scholarly journals Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-258
Author(s):  
L.B. Tavella ◽  
P.S.L. Silva ◽  
A.L. Monteiro ◽  
V.R. Oliveira ◽  
P.L.O.F. Siqueira
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Gliricidia Sepium ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Maize Production ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Weed Growth

One of the very important components in the organic maize production costs refers to spending on weed control. In this research were assessed the effects of maize hybrids (AG 1051 and BR 205) in an intercropping with Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and mechanical hoeing on weed control. The treatments assessed were: A - maize monocropping + two hoeings (20 and 40 days after sowing); B - maize with one hoeing at 20 days + intercropping with gliricidia sowed after hoeing; C - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing + hoeing at 40 days; D - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing without hoeing; E - monocropping maize without hoeing. In the intercroppings, gliricidia was sowed in broadcast seeding with 30 viable seeds m-2. Maize hybrids did not differ in their effects on weed growth and grain yield. Treatments A, B and C have reduced weed growth, compared to treatments D and E. The highest grain yield was obtained with treatment A and the lowest with treatment E. It was concluded that intercropping maize and gliricidia is not a good alternative for an integrated weed management in maize crops in the conditions assessed.

Integrated Weed Management Using Planting Pattern, Cultivar, and Herbicide in Dry-Seeded Rice in Northwest India

Weed Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulshan Mahajan ◽  
Vikas Poonia ◽  
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Weed Suppression ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Rice Grain ◽  
Planting Pattern ◽  
Weed Biomass ◽  
Northwest India

Field experiments were conducted in Punjab, India, in 2011 and 2012 to study the integrated effect of planting pattern [uniform rows (20-cm spacing) and paired rows (15-, 25-, and 15-cm spacing)], cultivars (PR-115 and IET-21214), and weed control treatments (nontreated control, pendimethalin 750 g ai ha−1, bispyribac-sodium 25 g ai ha−1, and pendimethalin 750 g ha−1 followed by bispyribac-sodium 25 g ha−1) on weed suppression and rice grain yield in dry-seeded rice. In the nontreated control, IET-21214 had higher grain yield than PR-115 in both planting patterns. However, such differences were not observed within the herbicide treatment. IET-21214 in paired rows, even in nontreated control, provided grain yield (4.7 t ha−1) similar to that in uniform rows coupled with the sole application of pendimethalin (4.3 t ha−1) and bispyribac-sodium (5.0 t ha−1). In uniform rows, sequential application of pendimethalin (PRE) and bispyribac-sodium (POST) provided the highest grain yield among all the weed control treatments and this treatment produced grain yield of 5.9 and 6.1 t ha−1 for PR-115 and IET-21214, respectively. Similarly, in paired rows, PR-115 in paired rows treated with sequential application of pendimethalin and bispyribac-sodium had highest grain yield (6.1 t ha−1) among all the weed control treatments. However, IET-21214 with the sole application of bispyribac-sodium produced grain yield similar to the sequential application of pendimethalin and bispyribac-sodium. At 30 days after sowing, PR-115 in paired rows coupled with pendimethalin application accrued weed biomass (10.7 g m−2) similar to the sequential application of pendimethalin and bispyribac-sodium coupled with uniform rows (8.1 g m−2). Similarly, IET-21214 with bispyribac-sodium application provided weed control similar to the sequential application of pendimethalin and bispyribac-sodium. Our study implied that grain yield of some cultivars could be improved by exploring their competitiveness through paired-row planting patterns with less use of herbicides.

scholarly journals Integrated weed management in transplanted rice: Options for addressing labor constraints and improving farmers’ income in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Sharif Ahmed ◽  
Virender Kumar ◽  
Murshedul Alam ◽  
Mahbubur Rahman Dewan ◽  
Khairul Alam Bhuiyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Control Cost ◽  
Control Practice ◽  
Net Returns ◽  
Transplanted Rice ◽  
Hand Weeding

Abstract In Bangladesh, weeds in transplanted rice are largely controlled by labor-intensive and costly manual weeding, resulting in inadequate and untimely weed control. Labor scarcity coupled with intensive rice production has triggered increased use of herbicides. These factors warrant a cost-effective and strategic integrated weed management (IWM) approaches. On-farm trials with transplanted rice were conducted during monsoon (‘Aman’) season in 2016 and 2017 and winter (‘Boro’) season in 2016 to 2017 in agroecological zones 11 and 12 with ten treatments - seven herbicide-based IWM options, one mechanical weed control-based option, and two checks – farmers’ current weed control practice and weed-free, to assess effects on weed control, grain yield, labor use, and profitability. Compared to farmers’ practice, herbicide-based IWM options with mefenacet+bensulfuron-methyl as preemergence (PRE) followed by (fb) either bispyribac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence (POST) fb one hand-weeding (HW) were most profitable alternatives, with reductions in labor requirement by 11 to 25 persons-day ha−1 and total weed control cost by USD 44 to 94 ha−1, resulting in net returns increases by USD 54 to 77 ha−1 without compromising on grain yield. In contrast, IWM options with bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam as POST application fb one HW reduced yields by 12 to 13% and profits by USD 71 to 190 ha−1. Non-chemical option with mechanical weeding fb one HW performed similarly to farmers’ practice on yield and profitability. We suggest additional research to develop feasible herbicide-free approaches to weed management in transplanted rice that can offer competitive advantages to current practices.

