scholarly journals Knowledge and behavior of professionals about bundled strategies of central venous catheter

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Bruna Figueiredo Manzo ◽  
Danielle Rodrigues Mariano ◽  
Fernanda Maria Correa Ferreira ◽  
Fernanda Penido Matozinhos ◽  
Delma Aurélia da Silva Simão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Working Hours ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Belo Horizonte ◽  
And Behavior

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the factors that influence the knowledge and behavior of professionals of neonatal and pediatric units about bundled strategies of insertion of central venous catheter. Method: This is a cross-sectional study, conducted in one neonatal and one pediatric intensive care units in a public hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from April to July, 2016. The sample consisted of 255 professionals who answered a structured instrument. Descriptive and comparative analyses were made using the SPSS software. Results: The category nursing professional (p = 0.010), working hours of 12×36 scale (p < 0.001), training as a form of acquiring knowledge (p < 0.001) and participation in training programs (p < 0.001) are associated to greater knowledge about the bundle. Regarding behavior, no significant associations were observed. Conclusion: The study showed that there are factors that influence the knowledge about bundled strategies of insertion of central venous catheter, reflecting the need to consider these practices for making more effective educational practices in health care.

scholarly journals A Novel Objective Approach Towards Physicians' Knowledge and Practice Patterns to Optimize Central Venous Catheter Placement: A Cross-sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Catheter Tip

Study objective: Central venous catheterization is an essential component of intensive care of critically ill patients, and proper positioning of the catheter is essential to prevent position-related complications. This study was conducted by using digital tape measurement to objectively assess clinician preferences for central venous catheter positioning based on specific position levels and landmarks on post-procedural chest radiographs. Design: A cross-sectional study using electronic questionnaire survey. Setting: Single academic teaching hospital participated in this study. Participants: The study enrolled 276 physicians from multiple clinical disciplines. Interventions: None. Measurements: A seven-level reference system labeled on a sample chest radiograph was used to identify the acceptable lower and upper limits and landmarks used to determine the optimal central venous catheter tip position as well as the pattern of clinical practices based on the specialty and level of experience of participants. Main results: Among the 276 respondents, the ratio of cumulative acceptance for the lower and upper catheter tip limit was 62% and 66.3% within a 4-cm range below or above the carina, respectively. Intensive care unit (ICU) physicians showed a greater tendency to choose a catheter tip 4 cm below and 6 cm above the carina (p = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively) as did experienced physicians (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively). The commonest reason for catheter tip withdrawal was arrhythmia (50% of cases). Physicians in the ICU and experienced physicians were more concerned about the risk of cardiac perforation than other respondents (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The carina was the most commonly used landmark in 71.7% of all physicians, although 50% of radiologists also used other landmarks. Conclusions: The acceptable limit of the catheter tip is 4 cm above and below the carina (-4 to +4), as determined on chest radiography, without a need for tip adjustment.

scholarly journals Prevalence of central venous catheter salvage in newborn with staphylococcal bloodstream infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabela Linha Secco ◽  
Mitzy Tannia Reichembach ◽  
Higor Pacheco Pereira ◽  
Regina Paula Guimarães Vieira Cavalcante da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Cross Sectional

ABSTRACT Objectives: to establish the prevalence of salvage of central venous catheters in newborns with bloodstream infection caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Methods: retrospective cross-sectional study with 136 newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between 2011 and 2017. The total of 143 infection events undergoing antibiotic therapy were evaluated. Results: among the 143 infection events, 39 catheters in which antibiotic therapy was used were saved and in 69 cases, the device was removed. Positive central blood culture and single lumen catheter were factors associated with salvage failure. The probability of salvage decreased with infections diagnosed from 15 days of using the catheter. Negative blood culture raised the chance of salvage by fourfold. Conclusions: the use of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of infections resulted in a low prevalence of salvage of the central venous catheter. The probability of salvage was associated with variables of the device.

scholarly journals Risk factors for central venous catheter related bloodstream infection: a multicenter study of intensive care unit and haemodialysis unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21
Author(s):  
Zeenat Afroz ◽  
Mohammad Jobayer ◽  
Md Ferdous Mian ◽  
Farook Ahamed ◽  
Mizanur Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Affecting

