scholarly journals Perception and manifestation of collaborative competencies among undergraduate health students

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Wládia Silva de Lima ◽  
Fábia Alexandra Pottes Alves ◽  
Francisca Márcia Pereira Linhares ◽  
Marcelo Viana da Costa ◽  
Maria Wanderleya de Louvor Coriolano-Marinus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

Objective: to analyze the perception and manifestation of collaborative teamwork competencies among undergraduate health students who experienced the curricular internship’s integration module from the perspective of interprofessional education. Method: qualitative study, developed with the intervention research strategy. Twenty-eight students from five undergraduate health courses participated. Data were collected in three focus group interviews conducted with the undergraduate students at the end of each semester. For data analysis, the technique of intervention research and dialectical hermeneutics adopted was based on the theoretical framework of interprofessional education in health. Results: uniprofessional culture, the experience of integration of different fields of knowledge and collaborative competencies were manifested by the students in their reports and in the actions developed by the multidisciplinary team with individuals and families, during the experience of the curricular internship’s integration module. Conclusion: the experience of integration of the curricular internship from the perspective of interprofessionality favored the perception and manifestation of collaborative competencies that are necessary for teamwork among the students.

scholarly journals Students' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration on the care of diabetes: A qualitative study of focus-group interviews

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanna Pauliina Kangas ◽  
Pia Jaatinen ◽  
Saara Metso ◽  
Rintala Tuula-Maria
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Perceived Competence ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Group Interviews

Abstract Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) can promote healthcare professionals’ competence to work in interprof­­essional collaboration (IPC), whi­­­­ch is essential for the quality and safety of care. An interprofessional approach is particularly important in complex, chronic diseases like diabetes. A number of studies have been published on IPE, but only a few with a qualitative approach.Methods: The objective of this qualitative study was to evaluate changes in medical and nursing students’ perceptions of IPC, induced by a novel IPE course on diabetes care. The data from focus-group interviews of 30 students before and after the course were analyzed by using an inductive and deductive content analysis.Findings: The students´ perceptions were illustrated as Elements of interprofessional care (e.g. Elements formulating care team and Quality of professional care relationship ) and Elements of IPC (e.g. Importance of communication and Valuation of collaboration ). The post-course interviews added one subcategory ( Need of resources ) to the pre-course perceptions, and there was improvement in ten areas of self-perceived competence in performing or understanding IPC on diabetes care.Conclusions: The IPE course piloted in this study increased the students’ self-perceived competence and confidence in performing IPC on the care of diabetes, and changed their understanding of IPC towards a more patient centered and holistic perspective. More research is needed to evaluate the generalizability and sustainability of these changes.

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study on Employees’ Experiences of a Support model for Systematic Work Environment Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (19) ◽  
pp. 3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese Hellman ◽  
Fredrik Molin ◽  
Magnus Svartengren
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Work Groups ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Environment Management ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Support Model

Background: The aim is to explore how an organisational work environment support model, the Stamina model, influences employees’ work situations and the development of sustainable work systems. Methods: It was a qualitative study with semi-structured, focus-group interviews, including 45 employees from six work groups. Eighteen focus group interviews were conducted over a period of two years. Data were analysed with constant comparative method. Results: The core category, shifting focus from an individual to an organisational perspective of work, illustrated how communication and increased understanding of one’s work tasks changed over time and contributed to deeper focus on the actual operation. These insights were implemented at different time points among the work groups during the two-year process. Conclusions: Our results indicate that working with the model engages employees in the work environment management, puts emphasis on reflections and discussions about the meaning and purpose of the operations and enables a shared platform for communication. These are important features that need to continue over time in order to create a sustainable work system. The Stamina model, thus seems to have the potential to promote productive and healthy work places.