scholarly journals Assessment of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics, Yield Components and Yield of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in Eastern Ethiopia

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Nano Alemu Daba ◽  
Janmejai Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Faba Bean ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Yield Components ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Eastern Ethiopia ◽  
Hand Weeding

The experiment was conducted to assess the integrated effects of pre-emergence herbicides and hand-weeding on weed control, yield components, yield, and their economic feasibility for cost effective weed control in faba bean. The experiment consisted of 12 treatments viz. pre-emergence s-metolachlor (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg ha-1) and pendimethalin (1.0, 1.25 and 1.5 kg ha-1), each at three rates metolachlor, s-metolachlor + one-hand-weeding, pendimethalin + one-hand-weeding, two-hand-weeding, complete weed free and weedy checks arranged. The weed flora consisted of broadleaved and sedge with the relative densities of 81.02 and 18.98 % at Haramaya district, and 80.83% and 19.17%, at Gurawa district, respectively. Application of s-metolachlor and pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 each supplemented with hand weeding 5 WAE significantly (p ≤0.01) affected the broadleaved weeds, sedges and weed dry weight at both sites. S-metolachlor 1.0 kg ha-1 supplemented with hand weeding 5 WAE gave the lowest total number of weeds (8.29 m-2) following the weed free check. Higher grain yield (3555.8 kg ha-1) was produced with s-metolachlor 1.0 kg ha-1 supplemented with one-hand-weeding 5 WAE following complete weed-free at Gurawa. The benefit gained from s-metolachlor and pendimethalin at 1.0 kg ha-1 each supplemented with one hand weeding 5 WAE were greater than the value recorded from the weedy check by 216% and 198 %, respectively. S-metolachlor 1.0 kg ha-1 supplemented with hand weeding 5 WAE treatment resulted in the highest grain yield and economic benefit. However, in case labour is constraint and s-metolachlor herbicide is timely available, pre emergence application of s-metolachlor at 2.0 kg ha-1 should be the alternative to preclude the yield loss and to ensure maximum benefit.

Effect of integrated weed management and nitrogen fertilization on the performance of rice under flood-prone lowland conditions

1997 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. SHARMA
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Water Depth ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Conventional Tillage ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Crop Cultivation

Field experiments were conducted at Cuttack, India during 1991–94 to study the effect of tillage, methods of crop establishment and weed control at varying levels of N fertilizer on the performance of rice under flood-prone lowland conditions (0·60 cm water depth). The loss in grain yield of direct-sown rice caused by unchecked weed growth ranged from 18·2 to 59·2% in the different years, and was greater when N fertilizer was applied and when the conventional practice of ploughing the fields just before sowing was followed. Increasing the number of tillage operations before sowing improved the crop stand, reduced weed infestation and, thereby, increased the yield significantly compared with that achieved by conventional tillage. Summer ploughing rather than conventional tillage decreased weed dry weight at harvest by 15·8–53·2% and increased grain yield by 47·4–56·3%. A pre-emergence application of thiobencarb at 2·0 kg/ha, hand weeding once at 20 days of growth and post-establishment inter-crop cultivation at 37–42 days provided effective weed control and increased yield by 32·7–34·7, 36·7 and 28·7–83·9%, respectively. The efficiency of weed control and the resulting increase in rice yield were comparatively greater under puddling than with inter-crop cultivation and herbicide application. The loss in yield due to weeds was negligible when the crop was transplanted due to the incorporation of weeds during puddling and a greater water depth in the later growth stages. Therefore, the grain yield of rice was highest with transplanting followed closely by the direct-sown crop with post-establishment inter-crop cultivation. The response of direct-sown rice to N fertilization up to 60 kg N/ha decreased with fewer ploughings when no weed control measures were adopted. However, the grain yield increased significantly with N application up to 40 kg N/ha when weeds were controlled by cultural or chemical methods. The results suggested that an integrated weed management strategy involving summer ploughing, thiobencarb application and inter-crop cultivation is essential for effective weed control in direct-sown, flood-prone, lowland rice, in order to ensure higher N-use efficiency and crop productivity.

