scholarly journals DNA methylation confers clinical potential to predict the oral cancer prognosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Chieh Yang ◽  
Cheng-Hsien Wu ◽  
Chi-Feng Chang ◽  
Chien-Ping Hung ◽  
Micah Sy ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleur S. Peters ◽  
Olivier C. Manintveld ◽  
Michiel G.H. Betjes ◽  
Carla C. Baan ◽  
Karin Boer

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide B. Gissi ◽  
Achille Tarsitano ◽  
Andrea Gabusi ◽  
Roberto Rossi ◽  
Giuseppe Attardo ◽  
...  

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of a non-invasive sampling procedure based on 13-gene DNA methylation analysis in the follow-up of patients previously treated for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Methods: The study population included 49 consecutive patients treated for OSCC. Oral brushing sample collection was performed at two different times: before any cancer treatment in the tumor mass and during patient follow-up almost 6 months after OSCC treatment, within the regenerative area after OSCC resection. Each sample was considered positive or negative in relation to a predefined cut-off value. Results: Before any cancer treatment, 47/49 specimens exceeded the score and were considered as positive. Six months after OSCC resection, 16/49 specimens also had positive scores in the samples collected from the regenerative area. During the follow-up period, 7/49 patients developed locoregional relapse: 6/7 patients had a positive score in the regenerative area after OSCC resection. The presence of a positive score after oral cancer treatment was the most powerful variable related to the appearance of locoregional relapse. Conclusion: 13-gene DNA methylation analysis by oral brushing may have a clinical application as a prognostic non-invasive tool in the follow-up of patients surgically treated for OSCC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1027-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Foy ◽  
Curtis R. Pickering ◽  
Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou ◽  
Jaroslav Jelinek ◽  
Steven H. Lin ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (5) ◽  
pp. 1753-1758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Cottrell ◽  
Klaus Jung ◽  
Glen Kristiansen ◽  
Elke Eltze ◽  
Axel Semjonow ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S190
Author(s):  
M. Vourvachis ◽  
T. Upile ◽  
W. Jerjes ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
C. Hopper

Oral Oncology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.T. Cody ◽  
Yuanhui Huang ◽  
C.J. Darby ◽  
G.K. Johnson ◽  
F.E. Domann

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 962-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dedeurwaerder ◽  
François Fuks

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borong Shao ◽  
Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci ◽  
Tim OF. Conrad

Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) process has been shown as highly relevant to cancer prognosis. However, although different biological network-based biomarker identification methods have been proposed to predict cancer prognosis, EMT network has not been directly used for this purpose. In this study, we constructed an EMT regulatory network consisting of 87 molecules and tried to select features that are useful for prognosis prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD). To incorporate multiple molecular profiles, we obtained four types of molecular data including mRNA-Seq, copy number alteration (CNA), DNA methylation, and miRNA-Seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The data were mapped to the EMT network in three alternative ways: mRNA-Seq and miRNA-Seq, DNA methylation, and CNA and miRNA-Seq. Each mapping was employed to extract five different sets of features using discretization and network-based biomarker identification methods. Each feature set was then used to predict prognosis with SVM and logistic regression classifiers. We measured the prediction accuracy with AUC and AUPR values using 10 times 10-fold cross validation. For a more comprehensive evaluation, we also measured the prediction accuracies of clinical features, EMT plus clinical features, randomly picked 87 molecules from each data mapping, and using all molecules from each data type. Counter-intuitively, EMT features do not always outperform randomly selected features and the prediction accuracies of the five feature sets are mostly not significantly different. Clinical features are shown to give the highest prediction accuracies. In addition, the prediction accuracies of both EMT features and random features are comparable as using all features (more than 17,000) from each data type.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document