scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of a commercial ELISA used as a complementary test for bovine tuberculosis in two bovine herds with different disease status

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
P.M. Soares Filho ◽  
A.K. Ramalho ◽  
A.M. Silva ◽  
M.A. Issa ◽  
P.M.P.C. Mota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bovine Tuberculosis ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Latent Class Models ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Kappa Index ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Test Kit

ABSTRACT Bovine tuberculosis is a worldwide spread zoonotic disease. Intradermal tuberculinizations are the most used diagnostic tests in the world. Serological tests can be an ancillary diagnosis for bovine tuberculosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the ELISA Mycobacterium Bovis Antibody Test Kit IDEXX ™ in infected herds, which were in different disease control stages. One hundred and twenty animals from two dairy herds of Minas Gerais state, Brazil, were subjected to the ELISA serological test and the comparative cervical tuberculin test (CCT). Diagnostic test parameters were estimated using Bayesian latent class models and concordance between tests estimated by the frequentist approach. The ELISA test presented lower sensitivity than CCT in both herds. Its sensitivity was higher in the herd in sanitation process. Specificity estimates were above 95% in both herds. Kappa index indicated low concordance or even disagreement between tests. According to the results, the ELISA IDEXX should not be used as substitution for CCT. The tests must not be associated in series. Parallel association increased diagnostic sensitivity in the herd which was in the process of sanitation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the performance of three serological tests for diagnosis of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs using latent class analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asier Basurco ◽  
Alda Natale ◽  
Katia Capello ◽  
Antonio Fernández ◽  
María Teresa Verde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Leishmania Infantum ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Latent Class Models ◽  
Canine Leishmaniasis ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Serological Tests

Abstract Canine leishmaniasis (CanL) is a disease caused by Leishmania infantum. Serological methods are the most common diagnostic techniques used for the diagnosis of the CanL. The objective of our study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of one in-house ELISA kit (ELISA UNIZAR) and three commercially available serological tests (MEGACOR Diagnostik GmbH) including an immunochromatographic rapid test (FASTest LEISH®), an immunofluorescent antibody test (MegaFLUO LEISH®) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MegaELISA LEISH®), using latent class models in a Bayesian analysis. Two hundred fifteen serum samples were included. The highest sensitivity was achieved for FASTest LEISH® (99.38%), ELISA UNIZAR (99.37%), MegaFLUO LEISH® (99.36%) followed by MegaELISA LEISH® (98.49%). The best specificity was obtained by FASTest LEISH® (98.43%), followed by ELISA UNIZAR (97.50%), whilst MegaFLUO LEISH® and MegaELISA LEISH® obtained the lower specificity (91.94% and 91.93%, respectively). The results of present study indicate that the immunochromatographic rapid test evaluated FASTest LEISH® show similar levels of sensitivity and specificity to the quantitative commercial tests. Among quantitative serological tests, sensitivity and specificity were similar considering ELISA or IFAT techniques.

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of the BZ COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibody Test for the Culture-Free and Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2193
Author(s):  
Bo Kyeung Jung ◽  
Jung Yoon ◽  
Joon-Yong Bae ◽  
Jeonghun Kim ◽  
Man-Seong Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Neutralization Test ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Control Line ◽  
Perfect Agreement ◽  
Strong Negative Correlation ◽  
Percent Inhibition

Rapid and accurate measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) can aid in understanding the development of immunity against COVID-19. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 nAb detection test called the BZ COVID-19 nAb test BZ-nAb (BZ-nAb; BioZentech). Using the 90% plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT-90) as a reference, 104 serum specimens collected from COVID-19-positive and -negative patients were grouped into 40 PRNT-90-positive and 64 PRNT-90-negative specimens. The performance of the BZ-nAb was compared with that of the cPass surrogate virus neutralization test (cPass sVNT; Genscript). The BZ-nAb showed a sensitivity ranging from 92.5%–95.0% and specificity ranging from 96.9%–100%, whereas cPass sVNT showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.5%–100%) and specificity of 98.4% (95% CI, 91.6%–100%). The dilution factor obtained with PRNT-90 showed a stronger correlation with the percent inhibition of cPass sVNT (r = 0.8660, p < 0.001) compared with the test and control line ratio (T/C ratio) of the BZ-nAb (r = −0.7089, p < 0.001). An almost perfect agreement was seen between the BZ-nAb and cPass sVNT results, with a strong negative correlation between the BZ-nAb T/C ratio and cPass sVNT percent inhibition (r = −0.8022, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of the BZ-nAb was comparable to that of the cPass sVNT, although the BZ-nAb had a slightly lower sensitivity.

