scholarly journals ANTEGRADE X RETROGRADE NAILING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES: A STUDY ON CONSOLIDATION AND INFECTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 313-316
Author(s):  
Jorge Rafael Durigan ◽  
Ana Carolina da Silva ◽  
Pedro Takata ◽  
Caio Zamboni ◽  
Claudio Santili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Bone Healing ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Retrograde Nailing ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

ABSTRACT Objective: Osteosynthesis with intramedullary nailing is considered the method of choice to treat diaphyseal femur fractures in adults. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the bone healing time and incidence of infection in patients with diaphyseal femur fractures treated surgically with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing. Methods: The medical records of 123 patients from two university hospitals dated 2011-2013 were evaluated, with 126 diaphyseal femur fractures having been found. The most frequent treatment was antegrade intramedullary nailing (51%), of which 38% involved reaming (n=25). Results: We found evidence of 92% healed fractures at 12 months postoperatively. Complications included chronic osteomyelitis in one patient and femoral neck fracture in another patient, both after reamed antegrade nailing. Pyoarthritis of the knee associated with osteomyelitis affected two patients after reamed retrograde nailing and one patient after unreamed retrograde nailing. Conclusion: We did not observe a significant difference in bone healing rates with the use of reamed or unreamed antegrade or retrograde nailing. Complications included the presence of infection with an incidence similar to that reported in the literature, and of particular significance, unrelated to the type of approach. Level of evidence III, Retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Management of Complex Distal Femur Fractures: Comparative Study between Ilizarov External Fixation and Double Plating

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M F Thakeb ◽  
A H Gooda ◽  
T A Fayyad ◽  
M A Elkersh ◽  
E N Abourisha
Keyword(s):  
Knee Society Score ◽  
Distal Femur ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Double Plating

Abstract Background In this prospective randomized clinical study, we report results of management of type C2 and C3 distal femur fractures by Ilizarov external fixator in comparison with double plating through separate medial and lateral approaches with a mean of 42.8 ± 6.84 weeks follow-up. Patients and Methods In this study we managed 30 cases with highly comminuted distal femoral fractures AO classification type C2 or C3. Fifteen cases were surgically managed by Ilizarov technique and the other fifteen cases were surgically managed by double plating technique. We compare between both group as regard clinical, radiological results and rate of complications. Results while using Knee society score, the results are the following: In Ilizarov group: 7 cases (46.67%) are excellent, 4 cases (26.67%) are good, 3 cases (20.00%) had fair results while 1 case (6.67%) had poor results. In internal fixation group, 8 cases (53.33%) had excellent results, 3cases (20%) had good results, 2 cases (13.33%) had fair results while 2 cases (13.33%) had poor results. Conclusion In fixation of complex distal femur fracture, both Ilizarov and double plating methods had no significant difference in clinical outcome by knee society score and in rate of complications. Ilizarov allow earlier weight bearing and less blood loss while double plating gives better ROM of knee joint and rapid radiological healing. Level of Evidence Level I Randomized controlled study.

scholarly journals Comparison of Atypical and Osteoporotic Femoral Shaft Fractures in the Elderly: A Multicenter Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Miura ◽  
Hiroaki Kijima ◽  
Noriyuki Ishikawa ◽  
Toshihito Ebina ◽  
Takayuki Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Bone Healing ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Femoral Shaft ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Atypical Femoral Fractures ◽  
Femoral Shaft Fractures ◽  
Shaft Fractures

Background. In atypical femoral fractures, owing to the high rates of complications and delayed healing that accompany the plate fixation, the most favorable treatment is intramedullary nailing. Although there is insufficient evidence, plate fixation is chosen due to anterolateral bowing of the femur. This study compared the bone healing time and rates of complications in atypical femoral shaft fractures and osteoporotic femoral shaft fractures. Methods. We searched the medical records of 3 institutions in Japan for patients with femoral shaft fractures who visited between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. We identified 65 patients and excluded 37 among these due to high-energy injuries or being younger than 65 years. Among the remaining patients, we identified 17 and 11 women with atypical (AFF group) and osteoporotic femoral shaft fractures (OP group), respectively. Results. In surgical method, there were differences in intramedullary nailing (94.1% versus 27.2%) (p<0.01). The mean bone healing time was 11.1 months versus 6.7 months in 2 groups (p<0.01). Iatrogenic femoral fractures during intramedullary nail insertion were observed in both groups, and reoperation was only seen in atypical femoral fractures treated with a plate fixation, but there was no difference in the rate of complications (23.5% versus 9.1%). Conclusions. In the atypical femoral fracture group, intramedullary nailing was more chosen, but the bone healing time was delayed and plate fixation cases needed reoperation. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the 2 groups.

