The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 1: Introduction and Treatment Experience

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunvor Semb ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
William C. Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Parent Satisfaction ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Burden Of Treatment ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Number Of Visits

Objective To calculate the amount of treatment and associated travel experienced by five groups of patients treated at different centers. (This data is related to outcomes and patient/parent satisfaction in subsequent papers in this series). Design A longitudinal cohort study where results were previously reported at 9 years and follow-up measurements were obtained for 12 and 17 years. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Main Outcome Measures Numbers of surgeries and outpatient visits, number of visits, and treatment duration for early orthopedics and orthodontic treatment, associated travel time and difficulties. Results The mean number of operations per center ranged from 3.5 to 6; length of orthodontic treatment from 3.3 to 8.5 years, and attendance from 49 to 94 visits; and for early orthopedics, 0 to 15 months of treatment, 0 to 17 visits, and 0 to 146 days in hospital. Conclusion Protocols for the management of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate can vary dramatically in the burden of treatment imposed.

The Impacts and Outcomes of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding (PNAM) in Newborn Sequential Therapeutic Implementation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vonda Trivosa
Keyword(s):  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Deciduous Dentition ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding

Cleft lip and palate is a common congenital malformation in the oral and maxillofacial regions. According to epidemiological investigation, the incidence rate is about 1.625%, and the incidence rate is high in poor areas and rural areas. Cleft lip and palate mainly involve the upper lip, hard palate, soft palate and nose, which can damage the appearance of children, affect pronunciation, swallowing and chewing, and also bring different degrees of psychological damage to children in the growth stage. Therefore, we should actively carry out sequential treatment and participate in the treatment work through multi-disciplines. Based on restoring the oral and maxillofacial function and health of children, we should also pay attention to their aesthetic needs, enhance the treatment confidence of parents and children, and lay the foundation for the follow-up repair treatment. Most patients with cleft lip and palate are complicated with malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment is an important part of the treatment of cleft lip and palate. The orthodontic treatment of cleft lip and palate can be divided into five periods: newborn period, deciduous dentition period, mixed dentition period, permanent dentition period and combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment period. Presurgicalnasoalveolar molding (PNAM) was used to reduce the severity of facial deformity in children with cleft lip and palate. This article discusses the therapeutic effect of newborn PNAM according to clinical cases. Objective to study the opportunity and current situation of PNAM in the treatment of children with cleft lip and palate, and to provide a favorable reference for clinical orthodontists, emphasizing the close communication between various disciplines.

The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 4: Relationship among Treatment Outcome, Patient/Parent Satisfaction, and the Burden of Care

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunvor Semb ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
Petra Zuurbier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Parent Satisfaction ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Burden Of Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Questionnaire Surveys ◽  
High Level

Objective To assess patient/parent satisfaction with the treatment they had received from their respective teams, and to explore interrelationships between satisfaction, objectively rated outcome, and the burden of care. Design This study reports cross-sectional data as part of the overall longitudinal cohort study reported in the other four papers of this series. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated 17-year-olds with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and their parents. Main Outcome Measure Patient/parent satisfaction. Results Generally, there was a high level of patient/parent satisfaction. There were no relationships among satisfaction, objectively rated outcomes, and the amount of care. Conclusions This study highlights various challenges involved in questionnaire surveys into patient/parent satisfaction, and underlines the need for collective efforts to improve our understanding of this issue.

scholarly journals Surgical-orthodontic treatment for severe malocclusion in a patient with osteopetrosis and bilateral cleft lip and palate: Case report with a 5-year follow-up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Kyu Kim ◽  
Jun-Young Kim ◽  
Hwi-Dong Jung ◽  
Young-Soo Jung
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Bone Metabolism Markers ◽  
Normal Bone ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

ABSTRACT Orthognathic surgery in patients with craniofacial osteopetrosis, a condition associated with osteoclast dysfunction, is usually avoided because of the risk of osteomyelitis. A 19-year-old woman presented with the chief complaint of severe malocclusion and anterior crossbite. After radiographic evaluation, craniofacial osteopetrosis was diagnosed. Surgical-orthodontic treatment was performed after meticulous history taking and verification of normal bone turnover using bone-metabolism markers for endocrine evaluation. Favorable esthetic and functional outcomes were achieved.