How accessible are grocery shops for people with dementia? A qualitative study using photo documentation and focus group interviews

Dementia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1872-1888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Brorsson ◽  
Annika Öhman ◽  
Stefan Lundberg ◽  
Malcolm P Cutchin ◽  
Louise Nygård
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Grocery Shopping ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Photo Documentation ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Grounded Theory Approach

Background People with dementia who live in ordinary housing need to perform activities outside the home such as visiting friends, talking walks and doing grocery shopping. This article identifies and examines characteristics that may influence accessibility in the space of a grocery shop as perceived by people with dementia. Methods This is a qualitative study with a grounded theory approach. The data collection was done with two different methods. It started with photo documentation and continued with focus group interviews in combination with photo elicitation. Data from both photo documentation and focus groups were analysed according to a grounded theory approach. Results The categories “illogical arrangement”, “overload of products, information and people”, “visual illusions” and “intrusive auditory stimuli” showed characteristics in the grocery shop that influenced how accessible and usable the informants experienced a shop to be. Furthermore, personal capacities in relation to the specific characteristics of the grocery shop space had an influence on how accessible and usable the informants experienced the grocery shop to be. Capacities to find, stay focused and concentrated, meet stress, remember, interpret and discriminate sensory impressions through hearing and sight came to the fore as important. Conclusions Characteristics of both the shop and the person need to be taken into account when supporting people with dementia in grocery shopping.

scholarly journals Different forms of informal coercion in psychiatry – a qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veikko Pelto-Piri ◽  
Lars Kjellin ◽  
Ulrika Hylén ◽  
Emanuele Valenti ◽  
Stefan Priebe
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Informal Coercion ◽  
Group Interviews

Abstract Objectives The objective of the study was to investigate how mental health professionals describe and reflect upon different forms of informal coercion. Results In a deductive qualitative content analysis of focus group interviews, several examples of persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, and threats were found. Persuasion was sometimes described as being more like a negotiation. Some participants worried about that the use of interpersonal leverage and inducements risked to pass into blackmail in some situations. In a following inductive analysis, three more categories of informal coercion was found: cheating, using a disciplinary style and referring to rules and routines. Participants also described situations of coercion from other stakeholders: relatives and other authorities than psychiatry. The results indicate that informal coercion includes forms that are not obviously arranged in a hierarchy, and that its use is complex with a variety of pathways between different forms before treatment is accepted by the patient or compulsion is imposed.

scholarly journals Flipped Classroom in an Orthopaedic Assessment Course: Students' Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana K. Bates
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Physical Exam ◽  
Pedagogical Practice ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

Context:The flipped classroom, moving lecture outside class time and homework to the classroom, has been researched widely across many disciplines. Athletic training education has little research investigating this pedagogical approach.Objective:To explore students' perceptions of a flipped orthopaedic assessment course.Design:Qualitative study using a phenomenological approach.Setting:Focus group interviews with undergraduate students enrolled in an orthopaedic assessment course.Patients or Other Participants:Students (N = 15) enrolled in either the Physical Exam of the Lower Extremities in Athletic Training or the Physical Exam of the Upper Extremities in Athletic Training course participated in a focus-group interview in January or April 2016.Main Outcome Measure(s):Focus group interviews were conducted with a structured interview protocol. Interview data were analyzed inductively to uncover dominant themes by first organizing the data, then summarizing it into codes, and finally interpreting. Credibility was secured through member checking, triangulation, and investigator triangulation.Results:Themes indicated that participants in a flipped classroom found that this pedagogical practice was helpful, allowed for repetition, initially created more work, and was self-paced.Conclusions:Evidence demonstrated that the flipped classroom for this orthopaedic assessment course was favorably received by the participants.

scholarly journals Value-sensitive clinical accompaniment in community nursing science

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonya Beukes ◽  
Anna G.W. Nolte ◽  
Ebin Arries
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Value Systems ◽  
Community Nursing ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Nursing Science ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Contextual Design ◽  
Group Interviews

