scholarly journals Spine surgery in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natália Maria Fernandes Britto ◽  
Beatriz Souza Renor ◽  
Enrico Ghizoni ◽  
Helder Tedeschi ◽  
Andrei Fernandes Joaquim

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an idiopathic seronegative spondyloartropathy that involves mainly the axial skeleton and the sacroiliac joints. AS promotes biomechanical changes in the spine that predispose to fractures, spinal deformity and spondylodiscitis. The aim of this article is to report the clinical and laboratorial characteristics of patients with AS who underwent spinal surgery at our Institution. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical charts of patients who had AS and underwent spinal interventions. RESULTS: Nine patients were found and eight were included in the present study. There were three men and six women and the patients’ mean age was 57 years old. All patients had pain at the involved spinal level and one patient had tetraparesis due to cervical myelopathy. Acute-phase proteins were positive in six patients (75%), and HLA-B27 was found in two patients (25%). Four patients had the radiological diagnosis of spondylodiscitis (50%) and underwent a spinal disc biopsy. They were all characterized as having aseptic spondylodiscitis. Three patients were free of pain with analgesics in their last follow-up and one patient had only partial solution of his pain. Three additional patients had spinal fractures surgically treated (37.5%) and one patient was operated because of a cervical kyphotic deformity (12.5%). There were no deaths or surgical complications in this series. CONCLUSIONS: the majority of our clinical and laboratories findings were discrepant with the medical literature. These differences may be secondary to regional characteristics or by the fact that our population included only those patients who underwent spinal surgery.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liming Cao ◽  
Xiang Xiao ◽  
Shixin Du

Abstract Background Intercostal neuralgia is most common in patients with herpes zoster, but it might be the initial symptom of serious diseases, such as atraumatic spinal fracture, which may lead to serious consequences if not diagnosed and treated early. Severe intercostal neuralgia is rarely reported as the first symptom of ankylosing spondylitis with atraumatic vertebral fractures. Case presentation A 70-year-old Chinese Han man previously diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis presented to the hospital with intense intercostal pain without trauma. The patient was initially suspected of having herpes zoster neuralgia; however, he subsequently experienced numbness and weakness of both lower limbs as well as constipation. Thoracic vertebral fracture and compression of the spinal cord were detected with magnetic resonance imaging, and he underwent emergency posterior thoracic spinal canal decompression, and intercostal neuralgia was relieved after surgery. Spinal tuberculosis and tumors were later excluded by pathological examination and follow-up results. A 6-month postoperative follow-up showed that the weakness and numbness of the left lower limb had significantly improved, and his urinary function had recovered. Conclusions Patients with ankylosing spondylitis could develop atraumatic spinal fractures. Severe intercostal neuralgia is an early indicator of spinal fractures, and spinal magnetic resonance imaging is crucial for the diagnosis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad B. Chaudhary ◽  
Heidi Hullinger ◽  
Michael J. Vives

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a multifactorial and polygenic rheumatic condition without a well-understood pathophysiology (Braun and Sieper (2007)). It results in chronic pain, deformity, and fracture of the axial skeleton. AS alters the biomechanical properties of the spine through a chronic inflammatory process, yielding a brittle, minimally compliant spinal column. Consequently, this patient population is highly susceptible to unstable spine fractures and associated neurologic devastation even with minimal trauma. Delay in diagnosis is not uncommon, resulting in inappropriate immobilization and treatment. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for fracture when evaluating this group to avoid morbidity and mortality. Advanced imaging studies in the form of multidetector CT and/or MRI should be employed to confirm the diagnosis. Initial immobilization in the patient's preinjury alignment is mandatory to prevent iatrogenic neurologic injury. Both nonoperative and operative treatments can be employed depending on the patient's age, comorbidities, and fracture stability. Operative techniques must be individually tailored for this patient population. A multidisciplinary team approach is best with preoperative nutritional assessment and pulmonary evaluation.