The clinical condition of the patient, type of central venous catheter (CVC), site and duration of CVC placement are the factors affecting the risk of infection. The aim of this study was to examine and find out the risk factors of CVC related blood stream infections (CVC-BSI). This cross sectional study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period of July 2011 to June 2012. One hundred patients who were admitted in ICU of BSMMU and ICU and haemodialysis unit of Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH) having central venous catheter, were enrolled in the study. The rate of CVC-BSI was 11% and the incidence was observed to be 11.14/1000 catheter days. Both CVC-BSI and CVC colonization were higher in trilumen than in bilumen central venous catheter. CVC-BSI rate was 12.79% in trilumen whereas there was no CVC-BSI in patient with bilumen catheter. The mean duration from CVC insertion to development of CVC-BSI was 14 days, CVC colonization was 8.41 days and noninfected CVC was 6 days. CVC-BSI and CVC colonization were most common in right femoral vein where CVC-BSI was 18.52% and CVC colonization was 59.26%, whereas no CVC-BSI was found in right internal jugular vein. Risk factors for CVC-BSI included type of CVC, site of CVC placement, duration of catheterization were not found statistically significant in this study. CVC-BSI and CVC colonization were higher in trilumen catheter and rate raised with increased duration of placement and highest number of CVC-BSI and colonization was found in right femoral vein. Bangladesh Med J. 2018 Jan; 47 (1): 18-21

scholarly journals Estratégia Multidimensional na Redução de Infeção Associada a Cateter Venoso Central em Pediatria

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Jorge Rodrigues ◽  
Andrea Dias ◽  
Guiomar Oliveira ◽  
José Farela Neves
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Group 2

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> To determine the central-line associated bloodstream infection rate after implementation of central venous catheter-care practice bundles and guidelines and to compare it with the previous central-line associated bloodstream infection rate.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> A prospective, longitudinal, observational descriptive study with an exploratory component was performed in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit during five months. The universe was composed of every child admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit who inserted a central venous catheter. A comparative study with historical controls was performed to evaluate the result of the intervention (group 1 <em>versus</em> group 2).<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Seventy five children were included, with a median age of 23 months: 22 (29.3%) newborns; 28 (37.3%) with recent surgery and 32 (43.8%) with underlying illness. A total of 105 central venous catheter were inserted, the majority a single central venous catheter (69.3%), with a mean duration of 6.8 ± 6.7 days. The most common type of central venous catheter was the short-term, non-tunneled central venous catheter (45.7%), while the subclavian and brachial flexure veins were the most frequent insertion sites (both 25.7%). There were no cases of central-line associated bloodstream infection reported during this study. Comparing with historical controls (group 1), both groups were similar regarding age, gender, department of origin and place of central venous catheter insertion. In the current study (group 2), the median length of stay was higher, while the mean duration of central venous catheter (excluding peripherally inserted central line) was similar in both groups. There were no statistical differences regarding central venous catheter caliber and number of lumens. Fewer children admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit had central venous catheter inserted in group 2, with no significant difference between single or multiple central venous catheter.<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> After multidimensional strategy implementation there was no reported central-line associated bloodstream infection<br /><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Efforts must be made to preserve the same degree of multidimensional prevention, in order to confirm the effective reduction of the central-line associated bloodstream infection rate and to allow its maintenance.</p>

Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Intensive Care Units A Performance Improvement Collaborative

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard E. Jeffries ◽  
Wilbert Mason ◽  
Melanie Brewer ◽  
Katie L. Oakes ◽  
Esther I. Mufioz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Prevention Interventions

Objective.The goal of this effort was to reduce central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) in pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients by means of a multicenter evidence-based intervention.Methods.An observational study was conducted in 26 freestanding children's hospitals with pediatric or cardiac ICUs that joined a Child Health Corporation of America collaborative. CVC-associated BSI protocols were implemented using a collaborative process that included catheter insertion and maintenance bundles, daily review of CVC necessity, and daily goals. The primary goal was either a 50% reduction in the CVC-associated BSI rate or a rate of 1.5 CVC-associated BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days in each ICU at the end of a 9-month improvement period. A 12-month sustain period followed the initial improvement period, with the primary goal of maintaining the improvements achieved.Results.The collaborative median CVC-associated BSI rate decreased from 6.3 CVC-associated BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days at the start of the collaborative to 4.3 CVC-associated BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days at the end of the collaborative. Sixty-five percent of all participants documented a decrease in their CVC-associated BSI rate. Sixty-nine CVC-associated BSIs were prevented across all teams, with an estimated cost avoidance of $2.9 million. Hospitals were able to sustain their improvements during a 12-month sustain period and prevent another 198 infections.Conclusions.We conclude that our collaborative quality improvement project demonstrated that significant reduction in CVC-associated BSI rates and related costs can be realized by means of evidence-based prevention interventions, enhanced communication among caregivers, standardization of CVC insertion and maintenance processes, enhanced measurement, and empowerment of team members to enforce adherence to best practices.