Clinical community health facilities where undergraduate students are placed for their practical work in community nursing science are dynamic and have undergone major transformation over the past few years. In the clinical field, community nurses and undergraduate students are representative of the different races and language and ethnic groups in the South African population, with each group espousing different value systems. Both parties – students and community nurses – report that, due to these differences, value conflicts are experienced during clinical accompaniment and that this has negative effects on clinical learning in community nursing science.The goal of this study was to explore and describe the experiences of students with regard to value-sensitive clinical accompaniment in the community nursing environment. An exploratory, descriptive and contextual design was used. Interactions between community nurses and students during clinical accompaniment were explored for value sensitivity by means of video recordings,participant observation and focus group interviews. Data were collected by means of video recordings, participant observation and focus group interviews. The data were analysed and coded by the researcher and the external coder, using an inductive descriptive method to identify important segments of the regularity of behaviour. The focus group interviews were transcribed, analysed and coded by the researcher and the external coder, using Tesch’s steps of analysis (Creswell 1994:155–156).Lincoln and Guba’s criteria (1985:290) for trustworthiness were applied to the study.The general findings indicate that clinical accompaniment in community nursing is not value sensitive and, as a result, guidelines for value-sensitive clinical accompaniment need to be developed for undergraduate students in the community nursing environment. The following values (values for which guidelines need to be developed) were identified: respect during clinical accompaniment,value-sensitive communication and sensitivity to the quality of clinical accompaniment.OpsommingKliniese gemeenskapsgesondheidsfasiliteite waar voorgraadse studente geplaas word vir gemeenskapsverpleegkundepraktika is dinamies en het groot veranderinge oor die laaste paar jare ondergaan. In die kliniese veld verteenwoordig gemeenskapsverpleegkundiges en voorgraadse studente verskillende rasse en taal- en etniese groepe in die Suid-Afrikaanse bevolking, elkeen met verskillende waardes. Albei partye – studente en gemeenskapsverpleegkundiges – het gerapporteer dat waardekonflik weens verskillende kulture en waardes tydens kliniese begeleiding ervaar word,wat kliniese leer op sy beurt in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde negatief beïnvloed.Die doel van die studie was om die belewenis van studente met betrekking tot waardesensitiewe kliniese begeleiding in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde te verken en te beskryf. ’n Verkennende, beskrywende en kontekstuele ontwerp is gebruik. Die interaksie wat tussen die gemeenskapsverpleegkundiges en studente tydens kliniese begeleiding plaasgevind het, is vir waardesensitiwiteit deur middel van video opnames, deelnemerobservasie en fokusgroeponderhoude verken. Die data wat deur middel van video-opnames en deelnemerobservasie ingesamel is, is deur die navorser en ’n eksterne kodeerder ontleed en gekodeer.’n Induktiewe beskrywende metode is gebruik om belangrike segmente van die gereeldheid van gedrag te identifiseer en beskryf. Fokusgroeponderhoude is deur die navorsers en ’n eksterne kodeerder getranskribeer, ontleed en gekodeer deur gebruik te maak van Tesch se stappe van analise (Creswell 1994:155–156). Lincoln en Guba (1985:290) se kriteria vir geloofwaardigheid is in die studie gebruik.Die algemene bevindinge dui daarop dat kliniese begeleiding in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde nie waarde-sensitief is nie. Gevolglik moet riglyne vir waarde-sensitiewe kliniese begeleiding vir voorgraadse studente in gemeenskapsverpleegkunde ontwikkel word. Die volgende waardes(waardes waarvoor riglyne ontwikkel moet word) is geïdentifiseer, naamlik respek tydens kliniese begeleiding, waarde-sensitiewe kommunikasie en sensitiwiteit vir gehalte van kliniese begeleiding.