scholarly journals Operational experience of the Dutch helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: jeopardy on the prehospital care system?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinten G. H. Rikken ◽  
Sarah Mikdad ◽  
Mathijs T. Carvalho Mota ◽  
Marcel A. De Leeuw ◽  
Patrick Schober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Operational Experience ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Global And Local

Abstract Purpose The SARS-CoV-2 virus has disrupted global and local medical supply chains. To combat the spread of the virus and prevent an uncontrolled outbreak with limited resources, national lockdown protocols have taken effect in the Netherlands since March 13th, 2020. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, type and characteristics of HEMS and HEMS-ambulance ‘Lifeliner 1’ dispatches during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period one year prior. Methods A retrospective review of all HEMS and HEMS-ambulance ‘Lifeliner 1’ dispatches was performed from the start of Dutch nationwide lockdown orders from March 13th until May 13th, 2020 and the corresponding period one year prior. Dispatch-, operational-, patient-, injury-, and on-site treatment characteristics were extracted for analysis. In addition, the rate of COVID-19 positively tested HEMS personnel and the time physicians were unable to take call was described. Results During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the HEMS and HEMS-ambulance was requested in 528 cases. One year prior, a total of 620 requests were received. The HEMS (helicopter and ambulance) was cancelled after deployment in 56.4% of the COVID-19 cohort and 50.7% of the historical cohort (P = 0.05). Incident location type did not differ between the two cohorts, specifically, there was no significant difference in the number of injuries that occurred at home in pandemic versus non-pandemic circumstances. Besides a decrease in the number of falls, the distribution of mechanisms of injury remained similar during the COVID-19 study period. There was no difference in self-inflicted injuries observed. Prehospital interventions remained similar during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to one year prior. Specifically, prehospital intubation did not differ between the two cohorts. The rate of COVID-19 positively tested HEMS personnel was 23.1%. Physicians who tested positive were unable to take call for a mean of 25 days (range 8–53). Conclusion A decrease in the number of deployments and increase in the number of cancelled missions was observed during the COVID-19 study period. No major differences in operational- and injury characteristics were found for HEMS and HEMS-ambulance dispatches between the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands and the same period one year prior. These findings highlight the importance of continued operability of the HEMS, even during pandemic circumstances. Level of evidence III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Lodde ◽  
M. J. Raschke ◽  
J. Stolberg-Stolberg ◽  
J. Everding ◽  
S. Rosslenbroich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Periprosthetic Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Distal Femoral Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Double Plating

Abstract Background The optimal treatment strategy for the surgical management of femur fractures and non-unions remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess union rates, complications and outcome after femoral double plating. Treatment of shaft, distal, periprosthetic fractures and pathological proximal femur fractures as well as femoral non-unions with double plating were evaluated. Methods A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was conducted. Published literature reporting on the treatment and clinical outcome of femoral fractures and non-unions with double plating was identified. In total, 24 studies with 436 cases of double plating, 64 cases of single plating, 84 cases of intramedullary nailing (IM), and 1 interfragmentary screw treatment met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The evaluated literature was published between 1991 and 2020. Results Double plating of femoral fractures achieved high healing rates and few complications were reported. It displayed significantly less intraoperative haemorrhage, shorter surgery time reduced risk of malunion in polytraumatised patients when compared to IM. Fracture healing rate of double-plating distal femoral fractures was 88.0%. However, there were no significant differences regarding fracture healing, complication or functional outcome when compared to single plating. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures with double plating displayed high healing rates (88.5%). Double plating of non-unions achieved excellent osseous union rates (98.5%). Conclusions The literature provides evidence for superior outcomes when using double plating in distal femoral fractures, periprosthetic fractures and femoral non-unions. Some evidence suggests that the use of double plating of femoral fractures in polytraumatised patients may be beneficial over other types of fracture fixation. Level of evidence IV.

scholarly journals Dimensions of the paediatric femur: anatomical limitations of flexible intramedullary nailing

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
T. Lucak ◽  
S. Raju ◽  
A. Andrews ◽  
L. Igbokwe ◽  
M. J. Heffernan
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femoral Length ◽  
Paediatric Hospital ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Flexible Nailing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Width Measurements ◽  
Flexible Nails