scholarly journals Current Status and Risk Factors of Complications Associated with Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
JingMei Li ◽  
JiaFei Zhang ◽  
Bo Feng ◽  
ChunHui Wang ◽  
MeiLing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Puncture Site

Abstract Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate incidence and influencing factors of complications related to central venous catheters (CVCs) in the Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of Xi'an Children's Hospital.Methods: We analyzed the complications of all children that had CVCs and were hospitalized between June 2020 to February 2021. A total of 334 CVCs were inserted in 310 children.Results: We noted 102 (30.54%) CVCs-related complications. Complications related to CVCs insertion were infection of catheter (13.17%) and malposition of catheter (8.38%), occlusion of CVCs (2.99%), accidental removal (0.6%), puncture site exudate (4.79%), central venous thrombosis (0.6%). Infection mainly due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. 88 cases (24.55%) of CVCs were extubated due to complications. Analysis of the frequency of maintenance-related complications except for center vein thrombosis showed no differences between the jugular, femoral and subclavian vein access (P > 0.05). It was found that the duration of the catheterization use was critical for the occurrence of CVCs-related infections, puncture site exudate, occlusion (P < 0.05). Suture-off, bleeding of insertion site, and the maximum channels of intravenous infusion in patients were dominant risk factors of catheter-related complications. Conclusion: The risk factors of complications during catheter indwelling are suture-off, bleeding of insertion site and the maximum channels of intravenous infusion in patients. Therefore, strict aseptic operation in various operations, control of the infusion channel, effective fixation of the central venous catheter, reduce the malposition and pull of the catheter, and reduce the infiltration of blood at the puncture point, are particularly important to prevent the complications related to the central venous catheter.

Variation in Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662096245
Author(s):  
Malini Mahendra ◽  
Patrick McQuillen ◽  
R. Adams Dudley ◽  
Martina A. Steurer
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Units ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Hospital Characteristics

Objective: Describe patient and hospital characteristics associated with Arterial Catheter (AC) or Central Venous Catheter (CVC) use among pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). Design: Hierarchical mixed effects analyses were used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with AC or CVC placement. The ICU adjusted median odds ratios (ICU-AMOR) for the admission ICU, marginal R2, and conditional intraclass correlation coefficient were reported. Setting: 166 PICUs in the Virtual PICU Systems (VPS, LLC) Database. Patients: 682,791 patients with unscheduled admissions to the PICU. Intervention: None. Measures and Main Results: ACs were placed in (median, [interquartile range]) 8.2% [4.9%-11.3%] of admissions, and CVCs were placed in 14.9% [10.4%-19.3%] of admissions across cohort ICUs. Measured patient characteristics explained about 25% of the variability in AC and CVC placement. Higher Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) illness severity scores were associated with increased odds of placement (Odds Ratio (95th% Confidence Interval)) AC: 1.88 (1.87-1.89) and CVC: 1.82 (1.81-1.83) per 1 unit increase in PIM2 score. Primary diagnoses of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematology/oncology, infectious, renal/genitourinary, rheumatology, and transplant were associated with increased odds of AC or CVC placement compared to a primary respiratory diagnosis. Presence of in-house attendings 24/7 was associated with increased odds of AC placement 1.32 (1.11-1.57). Admission ICU explained 4.9% and 3.5% of the variability in AC or CVC placement, respectively. The ICU-AMOR showed a patient would have a median increase in odds of 55% and 43% for AC or CVC placement, respectively, if the same patient moved from an ICU with lower odds of placement to an ICU with higher odds of placement. Conclusions: Variation in AC or CVC use exists among PICUs. The admission ICU was more strongly associated with AC than with CVC placement. Further study is needed to understand unexplained variation in AC and CVC use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document