scholarly journals ACERTO PROJECT: IMPACT ON ASSISTANCE OF A PUBLIC EMERGENCY HOSPITAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Adam Feitosa SAMPAIO ◽  
Simone Losekann Pereira SAMPAIO ◽  
Plinio da Cunha LEAL ◽  
Ed Carlos Rey MOURA ◽  
Lívia Goreth Galvão Serejo ALVARES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Caloric Intake ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Postoperative Vomiting ◽  
Project Impact ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Background: In Brazil, the goal-based approach was named Project ACERTO and has obtained good results when applied in elective surgeries with shorter hospitalization time, earlier return to activities without increased morbidity and mortality. Aim: To analyze the impact of ACERTO on emergency surgery care. Methods: An intervention study was performed at a trauma hospital. Were compared 452 patients undergoing emergency surgery and followed up by the general surgery service from October to December 2018 (pre-ACERTO, n=243) and from March to June 2019 (post-ACERTO, n=209). Dietary reintroduction, volume of infused postoperative venous hydration, duration of use of catheters, probes and drains, postoperative analgesia, prevention of postoperative vomiting, early mobilization and physiotherapy were evaluated. Results: After the ACERTO implantation there was earlier reintroduction of the diet, the earlier optimal caloric intake, earlier venous hydration withdrawal, higher postoperative analgesia prescription, postoperative vomiting prophylaxis and higher physiotherapy and mobilization prescription were achieved early in all (p<0.01); in the multivariate analysis there was no change in the complication rates observed before and after ACERTO (10.7% vs. 7.7% (p=0.268) and there was a decrease in the length of hospitalization after ACERTO (8,5 vs. 6,1 dias (p=0.008). Conclusion: The implementation of the ACERTO project decreased the length of hospital stay, improved medical care provided without increasing the rates of complications evaluated.

Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynecology: are all items of equal importance?

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basile Pache ◽  
Jonas Jurt ◽  
Fabian Grass ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines in gynecologic surgery are a set of multiple recommendations based on the best available evidence. However, according to previous studies, maintaining high compliance is challenging in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of compliance to individual ERAS items on clinical outcomes.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of 446 consecutive women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery (both open and minimally invasive) within an ERAS program from 1 October 2013 until 31 January 2017 in a tertiary academic center in Switzerland. Demographics, adherence, and outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed, with adjustment for confounding factors. Main outcomes were overall compliance, compliance to each individual ERAS item, and impact on post-operative complications according to Clavien classification.ResultsA total of 446 patients were included, 26.2 % (n=117) had at least one complication (Clavien I–V), and 11.4 % (n=51) had a prolonged length of hospital stay. The single independent risk factor for overall complications was intra-operative blood loss > 200 mL (OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.89, p=0.001). Overall compliance >70% with ERAS items (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66, p=0.12) showed a protective effect on complications. Increased compliance was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.435 to 0.93, p=0.001).ConclusionsCompliance >70% with modifiable ERAS items was significantly associated with reduced overall complications. Best possible compliance with all ERAS items is the goal to achieve lower complication rates after gynecologic oncology surgery.

scholarly journals Cost Savings Analysis of Individualized Exercise Oncology Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153473541983946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Y. Wonders ◽  
Rob Wise ◽  
Danielle Ondreka ◽  
Josh Gratsch
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Care ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Cost Burden ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Exercise Oncology

Background: The physical and economic toll of cancer make it a high health priority. The rising cost of cancer care is now a primary focus for patients, payers, and providers. Escalating costs of clinical trials and national drug regulations have led the median monthly costs of cancer drugs to rise from less than $100 in 1965 to 1969, to more than $5000 in 2005 to 2009, stressing the importance of finding innovative ways to reduce cost burden. In the present study, we report the economic evaluation of an individualized exercise oncology program beginning early after diagnosis. Methods: An independent research group, ASCEND Innovations, retrospectively analyzed patient records to statistically demonstrate the impact of exercise oncology during cancer treatment. All patients completed 12 weeks of prescribed, individualized exercise that included cardiovascular, strength training, and flexibility components. The 3 primary hospital measures leveraged for statistical comparison before and after supportive care enrollment were number of encounters, number of readmissions, and average total charges, as well as emergency room visits and length of hospital stay ( P < .05). Results: The resulting dataset consisted of 1493 total hospital encounters for 147 unique patients. The results statistically demonstrate a positive effect of exercise oncology during cancer care, in terms of reductions in overall cost per patient pre- to post-intervention. Conclusions: Individualized exercise oncology programs should be employed as part of the national standard of care for individuals battling cancer, in order to improve patient outcome and reduce cost burden.