scholarly journals Rapid Serological Tests for SARS-COV-2: Diagnostic Performance of Four Commercial Assays

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Monteiro de Almeida ◽  
Regiane Nogueira Spalanzani ◽  
Meri Bordignon Nogueira ◽  
Beatriz Sanada Spiri ◽  
Barbara Maria Cavalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
Healthy Control ◽  
One Step ◽  
Substantial Heterogeneity

Abstract Background. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFA) of four different manufacturers to identify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgM, IgG or total), comparing them with the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) or clinical defined (definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection respectively). Methods. 119 serum samples were randomly selected by convenience and distributed in the groups: (1) Group with SARS-CoV-2 infection [n=82; RT-qPCR positive (definite, n=70), and probable (n=12)]; (2) other diseases [n= 27; other viruses identified (n=8), SARS of other etiologies (n=19)]; (3) healthy control group (n=10). LFA essays of four manufacturers were compared: MedTest Coronavírus (COVID-19) IgG/IgM (MedLevensohn, Brazil); COVID-19 IgG/IgM ECO Test (Ecodiagnóstica, Brazil); Camtech COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kit (Camtech Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore); and one Step COVID-19 Test for total antibodies (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co, China).Results. The four tests studied showed high diagnostic performance characteristics for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. The best measures were for the Wondfo test: sensitivity (86.59%; 95%CI, 77.26-93.11%); specificity (100%; 90.51-100%); DOR (257; 60-1008); LR+ (33.43; 4.82-231.85); LR− (0.13; 0.08 - 0.23); accuracy (90.76%; 84.06- 95.29%); Matthews Correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.82. Although considering only the probable SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR-) cases, all the kits studied showed limited values.Conclusion. Our data demonstrate the excellent performance of LFA for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was substantial heterogeneity in sensitivities of IgM and IgG antibodies among the manufacturers. LFA tests cannot replace molecular diagnostics, but should be used as additional screening tool.

scholarly journals Rapid Serological Tests for SARS-COV-2: Diagnostic Performance of Four Commercial Assays

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Monteiro de Almeida ◽  
Regiane Nogueira Spalanzani ◽  
Meri Bordignon Nogueira ◽  
Beatriz Sanada Spiri ◽  
Barbara Maria Cavalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
Healthy Control ◽  
One Step ◽  
Substantial Heterogeneity

Abstract Background. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFA) of four different manufacturers to identify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgM, IgG or total), comparing them with the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) or clinical defined (definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection respectively). Methods. 119 serum samples were randomly selected by convenience and distributed in the groups: (1) Group with SARS-CoV-2 infection [n=82; RT-qPCR positive (definite, n=70), and probable (n=12)]; (2) other diseases [n= 27; other viruses identified (n=8), SARS of other etiologies (n=19)]; (3) healthy control group (n=10). LFA essays of four manufacturers were compared: MedTest Coronavírus (COVID-19) IgG/IgM (MedLevensohn, Brazil); COVID-19 IgG/IgM ECO Test (Ecodiagnóstica, Brazil); Camtech COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kit (Camtech Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore); and one Step COVID-19 Test for total antibodies (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co, China).Results. The four tests studied showed high diagnostic performance characteristics for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. The best measures were for the Wondfo test: sensitivity (86.59%; 95%CI, 77.26-93.11%); specificity (100%; 90.51-100%); DOR (257; 60-1008); LR+ (33.43; 4.82-231.85); LR− (0.13; 0.08 - 0.23); accuracy (90.76%; 84.06- 95.29%); Matthews Correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.82. Although considering only the probable SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR-) cases, all the kits studied showed limited values.Conclusion. Our data demonstrate the excellent performance of LFA for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was substantial heterogeneity in sensitivities of IgM and IgG antibodies among the manufacturers. LFA tests cannot replace molecular diagnostics, but should be used as additional screening tool.