1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Caruso ◽  
M Cazzola ◽  
S Santandrea

In an open study, a new treatment modality was evaluated in 22 patients with active ankylosing spondylitis and compared with oral treatment. Patients were given a 10-week course of rifamycin SV infiltrations to all large peripheral joints, whether or not affected, and were followed for up to 12 months after the end of treatment. Clinical improvements observed at the end of the 10-week treatment cycle persisted for 12 months: morning stiffness ( P < 0.02); subjective pain ( P < 0.0001); Schober's test ( P < 0.006); hand – ground distance ( P < 0.001); erythrocyte sedimentation rate ( P < 0.001); and C-reactive protein ( P < 0.04). The number of painful joints became significantly lower at 6 ( P < 0.01) and 12 months ( P < 0.02) of the follow-up period. Oral administration of rifampin at three times the intra-articular dosage was devoid of any therapeutic activity. It is not known how treatment of peripheral joints influenced the inflammatory process at the level of the axial skeleton. These results must be considered preliminary due to the small number of patients and the short follow-up period, and because it was an open study.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shea Carter ◽  
Kirsten Braem ◽  
Rik J. Lories

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the best-known form of spondyloarthritis (SpA), is a remodelling arthritis characterized by chronic inflammation and bone formation. Ankylosis of the axial skeleton and sacroiliac joints leads to an impairment of spinal mobility, progressive spinal fusion and an increased risk of spinal fractures. The nature of the relationship between inflammation and new bone formation in AS has been controversial and questions remain as to whether there is a direct relationship between inflammation and new bone formation. Like others, we have hypothesized that the molecular pathways underlying ankylosis recapitulate the process of endochondral bone formation and that bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) play a key role in this process in AS. Furthermore, we discuss the entheseal stress hypothesis, which proposes that inflammation and ankylosis are linked but largely independent processes, and consider observations from mouse models and other human diseases which also imply that biomechanical factors contribute to the pathogenesis of AS. As current therapeutics, such as tumour necrosis factor inhibitors do not impede disease progression and ankylosis in AS, it is the pathways discussed in this review that are the now the focus for the identification of future drug targets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 769.2-770
Author(s):  
J. Rademacher ◽  
M. Siderius ◽  
L. Gellert ◽  
F. Wink ◽  
M. Verba ◽  
...  

Background:Radiographic spinal progression determinates functional status and mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS)1.Objectives:To analyse whether biomarker of inflammation, bone turnover and adipokines at baseline or their change after 3 months or 2 years can predict spinal radiographic progression after 2 years in AS patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi).Methods:Consecutive AS patients from the Groningen Leeuwarden Axial Spondyloarthritis (GLAS) cohort2 starting TNFi between 2004 and 2012 were included. The following serum biomarkers were measured at baseline, 3 months and 2 years of follow-up with ELISA: - Markers of inflammation: calprotectin, matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - Markers of bone turnover: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), serum C-terminal telopeptide (sCTX), osteocalcin (OC), osteoprotegerin (OPG), procollagen typ I and II N-terminal propeptide (PINP; PIINP), sclerostin. - Adipokines: high molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin, leptin, visfatinTwo independent readers assessed spinal radiographs at baseline and 2 years of follow-up according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Radiographic spinal progression was defined as mSASSS change ≥2 units or the formation of ≥1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. Logistic regression was performed to examine the association between biomarker values at baseline, their change after 3 months and 2 years and radiographic spinal progression. Multivariable models for each biomarker were adjusted for mSASSS or syndesmophytes at baseline, elevated CRP (≥5mg/l), smoking status, male gender, symptom duration, BMI, and baseline biomarker level (the latter only in models with biomarker change).Results:Of the 137 included AS patients, 72% were male, 79% HLAB27+; mean age at baseline was 42 years (SD 10.8), ASDAScrp 3.8 (0.8) and mSASSS 10.6 (16.1). After 2 years of follow-up, 33% showed mSASSS change ≥2 units and 24% had developed ≥1 new syndesmophyte. Serum levels of biomarkers of inflammation and bone formation showed significant changes under TNFi therapy, whereas adipokine levels were not altered from baseline (Figure 1).Univariable logistic regression revealed a significant association of baseline visfatin (odds ratio OR [95% confidence interval] 1.106 [1.007-1.215]) and sclerostin serum levels (OR 1.006 [1.001-1.011]) with mSASSS progression after 2 years. Baseline sclerostin levels were also associated with syndesmophyte progression (OR 1.007 [1.001-1.013]). In multivariable logistic analysis, only baseline visfatin level remained significantly associated (OR 1.465 [1.137-1.889]) with mSASSS progression. Furthermore, baseline calprotectin showed a positive association with both, mSASSS (OR 1.195 [1.055-1.355]) and syndesmophyte progression (OR 1.107 [1.001-1.225]) when adjusting for known risk factors for radiographic progression.Univariable logistic regression showed that change of sclerostin after 3 months was associated with syndesmophytes progression (OR 1.007 [1.000-1.015), change of PINP level after 2 years was associated with mSASSS progression (OR 1.027 [1.003-1.052]) and change of visfatin after 2 years was associated with both measures of radiographic progression – mSASSS (OR 1.108 [1.004-1.224]) and syndesmophyte formation (OR 1.115; [1.002-1.24]). However, those associations were lost in multivariable analysis.Conclusion:Independent of known risk factors, baseline calprotectin and visfatin levels were associated with radiographic spinal progression after 2 years of TNFi. Although biomarkers of inflammation and bone formation showed significant changes under TNFi therapy, these changes were not significantly related to radiographic spinal progression in our cohort of AS patients.References:[1]Poddubnyy et al 2018[2]Maas et al 2019Acknowledgements:Dr. Judith Rademacher is participant in the BIH-Charité Clinician Scientist Program funded by the Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Berlin Institute of Health.Disclosure of Interests:Judith Rademacher: None declared, Mark Siderius: None declared, Laura Gellert: None declared, Freke Wink Consultant of: AbbVie, Maryna Verba: None declared, Fiona Maas: None declared, Lorraine M Tietz: None declared, Denis Poddubnyy: None declared, Anneke Spoorenberg Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Lilly and Novartis, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, UCB, Novartis, Suzanne Arends Grant/research support from: Pfizer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 429.2-429
Author(s):  
L. Hu ◽  
X. Ji ◽  
F. Huang