Assessment of Orthodontic Burden of Care in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamara Frascarelli Alberconi ◽  
Gabriela Leticia Clavisio Siqueira ◽  
Renata Sathler ◽  
Katherine A. Kelly ◽  
Daniela G. Garib
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Craniofacial Anomalies ◽  
Burden Of Care ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To assess the orthodontic burden of care of patients from a Brazilian rehabilitation center (Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo [HRAC-USP]). Design: Retrospective. Setting: Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo. Interventions: One hundred files of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients who had consecutively finished orthodontic rehabilitation at HRAC-USP were evaluated from January 2011 to January 2013. The duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits, kilometers traveled, number of appliances and surgical procedures performed were recorded. The sample was divided into 2 subgroups according to severity the interarch relation (Goslon Yardstick score) at the beginning of orthodontic treatment. Mann-Whitney test was applied for intergroup comparison ( P < .05). Results: For the total sample (n = 100), the mean time of orthodontic treatment was 140.2 months, the mean number of orthodontic appointments was 61.8, the mean number of appliances was 10, the mean number of surgical procedures was 6.2, and the mean distance traveled to attend the center for orthodontic appointments was 38,978.5 km. The subgroup with the most severe malocclusion (Goslon yardsticks scores 4 and 5) showed a longer orthodontic treatment length, greater number of surgical procedures, and longer distance traveled than those presenting Goslon yardstick scores 1, 2, and 3. Conclusion: Patients with greater severity of the initial malocclusion experienced a higher burden of care than patients with less severity of the initial malocclusion. To reduce the burden of care, research and efforts should focus on minimizing maxillary growth deficiency related to primary surgery.

The Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on the Goslon Score of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Southall ◽  
Mark Walters ◽  
Steven Singer
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Objective To assess the effect of orthodontic treatment on Goslon Yardstick outcome. Design Retrospective study. Patients A series of 66 consecutive patients born with a complete unilateral left lip and palate. Patients were sorted into a nontreatment group (n = 47) and a treatment group (n = 19). Method Three assessors trained in the use of the Goslon Yardstick ranked the dental arch relationships of study casts taken at 6 and 9 years. Results There was only a fair agreement (κ = .33) between 6- and 9-year Goslon Yardstick scores for the cohort of 66 patients, with a significant (p < .05) difference in the mean score at 6 years (3.17 ± 0.8) and at 9 years (2.88 ± 1.0). Removal of 19 subjects who had orthodontic inventions prior to taking of the 9-year-old study cast improved the agreement to moderate (κ = .52). There was no significant difference (p > .05) in mean scores at 6 and 9 years (3.13 ± 0.9 and 3.17 ± 1.03, respectively). The treatment group exhibited significant differences (p < .001) with mean Goslon Yardstick scores of 3.0 ± 0.9 at 6 and 2.25 ± 0.45 at 9 years. Conclusions The inclusion of patients who had received orthodontic treatment prior to taking of study casts being used for Goslon Yardstick scoring can result in a more favorable outcome. Patients who have received active orthodontic treatment prior to taking of dental casts should be excluded or accounted for in audits to assess primary cleft surgical outcome in patients with a unilateral cleft lip and palate.

The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 3: Dental Arch Relationships

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
William C. Shaw ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Causal Factors ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Panel Rating ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Objective To compare dental arch relationships up to age 17 in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at five European centers. Design Longitudinal cohort study, where results were previously reported at 9 years and follow-up measurements were obtained for 12 and 17 years. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired UCLP. Main outcome measure Panel rating of dental arch relationship. Results The results revealed that at 17 years of age three of the centers had better ratings in dental arch relationship (means scores: 1.7, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively) than the other two centers (3.3, 3.4) at statistically significant levels (p < .01 to p < .001). Conclusion The results confirm that systematic differences in dental arch relationships may occur between different cleft centers, but do not allow specific causal factors to be identified.