Reduction of Costs for Pelvic Exenteration Performed by High Volume Surgeons: Analysis of the Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission Database

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azah A. Althumairi ◽  
Joseph K. Canner ◽  
Michael A. Gorin ◽  
Sandy H. Fang ◽  
Susan L. Gearhart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Exenteration ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Health Service Cost ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
The Impact

High volume hospitals (HVHs) and high volume surgeons (HVSs) have better outcomes after complex procedures, but the association between surgeon and hospital volumes and patient outcomes is not completely understood. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of surgeon and hospital volumes, and their interaction, on postoperative outcomes and costs in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration (PE) in the state of Maryland. A review of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database between 2000 and 2011 was performed. Patients were compared for demographics and clinical variables. The differences in length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, operating room (OR) cost, and total cost were compared for surgeon volume and hospital volume controlling for all other factors. Surgery performed by HVS at HVH had the shortest ICU stay and lowest OR cost. When PE was performed by a low volume surgeon at an HVH, the OR cost and total cost were the highest and increased by $2,683 ( P < 0.0001) and $16,076 ( P < 0.0001), respectively. OR costs reduced when surgery was performed by an HVS at an HVH ($-1632, P = 0.008). PE performed by HVS at HVH is significantly associated with lower OR costs and ICU stay. We feel this is indicative of lower complication rates and higher quality care.

scholarly journals Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR Testing Reduces the Duration of MRSA-Targeted Therapy in Patients with Suspected MRSA Pneumonia

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhu Baby ◽  
Andrew C. Faust ◽  
Terri Smith ◽  
Lyndsay A. Sheperd ◽  
Laura Knoll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Health Care Associated Pneumonia ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Suspected Pneumonia

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-ordered methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR testing on the duration of empirical MRSA-targeted antibiotic therapy in patients with suspected pneumonia. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who received vancomycin or linezolid for suspected pneumonia before and after the implementation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nasal MRSA PCR testing. Patients were included if they were adults of >18 years of age and initiated on vancomycin or linezolid for suspected MRSA pneumonia. The primary endpoint was the duration of vancomycin or linezolid therapy. After screening 368 patients, 57 patients met inclusion criteria (27 pre-PCR and 30 post-PCR). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, with the majority of patients classified as having health care-associated pneumonia (68.4%). The use of the nasal MRSA PCR test reduced the mean duration of MRSA-targeted therapy by 46.6 h (74.0 ± 48.9 h versus 27.4 ± 18.7 h; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.3 to 65.8 h; P < 0.0001). Fewer patients in the post-PCR group required vancomycin serum levels and dose adjustment (48.1% versus 16.7%; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences between the pre- and post-PCR groups regarding days to clinical improvement (1.78 ± 2.52 versus 2.27 ± 3.34; P = 0.54), length of hospital stay (11.04 ± 9.5 versus 8.2 ± 7.8; P = 0.22), or hospital mortality (14.8% versus 6.7%; P = 0.41). The use of nasal MRSA PCR testing in patients with suspected MRSA pneumonia reduced the duration of empirical MRSA-targeted therapy by approximately 2 days without increasing adverse clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Day surgery for achalasia cardia: Time for consensus?

2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
DN Naumann ◽  
S Zaman ◽  
M Daskalakis ◽  
R Nijjar ◽  
M Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Day Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Achalasia Cardia ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Consensus Decision ◽  
Symptom Recurrence

Introduction Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy (LHM) is the most effective therapy for achalasia of the oesophagus. Most case series of LHM report a length of hospital stay (LOS) >1 day. We present 14 years of experience of LHM to examine the safety and feasibility of LHM as a day case procedure. Methods We retrospectively examined patients undergoing elective LHM for achalasia at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Demographics, episode statistics, prior investigations and interventions were collated. Outcomes, including LOS, complications and re-interventions, were compared for the periods before and after a consensus decision at our institution in 2008 to perform LHM as a day case procedure. Results Sixty patients with a mean age of 41±13 years were included, of whom 58% were male. The median LOS for all patients was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 0–2.25). Overall, LHM was performed as a day case in 27 (45%) cases, at 2/26 (7.7%) in the first period versus 25/34 (73.5%) in the second (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in age, gender or previous interventions between day surgery and non-day surgery groups. One patient required subsequent unplanned surgery, while six (10%) needed endoscopic treatment of recurrent symptoms within 12 months. Conclusions LHM can be performed safely as a day case procedure. Complication rates are low, with only a small proportion of patients requiring endoscopic treatment for symptom recurrence within 1 year.