Purpose Although spica casting remains the benchmark for treating diaphyseal femur fractures in preschool children, some authors advocate using flexible intramedullary nails in certain situations. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the anatomic feasibility of flexible nailing in young children. Methods Consecutive patients between the ages of zero and ten years with normal femurs who received femur radiographs at a tertiary paediatric hospital over a two-year period were included. Anteroposterior femur radiographs were evaluated for length and isthmus width measurements. Each femur was templated for flexible nail size. The proportions of each age group capable of accommodating two flexible nails up to 4.0 mm in size were determined and compared. Results A total of 381 full-length femur radiographs were reviewed. There was a strong, direct linear relationship between age and femoral length (R2 = 0.896) and a moderate correlation between age and femoral isthmus width (R2 = 0.417). Although the percentage of femurs able to accommodate flexible nails continued to increase with age, this increase did not represent a significant difference when comparing preschool-aged children with older age groups. Conclusions Age and femoral length demonstrated a strong, positive correlation while age and isthmus width had weaker correlation. The ability of femurs to accommodate flexible nails increased with age with most children age two years and older able to accommodate two flexible nails of at least 2.5 mm in size. Level of Evidence III

scholarly journals Treatment of Severe Ulnar Instability of the MCP Joint Improves Function in LRTI Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis of the Thumb CMC Joint

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 105-115
Author(s):  
Johanna Wirth ◽  
Eva-Maria Baur
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Strength Function ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Metacarpophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metacarpal Bone ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Pinch Grip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

Abstract Background Comorbidity in the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPj) of the thumb, i.e., hyperextension or ulnar collateral instability, could affect the outcome of arthroplasty in the thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCj). Objective In a retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of arthrodesis of the MCPj for thumbs with unstable MCPj and simultaneous ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) arthroplasty for the CMCj in terms of strength, function, and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods A total of 69 thumbs treated with a LRTI arthroplasty of the CMCj were included. In 14 of those cases, an arthrodesis of the MCPj was performed as well. In 12 thumbs, both procedures were done simultaneously; in one case MCPj arthrodesis followed LRTI arthroplasty, whereas one patient already had MCPj arthrodesis at time of LRTI arthroplasty. Those 14 thumbs were compared with the control group of 55 thumbs who had only undergone LRTI. At a mean follow-up of 4 to 5 years (mean 54 [10–124] months) postoperative assessments included range of motion (ROM) of the CMC, MCP, and interphalangeal (IP) joint of the thumb, as well as any instability of the MCPj. Pinch and grip strength were examined, also the visual analogue scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, QuickDASH, PRWE-Thumb, and the Kapandji's Opposition Score. Radiologically, proximalization of the first metacarpal bone was measured. Student's t-test was used to determine significance, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Additional arthrodesis of the MCPj provided no significant difference of function in thumbs that only had a hyperextension-instability. However, in thumbs with marked ulnar instability, stronger pinch-grip was obtained with arthrodesis, compared with only LRTI. Conclusion In patients with advanced painful thumb CMCj osteoarthritis, we recommend (simultaneous) arthrodesis of the MCPj, to allow a stable thumb grip if there is additional marked ulnar collateral ligament instability. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Effect of Postoperative Ketorolac Administration on Bone Healing in Ankle Fracture Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1135-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth McDonald ◽  
Brian Winters ◽  
Kristen Nicholson ◽  
Rachel Shakked ◽  
Steven Raikin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Healing ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinical Healing ◽  
Mean Time

Background: In an effort to minimize narcotic analgesia and its potential side effects, anti-inflammatory agents offer great potential provided they do not interfere with bone healing. The safety of ketorolac administration after foot and ankle surgery has not been well defined in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to report clinical healing and radiographic outcomes for patients treated with a perioperative ketorolac regimen after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients that received perioperative ketorolac at the time of lateral malleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar ankle ORIF by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2016 with minimum 4 months follow-up. Patients received 20 tablets of 10 mg ketorolac Q6 hours. Radiographs were evaluated independently by 2 blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons to assess for radiographic healing. A total of 281 patients were included, with a median age of 51 years and 138 males (47%). Statistical analysis consisted of a linear mixed-effects regression. Results: In all, 265/281 (94%) were clinically healed within 12 weeks and 261/281 (92%) were radiographically healed within 12 weeks. Within the group of patients that did not heal within 12 weeks, mean time to clinical healing was 16.9 weeks (range = 14-25 weeks), and mean time to radiographic healing was 17.1 weeks (range = 14-25 weeks). In patients taking ketorolac, there were no cases of nonunion in our series (n = 281) and no significant difference found between fracture patterns and healing or complications ( P = .500). Conclusions: Perioperative ketorolac use was associated with a high rate of fracture union by 12 weeks. This is the first study to examine the effect of ketorolac on radiographic time to union of ankle fractures. Additional studies are necessary to determine whether ketorolac helps reduce opioid consumption and improve pain following ORIF of ankle fractures. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Comparison of Chitosan-Based Liquid Scaffold and Hyaluronic Acid–Based Soft Scaffold for Treatment of Talus Osteochondral Lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1240-1248
Author(s):  
Ramazan Akmeşe ◽  
Mehmet Batu Ertan ◽  
Hakan Kocaoğlu
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of 2 different scaffolds with hyaluronan or chitosan-based structure used in the treatment of talus osteochondral lesions. Methods: Eighty-one patients who underwent chondral lesion repair with hyaluronan (n = 42) or chitosan-based (n = 39) scaffold were included. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated within and between groups preoperatively and at the 3rd, 12th, and 24th month postoperatively. In all patients, magnetic resonance imaging was performed between the 12 and 18th month postoperatively and compared with magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring. Results: Within-group evaluations revealed significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores at postoperative 3 and 12 months. The postoperative 24th-month results of AOFAS scores in any group did not differ significantly from the 12th-month results. There was no significant difference between the groups in comparison of AOFAS, VAS, and MOCART scores at any time period. Conclusion: Both scaffolds were found to be effective in cartilage healing but had no clinical or radiologic superiority to each other. This is the first study to compare the use of different cell-free scaffold types in osteochondral defects of the talus. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Surveillance ultrasonography for conservative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in young children