Background:Obesity population are rising rapidly and have become a major health issue. Studies have shown that obesity is a low-grade inflammatory status characterized by increase in proinflammatory cytokines.Objectives:To examine the impact of overweight or obesity on disease activity and treatment responses to biologics in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a real-world setting.Methods:Body mass index (BMI) is available in 1013 patients from the Chinese Ankylosing Spondylitis Imaging Cohort (CASPIC). Differences in clinical outcomes (such as BASDAI, ASDAS, BASFI, and ASAS HI) and treatment responses to biologics (ΔBASDAI and ΔASDAS) over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months are assessed between BMI categories (normal weight BMI <24 kg/m2; overweight BMI=24-28 kg/m2; obesity BMI ≥28 kg/m2) using Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between BMI and clinical characteristics and treatment responses to biologics was determined, and multivariate median regression analyses were conducted to adjust for confounders (such as age, gender, smoke, and HLA-B27).Results:Among 1013 patients with AS, overweight accounts for 33%, while obesity for 12.4%. There were significant differences between patients who were obese or overweight and those with a normal weight regarding clinical outcomes (BASDAI: 2.90/2.56 vs 2.21; ASDAS-CRP: 2.20/1.99 vs 1.81; BASFI: 2.13/1.69 vs 1.38; ASAS HI: 6.87/5.29 vs 5.12 and BASMI: 2.35/1.76 vs 1.62; all P<0.05). After adjusting for age, gender, smoke, and HLA-B27, obesity remained associated with higher disease activity (BASDAI: β=0.55, P=0.005; ASDAS-CRP: β=0.40, P<0.001), poorer functional capacity (BASFI: β=0.58, P=0.001), worse health index (ASAS HI: β=1.92, P<0.001) and metrology index (BASMI: β=0.71, P=0.013). For TNFi users, BMI was found to be negatively correlated with changes in disease activity (ΔBASDAI and ΔASDAS) in the multivariate regression model (all P<0.05), and overweight and obese patients showed an unsatisfactory reduction in disease activity during 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up period, compared to normal weight patients (all P<0.05).Conclusion:Overweight or obesity impacts greatly on clinical outcomes and treatment responses to biologics in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, which argues strongly for obesity management to become central to prevention and treatment strategies in patients with AS.References:[1]Maachi M, Pieroni L, Bruckert E, et al. Systemic low-grade inflammation is related to both circulating and adipose tissue TNFalpha, leptin and IL-6 levels in obese women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28:993–7.Figure 1.Changes of disease activity for TNFi users during 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up according to BMI categories. a: vs. normal weight, P<0.05 in 3 months; b: vs. normal weight, P<0.05 in 6 months; c: vs. normal weight, P<0.05 in 9 months; d: vs. normal weight, P<0.05 in 12 months.Acknowledgments:We appreciate the contribution of the present or former members of the CASPIC study group.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1129.1-1129
Author(s):  
A. Baillet ◽  
X. Romand ◽  
A. Pfimlin ◽  
M. Dalecky ◽  
M. Dougados