scholarly journals Rapid Serological Tests for Sars-Cov-2: Diagnostic Performance of Four Commercial Assays

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Monteiro de Almeida ◽  
Regiane Nogueira Spalanzani ◽  
Meri Bordignon Nogueira ◽  
Beatriz Sanada ◽  
Barbara Maria Cavalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
Healthy Control ◽  
One Step ◽  
Substantial Heterogeneity

To assess the diagnostic performance of lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFA) of four different manufacturers to identify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgM, IgG or total), comparing them with the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) or clinical defined (definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection respectively). Methods. 119 serum samples were randomly selected by convenience and distributed in the groups: (1) Group with SARS-CoV-2 infection [n=82; RT-qPCR positive (definite, n=70), and probable (n=12)]; (2) other diseases [n= 27; other viruses identified (n=8), SARS of other etiologies (n=19)]; (3) healthy control group (n=10). LFA essays of four manufacturers were compared: MedTest Coronavírus (COVID-19) IgG/IgM (MedLevensohn, Brazil); COVID-19 IgG/IgM ECO Test (Ecodiagnóstica, Brazil); Camtech COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kit (Camtech Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore); and one Step COVID-19 Test for total antibodies (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co, China). Results. The four tests studied showed high diagnostic performance characteristics for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. The best measures were for the Wondfo test: sensitivity (86.59%; 95%CI, 77.26-93.11%); specificity (100%; 90.51-100%); DOR (257; 60-1008); LR+ (33.43; 4.82-231.85); LR− (0.13; 0.08 - 0.23); accuracy (90.76%; 84.06- 95.29%); Matthews Correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.82. Although considering only the probable SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR-) cases, all the kits studied showed limited values. Conclusion. Our data demonstrate the excellent performance of LFA for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was substantial heterogeneity in sensitivities of IgM and IgG antibodies among the manufacturers. LFA tests cannot replace molecular diagnostics, but should be used as additional screening tool.

scholarly journals Better than we thought? The diagnostic performance of an influenza point-of-care test in children, a Bayesian re-analysis

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Joseph Lee
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Credible Interval ◽  
Latent Class Models ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Point Of Care Test ◽  
Low Sensitivity

Background: Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for influenza have been criticised for their diagnostic accuracy, with clinical use limited by low sensitivity. These criticisms are based on diagnostic-accuracy studies that often use the questionable assumption of an infallible gold standard. Bayesian latent class modelling can estimate diagnostic performance without this assumption. Methods: Data extracted from published diagnostic-accuracy studies comparing the QuickVue® influenza A+B influenza POCT to reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in two different populations were re-analysed. Classical and Bayesian latent class methods were applied using the Modelling for Infectious diseases CEntre (MICE) web-based application. Results: Under classical analyses the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the QuickVue® were 66.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 61.4-71.9) and 97.8% (95% CI 95.7-98.9), respectively. Bayesian latent class models estimated sensitivity of 97.8% (95% credible interval (CrI) 82.1-100) and specificity of 98.5% (95% CrI 96.5-100). Conclusions: Data from studies comparing the QuickVue® point-of-care test to RT-PCR are compatible with better diagnostic performance than previously reported.

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF NINE SEROLOGICALASSAYS FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 ANTIBODIES.