A New Technique in Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafting for Dental Implant Placement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vo Van Nhan ◽  
Le Van Son ◽  
Ta Anh Tuan ◽  
Nguyen Tai Son ◽  
Trinh Dinh Hai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Width Measurements ◽  
A New Technique

Objective: To evaluate 2 iliac corticocancellous-block grafting techniques for dental implant placement in residual alveolar clefts. Design: Nonrandomized prospective clinical trial between March 2010 and December 2014. Setting: National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi, Vietnam. Participants: Thirty-two patients (23 female, 9 male; mean age, 21.28 years; range, 16-31 years) with unilateral complete alveolar cleft after reconstructive surgery for cleft lip and palate (CLP). Interventions: Harvested iliac crest bone was cut into 2 corticocancellous blocks. The smaller block was adapted against the sutured nasal mucoperiosteum and overlaid with cancellous bone; the larger one overlapped the labial cleft margin and was fixed with screws. Endosteal dental implants were placed after 4 to 6 months, and final restorations were delivered 6 months later. Main Outcome Measures: Flap statuses were assessed clinically. Bone formation was assessed using the Enemark scale. Cone-beam computed tomography was used for graft height and width measurements. Implant health was assessed by the Misch criteria. Results: The mean postgrafting follow-up period was 36.7 ± 10.4 (range, 18-53) months. Three patients (9.4%) showed flap dehiscence but no infection 7 days after bone grafting. Twenty-nine patients (90.6%) had 75% to 100% bone fill (Enemark score of 1). The mean graft height and width were 11.4 ± 2.4 and 6.1 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Sufficient bone for implant placement was noted in 29 patients (90.6%); the others required partially fixed prostheses. All implants functioned for at least 18 months. Conclusion: The proposed technique is reliable to reconstruct the alveolar cleft for implant placement in CLP patients.

scholarly journals Evaluation of patient and parent satisfaction after orthodontic treatment/orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate deformity

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muraleedhara Bhat ◽  
Subramanya Shetty ◽  
Praveen Shetty ◽  
FaizanA Khan ◽  
Akhtar Husain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Parent Satisfaction

Outcomes of 44 Consecutive Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Treated with Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting and Premaxillary Osteotomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Scott ◽  
Julia Scott ◽  
Sami Stagnell ◽  
Steve Robinson ◽  
Tim Flood
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective To report the surgical outcomes of secondary alveolar bone grafting with premaxillary osteotomy in a single surgeon cohort of complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Design Retrospective review of 44 consecutive patients using hospital notes and radiographs. Setting Single specialist cleft lip and palate center, UK. Patients Consecutive patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate who were being treated with secondary alveolar bone grafting incorporating premaxillary osteotomy. Outcome Measures Assessment of success of bone graft by Kindelan score; canine eruption; closure of fistulae and assessment of morbidity. Results Between January 6, 2000, and August 8, 2013, 44 patients with complete BCLP underwent secondary ABG with a premaxillary osteotomy as a one-stage procedure. The mean follow-up was 7.3 years (range 1.4 to 14.6). Eighty-five percent of ABGs were successful (a Kindelan score of 1 or 2), and canine eruption was 89%. Failure of the ABG occurred in 7%. Fistulae recurrence rate was 11%, all of which were asymptomatic. No premaxillae were devitalized. Conclusion Incorporating a premaxillary osteotomy into the secondary ABG surgical protocol can be a safe technique that gives excellent surgical exposure for fistula repair.

scholarly journals Two-phase orthodontic treatment in a unilateral cleft lip and palate patient with 1-year follow-up results

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 101-107
Author(s):  
Prashant M. Dhole ◽  
Divya O. Maheshwari
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Total Treatment Time ◽  
Total Treatment ◽  
Growth Modification ◽  
Palate Patient

Treatment of a patient with cleft lip and palate can be challenging. A 10-year and 10-month-old girl presented with uneven and crowded teeth. She had unilateral cleft lip and palate on left side for which she had undergone primary lip repair and palatoplasty when she was younger. On examination, she had concave facial appearance, crossbite of upper arch with reverse overjet of 2 mm, wits appraisal of 6 mm and impacted 23. She was treated with two-phase orthodontic treatment; growth modification appliances followed by fixed mechanotherapy. Total treatment time was 5 years. 1-year follow-up shows that results have been stable with good facial aesthetics and functional occlusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document