored. This paper focuses on the construction of resilience at three scales: The Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) programme (global), Phase 1 of Durban's 100RC journey (city), and the Palmiet Catchment Rehabilitation Project (sub-catchment within a city). It presents the different approaches adopted by global, city-scale and local programmes to build resilience using different framings, approaches and methodologies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 03015
Author(s):  
Eko Teguh Paripurno ◽  
Arif Rianto Budi Nugroho

Kelud Volcano is an active volcano in Indonesia. About 150 million meter cubic has erupted on 13 February 2013 at 22.30. People were successfully responded to the most significant eruption in history without any fatalities, by doing less than 2 hours evacuation, from 21.15 to 22.50. This research was conducted to show the success of the community in building the resilience process by applying a good system of community-based early warning. The study was conducted through documentary review and field assessment with participatory research methods, including mapping, transects, and historical studies. The result of research show that the community has four aspects of early warning system has been successfully fulfilled by communities. Those four aspects are (1) Knowledge of risk; (2) Monitoring and warning service; (3) Dissemination and communication; (4) Ability of the people to respond. Systematic data collection and risk assessment, with its pattern and tendency factors, ensured that disaster and vulnerability are well-known. Monitoring parameter to create accurate and timely pre-estimation has been ensured by disaster monitoring and early warning service. Communicating information and early warning ensured that the warning could be received by everyone that affected by disaster, risk, and its warning can be understood and useful. Establishing the people’s responsibility to ensure the response must be renewed, ability and local knowledge can be utilized, and people are ready to response warning. Simulation and training activities were implemented by the people within the disaster-prone area. Finally, the powerfulness of community preparedness can manage the tremendous level of a volcano eruption.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Margono Margono ◽  
M Khoirul Amin ◽  
Retna Tri Astuti

Abstract Introduction: Magelang Regency is one of the areas on the slopes of Merapi Mountain with the greatest disaster risk is volcanic eruptions. Dukun Village is one of the volcanic disaster-prone areas located approximately 8 km from the top of the mountain and included as Disaster Risk Area III in Magelang Regency. In the eruption on 2010 most of the Dukun community evacuated to other districts avoiding the hot clouds. The volcano in Magelang was on alert status from May 21, 2018. Within a period of 1.5 years, several volcanoes emitted volcanic ash and earthquakes. Under these circumstances, the risk of disaster in the community is very high, especially those in the Disaster Risk Area III of Merapi Mountain. Community based disaster management needs to be improved, especially in preparation for disaster preparedness. Method: the type of this research is descriptive quantitative, with a field survey analysis method using a questionnaire about the community preparedness at Dukun Village in Disaster Risk Area III dealing with disasters. Results: The results showed the community analysis of disaster risk in the Dukun village was a volcanic eruption with a percentage of 96% of the community, source of information obtained by the community about the disaster 89% showed from village officials, as many as 74% of families had participated in the socialization of the disaster but the majority were only the family heads, as much as 66% have sought disaster risk reduction and as many as 33.5% of the community if there is a plan to evacuate siblings. Family preparedness in preparing first aid kits was still very low. Conclusion: The Dukun Village community has realized that being in a disaster-prone area, at present the majority of families have participated in preparedness socialization but in disaster risk reduction and preparation is still lacking.


2020 ◽  

Disaster events impact Asia and the Pacific more than any other region in the world. In light of current and future climate and disaster risks, there is an urgent need to address the region’s underinvestment in disaster risk and reduction. This publication aims to guide policy makers and other stakeholders on how to scale up disaster risk reduction financing in developing member countries of the Asian Development Bank. It provides an overview of financing opportunities—including instruments and mechanisms—as well as country case studies and practical tips for governments to implement enhanced disaster risk reduction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 884 (1) ◽  
pp. 012049
Author(s):  
N F Wardaya ◽  
Pujianto ◽  
Jumadi

Abstract This study aims to analyze student's level of understanding on mobile learning based volcano eruption. This research is quantitative descriptive. The sample were 200 students who lives in the area that affected by the eruption of Merapi Volcano (Magelang Regency, Sleman Regency, and Yogyakarta City), recruited using a simple random sampling. The instruments were online survey questionnaire of Student's Level of Understanding on Mobile Learning based Volcano Eruption. The distribution of the data is normal, reliable and homogen based the analysis used IBM SPSS Statistics 22 software. The results of this study indicate that students who lives in Merapi Volcano prone area have a good understanding about mobile learning based volcano eruption. Level of student's understanding on mobile learning meet a good criteria with percentage 72,80%, level of student's understanding on volcano eruption meet a good criteria with percentage 73,40%, and student's understanding on disaster mitigation meet a good criteria with higher percentage 76,40%.


Author(s):  
Deepthi Wickramasinghe

Disasters and their devastating consequences are increasingly evident in the world. Although nobody can prevent a hazard from occurring, individuals, societies, and governments can take necessary steps to avoid a hazard being transformed to a disaster. It is becoming clear that if sufficient efforts are not made, higher costs and greater losses including lives are inevitable. Thus, understanding risk and vulnerability and developing methods to reduce the impact of disasters and increase community resilience are priorities in development agendas. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) includes protection, restoration, and sustainable management of ecosystems to obtain nature’s “free services” to reduce disaster risk. The Eco-DRR concept is deeply rooted in nature, ecosystem services, and human practices in contrast to conventional structural disaster management methods. Eco-DRR approaches also contribute to successful implementation of postdisaster recovery. The implementation of Eco-DRR concepts can be challenging, and planning and making integrated decisions leading to sustainable development and nature conservation to harness safety and reduce community risks must be the way forward.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Renwick

Natural disasters strike at people’s lives across the world but hit underdeveloped countries and societies’ poorest hardest. Those living in the Asia-Pacific region are significantly more likely to experience natural disaster than those in any other part of the world. China is one of the most exposed to natural disasters, with a long history of devastating events and remains at high risk. China has undertaken major disaster risk reduction (DRR) reforms. Importantly, China is also increasingly committed to international cooperation over DRR within a Sendai Framework. Adopting a Human Security perspective, this article explains and critically evaluates China’s DRR reforms. It highlights China’s increased willingness to collaborate with international agencies over knowledge exchange and capacity building to improve its domestic DRR and contribute to the international DRR system. The study argues that China’s reforms are a work in progress, but demonstrating improvement. It argues that China’s expressed wish for closer international DRR cooperation is a new opportunity to mainstream China and it is incumbent on the international community and Chinese Government to build on emerging collaboration and grasp this long-overdue opportunity.


Author(s):  
E T Mei ◽  
R F Putri ◽  
M I Sadali ◽  
D Febrita ◽  
E D Yulandari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document