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-62
Author(s):  
Tagajdid Mohamed Rida ◽  
Konzi Clémence ◽  
El Kochri Safae ◽  
Elannaz Hicham ◽  
Abi Rachid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Test Kit

Introduction: Currently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based viral RNAdetection is the standard for COVID-19 diagnosis [2]. Though, RNA testing based on throat or nasopharyngeal swabs has shown a number of false-negative results. Antibody detection tests have been developed to detect specic antibodies, IgM and IgG, to SRAS-CoV-2 virus. The clinical relevance of these tests is still under evaluation and is highly related to their clinical performance. Our objective is to assess analytical performances of nine SARS-CoV-2 antibodies immunoassays. Materiel and Method: We collected 80 blood samples from PCR-conrmed COVID-19 patients diagnosed in our Virology department (20 samples collected at day 10 after the onset of symptoms, 60 collected after day 14 following the onset of symptoms) and 20 blood samples from patients SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negative. All sera were tested with nine SARS-CoV-2 antibodies immunoassays ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG® (Abbott), COVID-19 VIRCLIA® IgG MONOTEST (Vircell), COVID-19 VIRCLIA® IgM+IgA MONOTEST (Vircell), COVID-19 ELISA IgG® (Vircell), COVID-19 ELISA IgM+IgA® (Vircell), Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche), FREND® COVID-19 IgG/IgM Duo (NanoEntek), COVID-PRESTO® (AAZ) and COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) IgM/IgG Antibody Test Kit® (Labnovation Technologies). Results: Sensitivity of tests increases once the seroconversion to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive in most individuals occurs toward the end of week 2 post-infection. COVID-19 PRESTO had the best accuracy in our study showing 100% sensitivity after day 14 following the onset of symptoms. All of the tests had a specicity of 100%. Conclusion: Serological tests are sensitive for the latest stages of COVID-19 infection. Recommendations on using SRAS-COV-2 antibody detection tests are continuously improving based on current knowledge of host antibody responses during infection. They are of great value in cases presenting COVID-19 symptoms with negative RT-PCR.

scholarly journals Canine visceral leishmaniosis in an area of fishing tourism, Bonito Municipality, Mato Grosso do Sul, Central-West Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreia Fernandes Brilhante ◽  
Maria Elizabeth Cavalheiros Dorval ◽  
Eunice Aparecida Bianchi Galati ◽  
Vivianne de Oliveira Landgraf de Castro ◽  
Maria Elizabeth Ghizzi Rocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Test ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Leishmania Infection ◽  
Kappa Index ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Mato Grosso ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Visceral Leishmaniosis ◽  
Immunofluorescence Antibody Test ◽  
Immunoenzymatic Assay

ABSTRACT: The study aimed to investigate Leishmania infection in a population of dogs (92 animals) in a fishing area of Bonito Municipality, and evaluate comparatively the serological methods used, immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA), indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), and rapid Dual Path-Platform test (DPP®). Blood and aspirate of bone marrow samples were used and parasitological investigation was also performed, such as parasite isolation in Neal, Novy, Nicolle (NNN) medium culture, Woo technique, Giemsa stained smears and specific identification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). IFAT revealed 56/92 seropositive, the ELISA 8/92 and the DPP®41/92. Regarding the agreement between the serological tests by the Kappa index, there was a slight agreement between ELISA/IFAT and ELISA/DPP®, and fair agreement in IFAT/DPP®. The NNN culture was positive in three out of 21 dogs, and identified by PCR as Leishmania infantum chagasi. No samples were positive by the Woo technique. Our results showed low agreements between the serological tests recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Heath, and it is necessary to associate other diagnostic techniques, such as parasitological tests and PCR, to increase the sensitivity for canine visceral leishmaniosis diagnosis, mainly regarding asymptomatic dogs in endemic areas.

scholarly journals Seroprevalence and Clinical Features of Scrub Typhus among Febrile Patients Attending a Referral Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Anil Pokhrel ◽  
Binod Rayamajhee ◽  
Saroj Khadka ◽  
Sandeep Thapa ◽  
Samjhana Kapali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Serum ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Scrub Typhus ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Outbreak Detection ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Diagnostic Dilemma ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Test Kit