Background:Standardization of clinical practice has been proven to be effective in management of chronic diseases. This is particularly true at the time where the concept of treat to target is becoming more and more important in the field of axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA).Objectives:To propose a list of variables to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and over the follow-up of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) for an optimal management in daily practice.Methods:The process comprised (1) the evaluation of the interest of 51 variables proposed for the assessment of axSpA via a systematic literature research, (2) a consensus process involving 78 hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists, considering the collection of the variable in a 4 grade scale from ”potentially useful” to “mandatory”, (3) a consensus on optimal timeline for periodic assessment of the selected variables on a 5 grade scale from “at each visit” to “never to be re-collected”.Results:The systematic literature research retrieved a total of 14,133 abstracts, of which 213 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Concerning the data to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up, we proposed to differentiate the results based on a) the way of collection of the variables (e.g. questionnaires by the patient, interview by the physician, physical examination, investigations) b) the usefulness these variables in daily practice based on the opinion of the rheumatologists ” c) the optimal timeline between 2 evaluations of the variable based on the opinion of the rheumatologists. In the initial systematic review, symptoms of heart failure history of inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis or uveitis, patient global visual analogic scale, spine radiographs, modified Schöber test, coxo-femoral rotations, swollen joint count, urine strip test, BASDAI and ASDAS global scores were considered very useful and nocturnal back pain/morning stiffness, sacro-iliac joints radiographs and CRP were considered mandatory (Figure 1). Timeline between 2 evaluations of variables to collect in the periodic review are summarized inFigure 2.Figure 1.Core sets of items to collect and report in the systematic review in axial spondyloarthritis management in daily practice ASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functionnal Index, BASMI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, CT=computerized tomography, FIRST=Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool, HLA=Human Leukocyte Antigen, MRI=Magnetic resonance imaging, PET=positron emission tomography.Figure 2.Periodic review timeline of variables to collectASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, IBD = inflammatory bowel diseases, PRO = Patient Reported OutcomesConclusion:Using an evidence-based and an expert consensus approaches, this initiative defined a core set of variables to be collected and reported at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with ax-SpA in daily practice.Acknowledgments:this study has been conducted in two parts: the first one (evidence-based) was conducted thanks to a support from Abbvie France. AbbVie did not review the content or have influence on this manuscript. The second part of this initiative (consensus) has been conducted thanks to a support from the scientific non-profit organization: Association de Recherche Clinique en RhumatologieDisclosure of Interests:Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, Xavier Romand Consultant of: Xavier ROMAND has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Arnaud Pfimlin Consultant of: Arnaud PFIMLIN has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Mickael Dalecky Consultant of: Mickael DALECKY has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Maxime Dougados Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Sapkas ◽  
Konstantinos Kateros ◽  
Stamatios A Papadakis ◽  
Spyros Galanakos ◽  
Emmanuel Brilakis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1260.1-1260
Author(s):  
H. K. Min ◽  
K. Y. Kang

Background:The choice of second-line biologics for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients previously treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) remains unclearObjectives:Here, we compared drug retention and clinical efficacy between AS patients who switched biologics to secukinumab and those who switched to a different TNFi.Methods:AS patients enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology BIOlogics registry were included. Patients with previous TNFi exposure were divided into the secukinumab group and the TNFi switching group. Drug retention and clinical efficacy (BASDAI50, ASAS20, ASAS40, ASDAS <2.1, ASDAS clinically important improvement, and ASDAS major improvement) were assessed at the 1 year follow-up. Propensity score (PS)-matched and covariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed.Results:246 had available 1 year follow-up data. Secukinumab as third- or later-line biologics was more frequent than alternative TNFi (54% vs. 14%). PS-matched and multiple covariate-adjusted analyses showed that the odds ratio (OR) for drug discontinuation was comparable between the secukinumab and TNFi switching groups (OR=1.136; 95% CI, 0.843–1.531 and OR=1.000; 95% CI, 0.433–2.308, respectively). The proportion of patients who achieved BASDAI50 was also comparable between the two groups (OR=0.833; 95% CI, 0.481–1.441 in PS-matched analysis). Other clinical efficacy parameters were also comparable. In the subgroup analysis of AS patients with previous TNFi discontinuation due to ineffectiveness, all clinical efficacy parameters were comparable between the two groups.Conclusion:In AS patients with previous exposure to a TNFi, switching biologics to secukinumab and switching to an alternative TNFi resulted in comparable drug retention and clinical efficacy.References:[1]Micheroli R, Tellenbach C, Scherer A, et al. Effectiveness of secukinumab versus an alternative TNF inhibitor in patients with axial spondyloarthritis previously exposed to TNF inhibitors in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:1203-9.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document