scholarly journals Integrated Weed Management for Maize Crop in Croatia

1970 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zlatko SVEČNJAK ◽  
Klara BARIĆ ◽  
Dubravko MAĆEŠIĆ ◽  
Boris DURALIJA ◽  
Jerko GUNJAČA
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Pass Band ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Maize Crop ◽  
No Till ◽  
Seedbed Preparation

Concern about the effects of herbicides on the environment is the main stimulus to reduce their use in maize (Zea mays L.). Field research was conducted over two years to evaluate the efficacy of integrated weed management combining two seedbed practices at planting (no-till vs. tilled seedbeds), mechanical (0-3 inter-row cultivations) and chemical (none, band- and broadcast applied herbicide) methods on maize grain yield. Although seedbed practice had no effect on crop emergence, tilled seedbeds tended to produce larger grain yield than no-till seedbeds because of better control of early germinating weeds. Consequently, grain yield in no-till seedbeds consistently increased with each cultivation up to three passes because of improved weed control. However, the largest yield in tilled seedbeds occurred with two cultivations and then slightly decreased following third cultivation pass. Band herbicide application (50 % reduction in herbicide use compared to broadcast application) resulted in higher yield than one cultivation alone, whereas opposite responses occurred after multiple cultivation passes. Grain yield responded positively to one and two cultivation passes even when weeds were controlled by pre-emergence chemical method. Our findings indicated that banded herbicide application provided effective weed control in maize crop when complemented with two inter-row cultivations regardless of the method of seedbed preparation; thus making a viable option for Croatian farmers to lower herbicide load on the environment.

Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management

Weed Science ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin M. Williams ◽  
David A. Mortensen ◽  
John W. Doran
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Cover Crop ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Crop Residues ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Weed Growth ◽  
Canopy Volume

Cover crop residues are not widely used for weed control because, as a stand-alone tactic, they do not effectively suppress all weeds and their duration of weed control is too short. Field experiments were conducted in 1995 and 1996, under both irrigated and rainfed conditions, to quantifyAmaranthusspp.,Setariaspp., and soybean emergence and growth in residues of fall-planted, spring-killed barley, rye, triticale, wheat, and hairy vetch. For both weed species, seedling emergence was reduced 3 wk after soybean planting by rye and wheat residues (≥ 2, 170 kg ha−1) in 1996. In 1996,Amaranthusspp. canopy volume was reduced 38 to 71% by residues 3 wk after planting. Likewise,Setariaspp. canopy biomass was reduced 37 to 97% in residues 5 wk after planting over both years. The response comparison index was used to identify frequency by which weed growth was placed at a disadvantage relative to soybean growth.Amaranthusspp. andSetariaspp. growth suppressions 3 to 5 wk after planting indicate potential times for intervention with other integrated weed management tactics such as reduced postemergence herbicide rates and interrow cultivation.

Competitive ability of Australian canola (Brassica napus) genotypes for weed management

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre Lemerle ◽  
David J. Luckett ◽  
Peter Lockley ◽  
Eric Koetz ◽  
Hanwen Wu
Keyword(s):  
Brassica Napus ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Cropping Systems ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Brassica Napus L ◽  
Herbicide Resistant ◽  
Weed Growth

Canola (Brassica napus L.) is an important break crop in Australian cropping systems but weeds are a major cost to production and herbicide-resistant weeds are spreading. The potential competitive ability of canola genotypes to both suppress weed growth and maintain grain yield and quality in the presence of weeds has not been determined in Australia. Two experiments examined the range in competitive ability of 16 B. napus genotypes against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) and volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) over two contrasting seasons. Weed biomass at flowering was generally reduced 50% more in the presence of the strongly competitive genotypes than the least competitive, and this has significant benefits for lower weed seed production and reduced seedbank replenishment. Suppression of weed growth was negatively correlated with crop biomass. Significant differences in grain yield of canola were recorded between weedy and weed-free plots, depending on crop genotype, presence of weeds and season. Crop yield tolerance (where 0% = no tolerance and 100% = complete tolerance) to ryegrass competition ranged from 0% (e.g. with CB-Argyle) to 30–40% (e.g. with the hybrids 46Y78 and Hyola-50) in the dry season of 2009. Yield tolerance was higher (50–100%) with the lower densities of volunteer wheat and in the 2010 season. The range between genotypes was similar for both conditions. The hybrids and AV-Garnet were higher yielding and more competitive than the triazine-tolerant cultivars. The ranking of genotypes for competitiveness was strongly influenced by seasonal conditions; some genotypes were consistently more competitive than others. Competitive crops are a low-cost tactic for integrated weed management to reduce dependence on herbicides and retard the spread of herbicide-resistant weeds.