(1) Background: Scrub typhus (ST) is endemic to Nepal. It is often underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed due to non-specific clinical presentation coupled with limited microbiological facilities, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of scrub typhus in febrile patients attending Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital (STIDH), Nepal, from August 2018 to April 2019. (2) Materials and Method: Blood/serum samples and clinical and demographic data of adult febrile patients (≥19 years) who attended or were referred to the hospital were collected after obtaining written informed consent from the participants excluding immunocompromised individuals. Collected blood/serum samples were subjected to hematological, biochemical, and serological tests. A serological test for scrub typhus was performed using the ImmuneMed scrub typhus rapid diagnostic test kit. Data generated were analyzed using SPSS software version 24.0. (3) Results: Amongst the 2070 febrile patients, 462 (22.3%) were seropositive to at least one etiological agent of febrile illnesses (scrub typhus: 253 cases, dengue: 101 cases, leptospirosis: 9, brucellosis: 52, malaria: 9 and kala-azar: 20 cases). Scrub typhus accounted for 12.2% (n = 253) of total febrile illnesses followed by dengue (4.9%, n = 101). Mixed seropositivity of scrub typhus with dengue, brucellosis, and typhoid was found in 12 (0.6%), 9 (0.4%), and 5 (0.2%) cases, respectively. Among 253 scrub typhus patients, 53.4% were female. Among the 154 patients, the most common symptoms were fever (100%), headache (79.2%), sweating (70.1%), breathing difficulty (51.3%), redness of the eye (43.5%), and pathognomonic eschar was observed in 9.1% patients. Fifty percent of scrub typhus patients had low platelet count and >30% of patients had an elevated level of liver enzymes (such as serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGPT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGOT). (4) Conclusion: Scrub typhus is a considerable cause of febrile illness in Nepal. Females apparently have a higher chance of acquiring scrub typhus. ST presents nonspecific clinical presentation. The diagnostic dilemma of typhus patients can be minimized by the early monitoring of ST-associated symptoms. The country’s health system needs to be strengthened for early outbreak detection, and immediate response actions against scrub typhus to control the future outbreak of ST.

scholarly journals Comparative study on different field tests of ketosis using blood, milk, and urine in dairy cattle

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (No. 5) ◽  
pp. 199-206
Author(s):  
Md. SA Faruk ◽  
B Park ◽  
S Ha ◽  
SS Lee ◽  
LL Mamuad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cattle ◽  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Blood Test ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Urine Test ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
Low Sensitivity

This study assessed the diagnostic performance of five field tests for ketosis in the blood, milk and urine in dairy cows. Samples were collected simultaneously from 102 dairy cows to determine the accuracy of the test results. The concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) in the blood was measured quantitatively by using a portable ketone test kit. The milk and urine samples were analysed semi-quantitatively using different commercial test kits and urine sticks. The animals were categorised into a subclinical ketosis (SCK) and clinical ketosis (CK) group based on the BHBA concentration in the blood. The diagnostic performance of the milk and urine test kits was compared with the blood test kit. In the blood test, out of 102 cows, 27 and 19 cows were diagnosed with SCK and CK, respectively. The percentage agreement (kappa value) for the three different milk tests and the urine test kit was 43% (κ = −0.181), 72% (κ = 0.243), 63% (κ = 0.065) and 64% (κ = 0.163), respectively, for the SCK detection, which indicates lower sensitivity. However, a strong agreement with 88% (κ = 0.612), 85% (κ = 0.505), 86% (κ = 0.528) and 91% (κ = 0.753) was observed in the three milk tests and the urine test, respectively, for the CK diagnosis, showing a higher sensitivity. For the diagnosis of the SCK and CK, all the tested kits are generally applicable for the detection of CK in dairy cattle, but caution is needed during the interpretation of the SCK data due to the low sensitivity of the milk and urine tests for the SCK detection. Furthermore, this study suggests that milk and urine samples can be used as alternatives for the diagnosis of CK in replacement of blood tests.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document