scholarly journals Identifying Early Extraperitoneal High-Volume Urine Leak Post Kidney Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Mark Churchill ◽  
Ajay Sharma ◽  
Davis Aziz ◽  
Ahmed Halawa
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Biochemical Parameter ◽  
Parameter Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Urine Leak ◽  
Serum Biochemical Parameter ◽  
Serum Biochemical ◽  
The Impact

Transplant clinicians need to be watchful of several potential surgical complications in the early post-transplant period, including haemorrhage, extraperitoneal urine leak, and lymphocele. While haemorrhage and extraperitoneal urine leak usually present in the early post kidney transplant period, lymphoceles usually present 2–6 weeks after transplantation. While the colour and volume of the drained fluid can give some indication of the problem, is not enough evidence for a confident urine leak diagnosis. Further investigations, such as serum biochemical parameter analysis of the drained fluid and ultrasonography, help to identify the true cause. This paper discusses how to identify high-volume extraperitoneal urine leaks in the early post kidney transplant period and considers the differential diagnoses. Different ureteroneocystostomy procedures, including the Lich–Grégoir, Politano–Leadbetter, and U-stitch techniques, are discussed and compared regarding complication rates (especially urine leak and haematuria). The authors also address the management of low- and high-volume extraperitoneal urine leak, the follow-up needed, and the impact of urine leak on graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, and rate of hospital readmission.

62 Geriatric Surgical Liaison Staff Perspectives of Geriatric Care Before and After Introduction of An Embedded Service

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i18-i20
Author(s):  
K Shah ◽  
R Kyzy ◽  
H Pittaway
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Key Indicators ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Multi Disciplinary Team

Abstract Introduction National evidence demonstrates that older people having surgery, both in the elective and emergency setting, have more adverse outcomes postoperatively when compared with their younger counterparts (1). National reports have recommended daily input from a geriatric team for older patients having surgery (2). At our hospital we have introduced a geriatric surgical liaison consultant as a formal post to ensure daily geriatric input or review for patients over the age of 70 or comorbid younger patients as requested. The aim of this study was to review perspectives across the multi-disciplinary team on care provided to these patients before and after introduction of the surgical liaison team. Methods We created a 10 part questionnaire, which was distributed amongst all members of the multi-disciplinary team, asking them to rate confidence out of 10 in management of comorbidity, polypharmacy, discharge planning, pain assessments and nutrition. These data were then analysed to produce median scores for each category before and after the introduction of the service. We compared the change in scores between the foundation year 1 (FY1) doctors and the remainder of the respondents. Results The below table demonstrates the median scores across all 36 respondents in their confidence with the assessment and management of the 10 key domains before and after the liaison service was introduced: Conclusions Universally within our survey, staff reported improvement in all 10 key indicators of care of older patients on surgery with the introduction of a geriatric surgical liaison team. Greatest benefit was seen within the FY1 group. References 1. McVeigh TP, Al-Azawi D, O'Donoghue GT, Kerin MJ. Assessing the impact of an ageing population on complication rates and in-patient length of stay, Int J Surg, 2013, vol. 11 (pg. 872–5). 2. Wilkinson K. An age old Problem: A Review of the Care Received by Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Report by the National Confidential Enquiry Into Patient Outcome and Death. London, 2010.

scholarly journals Evaluating the impact of a computerized surveillance algorithm and decision support system on sepsis mortality