scholarly journals Management of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds in Mexican Citrus Groves: Chemical Alternatives and Economic Viability

Plants ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz ◽  
Pablo Alfredo Domínguez-Martínez ◽  
Hellen Martins da Silveira ◽  
Hugo Enrique Cruz-Hipólito ◽  
Candelario Palma-Bautista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Economic Viability ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Bidens Pilosa ◽  
Citrus Groves ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
The Cost

Glyphosate is a cheap herbicide that has been used to control a wide range of weeds (4–6 times/year) in citrus groves of the Gulf of Mexico; however, its excessive use has selected for glyphosate-resistant weeds. We evaluated the efficacy and economic viability of 13 herbicide treatments (glyphosate combined with PRE- and/or POST-emergence herbicides and other alternative treatments), applied in tank-mixture or sequence, to control glyphosate-resistant weeds in two Persian lime groves (referred to as SM-I and SM-II) of the municipality of Acateno, Puebla, during two years (2014 and 2015). The SM-I and SM-II fields had 243 and 346 weeds/m2, respectively, composed mainly of Bidens pilosa and Leptochloa virgata. Echinochloa colona was also frequent in SM-II. The glyphosate alone treatments (1080, 1440, or 1800 g ae ha−1) presented control levels of the total weed population ranging from 64% to 85% at 15, 30, and 45 d after treatment (DAT) in both fields. Mixtures of glyphosate with grass herbicides such as fluazifop-p-butyl, sethoxydim, and clethodim efficiently controlled E. colona and L. virgata, but favored the regrowth of B. pilosa. The sequential applications of glyphosate + (bromacil + diuron) and glufosinate + oxyfluorfen controlled more than 85% the total weed community for more than 75 days. However, these treatments were between 360% and 390% more expensive (1.79 and 1.89 $/day ha−1 of satisfactory weed control, respectively), compared to the representative treatment (glyphosate 1080 g ae ha−1 = USD $29.0 ha−1). In practical and economic terms, glufosinate alone was the best treatment controlling glyphosate resistant weeds maintaining control levels >80% for at least 60 DAT ($1.35/day ha−1). The rest of the treatments, applied in tank-mix or in sequence with glyphosate, had similar or lower control levels (~70%) than glyphosate at 1080 g ae ha−1. The adoption of glufosiante alone, glufosinate + oxyfluorfen or glyphosate + (bromacil + diuron) must consider the cost of satisfactory weed control per day, the period of weed control, as well as other factors associated with production costs to obtain an integrated weed management in the short and long term.

scholarly journals Weed control and soybean agronomic performance in response to application of sulfentrazone + diuron in pre-emergence

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-82
Author(s):  
Washington Louis Franklin Termineles Zacharias ◽  
Pedro Henrique Caldeirão Pierro ◽  
Guilherme Mendes Pio Oliveira ◽  
Rubia Fernanda Bovo ◽  
Leonardo Giorgiani Zarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Agronomic Performance ◽  
Wild Radish ◽  
Raphanus Raphanistrum ◽  
History Of ◽  
Rottboellia Cochinchinensis

The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool in weedmanagement. Sulfentrazone + diuron mixture was recently launched ontothe market. The objectiveof this work was to evaluate the weed control and the agronomic performance of soybean in response to application of sulfentrazone + diurondoses in pre-emergence. The experiment was conducted in Londrina PR, in an oxisol. The treatments were doses ofsulfentrazone + diuron (62 + 123, 123 + 245, 184 + 368, 245 + 490, 306 + 613 e 368 + 735 g a.i.ha-1). In addition to these treatments, isolated applications of sulfentrazone (245 g a.i.ha-1) and diuron (490 g a.i.ha-1) were evaluated, as well as a weedyand aweed-freecontrol. For the weed control, the wild radish(Raphanus raphanistrum)and itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) emergencewere evaluated. In soybean, photosystem II (PSII)activity, stand, plant height, number of podsper plant, height of insertion of the first pod, number of nodes per plant, mass of a thousand grains and grain yield were evaluated. Results show that the mixture of sulfentrazone + diuron resulted in less than 50% wild radish control, regardless of the dose evaluated. However, for itchgrass, the control was greater than 90% in doses from 123 g sulfentrazone + 245g diurona.i.ha-1. Regarding thesoybeancrop, in doses from 245 g sulfentrazone + 490 g diuron a.i. ha-1 there was a greater number of pods per plant and higher grain yield, of about3,000 kg ha-1. The application of herbicides led to a transient inhibition of PSIIactivity, which did not result in a reduction in crop grainyield, indicating plant recovery. Therefore, the mixture of sulfentrazone + diuron is a good alternative for the weed management in pre-emergence of soybean, and should be positioned according to the history of fieldinfestation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document