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Gao ◽  
Zhaoxia Wang ◽  
Yuxi Su
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Femoral Shaft ◽  
Preschool Age ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Skin Traction

Abstract Background The treatment for femoral shaft fracture (FSF) depends on the age of the patient. While the Pavlik harness is the first choice for patients under 6 months of age, spica casting is preferred for patients over 6 months and under preschool age. Minimally-invasive surgery using elastic stable intramedullary nails is also used in some cases. Skin traction is another treatment choice for some patients who are not candidates for the above methods. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of surveillance ultrasonography (US) for the conservative treatment of FSFs in young children. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 92 children who were diagnosed with FSF in our hospital from April 2017 to May 2019. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, they were divided into US surveillance (A) and control (B) groups. All patients received conservative treatment by skin traction. For group A, US was used to assess the femur fractures and adjust its reduction on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 until the fracture stabilized. For group B, the fractures were checked by radiographs on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 until the callus appeared. The FSF angle was measured using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Results All patients were followed up for 18 months. The radiographic evaluation of both groups at the final follow-up showed a significant difference in the FSF angle. The radiograph times and accumulated radiation also showed significant differences between the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications. Conclusions For FSF closed reduction, surveillance US is a better option compared to radiographs in children treated by skin traction. This approach can significantly decrease exposure to X-ray radiation and improve the reduction. Level of evidence III

Treatment of femoral fractures in children aged two to six

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1056-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Eric Gordon ◽  
John T. Anderson ◽  
Perry L. Schoenecker ◽  
Matthew B. Dobbs ◽  
Scott J. Luhmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Spica Casting ◽  
Flexible Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Family ◽  
Intramedullary Stabilization ◽  
The Mean

Aims Current American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines for treating femoral fractures in children aged two to six years recommend early spica casting although some individuals have recommended intramedullary stabilization in this age group. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment and family burden of care of spica casting and flexible intramedullary nailing in this age group. Methods Patients aged two to six years old with acute, non-pathological femur fractures were prospectively enrolled at one of three tertiary children’s hospitals. Either early closed reduction with spica cast application or flexible intramedullary nailing was accomplished under general anaesthesia. The treatment method was selected after discussion of the options by the surgeon with the family. Data were prospectively collected on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, complications, pain medication, and union. The Impact on Family Scale was obtained at the six-week follow-up visit. In all, 75 patients were included in the study: 39 in the spica group and 36 in the nailing group. The mean age of the spica group was 2.71 (2.0 to 6.9) years and the mean age of the nailing group was 3.16 (2.0 to 6.9) years. Results All fractures healed without evidence of malunion or more than 2.0 cm of shortening. The mean Impact on Family score was 70.2 for the spica group and 63.2 (55 to 99) for the nailing group, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.024) in a univariate analysis suggesting less impairment of the family in the intramedullary nailing group. There was no significant difference between pain medication requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Two patients in the spica group and one patient in the intramedullary nailing group required additional treatment under anaesthesia. Conclusion Both early spica casting and intramedullary nailing were effective methods for treating femoral fractures in children two to six years of age. Intramedullary stabilization provides an option in this age group that may be advantageous in some social situations that depend on the child’s mobility. Fracture treatment should be individualized based on factors that extend beyond anatomical and biological factors. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1056–1061.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document