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharad Manaktala ◽  
Stephen R Claypool
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Change Management ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Electronic Surveillance ◽  
Sepsis Mortality ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Objective: We created a system using a triad of change management, electronic surveillance, and algorithms to detect sepsis and deliver highly sensitive and specific decision support to the point of care using a mobile application. The investigators hypothesized that this system would result in a reduction in sepsis mortality. Methods: A before-and-after model was used to study the impact of the interventions on sepsis-related mortality. All patients admitted to the study units were screened per the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Surviving Sepsis Guidelines using real-time electronic surveillance. Sepsis surveillance algorithms that adjusted clinical parameters based on comorbid medical conditions were deployed for improved sensitivity and specificity. Nurses received mobile alerts for all positive sepsis screenings as well as severe sepsis and shock alerts over a period of 10 months. Advice was given for early goal-directed therapy. Sepsis mortality during a control period from January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2013 was used as baseline for comparison. Results: The primary outcome, sepsis mortality, decreased by 53% (P = 0.03; 95% CI, 1.06-5.25). The 30-day readmission rate reduced from 19.08% during the control period to 13.21% during the study period (P = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.97-2.52). No significant change in length of hospital stay was noted. The system had observed sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 82% for detecting sepsis compared to gold-standard physician chart review. Conclusion: A program consisting of change management and electronic surveillance with highly sensitive and specific decision support delivered to the point of care resulted in significant reduction in deaths from sepsis.

scholarly journals Implementation of a novel emergency surgical unit significantly improves the management of gallstone pancreatitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Bokhari ◽  
M Kulendran ◽  
L Liasis ◽  
K Qurashi ◽  
M Sen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
British Society ◽  
Gallstone Pancreatitis ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Comparative Audit ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Surgical Unit ◽  
Definitive Management

Introduction Emergency surgery is changing rapidly with a greater workload, early subspecialisation and centralisation of emergency care. We describe the impact of a novel emergency surgical unit (ESU) on the definitive management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis (GSP). Methods A comparative audit was undertaken for all admissions with GSP before and after the introduction of the ESU over a six-month period. The impact on compliance with British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines was assessed. Results Thirty-five patients were treated for GSP between December 2013 and May 2014, after the introduction of the ESU. This was twice the nationally reported average for a UK trust over a six-month period. All patients received definitive management for their GSP and 100% of all suitable patients received treatment during the index admission or within two weeks of discharge. This was a significantly greater proportion than that prior to the introduction of the ESU (57%, p=0.0001) as well as the recently reported national average (34%). The mean length of total inpatient stay was reduced significantly after the ESU was introduced from 13.7 ± 4.7 days to 7.8 ± 2.1 days (p=0.03). The mean length of postoperative stay also fell significantly from 6.7 ± 2.6 days to 1.8 ± 0.8 days (p=0.001). Conclusions A dedicated ESU following national recommendations for emergency surgery care by way of using dedicated emergency surgeons and a streamlined protocol for common presentations has been shown by audit of current practice to significantly improve the management of patients presenting to a busy district general hospital with GSP.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Team Care in the Surgical Management of Pituitary Adenoma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica W. Grayson ◽  
Agnish Nayak ◽  
Mark Winder ◽  
Benjamin Jonker ◽  
Raquel Alvarado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Pituitary Surgery ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose Despite multidisciplinary care being commonly recommended, there remains limited evidence supporting its benefits in pituitary disease management. This study aimed to assess the impact of multidisciplinary care in pituitary surgery. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing pituitary surgery outcomes among consecutive patients within a quaternary referral center in 5 years before and after introduction of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Primary outcomes were endocrine (transient diabetes insipidus [DI], syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone [SIADH], and new hypopituitarism) and surgical (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leak, epistaxis, intracranial hemorrhage, and meningitis) complications, length of hospital stay, and intrasellar residual tumor. Results 279 patients (89 pre-MDT vs. 190 post-MDT) were assessed (age 54 ± 17 years, 48% female). Nonfunctioning adenomas were most common (54%). In the post-MDT era, more clinically functioning tumors (42 vs. 28%, p = 0.03) were treated. Transient DI and SIADH occurred less often post-MDT (20 vs. 36%, p < 0.01 and 18 vs. 39%, p < 0.01), as well as new hypothyroidism (5 vs. 15, p < 0.01). Hospital stay was shorter post-MDT (5[3] vs. 7[5] days, p < 0.001) and intrasellar residuals were less common (8 vs. 35%, p < 0.001). Complications were more frequent pre-MDT independent of tumor size, hormone status, and surgical technique (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14 [1.05–4.32], p = 0.04). Conclusion Outcomes of pituitary surgery improved after the introduction of an MDT. Pituitary MDTs may benefit both patients and the health system by improving quality of care and reducing hospital stays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document