Improving interdisciplinary communication in MDT-meetings: Identification of barriers and facilitators in nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 321-321
Author(s):  
Julie Elisa Maria Swillens ◽  
Rinus Voorham ◽  
Iris D. Nagtegaal ◽  
Rosella Hermens
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Interdisciplinary Communication ◽  
Structured Reporting ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Medical Disciplines

321 Background: Standardized structured reporting (SSR) improves quality of diagnostic reporting for cancer patients, resulting in improved interdisciplinary communication in multidisciplinary-team meetings (MTMs) and subsequently better health outcomes and patient safety. In addition, SSR is important to secondary users including (tumor) registry organizations. Nevertheless, SSR-template usage, for example in pathology, varies widely among oncology related medical disciplines. Because of the advantages during MTMs, multidisciplinary-team (MDT) members could play an important role in encouraging and supporting pathologists to use SSR-templates. Therefore, the objective is to identify both barriers and facilitators for SSR-implementation from a MDT-member perspective. Methods: We used a mixed method design. Four focus group interviews with MDT-members, operating in the field of urological, gynecological or gastrointestinal oncology were performed, to identify barriers and facilitators in SSR in relation to the MTMs. Findings were classified into the domains of Flottorp et al. (2013). We used a web-based survey among Dutch MDT-members to quantify the findings. Results: Twenty-three MDT-members of nine medical disciplines participated in the focus group interviews. The survey yielded 211 responses. Main barriers of SSR among MDT-members were lack of information in the standardized structured report, particularly lack of information to retrieve doubts of the pathologist (56%, n = 211); lack of nuances (39%, n = 184); and lack of transparency on development of SSR-templates (50%, n = 211). Pathologists (59%, n = 54) also mentioned the numerous clicking when using SSR-templates as a barrier. Main facilitator was to expand the recommendation of SSR-usage in national guidelines (81%, n = 174). Conclusions: Although the use of SSR by multiple disciplines has benefits, as diagnostic reports are more complete, this study shows important barriers that have to be dealt with in the implementation process of SSR. The next step is to use the barriers for developing and testing implementation tools to encourage SSR-implementation.

scholarly journals Nurses’ Experiences of Blood Sample Collection from Children: A Qualitative Study from Swedish Paediatric Hospital Care

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Hjelmgren ◽  
Britt-Marie Ygge ◽  
Björn Nordlund ◽  
Nina Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Blood Sample ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Blood Sampling ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Paediatric Hospital ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Analytical Errors

Abstract Background: Blood sampling collections are necessary and important for diagnosis and treatment in paediatric hospital care. Nurses play an active role in helping the children with the blood sampling experience. Unfortunately, the blood sampling collection procedure is often affected by pre-analytical errors, leading to consequences such as delayed diagnosis, treatment and hospital stay, as well as repeated sampling. Moreover, children state that needle procedures are the worst experience of their hospital stay. Nurses working in children’s hospitals are responsible for conducting most of the needle related procedures but their experience of errors occurring during blood sample collection is unknown. The aim of this study therefore was to describe paediatric nurses’ experiences of blood sampling collections from children. Method: We used a qualitative study design with a (reflexive) thematic analysis (TA) method. Three focus group interviews were conducted, with 19 nurses from Sweden working at two different paediatric hospitals, focusing on their experiences of the blood sample collection procedure. Results: From the three focus group interviews we analysed patterns and meanings of the following themes: Paediatric blood sampling is a challenge for the nurses, Nurses’ feelings of frustration with unsuccessful samplings, Nurses believe in team work, Venous blood sampling was experienced as the best option, and Nurses’ thoughts and needs regarding skills development in paediatric blood sampling. Conclusion: The narrative results of this study illustrate that nurses working in paediatric hospital care face a big challenge in blood sampling collection from children. The nurses felt frustrated due to unsuccessful blood samplings and frequently could not understand why pre-analytical errors occurred. Nevertheless, they felt strengthened by colleagues in their team and shared feelings of responsibility to help each other with this complex procedure. The implications of this study are that paediatric hospital care needs to focus on improving guidelines for and increasing competence in blood sampling children and helping nurses to understand why samplings may be unsuccessful and how this can be avoided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document